Michael's Reviews > Y: The Last Man, Vol. 1: Unmanned
Y: The Last Man, Vol. 1: Unmanned
by
by

In typical comic book male-centric fashion, this series wonders what life would be like if all men died spontaneously...except for one.
I suppose if we're trying to put ourselves in the head of an early-nineties comic book reading teen, this might feel innovative. Unfortunately, I find that innovative in the world of comics is pretty much Iron Age for the rest of literature. How does Vaughan manage to make a series with gender issues at its center so bizarrely sexist?
Example: In a world where all men are dead except for one, and the death of that one man will mean the end of humanity, VIOLENT CULTS OF FEMINISTS SPRING UP TO TRY AND HUNT DOWN MEN AND MALE SYMPATHIZERS. What is the motive here? There sure isn't one written into the plot, other than the one speech about social inequality between the sexes--and how the only way to escape this inequality is to KILL ALL MEN.
Characterwise, I was exceptionally not impressed. Even the main character has vague motivations. As for the women, pretty much none of them function as anything but placeholders: the token love interest, the sister who has gone astray, the protective mother. IN A WORLD WHERE ONLY ONE MAN SURVIVED...apparently the world still revolves around that man.
And here's where the cultural rant starts...
This is a symptom of thinking that is still prevalent in most of popular culture, although not to as great an extent in literature. F'rinstance, lets talk about movies: movies are a great medium for making political statements. Statements about social injustices, such as the way that women are objectified, sexualized, expected to live up to some bleached, shaved, makeup-smeared, surgically modified yet waifishly thin ideal that has been developed over centuries of patriarchal society...and how this objectification upon women is psychologically damaging--to men.

This poor guy above has been so mentally warped by Hollywood and advertising that he's incapable of developing a physical attraction to any of the normal girls he knows in real life. Let's take a moment to pitty him.
Okay, we done? Good. Fortunately, a blonde porn star moves in next door, and immediately falls for him, even though he's intensely dorky, because, you know, it's what's on the inside that counts. But, I'm not just cherry-picking films here. I could point to this one:

Another example of an attractive woman with a *cough cough* career who ends up with a loser whose only redeeming trait is that he's willing to "raise" the baby...if sleazy frat boys without jobs can be said to raise babies.
But surely this is a phenomenon in teen comedies?
Well, look at "romances."

Here's a fairly recent romantic comedy where a successful, relatively well-balanced woman who is portrayed as HORRIBLY DESPARATE for being interested in a neighbor....meanwhile, the character played by Gerard Butler mudwrestles with models on television, and has no interest in anything but one-night stands, yet this is understandable because of his childhood. This is a ROMANCE.
End rant.
Okay, BUT, regardless of how inadequately this comic deals with gender issues, it at least TRIES to grapple with them, and it does a better job than any of the movies mentioned above. Perhaps by the end of the series, the author's portrayals of gender issues will become more interesting and sophisticated. This was an entertaining comic, and I plan on continuing it for at least a little longer...but I'll admit that I'm highly confused by the acclaim it has gotten.
I suppose if we're trying to put ourselves in the head of an early-nineties comic book reading teen, this might feel innovative. Unfortunately, I find that innovative in the world of comics is pretty much Iron Age for the rest of literature. How does Vaughan manage to make a series with gender issues at its center so bizarrely sexist?
Example: In a world where all men are dead except for one, and the death of that one man will mean the end of humanity, VIOLENT CULTS OF FEMINISTS SPRING UP TO TRY AND HUNT DOWN MEN AND MALE SYMPATHIZERS. What is the motive here? There sure isn't one written into the plot, other than the one speech about social inequality between the sexes--and how the only way to escape this inequality is to KILL ALL MEN.
Characterwise, I was exceptionally not impressed. Even the main character has vague motivations. As for the women, pretty much none of them function as anything but placeholders: the token love interest, the sister who has gone astray, the protective mother. IN A WORLD WHERE ONLY ONE MAN SURVIVED...apparently the world still revolves around that man.
And here's where the cultural rant starts...
This is a symptom of thinking that is still prevalent in most of popular culture, although not to as great an extent in literature. F'rinstance, lets talk about movies: movies are a great medium for making political statements. Statements about social injustices, such as the way that women are objectified, sexualized, expected to live up to some bleached, shaved, makeup-smeared, surgically modified yet waifishly thin ideal that has been developed over centuries of patriarchal society...and how this objectification upon women is psychologically damaging--to men.

This poor guy above has been so mentally warped by Hollywood and advertising that he's incapable of developing a physical attraction to any of the normal girls he knows in real life. Let's take a moment to pitty him.
Okay, we done? Good. Fortunately, a blonde porn star moves in next door, and immediately falls for him, even though he's intensely dorky, because, you know, it's what's on the inside that counts. But, I'm not just cherry-picking films here. I could point to this one:

Another example of an attractive woman with a *cough cough* career who ends up with a loser whose only redeeming trait is that he's willing to "raise" the baby...if sleazy frat boys without jobs can be said to raise babies.
But surely this is a phenomenon in teen comedies?
Well, look at "romances."

Here's a fairly recent romantic comedy where a successful, relatively well-balanced woman who is portrayed as HORRIBLY DESPARATE for being interested in a neighbor....meanwhile, the character played by Gerard Butler mudwrestles with models on television, and has no interest in anything but one-night stands, yet this is understandable because of his childhood. This is a ROMANCE.
End rant.
Okay, BUT, regardless of how inadequately this comic deals with gender issues, it at least TRIES to grapple with them, and it does a better job than any of the movies mentioned above. Perhaps by the end of the series, the author's portrayals of gender issues will become more interesting and sophisticated. This was an entertaining comic, and I plan on continuing it for at least a little longer...but I'll admit that I'm highly confused by the acclaim it has gotten.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Y.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
November 28, 2010
– Shelved
November 28, 2010
– Shelved as:
graphic-novels
June 30, 2014
– Shelved as:
most-popular-reviews
Comments Showing 1-50 of 96 (96 new)
message 1:
by
Joel
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Dec 16, 2010 11:05AM

reply
|
flag


Joel wrote: "i have a female nerd friend who loves this series and i have no idea why. the second volume is all about the daughters of amazon and is even worse. i kind of hated it."
I did not read book two, because of my irritation with this one, but my husband did. Big mistake.
The Amazons were stupid for many reasons, but the one that really killed me is that they cut off the wrong breast. It's the right, not the left. Does no one have a sense of craft anymore? Bah. Off my lawn.
I did not read book two, because of my irritation with this one, but my husband did. Big mistake.
The Amazons were stupid for many reasons, but the one that really killed me is that they cut off the wrong breast. It's the right, not the left. Does no one have a sense of craft anymore? Bah. Off my lawn.

The Amazons just rubbed me the wrong way all over, like a perverse uncle in a dark movie theater. The second volume came in at the library today, so I'll be reading it soon...if the amazons are even more prevalent, he might be getting a one or two-star rating. I feel like my three was on the border with two.





I love that you're almost more feminist than I am
I think it all stems from my dislike of stupidity. Thinking a woman won't do as good a job as a man because she's a woman is stupid. Thinking that gay people can't drop bombs on foreign civilians just as well as straight guys is also stupid. I'm feminist, and pro-equality in just about every way, but that all stems from my strong anti-stupid stance.

Well, that's not really fair. There are a few graphic novels out there that break the mold. The Sandman series by Neil Gaiman are my favorite and Maus is a pretty famous example of the possibilities of the graphic novel.
...which are now both 20 years old. Though I agree, those examples rock.


hehe :) To be honest I stopped reading comics about 9-10 years ago when I felt I had depleted all the most interesting comics. I should probably see if there are some good new ones that have come out.
The first one or two are uneven, but by 3, Sandman is awesome.


Scott wrote: "Clearly you are one of the women who would cut off their breasts and terrorize the roads in this alternate world."
...but it would be the right one.
...but it would be the right one.


and it was so easy! you must not get blown too often. don't worry, it happens to the best of us.

Nope, I just like to call bullshit when I see it, regardless of whether it's socially-accepted bullshit or not. But let's talk about you, Scott. Since you gave Y a five-star review, I must ask, Y? Did you notice that it wasn't very good?
Do you find the whole idea of violent hordes of feminists to be supported by anything from reality?

Well, that would end gender inequality, wouldn't it? I mean, if that is one's concern...

Miriam wrote: "the only way to escape this inequality is to KILL ALL MEN.
Well, that would end gender inequality, wouldn't it? I mean, if that is one's concern..."
It certainly would. Although, in the context of this book, all the dudes are dead to begin with. The Amazons would have their first meeting, dust off their hands, and congratulate the sub-committee before disbanding.
Well, that would end gender inequality, wouldn't it? I mean, if that is one's concern..."
It certainly would. Although, in the context of this book, all the dudes are dead to begin with. The Amazons would have their first meeting, dust off their hands, and congratulate the sub-committee before disbanding.

Nope, I just like to call bullshit when I see it, regardless of whether it's socially-accepted bullshit or n..."
I honestly didn't realize any anti-women themes. Maybe it's because I'm not the type of person to notice it, or maybe I'm such a male chauvinist that I'm blind to this.. perceived degradation of women.
I gave it 5 stars because the full color drawings were good, and because it's funny and bizarre.
Were you blind to the powerful confident.. and very sane female leads?

No, I wasn't blind to them. A couple of them were nearly as developed as the lead character... I didn't find ANY of the characters very interesting or believable, including the male lead, but that has nothing to do with gender issues, and more with the limitations of writing a comic book: it's hard to get the depth of character you get with a novel.
But the fact that a couple female characters have personality doesn't negate the specific aspect of the story that I was taking issue with in this review: I specifically found the guerrilla feminists offensive and badly researched, and I think feminists get a horrible rap for no clear reason. That whole aspect of the plot--which is HUGE in this collection; in fact, it's the climax--might be the most badly examined plot I've come across in comic books, period. Since the most interesting part of this book was the humor, there wasn't enough substance to overcome the problems I had with this story.
That said, I DID enjoy collections two and three a lot better, when the plot moves away from the militant feminists. I stand by this review, though, because volume one was a really crappy beginning to what would go on to be an okay, readable series.

As for this graphic novel, I appreciate your review. It addresses a lot of issues I agree with and have noticed in other stories with similar concepts.




But I digress. Off to a crappy start. I give it another volume to make up for its crappiness although I suspect I will be further disappointed.

abbax wrote: "I have the same feelings about the amazons and the general way women are treated in this series. Also, I do get why everyone finds it annoying that they cut off the wrong breast in this but keep in..."
Wonder Woman had both her boobs, for example.
Wonder Woman had both her boobs, for example.

It's been a year, how have you been?
Anyway.. you are missing the point. In this universe all men have died, except for the protagonist. Therefore.. the absurd violent enemies in this story could only be women.
Write this story where all the women have died save one, and it's men roaming the Earth, would you take offense if in such a story there was a group of masculine-supremacists who walked around with weapons acting crazy?
I'm not taking offense that this story is full of stupid, badly written feminist caricatures, I'm just dismissing it as not very good.