Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Manny's Reviews > xkcd: volume 0

xkcd by Randall Munroe
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1713956
[Original review, Jul 7 2015]

I am the coauthor of which cites an xkcd cartoon.
_____________________

[Update, Mar 18 2020]

Giacomo Bonanno's cites .
66 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read xkcd.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
November 1, 2014 – Finished Reading
July 7, 2015 – Shelved
July 7, 2015 – Shelved as: linguistics-and-philosophy
July 7, 2015 – Shelved as: not-the-whole-truth
July 7, 2015 – Shelved as: science-fiction
July 7, 2015 – Shelved as: science
July 7, 2015 – Shelved as: strongly-recommended
July 7, 2015 – Shelved as: too-sexy-for-maiden-aunts
July 7, 2015 – Shelved as: well-i-think-its-funny
July 7, 2015 – Shelved as: why-not-call-it-poetry
July 7, 2015 – Shelved as: what-i-do-for-a-living

Comments Showing 1-34 of 34 (34 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Matt (new)

Matt That paper is fucking great!


message 2: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan absofuckinglutely agree!


Manny Aw, you guys are so fucking nice!


Manny PS I should make it clear that my coauthor wrote virtually the whole fucking thing. She said there was no fucking reason why academic writing needed to be so fucking boring. If the content was any fucking good, it would fucking well get accepted.

And you know what? She was fucking right!


message 5: by Joe (new)

Joe Goddamn, that was interesting. More, please.


Manny I keep telling my coauthor that we need to write a follow-on article!


message 7: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Manny wrote: "I keep telling my coauthor that we need to write a follow-on article!"

Based on obscenity, an xkcd cartoon, or both?


Manny The relationship between profane intensifiers and speech recognition quality needs to be examined further. It's fucking important!


message 9: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Too bloody right.

(I doubt "bloody" counts as offensive nowadays, but it fits the phrase better.)


Manny One of the curious findings of the experiment was that different intensifiers appeared to work differently well: "fucking" was effective, but "goddamn" wasn't. But there wasn't enough data to be sure of this. We really need to repeat with a larger sample.


message 11: by Matt (new)

Matt It would be interesting to find out whether the use of fucking (in the fuck2 sense) in a review improves the count of votes. Or maybe it's adjectives like awesome or super or a combination thereof?


message 12: by Nandakishore (new)

Nandakishore Mridula As a person who never uses expletives in reviews, I cannot say whether it will improve the vote count.

But it may FUCKING well.


message 13: by Manny (last edited Jul 08, 2015 01:49AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Manny Matt wrote: "It would be interesting to find out whether the use of fucking (in the fuck2 sense) in a review improves the count of votes. Or maybe it's adjectives like awesome or super or a combination thereof?"

If you can figure out the Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ API enough to download a decent sample of data, I'm happy to write some corpus analysis scripts...


message 14: by Manny (last edited Jul 08, 2015 01:48AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Manny Nandakishore wrote: "As a person who never uses expletives in reviews, I cannot say whether it will improve the vote count.

But it may FUCKING well."


I see that, as the Captain of the Pinafore would have put it, you never swear a big, big F.

Well, hardly ever.


message 15: by Bjorn (new)

Bjorn Cecily wrote: "Too bloody right.

(I doubt "bloody" counts as offensive nowadays, but it fits the phrase better.)"


There's an anecdote about a tourist in England, who, not knowing the word for "rare", asks the waiter for a bloody steak. The waiter, all stiff upper lip, responds, "Very good, Sir, and would you like some fucking potatoes with that?"


message 16: by Bjorn (new)

Bjorn Manny wrote: "One of the curious findings of the experiment was that different intensifiers appeared to work differently well: "fucking" was effective, but "goddamn" wasn't. But there wasn't enough data to be su..."

I would refer to the research of , whose results seems to corroborate yours.


Manny He has a way with words, doesn't he?


message 18: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Bjorn wrote: "There's an anecdote about a tourist in England, who, not knowing the word for "rare", asks the waiter for a bloody steak..."

Neat. (In practice, the intonation of the two uses of "bloody" usually disambiguates, but a non-native speaker might not use the right one.)


message 19: by Tuck (new)

Tuck that seems like a bitchin' journal! are all the articles that fucking informative?


Manny No fucking way! This paper is so fucking unique it's not true.


message 21: by Ivonne (new)

Ivonne Rovira Manny wrote: "No fucking way! This paper is so fucking unique it's not true."

As usual, you have fucking outdone yourself!


Manny Thank you Ivonne! But as noted above, my coauthor should get all the fucking credit.


Manny Excuse me, these weren't Europeans, these were Australians.


message 24: by Matt (last edited Feb 10, 2017 11:26PM) (new)

Matt This fucking article give some reason why it's easier for me as a fucking ESL to write words like "fucking" in a fucking comment than it is for English speakers:



and a fucking video from a US expat in Germany on the same fucking topic




Manny Merde, c'est vrai! Putain!


Manny (It just struck me that "Putain" and "Putin" only differ by one letter. Significant or what?)


message 27: by Matt (new)

Matt Yeah, significkant. Etyms at work here. I wonder how the French pronunciations differ.


message 28: by Manny (last edited Feb 11, 2017 10:57PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Manny Well, in French you actually spell it "Poutine" (roughly rhymes with "you mean"), so it differs by several letters. But I'm ignoring that.


message 29: by Matt (new)

Matt Let's see what Google Translate comes up with when we let it translate "Poutine" into, say, Swedish:

!


message 30: by Matt (new)

Matt Ha! While browsing the Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm I came upon Trumpeltrei (also Trumpenwerk) which stands for farce, nonsense, tomfoolery, jest and so on.
I didn't know the word, but I think I'm going to use from now on.




message 31: by Bjorn (new)

Bjorn Matt wrote: "Ha! While browsing the Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm I came upon Trumpeltrei (also Trumpenwerk) which stands for farce, nonsense, tomfoolery, jest and so on.
I didn't know ..."


Brilliant.

On the other hand, there's the Swedish word trumpen, meaning sad or grumpy. Sad!


message 32: by Matt (new)

Matt Bjorn wrote: "On the other hand, there's the Swedish word trumpen, meaning sad or grumpy. Sad! "

Brilliant.

We also have (had, because it's old) trumpen; a verb meaning the cumbersome movement of one's feet, like "to trudge" or "to plod".


message 33: by Jared (new)

Jared Davis first time a review of an Xkcd related book in Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ linked to a paper by the reviewer?


Manny Oh, I hope not!


back to top