Arlene's Reviews > The Boy in the Striped Pajamas
The Boy in the Striped Pajamas
by
by

The Boy in the Striped Pajamas is truly an amazing yet daunting novel that I will never forget. The author John Boyne did a masterful job of depicting the setting in such vivid detail and exposing the events in a manner that I felt a constant emotional pull as the story unfolded and impending doom lingered on the horizon.
I was recommended this novel a while back while reading The Book Thief, but after finishing that story and experiencing such deep sadness, I knew I couldn’t jump into another novel about the Holocaust for quite some time. I’m glad I waited because as with other works that cover this topic, distance and perspective is key. I feel the author did a grand job of juxtaposing two resounding themes in such a flawless manner; one being of the evil that was the Holocaust; against the second theme that of the innocence of a child.
I thought it was brilliant of Boyne to tell the story from the perspective of a nine year old German boy as you experience the events of this abominable and unthinkable time in history as a mere complicit bystander, which ultimately leaves you with a sense of hopelessness.
The story unfolds the day Bruno arrives home to discover his family is moving from Berlin to Auschwitz where his father will serve as a Commandant for the concentration camp. Bruno is forced to leave his three best friends for life and discovers that life in Auschwitz is lonely and desolate. All that changes the day he meets a boy his exact age and they begin to forge a friendship over the course of year. However, as much as he finds he and Schmuel have in common, living on opposite sides of the fence proves to have a devastating consequence to their friendship.
After completing this book, I did some research on the author and the novel and found that he not only received well deserved praise for this book, but also harsh criticism. As with any piece of literature, when words are committed to page and presented to an audience for their interpretation there will be varying degrees of acceptance and backlash. Couple that with such a sensitive topic and you’re bound to get a reaction. Well, my hats off to John Boyne for tackling a story through a unique perspective and presenting a poignant fable that as a reader I willingly suspended my reality and experienced the events in a way that exposed my emotions and feelings to such a raw level. Well done IMHO.
I was recommended this novel a while back while reading The Book Thief, but after finishing that story and experiencing such deep sadness, I knew I couldn’t jump into another novel about the Holocaust for quite some time. I’m glad I waited because as with other works that cover this topic, distance and perspective is key. I feel the author did a grand job of juxtaposing two resounding themes in such a flawless manner; one being of the evil that was the Holocaust; against the second theme that of the innocence of a child.
I thought it was brilliant of Boyne to tell the story from the perspective of a nine year old German boy as you experience the events of this abominable and unthinkable time in history as a mere complicit bystander, which ultimately leaves you with a sense of hopelessness.
The story unfolds the day Bruno arrives home to discover his family is moving from Berlin to Auschwitz where his father will serve as a Commandant for the concentration camp. Bruno is forced to leave his three best friends for life and discovers that life in Auschwitz is lonely and desolate. All that changes the day he meets a boy his exact age and they begin to forge a friendship over the course of year. However, as much as he finds he and Schmuel have in common, living on opposite sides of the fence proves to have a devastating consequence to their friendship.
After completing this book, I did some research on the author and the novel and found that he not only received well deserved praise for this book, but also harsh criticism. As with any piece of literature, when words are committed to page and presented to an audience for their interpretation there will be varying degrees of acceptance and backlash. Couple that with such a sensitive topic and you’re bound to get a reaction. Well, my hats off to John Boyne for tackling a story through a unique perspective and presenting a poignant fable that as a reader I willingly suspended my reality and experienced the events in a way that exposed my emotions and feelings to such a raw level. Well done IMHO.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Boy in the Striped Pajamas.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
December 1, 2010
– Shelved
December 1, 2010
– Shelved as:
read-2010
December 1, 2010
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 68 (68 new)
message 1:
by
Kristy
(new)
Dec 01, 2010 10:23AM

reply
|
flag

Good review.




@ Morgan, I share your sentiment about Holocaust books. I loved The Book Thief
and my first graphic novel was The Complete Maus, which was awesome. But they leave me so sad. I don't get it, but I do love them. I still need to bring myself to read Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl.







Well an amazing professor is a good indicator you're going to really enjoy the class. I hope you do. :)
Thanks for the friend-vite. I look forward to chatting about other books with you.



They did well with the movie. I'm not always happy with "book movies" but it was good. No need to be nervous!





http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...




Well said Robby. The perspective really made this book amazing.

Agreed. This book was amazing. I've yet to see the movie. Don't know if I can handle it quite yet. The book was beautifully written though. Thank you for commenting Elena.

I think Shmuel was simply a friend he could connect with and enjoyed his company. Friendship was obviously very important to Bruno and it was evident that the move saddened him, so when he connected with Shmuel, it was a strong bond. I enjoyed reading your comments Chris. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

Boyd, what I think you failed to realize is that this novel is not intended to "belittle" the atrocities the true victims of the Holocaust experienced, but rather provide an alternate perspective of this horrific time in history through a different lens. It gives the reader an alternate angle (that of an innocent child) of what occurred during the Holocaust. There was no minimalization of what the victims went through by any stretch of the imagination. Your conclusion is absolutely absurd.
You might find it ironic that it was my Jewish mother in law that has studied Jewish history longer than you've been alive, recommended this book to me. She was moved by this story as were other people in my family that I sit with at Passover, Rosh Hashanah, and Hanukah every year. They appreciated the fable for what it was worth. Because you missed that, does not give you the right to cast judgment on others that grasped the intended message.
Lastly, to insinuate that I would cry over one German dead kid and not over a million Jewish children is ignorant and simply not true. First, I did not state that in my review. Secondly, you made a statement without knowing me, my background and my feelings about this subject... Simply reading my five paragraph review and assuming you can cast judgment on me is not only disrespectful but also shallow and ignorant on your part.
Unfortunately, where I was looking forward to reading The Diary of Anne Frank (another recommendation by my mother in law), it's now tainted with by your careless post.

You are untrustworthy and devious. I refuse to participate in a conversation with a person who is going to delete what I say if sh..."
I encourage you to post any edited comments you have a record of. Please, do so, that way you can see I don't change facts. I will correct a typo or grammatical oversight on my part but I won't change what I say. Post it... Please... so you can take the time to see and realize that when you say
I'm devious and untrustworthy that's just another example of the ignorant comments you make. Maybe taking the time to think before you react will be a valuable lesson.
Your post was directed to me because you reacted to my review, so I have every right to respond. If you had a reaction to the book, you should have just posted your own review.
I'm glad you've decided to not respond. I get no joy interacting with people that make flippant and careless comments. Annoying.....



I should really watch the movie. I've heard such great things about it. So glad you found it amazing.
Thanks for sharing your insight. :)


I hope you like the book Steph. The Book Thief was amazing and so was this book IMHO.


Sounds like the book parallel's the book a bit closely. It's very sad and if the movie upset you, then likely the book will have the same effect.
Looks like you like dystopic novels. Have you tried The Maze Runner, Legend or The Hunger Games? Those are a few I'd recommend. Happy reading!


Hence, no fable here. 'tis just not.

Hence, no fable here. 'tis just not."
Lina, many words in the English language carry multiple meanings and fable is one of them. A simple look-up search will tell you that fable can carry the following meanings:
fable [fey-buh l] /ˈfeɪ bəl/ noun
1. a short tale to teach a moral lesson, often with animals or inanimate objects as characters; apologue:
the fable of the tortoise and the hare; Aesop's fables.
2. a story not founded on fact:
This biography is largely a self-laudatory fable.
3. a story about supernatural or extraordinary persons or incidents; legend:
the fables of gods and heroes.
4. legends or myths collectively:
the heroes of Greek fable.
5. an untruth; falsehood:
This boast of a cure is a medical fable.
6. the plot of an epic, a dramatic poem, or a play.
7. idle talk:
old wives' fables.
I highlight #2 as it pertains to what I was referencing in my review, so no need to shout at anyone.

Thank you Rst123. I appreciate your comments. It always amazes me to see that people on this forum feel they have the right to criticize and disrespect those who didn't interpret a story in the same way as they did. Everyone has different perceptions and opinions. No need to be hurtful towards those that don't share the same view. Again, thank you for your thoughtfulness. :)


I am German; the only use for the word "fable" I know is "a morality tale with talking animals". The distinction between "fiction" and "fable" is quite strict.
Of course, the book is still rubbish and John Boyne is an idiot. I just get irritated when people use "fable" as a synonym for "fiction". The word Boyne wanted was "fairytale", I believe: Something ridiculously unrealistic.
If there's a professional student of the English lanuage here who could explain to me why "fable" is used instead of "fiction", I'd appreciate it. Until then, I will continue to apply the word as I learned it. Mainly because "fable" makes a cutesy fairytale out of the historical background of this story.
But I should stop writing now, or I'm going to rant for the next three hours about this book.