Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Cecily's Reviews > Butcher's Crossing

Butcher's Crossing by John  Williams
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1199525
Why read a historical novel about a privileged Harvard dropout who wants to find himself by going on a buffalo hunt?

1. It's by John Williams, who wrote one of my three favourite novels, Stoner, which I reviewed HERE, as well as his masterpiece, Augustus, which I reviewed HERE.

2. Hunting is not what it's really about (probably like Moby Dick?).

3. It was a good follow-on from Cold Mountain, which I reviewed HERE: two totally different US landscape-based stories, set only a few years apart.

What This Is - and Is Not

� This is a road movie - without the road, the car, or the film cameras.

� It's a Western - without cows, cowboys or indians native Americans.

� It's a character-based story - but the main characters don't speak or move (because they’re the landscape and weather).

� It's about big beasts, big wilderness, big ambitions, some big characters - but it often focuses on the minutest details of how things looks, sound, and feel (see quotes near the end).

� It’s about quests and dreams (of meaning for one; of wealth for another); aspects have a mythical air � but harsh reality dominates, and it's not the standard "American Dream" of wealth (success, fame, power).

� It's a coming-of-age story or bildungsroman - except that the end of the journey seems more like the beginning of Will's growing up.

� It's about life (finding purpose in it, as well as basic survival) - but there's bloody death and butchery.

If it seems a slightly surprising subject for a quiet professor of literature to write about, his wife explains that he lived in the West, loved the landscape, and liked camping. (He didn't hunt buffalo.) See this interview with Nancy Gardner Williams: .

Landscape

“He believed there was a subtle magnetism in nature, which if he unconsciously yielded to it, would direct him aright.�

I often seek quiet landscapes for solace, thinking, escape (preferably woodland). I like to listen and touch. I’m not brave or reckless enough to go anywhere really wild, and although I eat meat, I’m no hunter. Nevertheless, I can relate to underlying theme of this story more than I expected.

Will Andrews heads west, not to make his fortune, but to find meaning in his life. The landscape quickly has a profound effect, though it doesn’t really clarify things for him. He longs for the distant mountains but “did not know precisely what hunger or thirst they would assuage�. How many of us long vaguely for something, without being sure how or if it will fix things?

After only a month away from Boston, he barely remembers home, which seems “in a very distant time� The image would not stay with him. Unreal, it thinned like brown fog.� He quickly feels at home in the tiny settlement of Butcher’s Crossing, but yearns to go further, into the wilderness: in “a hint of the distant horizon� he sees “his own undiscovered nature�.

As he travels, he comes to identify with his surroundings, “He felt himself to be like the land, without identity or shape�. He has “the feeling that he was being absorbed� and “promised� a richness and a fulfilment for which he had no name�. After only a few weeks, “He had been here in the high valley for all of that part of his life that mattered� He could not think of himself outside of where he was�. Is this peace or an unhealthy form of disassociation?

But what’s it all for? When they eventually leave the valley, after much hardship, Will “felt vaguely that he would be leaving something behind, something that might have been precious to him, had he been able to know what it was.�

This thwarting of uncertain ambitions, this lack of resolution, reminded me of Stoner.

Faith, Religion, Ritual

Does everyone need faith in something? I’m not sure (I don’t think I have faith in anything much), but that’s the suggestion here.

Charley Hoge, the waggon driver, has a simple but profound faith in the words of his dog-eared Bible, and a fair amount of faith in Miller, the experienced buffalo hunter. Miller’s faith is also in Miller: his vast experience of the beasts and their environment. Schneider, the skinner, has faith in his own experience, so it’s no surprise that he and Miller don’t always agree. McDonald, the hide trader, has hope of future prosperity when the railroad comes through town.

Will is the faithless one: the son of a preacher who pressed Emerson more than God on his son. That is surely why Will now seeks answers in the wilderness, and why “the reality of their journey lay in the routine detail� a ritual, more and more meaningless as it was repeated, but a ritual which nevertheless gave his life the only shape it now had�.

There is also a ritualistic aspect to the hunting, killing, and skinning: “a rhythm in Miller’s slaughter� Like a dance, a thunderous minuet created by the wildness that surrounded it�. Does that make it somehow sacred, or profane and greedy?

If my Biblical knowledge were closer to Charley’s than Will’s, I’d probably spot more, but wilderness is significant in the Christian story, and just as Genesis has a six-day creation, Miller’s preparation for the journey is six days, as it the first leg of it (after which, they are literally off the beaten track).

I’m not sure if it’s the author’s intention, but you could easily sermonise along the lines of the perils of chasing material gain, versus the importance of searching for deeper truth.

Transformation

From the most ancient myths and stories, physical journeys have paralleled personal journeys of transformation. That is true here � not just of Will, but even the characters who are used to venturing out for weeks on end.

There are the obvious physical transformations from weeks in the saddle, then the hard labour of hunting and skinning etc, but the psychological changes are greatest, and most profound. As things get tougher, each man has to wrestle his own demons, as well as the other men, and the conditions in which they’re living, travelling and, hopefully, surviving - physically and mentally.

“He thought at times that he as moving into a new body, or into a real body that had lain hidden beneath unreal layers of softness and whiteness and smoothness.� Later, these feelings are echoed when he loses his virginity.

Survival

If you like survival stories, there’s plenty here. They travel in uncharted territory, where only one of them has been before, and that was ten years earlier. They have supplies, but need to make them last, and can’t ever go too far from water. The terrain and weather are always a risk, as is the greed of trying to get just a few more hides.

Seeing this Through Other Eyes

Some books are so deep or strange, they inspire hugely varied and very creative reviews. This is, in some ways, a very simple story, but I was struck by the variety of my friends' reviews: they are almost all 4* or 5*, but the themes and ideas the pick out are remarkably diverse. I think that indicates how much depth there is beneath the surface.

I think this could make a wonderful film - but only in the rights hands. It needs to focus on careful shots of the landscape, rather than wild west clichés: enormous vistas, as well as careful light, highlighting details close-up. would be perfect, though in 2010, Sam Mendes was reported to be adapting it. He's made some excellent films, but I'm not sure I'd want to see his version of this.

Descriptions of Minute Details

This is also a notable feature of his first (disowned) novel, Nothing But The Night, HERE.

� “He became aware that his hands were tightly clenched; the tips of his fingers slipped in the moisture of his palms.

� “Flat lines of sweat ran through the glinting beads of moisture that stood out on his forehead, and ran into his tangled eyebrows.�

� “He noticed the minute beads of sweat that stood out distinctly above her full lip and caught the sunlight like tiny crystals.�

� “The rich buffalo grass� changed its color throughout the day; in the morning, in the pinkish rays of the early sun, it was nearly gray; in the yellow light of the midmorning sun, it was a brilliant green; at noon it took on a bluish cast; in the afternoon, in the intensity of the sun, at a distance, the blades lost their individual character and through the green showed a distinct cast of yellow, so that when a light breeze whipped across, a living color seemed to run through the grass, to disappear and reappear from moment to moment. In the evening after the sun had gone down, the grass took on a purplish hue as if it absorbed all the light from the sky and would not give it back.�

� “When he inserted the rod into the breech of the barrel the hot metal hissed, and the drops of water that got on the outside of the barrel danced for a moment on the blued metal and disappeared.�

� “He heard nothing save the soft whistling of the wind around his ears, which were beginning to tingle from the coolness. The southern reaches of the valley were softening in a faint mist that was coming down from the mountains� the sunlit white vapor twisted and coiled upon itself before a thrusting wind that was not felt on the ground here in the valley.�

� “The mountainside was a riot of varied shade and hue� He thought that if he listened he could hear the sound of growth� the fragrant air, spiced with the odor of crushed pine needles and musty from the slow decay that worked upward from the earth.�

Other Quotes

� “It was a freedom and a goodness, a hope and a vigor that he perceived to underlie all the familiar things of his life, which were not free or good or hopeful or vigorous. What he sought was the source and preserver of his world, a world which seemed to turn ever in fear away from its source.�

� “She was a presence which assuaged a need in him that he barely knew he had, until the need was met.�

� “Caught in the ugliness of sleep� defenceless� in the innocence of sleep� he “had never seen a part of her that he was seeing now.�

� “It wasn’t you, it was me.� (Published in 1960!)

Williams' Four Novels, Compared

See the end of my review of his first (disowned) novel, Nothing But The Night, HERE.
313 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Butcher's Crossing.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

July 25, 2015 – Shelved as: to-read
July 25, 2015 – Shelved
July 25, 2015 – Shelved as: usa-and-canada
September 21, 2015 – Started Reading
September 27, 2015 –
page 108
39.42% "Nearly half way through. It's beautiful and well-written, but a word away from Williams' "Stoner", and I find I don't relate to it as profoundly. (I'm enjoying it, though.)"
September 30, 2015 – Shelved as: historical-fict-pre-20th-c
October 1, 2015 – Finished Reading
October 7, 2015 – Shelved as: landscape-location-protagonist
December 4, 2015 – Shelved as: read-only-cos-of-gr-friends
October 7, 2017 – Shelved as: bildungsroman

Comments Showing 1-50 of 73 (73 new)


message 1: by Ted (new) - rated it 5 stars

Ted My, what a fine review, Cecily. Loved all the quotes, they brought back the book to me. Many of them I had entered into a document myself, and I remembered them vividly as I read the review.


Cecily Thank you, Ted. Your review was one of those that tempted me to risk not loving a book by Stoner's author. As you can see, I'm glad I took that chance.


message 3: by Sue (new) - added it

Sue This is the second excellent review I've read of this book. The first led me to add it to my list. Now I need to push it up sooner. I also loved Stoner but thought this book just didn't sound like a fit for me. Now I'm quite certain I was wrong.


Dolors What an exhaustive analysis of themes, implications and scope you've managed to pull together in this review, Cecily. I would add "bildungsroman" in the list of "what this is" and wouldn't change a single word, quotes included, in this review.


Cecily Sue wrote: "I also loved Stoner but thought this book just didn't sound like a fit for me. Now I'm quite certain I was wrong."

Yes, that was what held me back - and why I started this review as I did. Objectively, it's probably at least as good as Stoner, but I didn't love or engage with it quite as much - but 4* is still good. I hope you have a similar experience.


Cecily Dolors wrote: "What an exhaustive analysis of themes, implications and scope you've managed to pull together in this review, Cecily. I would add "bildungsroman" in the list of "what this is"..."

Gosh, thank you, Dolors. Coming from you, that's high praise.

Of course, you're quite right about it being a bildungsroman; I may weave that into my review (with a credit to you) later, though I'm not sure where: there isn't an "isn't" side to it, so I might make it more explicit in the Transformation section.


message 7: by Apatt (new)

Apatt "This is a road movie - without the road, the car, or the film cameras."

So it's a bit like The Fast & The Furious then? ;)
Well, providing the quotation marks are in place I may give it a spin one day. Nevermind my usual fare, I'm reading Sons and Lovers at the moment! Best review I've ever read*

*of Butcher's Crossing.


message 8: by Cecily (last edited Oct 06, 2015 01:23AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Cecily Apatt wrote: "So it's a bit like The Fast & The Furious then?"

Gah! I may have unconsciously echoed that review of yours where you did something similar (which was it - an Austen?). If so, in mitigation, I plead that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

EDIT: I've tracked it down, and it's Sense and Sensibility: /review/show...
It's worth a read, folks.

Apatt wrote: "I'm reading Sons and Lovers at the moment!"

Lawrence has been in the upper echelons of my TBR for a while; he keeps being overtaken, though.

Apatt wrote: "*of Butcher's Crossing."

Ha ha.
But seriously, look around: there are plenty of wonderful reviews, and they're surprisingly varied in what they read into the book.


message 9: by Apatt (new)

Apatt "If so, in mitigation, I plead that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery."

Oh no, but you put it to much better -- and meaningful -- use, it's like changing a screwdriver into a pair of sunglasses. Who would have thunk?

If we had decent public libraries here I'd read more contemporary litfic. D.H. Lawrence and his friends are free to read ;)


message 10: by Caroline (new)

Caroline Whilst I couldn't read a book about hunting - or one that presented it in an even vaguely positive light - I still thought this was a great review. I also loved the quote about the buffalo grass in different lights.


message 11: by Cecily (last edited Oct 06, 2015 01:23AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Cecily Apatt, whether a screwdriver is more meaningful than sunglasses rather depends where you are. ;)
(Bit if it's a sonic one, always stick with that, obvs.)


message 12: by Seemita (new) - added it

Seemita Wow!! This is a fantastic ode to Williams' magic that is gradually ceasing to be of spiking brilliance and collating to be of consistent vision. You cover the entire landscape, literal and symbolic, in your impeccable style, Cecily; and the themes are the exact modulations of earthy and evocative prose that dots a great work. I hope to get to him soon although the delay is sauntered by these gems from your pen! :)


message 13: by Cecily (last edited Oct 06, 2015 01:24AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Cecily Caroline wrote: "Whilst I couldn't read a book about hunting - or one that presented it in an even vaguely positive light - I still thought this was a great review. I also loved the quote about the buffalo grass..."

Thanks, and I quite understand your feelings, though I would add that I didn't think it was presented at all positively.

I'm glad the grass quote was more to your liking.


Cecily Seemita wrote: "Wow!!..."

Umm. I'm speechless. Thank you so much for your effusive and beautiful compliments, but at least 95% of the credit really belongs to Williams.


Parthiban Sekar Thanks for this splendid review, Cecily.


message 16: by Seemita (new) - added it

Seemita Cecily wrote: "Thank you so much for your effusive and beautiful compliments, but at least 95% of the credit really belongs to Williams."

Ah! That virtue called modesty!


message 17: by Lynne (last edited Oct 06, 2015 03:13AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lynne King Cecily,

I've read some wonderful friends' reviews on this book but I have to say in all honesty that yours is perfect, just as I view John Williams' books (apart from his first novella, a taster, that I felt warranted a 4).

The analysis, the detail, your own thoughts thrown in, etc. Well I loved this review, absolutely, absolutely loved it and when you reach 99 likes, I want to see 100, if not more!

Bravo!


message 18: by Gautam (new)

Gautam What a marvelous review, Cecily ! Astute analysis of a great novel ! Loved it !


message 19: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala Why read a historical novel about a privileged Harvard dropout who wants to find himself by going on a buffalo hunt?

Your first line really caught my attention, Cecily, as I've just been reading a book called The Crossing which could very well be named Butcher's Crossing given the many dead and dying scattered throughout its pages.

But to get back to your review - I was a little familiar with this book by Williams from the several reviews among our common gr friends, and now that I've read yours too, I feel I've got a good grasp of its themes - in particular the landscape one. You've really sold it to me on the basis of the descriptions of landscape - that quote about the buffalo-grass in particular is extraordinary.
I might have a problem with the amount of buffalo slaughter described though. I noted your own question about the slaughter:
Does that make it somehow sacred, or profane and greedy?
Did the ethical aspects of wiping out so many buffalo at one time get mentioned by the author, directly or indirectly? Any consideration that they were the mainstay of the native population's way of life?

I realise the focus of this book may have been entirely elsewhere, as you said at the beginning, but such a huge slaughter of buffalo has to raise that question. And is the book based on any real event?


message 20: by Cecily (last edited Oct 06, 2015 09:36AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Cecily Fionnuala wrote: "Did the ethical aspects of wiping out so many buffalo at one time get mentioned by the author, directly or indirectly? Any consideration that they were the mainstay of the native population's way of life?

I realise the focus of this book may have been entirely elsewhere, as you said at the beginning, but such a huge slaughter of buffalo has to raise that question. And is the book based on any real event?"


Hi Fionnuala. The ethical aspects of the scale of slaughter are mentioned a little, though that's partly borne of one person's desire to head home with what they have, rather than any moral objection. There are also qualms about the bloodiness of it all, but the prospect of possibly wiping them out entirely isn't a major concern - as it probably wasn't at the time. The native population is barely mentioned.

I don't think this is based on any specific event, but I suggest you look at Jeffrey's review: /review/show...
It's excellent in many respects, including historical and family background. It also has a photo of a shockingly large pile of bones, that gives a powerful impression of the scale of the slaughter, without being gory.


Cecily Elyse wrote: "Great informative- enjoyable review! The book sounds terrific to me too! Thanks. Stoner is a favorite!!!"

Thanks for your typically enthusiastic and encouraging comment. At first sight, this is very different from Stoner, and yet there is a similarity of understated writing, attention to detail, and something unfulfilled.


Cecily Thanks, Parthiban and Gautam. It is a remarkable book, that invites deep thought.


message 23: by Cecily (last edited Oct 06, 2015 09:25AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Cecily Lynne wrote: I've read some wonderful friends' reviews on this book but I have to say in all honesty that yours is perfect, just as I view John Williams' books..."

Lynne, thank you so very much for your generous words. However, as an outsider, with very little knowledge of US history in general, let alone buffalo hunting, I feel a bit of a fraud. There must be so much I missed - though Jeffrey's review (see link in comment #21) filled some of those gaps.

Also, I am very grateful for your encouragement (and Ted's) to risk this book. Williams remains wonderful in my eyes.


message 24: by Lynne (last edited Oct 06, 2015 10:54AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lynne King Cecily, Williams said himself that this is purely fiction because for a start it is not a true western, as Indians, as you rightly know, are scarcely mentioned.

I don't think you are a fraud at all. You have come across an incredible author and now you are beginning, indirectly, to question him in detail.

Americans often write about English history and I don't have a problem with that! Yes, I read Jeffrey's review and it was also excellent.

I'm not one for violence at all, especially with the slaughter of the buffalo, but everything even at its most bleak was so skilfully written that I would forgive Williams anything.

Just remember, you gave a review on a book in your own words and that's all that interests me!

Again, this is fiction!


Cecily Thanks, Lynne. And I only said "a bit". ;)


Lynne King Oh yes, a bit!!


message 27: by Violet (new) - added it

Violet wells Brilliant review, Cecily. Time I read Williams.


Cecily Thank you, Violet. He is indeed a wonderful writer, but he only wrote three novels!

This one is, in some ways, quite alien for those of us outside the US. That's not a bad thing, but I think Stoner may be a better place to start. (I haven't yet read Augustus.)


message 29: by Violet (new) - added it

Violet wells Okay, I'll read Stoner first. Thanks Cecily.


message 30: by Michael (new) - added it

Michael Perfect review for me, with the framing on what the book is and is not and consumer outlook on "what's it all for?" The tough question to answer but uppermost for those coming to the review: why read this book?

As to possibly wiping them out entirely isn't a major concern - as it probably wasn't at the time, it was official Army policy to wipe the buffalo out to get rid of the Plains Indian problem (I put a link in message 36 of Jeffrey's review).


Cecily Thank you, Michael. So many of my reviews end up mainly as plot summaries, I'm trying to do something a little different. The premise of this book is so unappealing and alien to me in some ways, the way to go seemed clear. I'm glad it's helpful to others.

Thanks for pointing out your specific comment on Jeffrey's excellent review:
/review/show...


message 32: by Jaidee (new)

Jaidee Just want to say the layout of this review is wonderful. You should market this review to uni students who are studying this in lit. class. Make a few bucks from this wonderful review :).

I hope to read Stoner at some point. I am not sure about this one yet.


Cecily Jaidee wrote: "Just want to say the layout of this review is wonderful..."

Thank you, Jaidee; what a lovely thing to say. I'm not in this for money, but compliments are always welcome.

I definitely prefer Stoner. It's because the premise of this is so apparently unappealling, that I wanted to give some context as to why it's not what it seems: hence the structure of the review.


Cecily Sabah wrote: "Cecily Thankyou for this amazing review. Your review makes me want to read this book."

Thanks, Sabah. Certainly, the summary from the back of the book wouldn't have enticed me, and maybe not you. Evidently the introductory parts of the review have done their job.


message 35: by Matthias (new)

Matthias I got "Stoner", "Augustus" and this book sitting on my shelves, waiting for me to make my mind up on wich one to start with. I am very eagerly looking forward to reading them, but I'm enjoying the expectation so much I find myself putting it off time and again. Thanks for another great review, which admittedly I did not read fully in order to leave as much room for surprise as possible :-)


Cecily Matthias wrote: "I got "Stoner", "Augustus" and this book sitting on my shelves, waiting for me to make my mind up on wich one to start with. "

I've read this and Stoner, but not Augustus, so I can't advise, except to say that I love Stoner even more than this.

Matthias wrote: "Thanks for another great review, which admittedly I did not read fully in order to leave as much room for surprise as possible :-) "

And thank you for your kind comment. This isn't really a book of surprises, more of slow revelation. I hope you enjoy its unfolding.


Cecily Hades wrote: "Cecily - such a fantastic well structured review. Thank you."

Thank you, Hades. I've been trying to vary the structure of my reviews a little this year, so it's nice to know that people are appreciative.


message 38: by s.penkevich (new)

s.penkevich Incredible
I
N
C
R
E
D
I
B
L
E
elbidercni
E
L
B
I
D
E
R
C
N
I

Yea, this hits from every direction.


message 39: by Cecily (last edited Dec 23, 2015 11:10AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Cecily Incredible comment, Penk. Thanks. I'm flattered, but of course it's the book that deserves the praise. It is wonderful in a way one could not possibly expect from a description of the plot.


message 40: by Carol (new) - added it

Carol Your review is brilliant and beautiful, Cecily. As I read your overview, I was reminded of a documentary that I saw about the young man in the book, Into the Wild. Stoner was my favorite novel in 2015. I loved that story and the author's beautiful prose; but, the buffalo slaughter in this book would probably be too disturbing for me...even though it was a reality in settling the American West.


Cecily Carol wrote: "Your review is brilliant and beautiful, Cecily. ...
the buffalo slaughter in this book would probably be too disturbing for me..."


Thank you, Carol. The book is harsh in places, though the physical effects on the men is possibly more gruesome than the descriptions of the hunt. Nevertheless, I wouldn't want to persuade you to read something you fear would be too disturbing for you.


message 42: by Tom (new) - rated it 5 stars

Tom About to tackle a library copy of this. I haven't read stoner yet but its one of my brothers favorite novels. The epic american front cover of this one stood out to me.


Cecily I think they're both utterly wonderful, though in rather different ways, and most GoodReaders agree. It doesn't matter which you read first. And then there's Augustus, which I don't even have a copy of yet...


message 44: by Tom (new) - rated it 5 stars

Tom Well, I have read it. I loved the vivid descriptions of the scenery, and how it put you right in the scene. I could very much feel being a younger guy trying to keep up with those tough older men in a grim place. I liked how real it felt. It reminded me of a grittier, slower version of Hucklberry Finn a little.


Cecily The full 5* from you. I'm so glad, and I appreciate your reasons. You may notice one of the shelves I've put this on is Landscape Protagonist.

(Huck Finn isn't a major feature in my literary life, but I'm sure others appreciate the comparison.)


Fabian  {Councillor} A fantastic review, Cecily! I have finished this book just yesterday and am intriguied by a lot of the points you made.


Cecily Councillor wrote: "A fantastic review, Cecily! I have finished this book just yesterday and am intriguied by a lot of the points you made."

Thanks, Councillor. I've been a bit out of things the last couple of days, so have a backlog, but look forward to reading your review before long. I'm sure it will be worth the wait.


Lance I read it while taking a rafting trip through the Grand Canyon. Perfect setting.


Cecily Lance wrote: "I read it while taking a rafting trip through the Grand Canyon. Perfect setting."

Wow. Perfect indeed. Well, nearly. Plains with buffalo herds would have been even better.


Howard Outstanding, Cecily. You certainly got a lot out of the book.


« previous 1
back to top