Kirsten's Reviews > Mindset: The New Psychology of Success
Mindset: The New Psychology of Success
by
by

Let me save you the money and the aggravation: The point of this book is (admittedly) not terrible, but it could be summed up real fast. Here you go, you're welcome.
Often, people see their abilities as 'fixed' and this attitude stops them from working to better themselves, turns out that if you work hard and keep the right can-do attitude, that you can accomplish more than if you think you're doomed to be a particular skill level forever. There are examples of this all around you.
Boom. Done. But no. What you get with this book is an endless diatribe. Hey, you remember that thing that happened in history? Where X person did Y thing that turned out to be good/bad? Well, if it was bad, it was TOTALLY because they had a fixed mindset. If it was good, it was 100% because of their growth mindset. This is true of literally any example in history ever no matter how poorly researched it might be. Is there any scientific basis for these historical claims? Absolutely not. Michael Jordan? SURE THING. That guy from that one business that went bad? WHAT A FIX MINDED DUMBASS. Bethoven? Duh. Seriously, I don't think I have ever read something so repetitive and belabored in my life. Sure, lady, you make a good point: People shouldn't limit themselves. Maybe give it a break after about 15 pages and I think it would probably be plenty.
Often, people see their abilities as 'fixed' and this attitude stops them from working to better themselves, turns out that if you work hard and keep the right can-do attitude, that you can accomplish more than if you think you're doomed to be a particular skill level forever. There are examples of this all around you.
Boom. Done. But no. What you get with this book is an endless diatribe. Hey, you remember that thing that happened in history? Where X person did Y thing that turned out to be good/bad? Well, if it was bad, it was TOTALLY because they had a fixed mindset. If it was good, it was 100% because of their growth mindset. This is true of literally any example in history ever no matter how poorly researched it might be. Is there any scientific basis for these historical claims? Absolutely not. Michael Jordan? SURE THING. That guy from that one business that went bad? WHAT A FIX MINDED DUMBASS. Bethoven? Duh. Seriously, I don't think I have ever read something so repetitive and belabored in my life. Sure, lady, you make a good point: People shouldn't limit themselves. Maybe give it a break after about 15 pages and I think it would probably be plenty.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Mindset.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
July 30, 2015
– Shelved
July 30, 2015
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 55 (55 new)
message 1:
by
Ash
(new)
Jul 31, 2015 09:44PM

reply
|
flag


Glad you felt this way, too! It is deeply harmful to promote the idea that depression is something you can always think your way out of or cure by sheer force of will (mindset). This type of thinking leads, in many cases (mine included), to gradual increase in hopelessness and worthlessness. It's lucky that instead of Dr. Dweck, I had supportive friends and family when I was struggling the most with depression.



I was disappointed that she thinks depressed people should just adopt a growth mindset when they are at their lowest. That went over my head coz I didn’t understand what she meant there. Like babe I barely thought I had a mind let alone any kind of mindset when I was at my darkest hour.


No book is perfect, and this book is not bad either. It gives you a different perspective. Take what helps you leave the rest.












When you criticize people for how they write, you'd best write properly. Did you mean backed "by" science? And what exactly is a doctoring student? A student who forges documents? Do you mean a doctoral student? Again, if you're going to throw stones, you might want to make sure your house isn't made of glass.
Her review was spectacular.

No book is perfect, and this book is not bad either. It gives you a different perspective. Take what helps you leave the rest."
It's called a review. It rates the book as good, middling, or bad. That's what reviews do. Reviews are also things that people use to express their opinions. Which people are doing. Then you come in and add, "If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all." OK. But you're in the comments section. That's what comments sections are for.

I think you missed the point of her review. The original author's theory--like most self-help bullshit--fails to take in and fully get around the idea that some people are simply unable, on their own, to get of their own heads. Depression can be a very severe form of this, but it's like looking at basketball and saying, "You know what? I've determined that being tall is a very good attribute to have for playing basketball, so if you're playing basketball, you should be tall!" Like, duh. Most depressed people know that their depression distorts the way they think. But being told to be positive doesn't make a person positive, just like being told to be tall doesn't make a person tall.





This book proved to me that even if you have “PhD� in your title� doesn’t make you anymore legitimized to write a “scientific� researched book. What a joke.

