ŷ

Buck's Reviews > Rossetti and His Circle

Rossetti and His Circle by Max Beerbohm
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1450485
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: sequential-art

Now that the Internet and chronic solvent abuse have cruelly abridged my attention span, I can’t seem to concentrate on anything more demanding than a businesslike text message (“Where u at bro?�) I’ve come to accept that I’ll never read Sein und Zeit in German � or any other earthly language. I’ll probably never read another novel. I might not read this paragraph.

Which is why Rossetti and His Circle is perfect for me. It’s short, beautiful and practically wordless. It’s also amusing. How come nothing’s amusing anymore? The term itself has a slightly archaic ring, like ‘gallant� or ‘chaste�. I don’t think anyone’s even tried to be amusing since Dick Cavett went off the air. I watch something like the trailer for the new Mad Max movie and think, ‘Yes, yes, clearly awesome. But where’s the witty insouciance?� Then again, old George Miller didn’t exactly set out to remake His Girl Friday, did he? So I don’t know what I’m complaining about.

Rossetti and His Circle was first published in 1922. Although it could now almost pass for an avant-garde graphic novel, it must have struck its original audience as bizarrely quaint. In an England that was already reading Joyce and dancing to jazz, here was this dandified aesthete composing a series of cartoons about the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, an extinct bohemia as remote from Beerbohm’s contemporaries as the beatniks are from us. But instead of doing what most modern graphic novelists would do when presenting some dimly remembered historical period—i.e. dumbing it down—Beerbohm assumes, on the reader’s part, an impossibly granular knowledge of mid-Victorian culture. This, for instance, is a picture called ‘Blue China�:



Thanks to an editor’s note, I can tell you that the dignified old gentleman here represents Thomas Carlyle and the little guy Whistler, while the vases point back to an old quarrel between the Aesthetes and the Ruskinites. So, yeah, if you happen to be an art historian, this scene might be unspeakably hilarious. Otherwise, though, not so much. And yet it still works somehow: you sense a moral seriousness behind the levity, even if the satire is partially occluded. It may be an inside joke, but the delivery is so perfect that you take the brilliance of the punchline on faith.

Not that it really matters, but I’ve never had the slightest interest in Pre-Raphaelite art. All those ethereal maidens drowning in rivers and whatnot appeal to the same vague romanticism that helped install Klimt’s ‘The Kiss� in a million dorm rooms (right next to the obligatory Robert Doisneau photo). But Beerbohm, a man saturated with irony, manages to make these disreputable painters both interesting and sympathetic. He even gets at the strange nobility of the titular Rossetti, turning that BBW-loving slacker into some kind of hero, a proto-Lebowski � mute, impassive, often recumbent, but still abiding:



Believe it or not, that picture contains, among other virtues, a sly allusion to S&M. I won’t spoil it for you, though. Just read the book, preferably in a high-quality edition with intelligent endnotes.
20 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Rossetti and His Circle.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
August 15, 2015 – Shelved
August 15, 2015 – Shelved as: sequential-art

Comments Showing 1-11 of 11 (11 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Lobstergirl (new)

Lobstergirl lol

Looks like Rushdie on the divan, he's put on some weight...not surprised to hear he's into S&M though.


Buck He does look a bit like Rushdie.

Just to clarify, Rossetti himself wasn't into S&M. That was Swinburne. Rossetti was the one who had his wife's corpse disinterred so he could recover a manuscript he'd flung into her coffin. That scene didn't make it into the book, for some reason.


message 3: by Mir (new)

Mir All those ethereal maidens drowning in rivers and whatnot appeal to the same vague romanticism that helped install Klimt’s ‘The Kiss� in a million dorm rooms (right next to the obligatory Robert Doisneau photo).

Interesting that you make that connection on your own (I'm taking as genuine your professed unfamiliarity with art history of this period). The original Pre-Raphaelite Movement was concerned with some serious political, religious, and social issues, but then the style became popular for its prettiness and became mostly about visual qualities rather than content. And that influenced the wider European Symbolist and Decadent art movements of which Klimt was a part.


Buck Yeah, my ignorance is genuine and profound. But so is my aversion to pseudo-medievalism, which the Pre-Raphaelites often trafficked in. Beautiful damsels, handsome knights, dragons of any kind: I just loathe all of it. Which may explain why I'm the only person in North America who can't get into Game of Thrones. I recognize that many serious grownups love this stuff, and that's fine. It's just not for me.


message 5: by Mir (new)

Mir I haven't read Game of Thrones but I thought it was all horrible people doing horrible things for power? Which, put like that, is probably a more honest depiction of the medieval elite than the chivalry and romance bullshit.

I find medievalism in the Victorian context somewhat more sympathetic, as a response to the truly horrible conditions arising from industrialization and immense growth of an incredibly impoverished urban working class.

Of course most artists give up social criticism because it doesn't sell and and ladies in flowing gowns do.


message 6: by Ceridwen (new)

Ceridwen My mother wrote her PhD thesis on the PBR, which makes me somewhat irrational on the subject, both for better and for worse. Did you ever check out the BBC series about them? Super hilarious, for values of hilarity that involve one's doctorate-having parent and the ability to post such shit on her facebook wall.




message 7: by Mir (new)

Mir I haven't seen that show, although I saw an ad for its existence. I would really need someone like your mom to watch it with.


Buck I guess I could see myself watching that. Pre-Raphaelite art doesn't do anything for me, but Pre-Raphaelite lives were super interesting. For one thing, there was a ton of weird sex stuff going on (or not going on, in Ruskin's case). Still, I'm just nicely settling into the first season of Walking Dead, which shows you how far behind I am on everything.


message 9: by Mir (new)

Mir I'm the opposite. I like art and don't care about the lives of the artists (in some cases, prefer not to know!). People's affairs or rumored affairs are not very interesting unless I know them personally.


message 10: by Buck (last edited Apr 23, 2016 11:07PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Buck That’s probably the correct, enlightened approach. But isn’t it also kind of limited? I mean, aesthetic appreciation is all well and good, and I’d like to think I’m capable of it from time to time. But human beings are also social animals, so it’s only natural for us to take an interest in how other people lead their lives. It’s great that The Stones of Venice exists, but is totally irrelevant and inconsequential that Ruskin was shocked by the sight of his bride’s pubic hair? And even if it is, I’d still defend anyone’s right to be curious about such things, especially since Ruskin is very, very dead.


message 11: by Mir (new)

Mir Sure, and obviously in some cases the inter-relationships of individuals makes a differences to their ideas or artistic output. Ruskin is an extreme case; extreme cases are more interesting. I am not interested in, for instance, whether or not Wm Morris and Georgina Burn-Jones were lovers or just friends, something that seems to be endless speculated upon in all books about either of them, despite the fact that it can never be proved one way or another.

You hardly need to "defend" others' right to be curious, since I expressed not intention of beginning a censorship campaign. I'm just saying I find the subject not interesting, and it annoys be when biographies dwell extensively on it, beyond the degree to which it was actually important to the individual's life or the material for which they were famous. Watch the O'Keefe biopic and measure how much screen time is given to her sex life versus her painting.


back to top