Warwick's Reviews > American Gods
American Gods
by
by

I find it really weird how many American media products have the word "American" in the title. Obviously, this; a few weeks back I also read American Rust. You've got your American Beauty, American Ninja, An American Werewolf in London. American Psycho. American Sniper. American Pie, American Dad, American Graffiti. What is going on here, what are they trying to prove?? I really don't understand it. I mean you'd never get "British Beauty", "French Psycho", would you? That just seems completely laughable.
Anyway, I really didn't get this book. It made no sense to me at all. I mean it's a fun conceit, that gods are living among men in modern day America, desperate to regain the faith they once commanded, but I just felt like it wasn't thought through properly. It presents itself as being predicated on the idea that ‘America is a bad land for gods� � this is something that characters keep saying to one another, moodily, that America is a really bad land for gods � and this is apparently why all the gods are now living hand-to-mouth existences as drifters or menial labourers.
Only � huh? Are we talking about the same America here? The one where 51 percent of the population think that humans were created by a divine being, and a further 40 percent think they were created by evolution which was set in motion by a divine being (leaving, as Tim Minchin said, a very small percentage of Americans who are right)? Is that the America that is supposed to be a bad land for gods? Do me a favour, it must be one of the most religious countries in the western world. I've driven through my share of rural Tennessee, where much of American Gods takes place, and one of the most striking things about these communities is the fact that there seems to be one church for every six or seven houses. God is invoked on the currency, on the news, by the head of state, and in schoolrooms every morning by little kids.
This is what is so frustrating about the book, because it seems like a brilliant chance to examine religion in the US in a cool and interesting way � but it doesn't. It either doesn't dare or it doesn't bother. I mean � if you're going to run with this idea that gods are walking around, with the more powerful deities being those who have the most believers, then where the fuck is Yahweh? I'm supposed to believe that Anubis is twatting around driving a hearse in fucking Cairo, IL. � despite the fact that no one in the history of America has ever worshipped Anubis � and yet Jesus doesn't make a single appearance? Somehow it's OK to play around with foreign gods that seem quaint or folkloric, but monotheism's off the table. It just didn't make any sense to me.¹
Instead, what we have to propel the narrative along is just a kind of comic-book war that we're supposed to care about. So although there were quite a few scenes that had me flipping the pages with engagement, there was always this nagging feeling that none of it really meant anything and that I didn't really care very much what happened to anyone. It doesn't help that the protagonist (with the dreadful name of ‘Shadow Moon�) is, for a central character, annoyingly passive and lacking in personality (although the goddesses he encounters still have a remarkable habit of wanting to have sex with him).
As for the writing style, well, it's fine, but it has absolutely no flair. There's quite an interesting bit in the Acknowledgements where Gaiman thanks many of his beta-readers and editors for spotting ‘stray and unintentional anglicisms�, presumably so he could remove them; this I think is something that contributes to the featureless blandness of his style. I'm not saying he is unentitled to this voice or anything like that � his wife is American, he lives in America, this is totally an authentic voice for him. It's just not one that has any character. It works in a kind of tab-A-into-slot-B way.
This is certainly not a bad book and it's quite readable � I think I'm just disappointed because I had unfairly high hopes, and I liked the concept, and I have a lot of friends who really enjoyed it. For me it was just a bit baffling and cartoony. In the same way that His Dark Materials is like a children's story for grown-ups, American Gods felt like an adult story for children. This is my third Neil Gaiman book (after Sandman and Smoke and Mirrors) and they have all been underwhelming; I think I'll just leave him alone now, since I'm sure they deserve higher ratings than I'm prepared to give them, but that's what you get when I try and squeeze in a review at 01:23 am in a foreign city when I still have another two hours' work to do before I can go to bed.
¹This "Tenth Anniversary Edition" includes in its appendices a brief section in which Jesus does, in fact make a brief appearance. This was cut from the original published version, and you can see why; it is very short and it raises more questions than it answers. The problem is, these are the questions the book should have been about.
Anyway, I really didn't get this book. It made no sense to me at all. I mean it's a fun conceit, that gods are living among men in modern day America, desperate to regain the faith they once commanded, but I just felt like it wasn't thought through properly. It presents itself as being predicated on the idea that ‘America is a bad land for gods� � this is something that characters keep saying to one another, moodily, that America is a really bad land for gods � and this is apparently why all the gods are now living hand-to-mouth existences as drifters or menial labourers.
Only � huh? Are we talking about the same America here? The one where 51 percent of the population think that humans were created by a divine being, and a further 40 percent think they were created by evolution which was set in motion by a divine being (leaving, as Tim Minchin said, a very small percentage of Americans who are right)? Is that the America that is supposed to be a bad land for gods? Do me a favour, it must be one of the most religious countries in the western world. I've driven through my share of rural Tennessee, where much of American Gods takes place, and one of the most striking things about these communities is the fact that there seems to be one church for every six or seven houses. God is invoked on the currency, on the news, by the head of state, and in schoolrooms every morning by little kids.
This is what is so frustrating about the book, because it seems like a brilliant chance to examine religion in the US in a cool and interesting way � but it doesn't. It either doesn't dare or it doesn't bother. I mean � if you're going to run with this idea that gods are walking around, with the more powerful deities being those who have the most believers, then where the fuck is Yahweh? I'm supposed to believe that Anubis is twatting around driving a hearse in fucking Cairo, IL. � despite the fact that no one in the history of America has ever worshipped Anubis � and yet Jesus doesn't make a single appearance? Somehow it's OK to play around with foreign gods that seem quaint or folkloric, but monotheism's off the table. It just didn't make any sense to me.¹
Instead, what we have to propel the narrative along is just a kind of comic-book war that we're supposed to care about. So although there were quite a few scenes that had me flipping the pages with engagement, there was always this nagging feeling that none of it really meant anything and that I didn't really care very much what happened to anyone. It doesn't help that the protagonist (with the dreadful name of ‘Shadow Moon�) is, for a central character, annoyingly passive and lacking in personality (although the goddesses he encounters still have a remarkable habit of wanting to have sex with him).
As for the writing style, well, it's fine, but it has absolutely no flair. There's quite an interesting bit in the Acknowledgements where Gaiman thanks many of his beta-readers and editors for spotting ‘stray and unintentional anglicisms�, presumably so he could remove them; this I think is something that contributes to the featureless blandness of his style. I'm not saying he is unentitled to this voice or anything like that � his wife is American, he lives in America, this is totally an authentic voice for him. It's just not one that has any character. It works in a kind of tab-A-into-slot-B way.
This is certainly not a bad book and it's quite readable � I think I'm just disappointed because I had unfairly high hopes, and I liked the concept, and I have a lot of friends who really enjoyed it. For me it was just a bit baffling and cartoony. In the same way that His Dark Materials is like a children's story for grown-ups, American Gods felt like an adult story for children. This is my third Neil Gaiman book (after Sandman and Smoke and Mirrors) and they have all been underwhelming; I think I'll just leave him alone now, since I'm sure they deserve higher ratings than I'm prepared to give them, but that's what you get when I try and squeeze in a review at 01:23 am in a foreign city when I still have another two hours' work to do before I can go to bed.
¹This "Tenth Anniversary Edition" includes in its appendices a brief section in which Jesus does, in fact make a brief appearance. This was cut from the original published version, and you can see why; it is very short and it raises more questions than it answers. The problem is, these are the questions the book should have been about.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
American Gods.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
September 2, 2015
–
Started Reading
September 2, 2015
– Shelved
September 4, 2015
– Shelved as:
fiction
September 4, 2015
– Shelved as:
fantasy
September 8, 2015
– Shelved as:
united-states
September 8, 2015
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 67 (67 new)
message 1:
by
Preyoshi
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Sep 07, 2015 10:46PM

reply
|
flag


I don't know the answer but when you find out, let us know.
I tried to read about 17 words from "The Ocean at the End of the Lane" and just barely managed. I don't get this author or his appeal, at all. I literally cannot imagine reading a whole page from one of his books.
Although I think I did read a picture book he wrote for the kids, I don't think I understood that one either.

He's not actually bad, and I've enjoyed some of his stuff, but it always feels almost epiphenomenal, like it's mainly there to bolster "Neil Gaiman" the Persona.

I have thought about this for 40 seconds and what I've come up with is:
1. Americans are basically narcissistic and like to see images of themselves everywhere.
2. Yet they are full of insecurities and like to be reminded that they are American, and different from the rest of the world, whether that difference is good or bad, it doesn't even matter. (See: American exceptionalism.)
3. Everything is about branding - and American is the brand. Slap the brand on the product.


I do..."
I actually quite liked Ocean at The End of The Lane, that was the first Gaiman i read. But i think i could have been biased by the fact that stories about childhood always appeal to me :)



I've read a few things by him, particularly short stories, that were really cool, so I have faith but yea. I heard Tom Hanks was going to produce a mini-series of this, I wonder if that is still a thing

The fact that it's not is what makes this 'genre fiction' said in that derisive tone that people use when saying the words 'genre fiction'. (I think it was you who posed the question about what people mean when they say this in another thread, but perhaps I misremember.) I think you were expecting literature.
I think for me this is one of the big problems with fantasy and scifi--there is the opportunity to use the fictional world to get into real stuff in a sort of off-site sandbox kind of way, which is great if it happens. But often it just ends up being a weird escapist entertainment thing that tries to be bigger and more serious than it is. I think I'd even be fine with the escapist thing if it didn't pretend to mix in a whole heavy seriousness.
Plus this particular book uses bodily suffering as part of its entertainment, so I'm not wild about that. Though perhaps that means it is a little bit about jesus and america after all.




You make good points, though. Maybe it's just one of those books that has to hit you at the right moment. If you've passed it, it's gone. (Frankly, I'm wondering if Gaiman's whole bibliography has to hit you at the right moment. Sounds painful.)


I do think that a book that really got into religion and religious culture in america in a meaningful way would be something more than escapist, would definitely fall into the serious lit box. I think there's no jesus in this book because it's just not that project.

Only � huh? Are we talking about the same America here? The one where 51 percent of the population think that humans were created by a divine being, and a further 40 percent think they were created by evolution which was set in motion by a divine being (leaving, as Tim Minchin said, a very small percentage of Americans who are right)? Is that the America that is supposed to be a bad land for gods? Do me a favour, it must be one of the most religious countries in the western world. I've driven through my share of rural Tennessee, where much of American Gods takes place, and one of the most striking things about these communities is the fact that there seems to be one church for every six or seven houses. God is invoked on the currency, on the news, by the head of state, and in schoolrooms every morning by little kids.
One thing to consider about religion in the US is that it is more of a commodity than an actual practice. The churches you see everywhere might as well be social clubs or sports teams, where one team is constantly talking trash about the other. If you look closely at all those kristians, I'll think you'll see that they break all of the commandments on a regular basis without giving a thought to how those offenses make them anything BUT religious. So with that perspective, I think America is indeed a lonely place for gods, including jesus...

Ha, thanks. Came out of a long day on the Tube, perhaps (I'm in London).

Thanks Jim. Yeah, that's certainly something the book could have tried to explore a bit.

Both books are perfectly enjoyable and breezy reads.

I also think my reading of this suffered coming completely coincidentally after The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul. Now that's how you write about those gods.

As to American obsession with prefixing everything with the name of their country, I have discovered that two types of people do that. Those unsure of their identity and place in the world (think how everything in Scotland starts with Scottish this or that); and those who are too sure of their place in the world that they flaunt it like a human right.

So well put, Jibran. I was about to say something along these lines as well. Only in America could kids be given surnames of ex Presidents as first names - Lincoln, Reagan, Kennedy etc etc. This level of self obsession is rarely seen in any other culture/nation.
Wonderful critical review, Warwick.




Not sure I buy this...I'm also not sure this is really self-obsession as much as honoring some kind of unattainable, aspirational other, a tad similar to how Kenyan parents were naming their kids Obama, Malia, and AirForceOne after his visit there.
Also I know several American kids named after Winston Churchill...

Rob, glad to hear someone saying this. Thanks.



Here's the way I see it. America is a land of transcience. Nothing about it seems to be set in stone, or real even. And that's a scary thought. So Americans like to scream they're American at the top of their lungs, cause god forbid they have to deal with their lack of identity. And I sorta feel that's also the point of the book?? The constant need to keep moving. If not physically then mentally or more specifically religiously. Gaiman added a chapter of the first people coming to America and they were on the run. Much as most Europeans were who came to America, and staked their claim by commiting mass murder. And yes America is hella religious, but for who. God yes, maybe, but whose god. Which god. The methodist one? The baptist one? The mormon one? But instead of focusing on that mess of Jesus/God worshipping Gaiman did what mythology tends to do... he wrote a story. About what happens to your identity (gods) when the thing you consider your roots are no longer in your life and what a headfuck it is to deal with. That's how I read the book at least. Also I have been obsessed with mythology and the good ol' U S of A for a long time so this book was kind of a perfect read for me :D.


Well, maybe. Personally I wished he had focused on the Jesus/God thing, or at least included it in SOME way. But I like your analysis.



Shadow is the Jesus character � the modern American incarnation of him. He’s a few centuries younger than the Old Gods. He's the son of a virgin impregnated by a god (since Wednesday only beds virgins). He was hung up, stabbed with a spear, died, had his “Easter resurrection� and returned as sort of a saviour. Heck, he even had his "I am thirsty!" moment while he was up there.
He's also in his early 30s when he's ripped away from the life he knows, in order to serve some higher divine purpose.
Now, on to America and Christianity. As you rightly stated, Christianity has a firm hold on a large chunk of America. But, the people’s devotion is to Christ, not to God, and many aren't able to differentiate one from the other. So, from a certain point of view, it’s the cult of man that has flourished in America, not the cult of God. Similarly, Shadow is the only being the Land is receptive to. The only being it appears to and tries to aid. It propagates the man while ignoring the gods, because, after all, America is not a good land for gods.
Anyway, that’s just my theory. If American Gods 2 features people hating on homosexuals and abortions in the name of Shadow, I’ll know I’m on to something.

