ŷ

Michael's Reviews > Seveneves

Seveneves by Neal Stephenson
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4086118
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: fiction, science-fiction, apocalyptic, post-apocalyptic, space-travel, survival

This epic tale of survival of the human species in space after the earth gets wrecked by a “Hard Rain� of meteorites was a real treat for me. It represents a landmark in revival of old themes of science fiction from the Golden Age of the 40s and 50s, which had hallmarks of inspiring a sense of wonder and of extolling human technological capacities and can-do spirit sufficient to break out of our fragile planetary prison. For those who have been disappointed in previous attempts to read recent Stephenson works, I see improvement in his character development and tendencies toward digression and diversion. A handful of characters here get fleshed out enough as lively personalities for satisfactory levels of emotional engagement, and the expository writing he incorporates to explain science and engineering feats are less like information dumps and more subjugated to the critical problem solving of the character’s heroic missions.

From the first line (“The moon blew up without warning and for no apparent reason�), the reader is placed in a marathon to prepare solutions for survival. The main characters are two women on the International Space Station, Dinah, an engineer from a company pursuing use of robots to mine asteroids, and Ivy, a physicist and NASA astronaut commanding “Izzy�. Their oddball friendship is forged as an island of sanity in the macho atmosphere of males in the complement of astronaut scientists on the station. When the modeling projections from earth experts tell them that within a couple of years that the big pieces of the moon will bash themselves up and throw off enough pieces to destroy the earth, we experience their tough emotional transitions in relating to loved ones destined to die along with everyone else. But they rise to the occasion. Ivy has to manage a massive remodeling of Izzy to accommodate as many people as earth can send, and Dinah gets tasked to use her cool array of robots to help with the engineering and to hollow out the asteroid recently brought in to the station by her company.

Another key character, Doob Harris, is a black astronomer turned into a public education whiz in the likeness of Neal deGrasse Tyson. Along with reports from Dinah’s miner father in Alaska and Ivy’s submarine commander husband, Doob contributes a lot to the eyewitness accounts of the progression of events on Earth. He is privy to a lot of meetings of the power elite and becomes tapped for inspiring cooperation and dedication to the colony enterprise, which calls for much sacrifice for survival of the few. He travels around as an official for media events associated with collecting pairs of boys and girls from each nation in proportion to their population. Though tens of thousands are selected, the sad secret is that fewer than two thousand can be sent. He is resigned to die with his family, but it turns out that his expertise in media relations and science-based propaganda are needs for Izzy’s mission.

The details of Izzy’s growth was fascinating. An image in the book shows the station bound to the asteroid at one end and a toroid which can be spun for artificial gravity, necessary for agriculture and for significant visitation by humans to avoid bone loss from weightlessness. Living space for the majority is created from modular inflatable cylinders or space capsules that can attack to station struts or fly freely in computed regulated swarms to dodge moon debris. They can be tethered in pairs and spun to make a centrifugal equivalent of gravity.



I love Stephenson’s interplay among factions on Izzy. The core of scientists and administrators making all the decisions, the cadre of mostly Russian astronauts sent up for the dangerous construction work, and the large set of youth who largely get ignored. The social and political evolution of this mix leads a number of dangerous crises. Appointment of a more powerful commander in place of Ivy becomes necessary, along with security forces to maintain order. The former U.S. president, who shows up uninvited, makes for an interesting and destabilizing villain in the factional disputes. How long can the effective dictatorship under martial law proceed? When does a constitution, bill of rights, and legal system become necessary? What is to stop a revolutionary faction from going off on their own?

Before the final apocalypse on Earth, Dinah’s boss mysteriously orders her to develop programming of her fleet of robots to work on sculpting ice. He arrives at Izzy unexpectedly and announces his bold plan to go get a big chunk of a comet to help assure the long term viability of the human space colony. He soon makes off with some of Ivy’s expert people, a small spaceship, a nuclear reactor, lots of supplies, and a lot of Dinah’s robots for this multiyear initiative. We get a big dose of science for this mission, but it’s worth it to make their brave and thrilling adventure come alive with high levels of plausibility and appreciation of its risks.

Ever since the real doom threatened by the Cold War our despair of science as a savior has only grown in response to the environmental devastations and mass extinctions arising from our human impacts in the world. Since my youth I have loved the big themes of apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic literature and now thrive on its recent renaissance. In response to pervasive pessimism most books in this area have been on a down-bound train for a long time, often melding closely with dystopian fiction. This tale is hopeful over the ability of the species to work collaboratively to harness current technologies for achieving sustainable orbital human colonies. But it is also incorporates a realistic appreciation of the curse in man’s divisive nature and proclivities for violent conflict. Before the book gets very far, you will not only be wrenched by natural death of countless residents of earth by fiery cataclysm, you will experience a lot of losses among the space colonists due to human stupidities and competition for power. As the book blurb testifies, the nip and tuck of survival has a coda many years later:

But the complexities and unpredictablity of human nature coupled with unforeseen dangers threaten the intrepid pioneers, until only a handful of survivors remains�
Five thousand years later, their progeny—seven distinct races now three billion strong—embark on yet another audacious journey into the unknown � to an alien world utterly transformed by cataclysm and time: Earth.


I will leave all details of the later part of the book unspoiled. Stephenson acknowledges his borrowing of ideas for this section:
While the first two parts of the story are a tale of straight-up global disaster and hastily improvised technology, I always viewed the third part of it as an opportunity to showcase many of the more positive ideas that have emerged over the last century, from the global community of people interested in space exploration. Many of the big hardware ideas of the latter part of the book have been kicking around in the literature for decades and will be recognized as old friend by longtime readers of hard science fiction.

Despite my appreciation of the plausibility of much of the engineering and physics in this book, I am somewhat disappointed that the biology did not get as much care. For one thing, living on reprocessed algae for generations is a bit of hand waving at the complexities involved for chemical manufacturing in a space environment. The problem of not having enough biodiversity in the human population in their final situation is handled okay with a fair projection of editing out deleterious mutations and splicing in of artificial variant of genes. However, the prospects of creating organisms and ecologies starting just from stored DNA sequences seems forever impossible to me. You will always need living cells of related species to insert any synthesized sequences into (for more information see this article from the ). E.O. Wilson in his book, The Diversity of Life, argues that an ecosystem with its interdependencies of thousands of species evolving over millions of years is unlikely to ever be something that technology interventions will ever be able to reconstitute. The idea in the end sections of generating races with different genetic proclivities in personality types also seemed not to be founded on current behavioral genetics as I understand it or likely to be founded on voluntary genetic segregation among human survivors.

Overall this book was an outstanding achievement that I will long treasure for its heights of imagination, fun, and adventure.



70 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Seveneves.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

October 6, 2015 – Started Reading
October 6, 2015 – Shelved
October 15, 2015 – Finished Reading
October 22, 2015 – Shelved as: fiction
October 22, 2015 – Shelved as: science-fiction
October 22, 2015 – Shelved as: apocalyptic
October 22, 2015 – Shelved as: post-apocalyptic
October 22, 2015 – Shelved as: space-travel
October 22, 2015 – Shelved as: survival

Comments Showing 1-16 of 16 (16 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Robert French Excellent review. Having read Seveneves at the end of August, I too very much enjoyed the book. This is the kind of science fiction I like. I also agree with your comments about the biology. Having never previously read a book by Neal Stephenson, I look forward to reading other books, particularly The Baroque Cycle.


Michael Robert wrote: "Excellent review. Having read Seveneves at the end of August, I too very much enjoyed the book. This is the kind of science fiction I like. ..."

The reader world could benefit from a few lines of a review to say why this was the kind of tale you like. I envy your position of getting of first reads of Stephenson's works. So many hours of pleasure. Quite a few 4 and 5 ones for me.


message 3: by Seemita (new)

Seemita Fascinating review, Michael! I was a lot into sci-fi during my teens but haven't drawn their company for the last couple of years. That needs to be remedied. Thanks for this well-structured penning.


Michael Seemita wrote: "Fascinating review, Michael! I was a lot into sci-fi during my teens but haven't drawn their company for the last couple of years. That needs to be remedied. Thanks for this well-structured penning."

So you grew out of the genre and are ready to grow back in? So much of the writing talent now is in fantasy and not hard sci fi. Mieville, Murikami, David Mitchell. This kind of book is so old fashioned. Even cyberpunk is archaic and hip heroes are vampires or zombie fighters.


message 5: by MD (new) - added it

MD Great review. I had some problems with the biology too, so appreciated reading your reasons. Another minor quibble I had is that as of the end of part 2 there had been no babies. Given a starting number of 1500+ mostly-young people, over 3 years time that just didn't seem likely. It may have been ill-advised and the children may not have survived, but surely it would have happened in the culture(s) Stephenson painted in the swarm.


Michael MD wrote: "Great review. I had some problems with the biology too, so appreciated reading your reasons. Another minor quibble I had is that as of the end of part 2 there had been no babies. Given a starting n..."

Thanks for the appreciation and for the critical elements. Hope ot wins the Hugo next week. It's weird that this small town I am in has so few sci fi readers. I donated my copy to its library and mpt once checked out in five months. Fantasy really rules these days.


message 7: by MD (new) - added it

MD The Hugo awards are tonight (8/20/16)! Streamed live on UStream. We plan to have our own little Hugo-watching party. More information at


message 8: by Jim (last edited Jul 20, 2017 11:55AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Jim It represents a landmark in revival of old themes of science fiction from the Golden Age of the 40s and 50s, which had hallmarks of inspiring a sense of wonder and of extolling human technological capacities and can-do spirit sufficient to break out of our fragile planetary prison.

Agree with the "old themes" assessment - I liked that Stephenson "stayed current" by incorporating social-media with the post-apocalypse politics of The Swarm.

Despite my appreciation of the plausibility of much of the engineering and physics in this book, I am somewhat disappointed that the biology did not get as much care.

I have often noted with irony that the "hard sciences" (with which Stephenson expertly dealt) are actually "easy" - at least compared to the life-sciences. At least it seems so to me who is much better versed in physics, chemistry, electrical-engineering, and the like. I suspect Stephenson's rolodex has more "hard" scientists and engineers than geneticists/biologists.

So much of the writing talent now is in fantasy and not hard sci fi. Mieville, Murikami, David Mitchell. This kind of book is so old fashioned. Even cyberpunk is archaic and hip heroes are vampires or zombie fighters.

I rarely dip into fantasy, and stay the hell away from "vampires and zombie fighters", but wasn't it always so that fantasy had a much larger audience? Certainly, fantasy writers have never had the obligations required of Hard SF Writers. And there is little doubt that there are many fewer readers that are informed about science.


Michael Jim wrote: "...Agree with the "old themes" assessment ...
I have often noted with irony that the "hard sciences" (with which Stephenson expertly dealt) are actually "easy"...
wasn't it always so that fantasy had a much larger audience? Certainly, fantasy writers have never had the obligations required of Hard SF Writers. ..."


Well said on wise points all around. Would love to hear your responses to this tale.


message 10: by Jim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Jim I'll distill some earlier comments on this tour-de-force:

Hard SF fans will appreciate that Stephenson describes a multi-year orbital dance in the first "book". It was quite credible - it showed that he thought hard about how the various craft would fly in service to the plot. He either did the calculations himself (with the right software) or got some expert help with it.

This respect for orbital ballistics complements his hard-nosed, clear-eyed view of politics (insight into human nature) - also quite credible - although the post-hard-rain disaster was not expected. "Big Politics" in Developed Nations (the ones with respectable politcal values) was cynically, but accurately, represented - in that they treated the masses like grownups (NOT!) - the better to suppress the doomed malcontents likely to bust thing up and interfere with the effort to seed humanity into space.

(one imagines the unrespectable nations would become more brutal to maintain order)

That "underground societies" formed was an interesting idea, as well)

The micro-politics on the space station was interesting, too - though not as much as the various swarms of robots that (among other activities) mined the rock to which the space station was affixed.

I found Stephenson's sociology experiment ca. 7000 A.D. to be un-interesting along with the plot, so the last 30% remains unread. I wonder, did Stephenson address those underground societies 5,000 years hence?


Michael Jim wrote: " I'll distill some earlier comments on this tour-de-force: Hard SF fans will appreciate that Stephenson describes a multi-year orbital dance in the first "book". It was quite credible..."

Glad you enjoyed it and were satisfied with the tech and much of the political projections. I like "could do" as much as "would do" when the story is good.

Jim wrote: "...I found Stephenson's sociology experiment ca. 7000 A.D. to be un-interesting along with the plot, so the last 30% remains unread. I wonder, did Stephenson address those underground societies 5,000 years hence? ..."

I don't blame you for dropping out. It's a different story to focus on realistic responses with our current tech and social order and then do a leap of projection into the far future. I appreciate the attempt, but for a novel it was hard to get interested in new characters when all I needed was some closure on extent of success by the space resident. (view spoiler)


message 12: by Supratim (new)

Supratim Great review, Michael!


Michael Supratim wrote: "Great review, Michael!"

Much obliged. Bit of an uphill push to energize folks to try it. I donated my copy to my rural library and not a single checkout in over six months. People are more into fantasy these days.


Russell Smith Excellent review. I especially agree with the following sentence:

"We get a big dose of science for this mission, but it’s worth it to make their brave and thrilling adventure come alive with high levels of plausibility and appreciation of its risks. "

Many reviewers here seem to have found these parts to be tedious, even skipping over them. However, the exquisite detail of the risks of the mission(s) are what gives this novel its enormous stakes. I'm having trouble thinking of a novel I've read recently where the stakes where higher.

I even enjoyed the final third a great deal, even though I concede that Stephenson is on shakier ground with regard to biology than physics and space travel. I found the references back to the events of thousands of years ago to be deeply moving. I hope that this book continues to be read for many years to come.


message 15: by Jim (last edited Mar 27, 2021 11:06PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Jim Many reviewers here seem to have found these parts

(/b)("a big dose of science")

to be tedious,

even skipping over them.

However, the exquisite detail of the risks of the mission(s) are what gives this novel its enormous stakes. I'm having trouble thinking of a novel I've read recently where the stakes where higher.


THERE ARE NO HIGHER STAKES.

Pretty much the nature of apocalyspe stories.

It is VERY GOOD to understand a reviewer's "tideous, disinterested" POV - which allows concerned reader to mine a review with that POV's lens.

Because, even without the slightest interest in the tech-atmospherics, the novel STILL WORKS as a political, sociological dance.

This makes me wonder if this is Stephenson's Magum Opus (whether HE regards is as such).

For my money, this is the core of his novel - the essential part. He should be honored for his effort to

ALSO respect and practice actual Hard Core Hard Science Fiction.

(a Science Kid, like me, with an early interest in math, and a barely well-enough polished math study (to make a living) asserts:)

(NO BELLS RUNG - the B#!!$#!T detectors remained dormant for Book 1)

I'm "of an age" with the author - a little older - but it's clear we both read 40s-60s hard SF.

My first encounter with grownup sociological huge society many-factions, competing with feudal, royal, "interests". fiction was (of course) DUNE.

Stephenson takes something similar and transplants it to Earths tiny society.

I suspect this tale will wear very well.


Russell Smith Jim wrote: "This makes me wonder if this is Stephenson's Magum Opus (whether HE regards is as such). "

For me it is. However, I have only read Cryptonomicon, SevenEves, and (most recently) Anathem. SevenEves is by far my favorite among these. I'm not sure which Stephenson book I will read next...


back to top