Deborah Pickstone's Reviews > The Physician
The Physician (The Cole Trilogy, 1)
by
by

Deborah Pickstone's review
bookshelves: belief-and-anti-belief, historical-howlers, history-of-all-things, middle-east, re-reads, medieval
Oct 10, 2015
bookshelves: belief-and-anti-belief, historical-howlers, history-of-all-things, middle-east, re-reads, medieval
Read 3 times. Last read October 11, 2015.
I generously give 3.5 stars despite the often farcical historical howlers this tale is flooded by because the storytelling is very good. DO NOT READ THIS BOOK and expect to be informed about the era allegedly covered.
I had read it many years ago, around age 10 I think and it was this book that generated my lifelong interest in the history of medecine. To be fair to the author I believe the parts covering Judaism and Arabic medicine of the period are broadly accurate but probably no more than that, despite NG's apparent research. Ibn Sina did exist but died in 1037.
I do note the date of publication and historical fiction at that time was apt to have less expected of it, to my mind.
So, a few of the errors I encountered:
Rob J Cole - the main character has a name that would never have been used in England at that time. Even Robert was rare, middle names did not exist for the masses and even today I have never met anyone using their name as a shortened first name plus middle initial in Britian - that is an Americanism. Finally, humble people also did not have surnames but were known by what they (or their father) did. Rob J's father was a carpenter so where did Cole come from? This absolutely basic set of errors sets the tone for the whole book!
Witch pricking and the whole set of beliefs about witches sounds straight out of the Salem witch trials! There is little record of witchcraft in historical record and most of them were wise women, not barber-surgeons, which was an actual profession, albeit ineffective. I think the fear that he and Barber would be thought witches was overstated and the incident from Barber's past was unlikely. The whole issue belonged more in the 16th century or later. An accusation of heresy was a more likely threat if their practice stepped outside the accepted domain.
The language Rob J studies so diligently is no Parsi but Farsi. A Parsi is actually from India and is a Zoroastrian.
Travelling barber-surgeons did exist in England, being first recorded at exactly the time of the novel. However Barber carried out the job more like a travelling quack in the US in a much later era.
The basic premise of the story was impossible - there is no way Rob J could have impersonated a Jew at that time and for that long and without really knowing how to be a Jew! Rob J thought like a modern man not a man of the 11th century. To have even conceived of doing what he did was beyond unlikely. NG also imputed an impossible freedom to women and Mary's father would never have considered a marriage between them as she was socially above Rob J.
Finally (but far from exhaustively!) he would not have been able to practice back in England/Scotland BECAUSE HE WAS A CHRISTIAN and the reason medicine back then was so basic in Christian countries was that vivisection was considered heresy (which was true for many more centuries). The merest hint that he had looked inside a body would have probably ended in him being killed as a heretic.
Here endeth my narrative!
I had read it many years ago, around age 10 I think and it was this book that generated my lifelong interest in the history of medecine. To be fair to the author I believe the parts covering Judaism and Arabic medicine of the period are broadly accurate but probably no more than that, despite NG's apparent research. Ibn Sina did exist but died in 1037.
I do note the date of publication and historical fiction at that time was apt to have less expected of it, to my mind.
So, a few of the errors I encountered:
Rob J Cole - the main character has a name that would never have been used in England at that time. Even Robert was rare, middle names did not exist for the masses and even today I have never met anyone using their name as a shortened first name plus middle initial in Britian - that is an Americanism. Finally, humble people also did not have surnames but were known by what they (or their father) did. Rob J's father was a carpenter so where did Cole come from? This absolutely basic set of errors sets the tone for the whole book!
Witch pricking and the whole set of beliefs about witches sounds straight out of the Salem witch trials! There is little record of witchcraft in historical record and most of them were wise women, not barber-surgeons, which was an actual profession, albeit ineffective. I think the fear that he and Barber would be thought witches was overstated and the incident from Barber's past was unlikely. The whole issue belonged more in the 16th century or later. An accusation of heresy was a more likely threat if their practice stepped outside the accepted domain.
The language Rob J studies so diligently is no Parsi but Farsi. A Parsi is actually from India and is a Zoroastrian.
Travelling barber-surgeons did exist in England, being first recorded at exactly the time of the novel. However Barber carried out the job more like a travelling quack in the US in a much later era.
The basic premise of the story was impossible - there is no way Rob J could have impersonated a Jew at that time and for that long and without really knowing how to be a Jew! Rob J thought like a modern man not a man of the 11th century. To have even conceived of doing what he did was beyond unlikely. NG also imputed an impossible freedom to women and Mary's father would never have considered a marriage between them as she was socially above Rob J.
Finally (but far from exhaustively!) he would not have been able to practice back in England/Scotland BECAUSE HE WAS A CHRISTIAN and the reason medicine back then was so basic in Christian countries was that vivisection was considered heresy (which was true for many more centuries). The merest hint that he had looked inside a body would have probably ended in him being killed as a heretic.
Here endeth my narrative!
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Physician.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
(Mass Market Paperback Edition)
Started Reading
(Paperback Edition)
April 24, 2015
– Shelved
(Paperback Edition)
April 24, 2015
–
Finished Reading
(Paperback Edition)
October 10, 2015
– Shelved
October 10, 2015
– Shelved as:
belief-and-anti-belief
October 10, 2015
– Shelved as:
historical-howlers
October 10, 2015
– Shelved as:
history-of-all-things
October 10, 2015
– Shelved as:
middle-east
October 10, 2015
– Shelved as:
re-reads
October 10, 2015
– Shelved as:
medieval
Started Reading
October 11, 2015
–
Finished Reading
January 8, 2016
– Shelved
(Mass Market Paperback Edition)
Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)
date
newest »



However I would like to point out two minor issues with your review:
a) Impersonations, and people pretending to be what/who they are, was quite common in medieval ages. Just look at the real life examples of Marco Polo and Ibn Battuta.
b) Your contention about calling 'Farsi' as 'Parsi' is needs more rigorous research. 'Parsi' is actually the more appropriate and accurate term. The Persian language original did not have the 'f' sound, that came from Arabic, after Persian lands embraced Islam. The original Persian language has the 'P' sound and the actual original language was indeed called 'Parsi'. The 'Parsis' as a religious group choose to call themselves precisely that because they claim to practice the original Persian religion of Zoroastrianism, and choose to use the original un-Arbacized term. Otherwise, apt review.

Also to my knowledge Muslims don't immediately fall to their knees at the first second of the call of prayer...

Thank you for your review Deborah it helped me decide :)