Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

William2's Reviews > The Fire Next Time

The Fire Next Time by James Baldwin
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4684009
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: essays, race, 20-ce

At 106 pages, The Fire Next Time is a brief snapshot of U.S. race relations in 1963. Like a balance sheet it concisely details the nation's racial strengths and (considerable) shortcomings. It was published one year before LBJ's Great Society program passed Congress, which, for the first time in the nation's history, sought to address longstanding racial injustices. Baldwin describes the unrelenting degradation faced by black Americans, both white indifference and murderous hostility toward them, in a spare, unadorned prose whose effect is harrowing. At the time of its publication it must have scared bigoted white people shitless. Yet it was also a prescription for change, and much of the change it calls for has come to pass. That is not to say that today we are without racial problems. Black Lives Matter-- that's irrefutable--but if you want to know how truly god awful it was in the bad old lynching days, this is the book, one of the few, that you must read.

PS Lynching still occurs, though now it’s in the form of the police gunning down young, unarmed black men: see Trayvon Martin, George Floyd et al.
166 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read The Fire Next Time.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

October 15, 2015 – Shelved
October 15, 2015 – Shelved as: to-read
October 15, 2015 – Shelved as: 20-ce
October 15, 2015 – Shelved as: race
October 15, 2015 – Shelved as: essays
November 18, 2015 – Started Reading
November 18, 2015 –
page 15
14.15%
November 25, 2015 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-20 of 20 (20 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Darwin8u "a spare, unadorned prose whose effect is harrowing." -- AMEN.


William2 Im with you brother.


Andrew William this is almost as timely now as it was then. To call it a "snapshot" and note "how truly god awful it was in the bad old days" is sort of over-looking that it's still pretty damn god awful for blacks in the U.S. Everything Baldwin wrote outside of the specific Russia/NOI/WWII passages still applies today.


William2 It was worse. Read it.


message 5: by Nigelle (new) - added it

Nigelle Worse back then, William1, but still bad today.


William2 No question. Never for a moment did I deny that. But it was worse then. Period. I'm 61 so I know first hand. How old are you?


Andrew William1 wrote: "No question. Never for a moment did I deny that. But it was worse then. Period. I'm 61 so I know first hand. How old are you?"
Interesting timing on your comment William. We're getting ready to test out your comparison full-on.


William2 Bring it


William2 PS My words refer to the past not the future. I am not an Oracle. But good luck with your protestations. I will be among you.


Andrew I didn't mean that last as a critique beyond my original disagreement of you calling this a "brief snapshot" when I find it more widely applicable. I do agree that it was significantly worse in the 60s. And I'm glad we will be joining together for the next little while.


William2 Getting more like the 1960s everyday. Feels good! But if Nixon was a crook and a statesman, the President-elect is just a crook. Don't think he'll make it through his entire term. Reps and Dems ate both raring to impeach him. Now that's what I call bipartisanship. But this will require a lot of civil disobedience. Be well...


Andrew I hope you're right re: impeachment but I'm skeptical. I have yet to see any evidence that GOP congressman have anything resembling a spine (let alone shame or integrity) when it comes to Trump.

I think you're overlooking the fact that most of the congresscritters who disavowed Trump during the campaign fared poorly in the election. They can't afford to alienate the Trump voters who have commandeered the party. This is very bad news for us, though I'm admittedly more pessimistic (paranoid?) than most.

Glad to count you one of my new friends though :-)


William2 See stories today, there's one in the New York Times, of a congressional inquiry into Russia's involvement in the 2016 election. It might be smoking mirrors. I await developments. Merry Christmas or Happy Holidays, take your pick. :-)


Christy Hammer So good, William1! Great pics, too. Thanks.


William2 Most welcome


message 16: by Lilo (new)

Lilo And we advanced a little bit further last night with the election of Doug Jones. Hallelujah!


message 17: by AC (new)

AC So interesting to read these comments by some longtime GR friends years later. How naive even the most pessimistic among us proved to be�


William2 Yes, AC. Who knew?


Sylvia Swann His brilliance left me breathless. I can’t imagine how alone he must have felt, alone in his intellect, alone in his sensitivity.

I finished it less than an hour ago and I’m still hearing him in my head.


William2 Belated thanks for the encomium, Sylvia. Agree!


back to top