Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Martine's Reviews > Perfume: The Story of a Murderer

Perfume by Patrick Süskind
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
381149
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: continental-european, modern-fiction, historical-fiction, crime, film, magic-realism

A cross between The Silence of the Lambs and a period drama. That's how I would describe Perfume, the great German classic of the 1980s. Basically, it's an eighteenth-century murder story, except that it doesn't focus on the victims and the hunt for the killer, but rather emphasises the life and times of the murderer, who is an unusual protagonist to say the least.

Perfume tells the story of Jean-Baptiste Grenouille, an eighteenth-century Parisian with a unique gift: a prodigiously well-developed olfactory sense which allows him to recognise pretty much any scent or smell. After a childhood full of hardship, he is apprenticed to a perfumier who teaches him all he knows about distilling smells. Unbeknownst to the perfumier, however, Grenouille isn't in it for the fashionable perfumes. Rather than extracting scents from flowers and petals, he wishes to extract smells from living objects -- more specifically, from the beautiful virgins he comes across every now and then, who smell like heaven to him. And so he plies his trade, hoping to learn that elusive trick which will enable him to trap the scents of the lovely young ladies he covets from afar, so that he can create the perfume he really wants -- essence of maiden.

Perfume is a riveting look into the mind of an obsessed man -- a murderer whose immorality and eccentricity put him on a par with Thomas Harris' unforgettable serial killers. As unlikeable and depraved as Grenouille is, you almost sympathise with him. He may be a monomaniac, but his perseverance and creativity and the originality of his quest are such you almost wish him to succeed, or at least to see how far he will get before he gets caught. Suskind does such a great job describing his obsession that you simply keep turning the pages, waiting to see what fate has in store for this horrible yet ever so original murderer.

The writing on display is beautiful. A tremendous lot of research went into Perfume, and it shows. The descriptions of the various perfume-making techniques are rich, detailed and thoroughly impressive. Suskind frequently devotes whole pages to explanations of parfumiers' secrets; it is testimony to the quality of his writing that they never get tedious. He also does a marvellous job evoking the odours of Grenouille's world and the way in which they affect him. With its many powerful descriptions of odours (both pleasant and unpleasant), the book is a veritable smellscape which makes you increasingly aware of the smells surrounding you. However, it is not without its problems. The middle chapters are a bit of a drag and the ending is so over the top that many readers will be put off by it. I was a bit put off by it myself, yet I can see why Suskind went for the grotesque touch. For all its scientific detail, Perfume is essentially a fairy tale, and anything but a strange ending would have been a betrayal. It's weird, but if you read the story as if it were fairy tale, the ending makes sense. It's a fairy tale with a fairy-tale ending, and then some.
67 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Perfume.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
January 1, 2006 – Finished Reading
February 2, 2008 – Shelved
February 2, 2008 – Shelved as: continental-european
February 2, 2008 – Shelved as: modern-fiction
February 2, 2008 – Shelved as: historical-fiction
February 2, 2008 – Shelved as: crime
February 2, 2008 – Shelved as: film
February 21, 2008 – Shelved as: magic-realism

Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Martine Actually, the film is pretty decent. Tom Tykwer did a great job evoking the atmosphere of eighteenth-century France with all its scents and malodours; in some scenes you can almost smell the things you see on screen. The acting is pretty solid, too. The ending is a bit over the top, but then it is in the book, so no real complaints there. I'd give the film a shot if I were you. Chances are you'll be pleasantly surprised.


Martine Heh. Thanks, Ginnie. I'm guessing it has something to do with the fact that you read and review many books before I get a chance to do so. :-)


Patrick I agree that the film is actually quite good, especially when taking into account just how difficult it is to translate a novel like this, which is so detailed and eloquent in its prose, something that rarely translates on the silver screen. It pretty much cuts out or glosses over all the drag that this review referred to, while remaining true to the story. Dustin Hoffman is awful though. Bad casting there.


Martine Exactly, Patrick. It should have been an unadaptable book, but it proved not to be. Tykwer focused on the good parts, left out the bad parts and came up with something quite remarkable -- something that got the story as well as the mood right. There's a reason why the man is one of my favourite directors. :-)

I agree on Dustin Hoffman. He should not have been in the film. Apart from that, though, it was an excellent shot at a very difficult adaptation.


David W. I loved both the book and the film. You were right when you compared this with Silence if the Lambs, the book and movie really complement each other.


back to top