Helle's Reviews > Nemesis
Nemesis
by
by

Helle, meet Philip. Philip, meet Helle. Except of course, Philip Roth has not met me � but I have certainly met him. His is one those names that have been hovering on my horizon for years, but after abandoning Portnoy’s Complaint years ago (vowing that I’d get back to it when I was a more mature reader), I kept putting it off, suspecting he wasn’t really my kind of thing. I’m still not sure that he is, but I’m glad to have met him.
The novel is a portrait of polio and its ravaging effects in 1940s America, more specifically in a Jewish neighbourhood in Newark during the summer of 1944. As we know, polio was a nasty disease that attacked mainly children, sometimes paralyzing them, sometimes killing them. For years, nobody had any idea of how it spread, and fear became a constant side-effect. This is the background for the story, as the children around a sweltering Newark playground are trying to pass the summer while Bucky Cantor, their athletic mentor and friend, tries to ward off the epidemic and keep up everybody’s spirit. He begins to wonder what kind of god would do something like this to children and gradually ponders life choices that may or may not have cataclysmic results (hence the title).
Meanwhile, Bucky’s girlfriend is at a safe summer camp up in the cooler mountains, insisting that he join her. Their love is palpable, their happiness an almost too-happy antidote to the horror of the polio epidemic, not to mention the war in Europe, which Bucky couldn’t join because of poor eyesight. His best friends are there, and though he feels guilty for not being able to sign up, he tries to make a difference at home. But how does he choose between the children who are caught in the maelstrom of polio and his girlfriend who offers him the glimpse of a life he had previously only dreamed of?
The novel began quietly and seemed, at first, to be a general description of polio. I was mildly interested. Then Bucky entered the story, and things perked up. But Bucky doesn’t offer much in the way of interiority, and though it’s well written with sentences like:
The four o’clock sun was no less punishing than the twelve o’clock sledgehammer.
The lake was fed by natural springs. The words sounded like the name of an earthly wonder: natural springs � yet another way of saying “no polio�.
there is something flat or wooden about the storytelling. I was almost the only one in my reading group who liked the novel; everyone else felt more or less unmoved by it despite the topic. It partly has to do with Bucky’s somewhat insipid character, I believe, and his overly responsible, guilt-ridden take on life but also the aforementioned lack of true interiority. Mainly, though, it has to do with the narration. The first person narrator who begins the novel doesn’t show itself again until the end when the novel falls flat on its face to me because the voice simply tells us what happened. This framing device had the effect of sucking out the life of the rest of the story to me and left me deducting a star (which had tentatively been there for a while).
A pretty good and interesting book about a topic that I’d never read about before. It must be one of the only novels that take place between 1939 and 1945 which is not about World War II. That alone makes it an interesting portrait of a time. So thanks for the story, Philip. Not sure when we’ll meet again.
The novel is a portrait of polio and its ravaging effects in 1940s America, more specifically in a Jewish neighbourhood in Newark during the summer of 1944. As we know, polio was a nasty disease that attacked mainly children, sometimes paralyzing them, sometimes killing them. For years, nobody had any idea of how it spread, and fear became a constant side-effect. This is the background for the story, as the children around a sweltering Newark playground are trying to pass the summer while Bucky Cantor, their athletic mentor and friend, tries to ward off the epidemic and keep up everybody’s spirit. He begins to wonder what kind of god would do something like this to children and gradually ponders life choices that may or may not have cataclysmic results (hence the title).
Meanwhile, Bucky’s girlfriend is at a safe summer camp up in the cooler mountains, insisting that he join her. Their love is palpable, their happiness an almost too-happy antidote to the horror of the polio epidemic, not to mention the war in Europe, which Bucky couldn’t join because of poor eyesight. His best friends are there, and though he feels guilty for not being able to sign up, he tries to make a difference at home. But how does he choose between the children who are caught in the maelstrom of polio and his girlfriend who offers him the glimpse of a life he had previously only dreamed of?
The novel began quietly and seemed, at first, to be a general description of polio. I was mildly interested. Then Bucky entered the story, and things perked up. But Bucky doesn’t offer much in the way of interiority, and though it’s well written with sentences like:
The four o’clock sun was no less punishing than the twelve o’clock sledgehammer.
The lake was fed by natural springs. The words sounded like the name of an earthly wonder: natural springs � yet another way of saying “no polio�.
there is something flat or wooden about the storytelling. I was almost the only one in my reading group who liked the novel; everyone else felt more or less unmoved by it despite the topic. It partly has to do with Bucky’s somewhat insipid character, I believe, and his overly responsible, guilt-ridden take on life but also the aforementioned lack of true interiority. Mainly, though, it has to do with the narration. The first person narrator who begins the novel doesn’t show itself again until the end when the novel falls flat on its face to me because the voice simply tells us what happened. This framing device had the effect of sucking out the life of the rest of the story to me and left me deducting a star (which had tentatively been there for a while).
A pretty good and interesting book about a topic that I’d never read about before. It must be one of the only novels that take place between 1939 and 1945 which is not about World War II. That alone makes it an interesting portrait of a time. So thanks for the story, Philip. Not sure when we’ll meet again.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Nemesis.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
November 26, 2015
–
Started Reading
November 26, 2015
– Shelved
December 5, 2015
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)
date
newest »


The writing is quite unlike Roth's other novels however.



Try The Human Stain, if you decide not to give up on the man."
Well, perhaps not quite 'oof', so thanks for that recommendation, Karen. I'll keep it in mind.

The writ..."
Thanks, Will. Yeah, I kind of gathered it's unlike his other novels, which my brief encounter with Portnoy's Complaint illustrated, so this probably wasn't the best place to start. Still, I did like much of it.

Ha, yeah, I guess my review may have that effect, Dolors, though actually I didn't dislike the novel. But with so many good books out there that we know we're not going to have the time for anyway, why settle, eh?

Well, it did and it didn't, Seemita. 'Almost written in disinterestt' sounds like an apt description. But I suspect he's just not really my kind of author, though it was interesting to sample his work.


Thanks, Cheryl. Based on this novel alone, I'm not a Roth fan either, but he was one of many authors I've been wanting to sample. Every time I'm picking up a new book, I ask myself if I want to broaden my horizon and read authors I haven't previously read or travel the safe route and read more by authors I like. Either way, I will never be able to explore everything I want.


Laysee, thanks so much for your comment, and glad to see you had a similiar experience with this novel. I'll definitely keep Human Stains in mind.
Try The Human Stain, if you decide not to give up on the man.