Mark Lawrence's Reviews > Peter Pan
Peter Pan
by
by

I read this to Celyn. It's a short book. Google tells me 47,000 words but it felt shorter than that.
Many of us know the story second hand through cartoons, Hollywood adaptations, and picture-books. The original item is not that dissimilar, though it's a fair bit more brutal than the cartoons and having been published in 1911 it's 100 years out of date when it comes to Native Americans!
The first thing to note is that it's not just the Never-Land that has a surreal, imaginary feel to it. The Darlings's home life is rather odd, with a dog acting as nursemaid to the three little Darlings, performing such tasks as getting them dressed, bathing them, and giving them medicine...
I liked the imagination on display where Peter Pan's shadow is torn off as he leaves in a hurry and the children's mother rolls it up and stores it in a drawer. Later Wendy sews it back on.
The main difference is in how callous Peter Pan is, and how he stays true to this self-absorbed character the whole time with no softening. He doesn't give a damn about the Lost Boys or Wendy's brothers. Tinkerbell is likewise remorseless, repeatedly attempting to get Wendy not just sent home but actively killed.
In the battles the boys have knives and use them to kill people. It's all in the bang-bang-you're-dead vibe of children's games, but the fact remains that pretty much every person on the Never-Land island is killed with violence by the end of the book. This includes most of the Redskins (whose portrayal in the manner given here would fall south of the racist-border in any of the last 4 decades), and pretty much all of the pirates. Even Wendy gets shot with an arrow at Tinkerbell's behest, though she turns out to be alright due to some rather hard to visualize complication with an acorn.
One surprise for me was that Captain Jas. Hook appears to be our pirate captain's real and longstanding name. The fact he now has a hook for a hand being pure coincidence!
Anyway - the book is full of good things, from the ticking crocodile to the invention of the Wendy House.
And Peter Pan, true to his word, never grows up. True to his character he soon forgets about Wendy, returning many years later and fixing his attentions to her daughter, and later granddaughter.
I'm withholding the 5th star simply because much of the description is rather vague, summary, implausible or all three together, so it can be hard to visualize/believe in the scenes.
...
Many of us know the story second hand through cartoons, Hollywood adaptations, and picture-books. The original item is not that dissimilar, though it's a fair bit more brutal than the cartoons and having been published in 1911 it's 100 years out of date when it comes to Native Americans!
The first thing to note is that it's not just the Never-Land that has a surreal, imaginary feel to it. The Darlings's home life is rather odd, with a dog acting as nursemaid to the three little Darlings, performing such tasks as getting them dressed, bathing them, and giving them medicine...
I liked the imagination on display where Peter Pan's shadow is torn off as he leaves in a hurry and the children's mother rolls it up and stores it in a drawer. Later Wendy sews it back on.
The main difference is in how callous Peter Pan is, and how he stays true to this self-absorbed character the whole time with no softening. He doesn't give a damn about the Lost Boys or Wendy's brothers. Tinkerbell is likewise remorseless, repeatedly attempting to get Wendy not just sent home but actively killed.
In the battles the boys have knives and use them to kill people. It's all in the bang-bang-you're-dead vibe of children's games, but the fact remains that pretty much every person on the Never-Land island is killed with violence by the end of the book. This includes most of the Redskins (whose portrayal in the manner given here would fall south of the racist-border in any of the last 4 decades), and pretty much all of the pirates. Even Wendy gets shot with an arrow at Tinkerbell's behest, though she turns out to be alright due to some rather hard to visualize complication with an acorn.
One surprise for me was that Captain Jas. Hook appears to be our pirate captain's real and longstanding name. The fact he now has a hook for a hand being pure coincidence!
Anyway - the book is full of good things, from the ticking crocodile to the invention of the Wendy House.
And Peter Pan, true to his word, never grows up. True to his character he soon forgets about Wendy, returning many years later and fixing his attentions to her daughter, and later granddaughter.
I'm withholding the 5th star simply because much of the description is rather vague, summary, implausible or all three together, so it can be hard to visualize/believe in the scenes.
...
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Peter Pan.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
November 29, 2015
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-19 of 19 (19 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Iris
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Mar 14, 2016 08:27PM

reply
|
flag



Safe to say as amazing as this book is (and i totally loved it) it destroyed all my PG illusions of his character.

"I followed you on many adventures -- but into the great Unknown Mystery, I go first, Indy."

Snakes. why did it have to be snakes?
Why couldn't it be Wendys?


And you say this based on what evidence?



Peter has a toddler’s narcissism � forgets the existence of others and fails to recognize the importance of their feelings. Instead of throwing tantrums, he flies, kidnaps, and slices off limbs. Essentially, a toddler with absolute power. Needless to say, he is quite popular amongst the young white men who call themselves the Lost Boys. We are fortunate his age disqualifies him form running for office.
I think he serves his purpose in the story and in society. The Darlings ultimately want to grow up and recognize the danger of being as selfish as Peter is. Colloquially, being called a “Peter Pan� is typically an insult rather than a compliment. I don’t know if anyone who considers him to be #lifegoals.
The novel is as racist and sexist as the year it was written. I think it’s important to read books that are racist and sexist so we can understand that the kids who grow up thinking these characters are unproblematic can now vote on policies that affect women and minorities. Children’s literature has always been quite political and should be treated as such.