ŷ

Mark Lawrence's Reviews > Peter Pan

Peter Pan by J.M. Barrie
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4508542
's review

really liked it

I read this to Celyn. It's a short book. Google tells me 47,000 words but it felt shorter than that.

Many of us know the story second hand through cartoons, Hollywood adaptations, and picture-books. The original item is not that dissimilar, though it's a fair bit more brutal than the cartoons and having been published in 1911 it's 100 years out of date when it comes to Native Americans!

The first thing to note is that it's not just the Never-Land that has a surreal, imaginary feel to it. The Darlings's home life is rather odd, with a dog acting as nursemaid to the three little Darlings, performing such tasks as getting them dressed, bathing them, and giving them medicine...

I liked the imagination on display where Peter Pan's shadow is torn off as he leaves in a hurry and the children's mother rolls it up and stores it in a drawer. Later Wendy sews it back on.

The main difference is in how callous Peter Pan is, and how he stays true to this self-absorbed character the whole time with no softening. He doesn't give a damn about the Lost Boys or Wendy's brothers. Tinkerbell is likewise remorseless, repeatedly attempting to get Wendy not just sent home but actively killed.

In the battles the boys have knives and use them to kill people. It's all in the bang-bang-you're-dead vibe of children's games, but the fact remains that pretty much every person on the Never-Land island is killed with violence by the end of the book. This includes most of the Redskins (whose portrayal in the manner given here would fall south of the racist-border in any of the last 4 decades), and pretty much all of the pirates. Even Wendy gets shot with an arrow at Tinkerbell's behest, though she turns out to be alright due to some rather hard to visualize complication with an acorn.

One surprise for me was that Captain Jas. Hook appears to be our pirate captain's real and longstanding name. The fact he now has a hook for a hand being pure coincidence!

Anyway - the book is full of good things, from the ticking crocodile to the invention of the Wendy House.

And Peter Pan, true to his word, never grows up. True to his character he soon forgets about Wendy, returning many years later and fixing his attentions to her daughter, and later granddaughter.

I'm withholding the 5th star simply because much of the description is rather vague, summary, implausible or all three together, so it can be hard to visualize/believe in the scenes.







...
395 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Peter Pan.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
November 29, 2015 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-19 of 19 (19 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Iris There are no native Americans in this book. There are Native Neverland-ers though...


message 2: by Laura (new)

Laura It is an odd little book. I preferred the Peter Pan story that tells how he fell out of his pram, and how he that was where the other lost boys came from.


message 3: by Cymia (new) - added it

Cymia Moss I've never read the Peter Pan book or the sequel books. But you did clarify what I already did know. When you analyse Peter Pan in the book you easily enough see the darker and more vain side to the character himself that Hollywood, Disney, and countless other adaptations refuse to let lose. He's got the childhood lack of understanding of right and wrong and thinks everything is a game. I think that's why I like Broms book The Child Thief it takes the darkside that many people don't know of Peter Pan and taking him and the other characters from the original story and twist them even further.


message 5: by Caio (new)

Caio Brown I agree with you, I knew the story but I loved it even more after reading the book.


Sade I've always felt Peter Pan is way more insidious than his character is made out to be.
Safe to say as amazing as this book is (and i totally loved it) it destroyed all my PG illusions of his character.


message 7: by Raymond (new)

Raymond Elmo “To die will be an awfully big adventure.�


Mark Lawrence Raymond wrote: "“To die will be an awfully big adventure.�"

"I followed you on many adventures -- but into the great Unknown Mystery, I go first, Indy."


message 9: by Raymond (new)

Raymond Elmo Mark wrote: "I followed you on many adventures -- but into the great Unknown Mystery, I go first, Indy.""

Snakes. why did it have to be snakes?
Why couldn't it be Wendys?


Doodle It’s has nothing to do with Native Americans. Are you being funny about the Redskins? How do you know they don’t look like red plugged turkey men? That’s how I pictured them...


message 11: by Mark (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mark Lawrence William wrote: "It’s has nothing to do with Native Americans."

And you say this based on what evidence?




message 12: by Sue (new) - rated it 1 star

Sue Bridgwater I've never liked this book, I find it very disturbing and sad.


message 13: by Peter (new)

Peter Harrison I haven’t fact checked this so forgive me if I’m wrong but I’m about 90% certain the name Wendy either didn’t exist and was invented for this book, or was pretty uncommon in Britain at the time and made popular by this book. If true, my favourite Peter Pan fact


Kerri-Lee I like your review and agree with it very much!


message 15: by Linn (new) - rated it 3 stars

Linn I agree with you on the redskins. I also think saying it's Neverland is a bad excuse for the way they are depicted. The book is quite old, naturally we are going to be uncomfortable with some of its contents, but that doesn't mean the book loses its value. I personally felt that by today's standards this book would also be considered very sexist. Wendy is acting like a mother and all women in the story grow up to be mothers.


Michael Ayomide odushola I hate this book


Michael Ayomide odushola Its the baddest book I ever read


message 18: by Momilani (new)

Momilani Awana I read this years ago and was struck by how Peter Pan embodies all the negative aspects of childhood. Barrie’s fixation on how small his teeth are in particular tells us Peter is very young � more like 4-6 years old, not 12 as he is usually depicted. Beyond that, there is something kind of predatory to it � it makes me think of a small child who has to be told not to bite people, or a vampire who regularly kidnaps children for his own amusement.

Peter has a toddler’s narcissism � forgets the existence of others and fails to recognize the importance of their feelings. Instead of throwing tantrums, he flies, kidnaps, and slices off limbs. Essentially, a toddler with absolute power. Needless to say, he is quite popular amongst the young white men who call themselves the Lost Boys. We are fortunate his age disqualifies him form running for office.

I think he serves his purpose in the story and in society. The Darlings ultimately want to grow up and recognize the danger of being as selfish as Peter is. Colloquially, being called a “Peter Pan� is typically an insult rather than a compliment. I don’t know if anyone who considers him to be #lifegoals.

The novel is as racist and sexist as the year it was written. I think it’s important to read books that are racist and sexist so we can understand that the kids who grow up thinking these characters are unproblematic can now vote on policies that affect women and minorities. Children’s literature has always been quite political and should be treated as such.


message 19: by Sue (new) - rated it 1 star

Sue Bridgwater Can’t bear this book. Mr.Darling in the kennel is if anything more worrying than the dog in the nursery. Ugg!


back to top