carol. 's Reviews > Darkfever
Darkfever (Fever, #1)
by
by

I enjoy a fun read as much as the next person, but the Fever series will not be taking that role in my life. Overall, not particularly impressed.
To start with, the language is most likely about a 10th grade reading level: "Now we turned down a long dim hallway that ended in an immense, square black door belted by bands of steel." Its very chick-lit as well, taking time to describe her outfits and nail polish: "What I had on was a luscious gauzy skirt of nearly every pastel hue on the color wheel that hugged my hips and kicked frothily at my ankles, a form-fitting rose sweater with silk trimmed cap sleeves and a plunging silk-edged neckline that made much of my bust, and dainty pink high heels that laced around my ankles." That's right; Moning took more time to describe the heroine's outfit than the approach to meeting her first vampire.
Not many reviews have mentioned it, but there's definitely not-so-concealed racism, describing the "primitive mix" of races in Barrons, and the background of one of the "Black Irish" bad guys. She blah blahs all the time how her home has nicer, kinder, more thoughtful people and comes across like a narrow-minded American prig. Perhaps that's Moning's point, that this is the growing-up period for our heroine, but frankly, I don't see any change during this book.
There isn't romantic interest so much as flat out sexualized scenes. Now that I think of it, I wonder if current authors are reacting against the over-explicitness of the Anita Blake generation, and are trying to find ways of more unique encounters. In the initial one, Mac basically has a self-sufficient encounter, and in the second one, after arousing her, the fae disappears, leaving her half-naked in front of a museum full of people. There wasn't really romantic tension between her and Barrons, her teacher, just an exchange of insults and orders. Perhaps that too is for another book.
Regardless, not sure I care. My TBR pile is so large I don't know how much time I want to waste.
There wasn't a specific moment that drove me batty; it was an accumulation of the writing emphasis and the shallow focus. Zala has a review that has a number of quotes and gives a much better sense of how it can wear on one: Zala's review
To start with, the language is most likely about a 10th grade reading level: "Now we turned down a long dim hallway that ended in an immense, square black door belted by bands of steel." Its very chick-lit as well, taking time to describe her outfits and nail polish: "What I had on was a luscious gauzy skirt of nearly every pastel hue on the color wheel that hugged my hips and kicked frothily at my ankles, a form-fitting rose sweater with silk trimmed cap sleeves and a plunging silk-edged neckline that made much of my bust, and dainty pink high heels that laced around my ankles." That's right; Moning took more time to describe the heroine's outfit than the approach to meeting her first vampire.
Not many reviews have mentioned it, but there's definitely not-so-concealed racism, describing the "primitive mix" of races in Barrons, and the background of one of the "Black Irish" bad guys. She blah blahs all the time how her home has nicer, kinder, more thoughtful people and comes across like a narrow-minded American prig. Perhaps that's Moning's point, that this is the growing-up period for our heroine, but frankly, I don't see any change during this book.
There isn't romantic interest so much as flat out sexualized scenes. Now that I think of it, I wonder if current authors are reacting against the over-explicitness of the Anita Blake generation, and are trying to find ways of more unique encounters. In the initial one, Mac basically has a self-sufficient encounter, and in the second one, after arousing her, the fae disappears, leaving her half-naked in front of a museum full of people. There wasn't really romantic tension between her and Barrons, her teacher, just an exchange of insults and orders. Perhaps that too is for another book.
Regardless, not sure I care. My TBR pile is so large I don't know how much time I want to waste.
There wasn't a specific moment that drove me batty; it was an accumulation of the writing emphasis and the shallow focus. Zala has a review that has a number of quotes and gives a much better sense of how it can wear on one: Zala's review
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Darkfever.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
February 20, 2011
– Shelved
May 1, 2011
–
Started Reading
May 1, 2011
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-22 of 22 (22 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Kristina
(last edited Jun 10, 2011 09:45AM)
(new)
Jun 10, 2011 09:43AM

reply
|
flag

Wonderful review!

I understand a number of fans say "Mac gets better/changes/matures/becomes a unicorn" but I don't care enough to continue. Bad writing, a character I wouldn't lend a pen to and porn standing in for erotica.

...are porn and erotica different? I actually am quite unfamiliar with the genre(s).

I'd say as a gross generalization that it's an issue of desire/intimacy versus um (censored) the act and factoring in control. The sex scenes in this book are more about humiliation standing in for romance (that I remember, particularly the panties she didn't remember taking off) and yet it's supposed to be oh-so-titillating during Mac's public humiliation (versus Mac enjoying being the object of voyeurism). I

My utter inability to comprehend romantic scenes is a bit of a killer for this type of book. I wasn't able to determine the intent of those scenes--whether they were intended to be horrifying or titillating.

Also - and that's pretty beside the point, but still: Barron's "primitive pairing of genes" would be...Basque and Celt?! What does Moning imagine a Basque looks like, exactly? Beside "primitive", that is.


You're not alone. Perhaps this is an unfair generalization, but I suspect fans of this sub-genre of UF are more Romance fans than Fantasy fans. They're far too "Romancy" for *this* Fantasy fan, anyway.
Which might be fine (for me), if it were interesting and compelling, but for me it was "meh".
I like the "Fantasy set in an Urban setting" type UF, but not this Romancy monster hunter type.

Yes. It's a fine line, for me. Which is probably why I often gravitate towards the male heroes--because there is much less emphasis on a man's emotional/romantic connections than on the conflict.

Yes. It's a fine line, for me. Which is probably why I often gravitate towards t..."
I hear ya. I enjoy bad ass female MCs, but finding a story with that, that isn't really-a-Romance can be a challenge :)



