Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Martine's Reviews > Quarantine

Quarantine by Jim Crace
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
381149
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: british, favourites, historical-fiction, modern-fiction, psychological-drama

Now this is how you write a gripping book.

Quarantine is what you might call a novel of ideas. It seeks to give an account of Jesus' forty-day sojourn in the desert and to explain how Christianity (or, if you will, the cult of Christ) came into being. While it's not overly blasphemous, it does present its theories in a way to which people who take the New Testament very literally might object. See, for one thing, Crace's Jesus is not the Son of God, but rather a clumsy and all too human carpenter who takes his faith more seriously than his work; for another, he is not actually the main character of the novel, nor even its most interesting character. That honour goes to Musa, surely one of the most fascinating villains in twentieth-century literature.

Quarantine is about the (apparently common in Biblical times) act of quarantining -- i.e., secluding oneself in the desert for a while to meditate and commune with God. Jesus is only one of several characters who, on the first day of the story, arrive in an inhospitable part of the wilderness to take up lodgings in some barren caves and begin meditating. He's different from the other quarantiners, though. While the others only fast during the day and aren't averse to talking to each other when not meditating, Jesus is determined not to eat or drink anything for forty days and to stay completely on his own. But before he retreats into his cave, he touches a dying man, Musa, who promptly recovers. Needless to say, Musa is convinced Jesus is a miraculous healer, and tries to get him out of his cave to talk. But Jesus refuses, believing Musa is a devil come to tempt him. And so a fascinating battle of wills begins, which quickly works its way to a haunting (and remarkably plausible) conclusion.

Crace is a fabulous writer. His metaphor-laden prose has a breath-taking, occasionally hallucinatory quality (especially in the marvellous second half of the book), and his descriptions of pretty much anything are superb. His Judean desert is an exciting place, so vivid it almost becomes a character in itself. His descriptions of fasting and what it does to one's body and mind are terrifying. (Trust me, after reading this book you'll never consider hunger striking again.) Yet it's the characters who steal the show. Jesus' struggle against temptation and hallucinations is rendered impressively, and rather more realistically than the stories told about this in the Bible. But while Jesus is important to the story for the effect he has on the other characters, he is not the most riveting character in the book. That would be Musa, a tyrannical merchant with a frightful sense of entitlement and very little compassion for anyone, let alone a bunch of afflicted souls who have come to the desert to pray. He's a nasty piece of work, is Musa, but Crace has drawn him so well that you find yourself fascinated by his exploits, even when he sets out, over the course of several pages, to plan the rape of the lone woman among the quarantiners (some of the most riveting prose I've ever come across). No, Musa is not Satan, but it's easy to see why Jesus believes he is. He's rotten to the core, which makes what he does on the final page of the book all the more extraordinary. I found myself glued to the pages whenever the story was told from his point of view, admiring Crace for the skill with which he brought his antagonist to life without making you want to close the book in disgust. The other perspectives are less impressive, but still entirely worth reading. Crace can draw characters in just a few lines, and his way with words is such that the effect is quite dazzling. He is quite the storyteller.

So. Do seek this book out, people. Don't believe the baffling number of three-star reviews on this site; instead, check out the plethora of five-star reviews on Amazon.co.uk () and remember that Quarantine was voted the Whitbread Novel of the Year and short-listed for the Booker Prize. Then read the book. I promise you you won't regret it.
17 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Quarantine.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

February 16, 2008 – Shelved
Started Reading
September 1, 2008 – Finished Reading
September 11, 2008 – Shelved as: british
September 11, 2008 – Shelved as: favourites
September 11, 2008 – Shelved as: historical-fiction
September 11, 2008 – Shelved as: modern-fiction
September 11, 2008 – Shelved as: psychological-drama

Comments Showing 1-8 of 8 (8 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Dottie FINALLY -- an appropriately fine and well-deserved review has arrived in the Quarantine column! I am a raving fan of this book and as a result a Crace follower though I still have a few of his to read. This book completely blew me away on my first encounter and I've read it once since then. An absolutely stunning book.


Martine Yeah, I noticed your five-star review, and was very glad to see I'm not the only one who seems to love this book. It's so imaginative, and so well told! I was seriously impressed with some of Crace's descriptions in the second half of the book. He's amazing at creating an eerie atmosphere.

Anyhow, I always suspected I'd like Crace (I leafed through Quarantine in a shop and was blown away by his turn of phrase), so I went and bought three of his books at once, without even bothering to try one first. The other two are Being Dead and The Devil's Larder. Which one do you think I should read next?


Martine Thanks, Ginnie. I guess The Devil's Larder will be my next Crace, then. Unless Dottie gives me a compelling reason why I should read Being Dead (which sounds fascinating!) first. :-)


Dottie Oei,oei,oei! Compelling reason here!

There's an archived Constant Reader discussion of Being Dead just waiting for you once you finish reading --- AND there are actually comments and responses from Jim Crace in that discussion. He was very nice to come and read and talk with us in our disucssion, very interesting.



Is that compelling enough?

Sorry, Ginnie, but it's the facts, ma'am so I had to see if it would do the trick.


Martine You know, that might just be compelling enough, Dottie. Also because I feel I may have to read some more 'typical' Crace books before I get started on his atypical ones. And of course you get bonus points for using Dutch in your answer. You knew that, didn't you? :-)

Hmm. Quandary. I may end up bringing both books to Australia...


Dottie And here is the Constant Reader disucssion of Quarantine, also, Martine. I haven't revisited these discussions in a while but hope you find them of interest.




Dottie Martine, I love that little bit of Dutch so much that I have it as the greeting above the date and time on my cell phone! It makes me smile often. Thanks for the extra points.


Martine You're welcome, Dottie. If you ever return to these parts, you may convert the points into a koffie verkeerd. :-)

The CR discussion of Quarantine looks fascinating. I'm not going to read the whole thing now as (gah) I have work to do (I'm spending so much time here discussing futile details of my translation job that I'm hardly getting round to doing any serious editing...), but I've bookmarked it, and I promise I'll get back to it when I have more time to do so. Thanks!


back to top