Felice Laverne's Reviews > 11/22/63
11/22/63
by
by

Stephen King’s 11/22/63 was a behemoth of a work with more layers than a Chicagoan in December. The premise in itself was exhilarating, and the execution was near flawless. Another chef-d'oeuvre from Ole� Uncle Stevie. This one was a novel that absolutely could not have been tackled by just anyone and may have fallen flat on its face if handled by a less experienced craftsman. The worlds on both sides of the time-travel line were utterly realistic, but where King really showed his masterful hand was with the threads throughout the novel that wove it all together, from the Yellow Card Man to the janitor’s father to JFK and Lee Harvey Oswald themselves. No character was superfluous, and despite the massive word count on this one, there wasn’t a single phrase that was either. Even characters who were fleeting left their mark, shocking me, tickling me, and provoking thought along the way.
The jargon that King used to color the various neighborhoods and scenes from Maine to Florida to Texas was deliciously realistic—he has a knack for that, and it was on full display here—and I felt that I was fully immersed in the world that he painted. This one gave me goosebumps in more than one place and food for thought in several others. And, refreshingly, King resisted painting the 50s as a happy-go-lucky time of just sock-hops and poodle skirts and gave the 60s the gritty air that it deserved. He infused this glimpse at this time period with realistic strokes of segregation and poverty in his portrayal—truly showing us the world through King-colored glasses.
11/22/63 shifted voices between characters in an effortless way that’s hard to execute. From backwoods Maine lingo to deep Southern vernacular, the voices were masterfully done and the characters were all fully realized. There are biblical references and historical facts—and distortions of them that allowed for his own creative riff on the past—Gothic elements galore and grit. True, unflinching blood-and-dirt-in-your-nails grit.
This one came full circle in various parts of the novel, not just in the end in that formulaic way that we are all oh-so-familiar with, showing how all of the pieces connected hand-in-hand to tell one larger story. Quite the narrative tool for building suspense and tension. I’ll admit that there were times when the full-circle aspect of this one hit me too squarely on the head, when it was too dead on, towards the end, and that pulled me out of the world briefly while I wrestled with my annoyance at being dowsed with that unnecessary, cold splash of water. But the sheer gravity of this novel and unimpeachable hand that resonated through to the very last page overrode those small annoyances. I resist giving this one 4 ½ stars to pay for that annoyance that I experienced, because the rest of the work was so phenomenally done that it would honestly border on being petty. JIMLA! 5 stars
FOLLOW ME HERE:
| | |
The jargon that King used to color the various neighborhoods and scenes from Maine to Florida to Texas was deliciously realistic—he has a knack for that, and it was on full display here—and I felt that I was fully immersed in the world that he painted. This one gave me goosebumps in more than one place and food for thought in several others. And, refreshingly, King resisted painting the 50s as a happy-go-lucky time of just sock-hops and poodle skirts and gave the 60s the gritty air that it deserved. He infused this glimpse at this time period with realistic strokes of segregation and poverty in his portrayal—truly showing us the world through King-colored glasses.
11/22/63 shifted voices between characters in an effortless way that’s hard to execute. From backwoods Maine lingo to deep Southern vernacular, the voices were masterfully done and the characters were all fully realized. There are biblical references and historical facts—and distortions of them that allowed for his own creative riff on the past—Gothic elements galore and grit. True, unflinching blood-and-dirt-in-your-nails grit.
This one came full circle in various parts of the novel, not just in the end in that formulaic way that we are all oh-so-familiar with, showing how all of the pieces connected hand-in-hand to tell one larger story. Quite the narrative tool for building suspense and tension. I’ll admit that there were times when the full-circle aspect of this one hit me too squarely on the head, when it was too dead on, towards the end, and that pulled me out of the world briefly while I wrestled with my annoyance at being dowsed with that unnecessary, cold splash of water. But the sheer gravity of this novel and unimpeachable hand that resonated through to the very last page overrode those small annoyances. I resist giving this one 4 ½ stars to pay for that annoyance that I experienced, because the rest of the work was so phenomenally done that it would honestly border on being petty. JIMLA! 5 stars
FOLLOW ME HERE:
| | |
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
11/22/63.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
February 25, 2016
– Shelved
March 16, 2016
– Shelved as:
historical-fiction
March 16, 2016
– Shelved as:
thrillers
June 16, 2016
– Shelved as:
full-review
Comments Showing 1-23 of 23 (23 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Andrew
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Apr 23, 2016 01:38AM

reply
|
flag



You know, I've heard that countless times now--that King was better in his youth. A lot of people feel that way. Of course, I haven't read all of his novels, though I've dabbled in a few of his earlier works from before my year of birth lol :) So, I can't go to bat for either side on that one not being properly versed. HOWEVER, I will say that his earlier shorts REALLY turned me off--they were so immature, like reading a Goosebumps spin-off or something--and that I do feel, after reading and reviewing Bazaar of Bad Dreams, that his later short stories FAR outdo his earlier works in that realm. One NYT reviewer made the comment that King is getting older--in his 60s--and now seems to be more poignantly contemplating death and the afterlife. From what I've read so far recently, I would agree, particularly in his SS collection.
Oh, that reminds me to add King's Desperation to my "read" shelf!




Thanks, Robert! I agree, some of his works have absolutely reeked with commercialism in recent years, but he was definitely at his finest here. I will always remember this book and keep a copy of it (marked up with notes and all!) on my shelf at home!

Ha! It was indeed quite the literary work; obviously far better than the on-screen adaptation on Hulu!

(Besides, better to re-see "The Handmaid's Tale" -- truly brilliant.)

(Besides, better to re-see "The Handmaid's Tale" -- truly br..."
Agreed! I LOVE The Handmaid's Tale!!!!


Oh, thank you, Alyson! I really appreciate that, and I'm glad that you enjoyed this review! :-)