Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Bill Kerwin's Reviews > The Loser

The Loser by Thomas Bernhard
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
83582
's review

really liked it


In most of his fictions—including this novella—the Austrian Thomas Bernhard insults everything Austrian. In fact, Bernhard declared in his will that every one of his literary works in perpetuity must not be printed or presented within the state of Austria, or within the geographical boundaries of the present state of Austria, whatever that area may in the future be called. Yet he never made an attempt to emigrate; he lived in Austria all his life.

Bernhard was a man of contradictions, and his works--The Loser, for instance—are full of contradictions too. They are filled with solitary characters who spew forth spleen and invective, loathing the seediness of everyday life, and yet these solitaries are often bound together by some ideal which points beyond pettiness, some absolute which both inspires and degrades them. In Losers that ideal is music.

What plot there is, is simple. In 1953, the unnamed Narrator and the “loser� Wertheimer, both advanced students of piano, met at the Mozarteum in Salzburg, intending to study with Horowitz. There, one day, standing just outside a practice room, they heard Glenn Gould playing the Goldberg Variations. Although the three become friends, the narrator and Wertheimer both knew perfection when they heard it, and from that moment their ambition to play serious piano began to die. Before the monologue that is The Loser begins, the narrator has learned that Wertheimer has committed suicide, and he begins to examine—in obsessive detail—the friendship of these three men: how both he and Wertheimer were not like Gould, and how he himself is not like Wertheimer.

If you like the bleak humor of Beckett's novels or the rants of the later Ligotti (My Work is Not Yet Done comes to mind) you will probably like this novella. But Bernhard brings a wealth of ironies all his own.

I'll end with the novella's first anti-Austrian rant, this one specifically about Salzburg:

...Salzburg, which at bottom is the sworn enemy of all art and culture, a cretinous provincial dump with stupid people and cold walls where everything without exception is eventually made cretinous....The town of Salzburg, which today is freshly painted in even its darkest corners and is even more disgusting than it was twenty-eight years ago was and is antagonistic to everything of value in a human being, and in time destroys it....The people of Salzburg have always been dreadful, like their climate, and when I enter the town today not only is my judgment confirmed, everything is even more dreadful....Glenn was charmed by the magic of this town for three days, then he saw that its magic, as they like to call it, was rotten, that basically its beauty is disgusting and that the people living in this disgusting beauty are vulgar. The climate of the lower Alps makes for emotionally disturbed people who fall victim to cretinism at a very early age and who in time become malevolent, I said.
156 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read The Loser.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

March 17, 2016 – Started Reading
March 17, 2016 – Shelved
March 17, 2016 –
page 51
25.25%
March 17, 2016 –
page 52
25.74%
March 24, 2016 –
page 70
34.65%
March 30, 2016 –
page 104
51.49%
March 31, 2016 –
page 139
68.81%
April 1, 2016 –
page 156
77.23%
April 3, 2016 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-8 of 8 (8 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Mike (new)

Mike I'll have to read Bernhard at some point, especially because I've been getting interested in Vienna, but the part about the climate of the Alps just makes me think that a miserable person, no matter where he or she is, can probably find some geographic distinctiveness or other to attribute the misery to.


Bill Kerwin Mike wrote: "...the part about the climate of the Alps just makes me think that a miserable person, no matter where he or she is, can probably find some geographic distinctiveness or other to attribute the misery to."

Yes! Bernhard's narrator--and I suspect Bernhard too--is definitely a person who actively seeks sources of misery. But it is also the source of a deadpan humor that makes the book less bleak than it at first seems.


message 3: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth A writer I greatly admire. He was the first of the Austrian writers vehemently to resist the whitewashing of Austria (a country that was remade from ground zero after WWII, as popular culture would have it). His writing is a polemic against the representation (and self-representation) of Austria as the land of beer festivals, buxom frauleins, geranium laced balconies, green hills, enchanting mountains and the Sound of Music. He also relentlessly exposed the (not so) dormant fascist persona that has deep roots in the Austrian (and not only, hence his great relevance to all of us) collective and individual psyche -and only loved those who through their damaged life and via their damaged voice refused to reproduce the general manufactured cheery denial (and the present politics of the country has proved him right). Writers of his calibre do not write to confirm the Austrian tourist industry , they write polemically, always against a culture that rams 'positivity' and 'affirmation' down our throats, while negativity and negation is all too real and threatening. Such a voice is sorely missed. We just have to make do with re-reading Bernhard's books (and those who have German are lucky enough to read his poems and plays as well). I personally have reread his autobiography, Gathering Evidence, and 'Wittgenstein's Nephew', a memoir of a friendship, countless of times.


message 4: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth Bernhardt is a giant of modern European literature, in my view. He (and the other great Austrian writers, Peter Handke and Elfriede Jelinek) masterfully, polemically and profoundly react against the view of Austria as the land of green fields, lakes, festivals, geraniums and buxomed Fräulein, or as Jelinek has called it, a country carefully reconstructed from ground zero after the war (the Sound of Music land of Nazi resisting handsome aristocratic Austrians). All of these writers are justifiably fired by a polemic pathos (and the current political scene in Austria proves their literary insights correct) that is also of great literary merit. In my view, great literature today cannot be but polemic. It is this that lends it moral pathos and shores up its aesthetic power and complexity. Also, there must be something particularly odious about Salzburg and throughout history, as Mozart (a native of it) also hated the place with a passion.


message 5: by Pillsonista (new)

Pillsonista Along with Gregor von Rezzori, with whom he had absolutely nothing in common with, on the page or off it, the greatest German-language novelist of the post-War era.


message 6: by Pillsonista (new)

Pillsonista Absolutely should have won the Nobel, hands down, which is probably why he didn't. That, and he almost certainly would have had nothing but disdain for it.


message 7: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth Pillsonista wrote: "Absolutely should have won the Nobel, hands down, which is probably why he didn't. That, and he almost certainly would have had nothing but disdain for it."

Indeed.


message 8: by Berkley (new) - added it

Berkley First Bernhard I read and one of the most mesmerising reading experiences of my life. And, amazingly, it might not even be his best book.


back to top