Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Felicia's Reviews > Terminal World

Terminal World by Alastair Reynolds
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
666892
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: steampunk, sci-fi

I dunnnnno. I am in love with "House of Suns", the other book I've read by this author, so I went into this with high expectations. I honestly didn't understand a lot of what was going on, the world was so confusing, it seemed to contradict itself SO MUCH as time went on. I found it extremely hard to finish, and I was always confused, and the main character was just MEH. I hate to give negative reviews, but I loved House of Suns SO MUCH I really wanted this to be as absorbing and raveful, and it just didn't do it for me. A sci-fi-steampunk-adventure that I would not readily recommend.

HOWEVER, I am looking forward to other works by the author! Just not any sequels to this, haha.
30 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Terminal World.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
April 3, 2011 – Shelved
April 3, 2011 – Shelved as: steampunk
April 3, 2011 – Shelved as: sci-fi
April 3, 2011 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-13 of 13 (13 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Will Try Pushing Ice. Stand alone story and is excellent.


message 2: by Tyler (new) - added it

Tyler Lutz House of Suns really was fantastic


Otto I had about the same feelings about this book, except that I read it first... How I managed to try another after this I don't know.
The Revelation Space series was slow, but incredibly deep and entertaining. If you still have any energy left of Reynolds, give that a look.


message 4: by Terence (new) - added it

Terence I'd recommend Reynolds' Revelation Space series; that's where most of his best work is.


Felicia Thx for the reccs, I'll start Revealation Space after Pushing Ice!


Chris Lewis I've read pretty much everything I can get my hands on by Alastair Reynolds. You're right, this isn't one of his stronger works. It's an okay read, but not on par with his usual stuff.


message 7: by Ingmar (last edited Apr 13, 2012 06:26AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ingmar This is an unusual work for Reynolds with the steampunkish setting and lack of space ships. It's also a wildly original setting that challenges the reader with lots of new concepts that are explained from the viewpoint of a society that has forgotten most of their history and science and so leaves a lot for the reader to puzzle out. Nonetheless, or perhaps because of this I found it immensely enjoyable.

It's also full of subtle references - did you figure out which planet it plays on? What the two cities were named after? Wikipedia has the spoilers, if you want to look.

Also, airships and steam-powered cyborgs! Only the organ was perhaps a little over the top.


Thomas I despised this book. The other Reynolds book I'd read was Chasm City - which I really liked a lot - until the last ten pages where I wanted to throw it As Hard As I Could against the wall. Trying to give Terminal World a chance after failing my 45-page-rule was a mistake.


William Please, please also read Turquoise Days, a novella, and short stories Enloa, Whisper, and Zima Blue. Surely his finest works, along with House of Suns.


steph (librarianish) It reminded me so much of Embassytown, and I had a hard time not picturing the world working the same way (which it didn't, obvs). Only halfway through, but finishing out of duty to a reading challenge rather than interest.


message 11: by William (last edited Jan 15, 2018 01:12PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

William Stephanie (Librarianish) wrote: "It reminded me so much of Embassytown, and I had a hard time not picturing the world working the same way (which it didn't, obvs). Only halfway through, but finishing out of duty to a reading chall..."

I didn’t finish it. Really awful.

So much of Reynolds is extraordinary, so many good books and stories.


message 12: by Thomas (new)

Thomas Fleming 13 years later i am still hoping for more house of suns.


message 13: by Tom (new) - rated it 3 stars

Tom the Guvnor It was poor.


back to top