Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Roger Brunyate's Reviews > On Chesil Beach

On Chesil Beach by Ian McEwan
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
42294189
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: top-reviews, hidden-gems, illustrated-review, music

Ìý
Almost

A brilliant book, but such a sad one; it would be unfair not to say so up front. Ian McEwan is a master at dissecting emotions. Every page of this wonderfully-crafted novel gave me the uncanny feeling of living within the skins of the two main characters, Edward and Florence, just married as the book opens. When they fall in love, nurture ambitions, experience happiness, I feel these things too. But when happiness eludes them, the pain is unbearable, not least because the author never lets us forget by how small a margin their happiness was missed.

In his last major novel, Saturday, McEwan pulled back from the multi-decade scope of Atonement , its predecessor, choosing to confine himself to the events of a single day. Here, the essential action occupies a mere three hours, described in a book which is itself unusually compact, a mere novella of only 200 delicate pages. In an opening that is surely a homage to Matthew Arnold's "Dover Beach," the new husband and wife sit in a hotel room within sound of the sea on England's South coast. They eat a mediocre meal in one room; in the next, their bed stands waiting. They love each other, there is never any doubt about that, but they are inexperienced and secretly afraid. The book tells how they came to that moment, and what becomes of their love and fears as they move from one room into the other.

I have not known McEwan to write before in such detail about sex, but his writing is never prurient. Every detail serves to illustrate the psychological intercourse between these two talented and caring young people. On this particular night, as in a high-stakes game, their honeymoon bed becomes the board upon which all the other pieces of their relationship must be played. By going back to the early 1960s, that dark hour just before the dawn of the sexual revolution, McEwan performs the remarkable feat of undoing the modern liberation of sex from marriage and returning to a mindset in which marriage was not only a contract for sex, but sex might also be a prime reason for marriage.

But not the only reason. The focus on the bedroom also makes you consider all the other qualities that these two bring to their marriage, and before long you feel that you know them very well. [Exceptionally well in my case, since I was also born in Britain in the same year (1940), and share qualities with each of them; readers might take this into account when weighing the objectivity of my reactions.] Edward is a bright young man from the country who has recently achieved a first-class academic degree. Florence comes from a more socially sophisticated family, though she herself is naive in most things. The one exception is her calling as a violinist; here as in Saturday, McEwan is extraordinary in his use of music; the sections describing Florence's quartet playing are right up there with Vikram Seth's An Equal Music, my touchstone for sensitive writing about musicians. So both are bright, both are talented, both feel the stirring of new possibilities, but there are big differences between them, socially and culturally (Edward, for example, is into rock), and they each want different things. But the most heartbreaking things in this book are not their differences, but how often and how close they come to making new connections; just an inch more, a moment longer, and everything might be all right�. Almost.

But McEwan does not end the story in the bedroom or on the beach below. Much as in Atonement, though in only a few pages, he adds an epilogue continuing the story forward several decades. At the time, I felt it was too brief to settle all the emotions stirred up by the preceding pages, but now as I write, several hours after closing the book, I begin to see its rightness and appreciate its consolation.

======



I saw the movie last night. With one exception, though, I will have to put my comments as a spoiler, for those who haven't already read the book. (view spoiler)

One thing I wholeheartedly admired was the music. In the book, we know that Florence is a violinist, and we see her with her quartet in concert at the end. But we cannot hear her. Not only does the film contain several scenes of her rehearsing or playing, but her music is there in the sound-track throughout: chamber music by Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, and Schubert, all beautifully matching the emotional temperature, and music by others as well. My first reaction on coming home was to pull out one of the featured pieces and play it through with my wife, also a violinist. Through music, if not always in words or pictures, I felt I could live inside Florence, and experience something vital in her that transcended her problems. Is it any wonder that Edward seemed a little ordinary by comparison?

97 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read On Chesil Beach.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

June 14, 2007 – Started Reading
June 15, 2007 – Finished Reading
April 30, 2016 – Shelved
May 16, 2016 – Shelved as: top-reviews
May 18, 2016 – Shelved as: hidden-gems
June 5, 2018 – Shelved as: illustrated-review
June 5, 2018 – Shelved as: music

Comments Showing 1-42 of 42 (42 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Cecily Lovely, and so true - especially about the pain of nearly making the necessary connections.

A film is due in 2017, starring Saoirse Ronan, whom I'm sure will be perfect for Florence. I don't know who will play Edward.


Roger Brunyate I heard about the film, but how is that possible? It is a book whose entire point is that nothing happens!


Cecily That's true of some excellent films - though I'm now struggling to think of an example!


Cecily Cecily wrote: "That's true of some excellent films - though I'm now struggling to think of an example!"

I have now: Boyhood, Lost in Translation - and even something like Gravity, when you think about it, doesn't have much Plot with a capital P.


Laysee Hi Edward, what a touching review! You conveyed so powerfully the poignancy of that missed connection.


message 6: by Fionnuala (new) - added it

Fionnuala just an inch more, a moment longer, and everything might be all right�. Almost.

But McEwan loves to leave us with an '...almost...', at least that's how I experience his narratives, that they are always just inches away from a terrible calamity. I was very uneasy reading Enduring Love and Saturday for that reason. And this book made me equally uneasy. I really felt McEwan was building up towards some violent act - but all we get in the end is a sanitized summing-up. It's not that I seek violent outcomes in the the books I read, not at all. But McEwan leads me to expect them and then invariably fails to deliver.

This is however a very fine review, Roger, and as you say, you are well placed to understand the atmosphere and the tensions of the times in which the book is set, and that comes across clearly. Forgive me if I have transferred my experience with McEwan's other books onto this possibly innocent story which you clearly love very much.


Roger Brunyate Laysee wrote: "Hi Edward, what a touching review! You conveyed so powerfully the poignancy of that missed connection."

I have never been called Edward before, but thank you, Laysee, for the compliment which I assume was intended for me! R.


message 8: by Roger (last edited Jul 21, 2016 06:33AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Roger Brunyate Fionnuala, what you say about the violent act is very true with McEwan, but it has changed as his career has progressed. All the earlier books seem either to proceed from or progress to some act of violence that is out of character for the rest of the novel; I call it his tendency towards grand guignol, and it is something that I have learned to accept from him, but not enjoy. But, as you seem to imply, he has more or less gone beyond that as he grew older; I think Amsterdam was the last of his books to have ended in melodrama of this kind. One reason why I so much enjoy Saturday and On Chesil Beach and The Children Act (Solar, I fear, was a regression) is that he manages to come to a conclusion without his usual resort to violence, even though you may be expecting it, as you say. I do not feel it sanitized at all, but in tune with a view of life that I would like to embrace, as a person of a certain age. It may well be different for you. R.


Laysee Roger wrote: "Laysee wrote: "Hi Edward, what a touching review! You conveyed so powerfully the poignancy of that missed connection."

I have never been called Edward before, but thank you, Laysee, for the compli..."


Oh, I'm so sorry. How in the world did I make up a new name for you, Roger?


Roger Brunyate Totally forgiven! R/E.


Laysee Roger wrote: "Totally forgiven! R/E."

Thanks, Roger. R/E? Love your sense of humor. :)


message 12: by Fionnuala (new) - added it

Fionnuala Roger wrote: "..I do not feel it sanitized at all, but in tune with a view of life that I would like to embrace, as a person of a certain age. ..."

Sanitized was probably a poor choice of word, Roger - it's quite a few years since I read this book - I see I marked it read in 2008 so I'm working from rather vague impressions. However, I do remember clearly finding the update on the characters' later circumstances really unnecessary and unwelcome. I don't remember much about what they were doing except that they weren't together anymore. There must have been more to it than that though - since you found it resonated with you.

You've summed up McEwan's entire oeuvre very well with your 'grand guignol' label - and your remark about the change from horror to the threat of horror in the later work is accurate too. As to Solar, I don't know if it was a regression, but I remember feeling that it didn't work for me on hardly any level. But again, I don't remember it very clearly - almost all the McEwan books I've read date from before I joined gr so I only have very sketchy reviews of them written a long time afterwards. I love that I now have a proper record of my reading life thanks to goodreads.


Roger Brunyate Laysee wrote: How in the world did I make up a new name for you, Roger?

Oh, I realize now: because in my review I identify myself so strongly with the male protagonist, who is called Edward! R.


message 14: by [deleted user] (new)

What a spectacular review, Robert. Some very perceptive notes on McEwan's style. I also found his descriptions of sex surprising, actually, now that I think about it and at the same time, very admirable. I like that he didn't shy away from describing it and yet I feel as though the true naked intimacy revealed in the novel is the delicate youth, self-doubt and desperately sad disconnect between the two characters.


Roger Brunyate Hannah, it seems you have taken to calling me Robert, which is someone else! However, I love the last sentence of your comment above. Roger.


message 16: by SueLucie (new)

SueLucie A lovely review, Roger, and has reminded me of a book I adored when I read it several years ago and have been wary of revisiting in case I loved it less second time around. After reading your review, I am sorely tempted to do so. I'm not sure I'm tempted by the film, though.


Roger Brunyate Thanks, Sue. I felt I had to see the film, and overall am not sorry that I did so. But other than the music, it does not signficantly add to a perfect book. R.


Glenn Sumi Great addition to your review, Roger. I think I prefer the book to the film. I loved the music, as well, and the scene where Florence takes Edward to Wigmore Hall was a highlight. (Also: I wonder if McEwan named her Florence to suggest a love of art.) I think the biggest difference was in the endings. As I pointed out in my own review of the film, I think the medium requires that we see certain things played out. (In the book, if I recall, it's not clear if Florence ended up with anyone. And everything's seen through Edward's POV. So much more poignant.)


message 19: by Roger (last edited Jun 05, 2018 05:46PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Roger Brunyate Thanks, Glenn. I reread your book review just now, and the film review to which it is linked. I guess that the film medium does require explicit completion, but I still can see no reason for McEwan to marry off Florence, other to have that rather touching scene with her daughter in the record shop. The book even specifically makes the point that she’s not attracted to the cellist.

As for the “spoiler� concerning the father, I totally missed it in the book, and pretty much missed it in the movie too. But there has to be some reason why, after more or less going along with what was happening, the premature ejeculation should have been such a violent trigger.

You say, incidentally, in your film review, that Florence was upper class. Not by a long chalk, merely upper middle. And, in the movie at any rate, Edward’s people were nothing like as lower or even lower-middle as I had supposed. In English society, however, that gap between upper-middle and middle-middle can still be enormous. This I discovered with the parents of the first girl I got engaged to, my social equal in any normal view, except that they cared about status and my parents didn’t. R.


Glenn Sumi Thank you for clarifying, Roger. Judging from the many negative reviews on here, lots of readers missed the father-daughter theme! And thank you for pointing out the differences in class and status! Of course now that I really think about it, you're right. I'm fascinated by what works on the page and what works on film. I loved the ending of Toibin's Brooklyn, but also realized we needed to see certain things play out in the film for an emotional closure.


message 21: by Lynn (new)

Lynn I read this a long time ago but would definitely re-read it was so good.


Roger Brunyate Lynn wrote: "I read this a long time ago but would definitely re-read it was so good."

Yes, just looking through it for the film comparison made me decide to keep it out. It now seems a much denser book than its small size and simple storyline had made me remember.


Cecily I agree with your comparison with the film, especially Florence's afterstory - and the speed of it. It puts a completely different spin on her relationship with Edward.


Roger Brunyate I think I read the movie addendum to your review, Cecily, before seeing it for myself. Even so, I still didn't get the father business at all clearly. But it seems we both agree that what had been a two-person story in the book had essentially turned into a one-person one, not just because Florence's reactions are explained (kinda, but then unexplained) as something more than just the Zeitgeist, but because the whole sound track (with a few exceptions) is suffused with her medium, not his. R.


Cecily I think it's best that "the father business" is subtle. It means you can't be 100% certain. But I don't think it was much less subtle in the film.


Kalliope I will be watching the film tomorrow... so I have not read that part of your review...

You now know what I think... those word crumbs that led nowhere would have explained for me much more than the epilogue.

Sad story indeed and superb recreation of the period.


Fergus, Weaver of Autistic Webs I'm going to read it, Roger, and btw another fine review. Thanks!


Roger Brunyate Kalliope and Fergus, both: please be sure to let me know when you have watched the film and/or read the book! R.


Hanneke Splendid review, Roger!


Roger Brunyate Thank you, Hanneke.


message 31: by Lauren (new) - added it

Lauren I just reread this book its beautiful but sad and uncomfortable .Wish love was an easy thing a natural things not always ,its a beautiful read ,in a stunning setting.very good review Roger


Roger Brunyate Sad indeed, Lauren. McEwan is often sad; he does not so often, as you're right he does here, couple it with beauty. R.


Violet wells Terrific review as always, Roger. I didn't know there was a film.


Roger Brunyate Thanks, Violet. It is fairly new in the US, 3�4 months old. R.


Barbara As others have said, I also believe some readers miss so much in this novel. For me, the emotions that the novelist creates in the reader cannot be orchestrated, but arise from the layers of the characterization, interactions among characters, the lives of each, and always the landscape. The ability of a novel to do this for me as a reader will make it both memorable and a book I may read again.


message 36: by Roger (last edited Jul 28, 2018 07:12AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Roger Brunyate You are right, Barbara. Did you see the movie? The landscape is certainly a feature there. But by opening it out, as films tend to do, it may also undermine the quality that the landscape has in the book, both isolating and bleak. How would it work as a stage play, I wonder? R.


message 37: by Théo d'Or (new)

Théo d'Or I have only read " The Cement Garden", but, even so, I can say that you are right, I.M. - is, certainly, a " master a dissecting emotions ".


Roger Brunyate That was my first also, Theodor. But he only gets better from then on out! R.


message 39: by Théo d'Or (new)

Théo d'Or Going on your idea, I imagine what " On Chesil Beach " should be like ( the ninth volume), if " The Cement Garden" was only the second one..


message 40: by Théo d'Or (new)

Théo d'Or I just noticed something :
In "On Chesil" - we have a topic that contains, among others - an unconsumed love. In " The Cement Garden", we have at one point - an incest scene.
Here is an interesting polarity...


Fergus, Weaver of Autistic Webs Roger, your manner of writing reviews is IMPECCABLE. So glad we now have your Blog to look forward to regularly as well!


message 42: by Julie (last edited Apr 27, 2020 12:41PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Julie G Roger,
I adore you and Ian McEwan! This review was like a balm to my heart today. Thank you.


back to top