Will Byrnes's Reviews > I Contain Multitudes: The Microbes Within Us and a Grander View of Life
I Contain Multitudes: The Microbes Within Us and a Grander View of Life
by
by

Will Byrnes's review
bookshelves: books-of-the-year-2016, brain-candy, food-nutrition, nature, nonfiction, public-health, science
May 20, 2016
bookshelves: books-of-the-year-2016, brain-candy, food-nutrition, nature, nonfiction, public-health, science
You’ve got company.
Carol Anne Freeling was certainly right when she said, “They’re hee-ur,� well maybe not enraged spirits, but there are certainly plenty of entities present to which we have paid insufficient attention. Maybe Regan MacNeil was closer to the mark in proclaiming “We are legion.�

I won’t say this book will blow your mind, but this is your brain

And it’s not even Mardi Gras � from the Brain Association of Mississippi
This is your brain after reading this book

Shame about that haircut
[In the interest of full disclosure, it should be known that every day when my wife was reading this book, she would walk in the door and tell me of yet another thing she had read that had totally blown her mind. Not that my mind didn't go Ka-Boom when I read it. It certainly did. But hers was blown first. I only steal from the best. ]
I Contain Multitudes will change how you understand not only the human body, but all the biota on the planet, hell, the universe. It will help you understand how it can happen that diseases like the flu can adapt so quickly to our latest attempts to stamp them out. It will help you understand why coral reefs are dying. It will give you some new words that help keep the new knowledge manageable. (My favorite is dysbiosis which is what it sounds like, a biological parallel to dystopia, with a hint of enforced disorganization.) It will expand your appreciation for how microbial biology works within people and in the world. It will offer you hope that there can be a future in which many of our maladies will not only be diagnosable, but will be treatable with the introduction of the right, specific probiotic. It will do your dishes and massage your feet. Well, ok, not the last two, but KABOOM, big new look-at-the-world stuff. Ok, you biologist types, pre-med, med, post med, anti-med, wearers of white lab coats, whatever the length, you know this stuff, at least I hope you do. But for most of the rest of us it is indeed a big change, a new layer of reality, well maybe not entirely new, but new enough to go KABOOM!
Our intro to the world of which Yong writes, antibiotics, is probably akin to the one WW II bombadiers had through their bombsites. Amazing invention/discovery, antibiotics. They do a great job of wiping out pathogens, the nasties that make us ill, well, some of them anyway. Other harmful microbial types, the viral ones, roll their eyes at incoming antibiotics and keep on with what they are up to. However, as with items dropped from passing aircraft, the use of antibiotics entails considerable collateral damage, as the human body is a container for a vast array of microbial life. One might well envision millions of non-pathogenic residents shaking their fists as the incomings not only wipe out the harmful bugs, but vast numbers of the helpful ones as well. Ed Yong offers a more on-the-ground look, filling us in on what is actually going on inside, and how this part of what’s inside relates to that other part.

If these folks can have an entire civilization inside a locker, just imagine what might develop in your liver or large intestine.
If you don’t know who Ed Yong is, it’s a good bet that you will before too long. Yong is a popular science guy, a Neal DeGrasse Tyson, Bill Nye, Mary Roach, Jacques Cousteau, David Attenborough, Carl Sagan sort, a person who can take the wild, wonderful and fascinating things that are going on in the world of science and distill them all down for public consumption without making viewers� or readers� eyes glaze over, or listeners� ears suddenly clog, without making you feel like an ill-educated dolt, and he accomplishes this with enough humor to produce a fair number of smiles and an occasional LOL. (Not in Mary Roach’s league for humor, but hey, who is?) He is an award-winning science writer at The Atlantic, whose work has appeared in a wide range of publications, from The New York Times to Nature, from The Guardian to Wired, from Slate to Scientific American, and on and on. He splits his time between London and DC, and I would not be at all surprised if he dashes back and forth in a TARDIS. I have provided links in EXTRA STUFF that will lead you down rabbit holes of fun material from Yong that may take you a while to leave.

Ed Yong - From Speakerpedia
Among the many surprises you will encounter here are a squid with its own high-beams, the microbial advantage of vaginal birth, the impact of gut microbes on mood, why a third of human milk is set aside for our guests (protection payments?), the relationship between the US Navy and mucus, why no man may be an island, but we may be archipelagos, and vats more.
There is serious consideration given to how our relationships with this invisible world evolved:
Balance � from Explainxkcd.com
This raises some concerns, although they do not get a lot of attention here. If scientists can develop designer probiota to ameliorate suffering, there will always be evil-doers eager to use new technology to make designer biota intended to act as pathogens. In fact that is pretty much my sole gripe about this book. I wish more space had been devoted to the potential dangers of this advancing treatment modality. Just ask yourself, What would ISIS do?
The title of Ed Yong’s book may not be up there with The Selfish Gene, Silent Spring, or Guns, Germs and Steel but what it lacks in snappy-ness it more than makes up for in content. This is a smart, readable explanation of one of the major ongoing scientific revolutions of our time. If you look deep inside yourself you will know that this is absolutely must-read material.
Publication
-----August 9, 2016 - Hardcover
-----January 16, 2018 - Trade Paper
Review first posted � July 1, 2016
==========In the summer of 2019 GR reduced the allowable review size by 25%, from 20,000 to 15,000 characters. In order to accommodate the text beyond that I have moved it to the comments section directly below.

Carol Anne Freeling was certainly right when she said, “They’re hee-ur,� well maybe not enraged spirits, but there are certainly plenty of entities present to which we have paid insufficient attention. Maybe Regan MacNeil was closer to the mark in proclaiming “We are legion.�

When Orson Welles said “We’re born alone, we live alone, we die alone,� he was mistaken. Even when we are alone, we are never alone. We exist in symbiosis—a wonderful term that refers to different organisms living together. Some animals are colonized by microbes while they are still unfertilized eggs; others pick up their first partners at the moment of birth. We then proceed through our lives in their presence. When we eat, so do they. When we travel, they come along. When we die, they consume us. Every one of us is a zoo in our own right—a colony enclosed within a single body. A multi-species collection. An entire world.Trying to map what it is to be a physical human being, in something like the , is a daunting task. But our genes tell only part of our story, like a novel with a beginning and ending but no middle. That middle is taken up by the vast array of other life that exists within our bodies. While the guests we harbor may not necessarily be in league with Satan, they are a mixed lot. They mean us no harm, particularly, and we have evolved very workable symbiotic relationships with them, but they are not necessarily our friends either. They took up residence for their own benefit and will stick around and provide benefits to us only as long as we provide what they need, like that girl/boy friend you remember with gritted teeth.
I won’t say this book will blow your mind, but this is your brain

And it’s not even Mardi Gras � from the Brain Association of Mississippi
This is your brain after reading this book

Shame about that haircut
[In the interest of full disclosure, it should be known that every day when my wife was reading this book, she would walk in the door and tell me of yet another thing she had read that had totally blown her mind. Not that my mind didn't go Ka-Boom when I read it. It certainly did. But hers was blown first. I only steal from the best. ]
I Contain Multitudes will change how you understand not only the human body, but all the biota on the planet, hell, the universe. It will help you understand how it can happen that diseases like the flu can adapt so quickly to our latest attempts to stamp them out. It will help you understand why coral reefs are dying. It will give you some new words that help keep the new knowledge manageable. (My favorite is dysbiosis which is what it sounds like, a biological parallel to dystopia, with a hint of enforced disorganization.) It will expand your appreciation for how microbial biology works within people and in the world. It will offer you hope that there can be a future in which many of our maladies will not only be diagnosable, but will be treatable with the introduction of the right, specific probiotic. It will do your dishes and massage your feet. Well, ok, not the last two, but KABOOM, big new look-at-the-world stuff. Ok, you biologist types, pre-med, med, post med, anti-med, wearers of white lab coats, whatever the length, you know this stuff, at least I hope you do. But for most of the rest of us it is indeed a big change, a new layer of reality, well maybe not entirely new, but new enough to go KABOOM!
Our intro to the world of which Yong writes, antibiotics, is probably akin to the one WW II bombadiers had through their bombsites. Amazing invention/discovery, antibiotics. They do a great job of wiping out pathogens, the nasties that make us ill, well, some of them anyway. Other harmful microbial types, the viral ones, roll their eyes at incoming antibiotics and keep on with what they are up to. However, as with items dropped from passing aircraft, the use of antibiotics entails considerable collateral damage, as the human body is a container for a vast array of microbial life. One might well envision millions of non-pathogenic residents shaking their fists as the incomings not only wipe out the harmful bugs, but vast numbers of the helpful ones as well. Ed Yong offers a more on-the-ground look, filling us in on what is actually going on inside, and how this part of what’s inside relates to that other part.

If these folks can have an entire civilization inside a locker, just imagine what might develop in your liver or large intestine.
If you don’t know who Ed Yong is, it’s a good bet that you will before too long. Yong is a popular science guy, a Neal DeGrasse Tyson, Bill Nye, Mary Roach, Jacques Cousteau, David Attenborough, Carl Sagan sort, a person who can take the wild, wonderful and fascinating things that are going on in the world of science and distill them all down for public consumption without making viewers� or readers� eyes glaze over, or listeners� ears suddenly clog, without making you feel like an ill-educated dolt, and he accomplishes this with enough humor to produce a fair number of smiles and an occasional LOL. (Not in Mary Roach’s league for humor, but hey, who is?) He is an award-winning science writer at The Atlantic, whose work has appeared in a wide range of publications, from The New York Times to Nature, from The Guardian to Wired, from Slate to Scientific American, and on and on. He splits his time between London and DC, and I would not be at all surprised if he dashes back and forth in a TARDIS. I have provided links in EXTRA STUFF that will lead you down rabbit holes of fun material from Yong that may take you a while to leave.

Ed Yong - From Speakerpedia
Among the many surprises you will encounter here are a squid with its own high-beams, the microbial advantage of vaginal birth, the impact of gut microbes on mood, why a third of human milk is set aside for our guests (protection payments?), the relationship between the US Navy and mucus, why no man may be an island, but we may be archipelagos, and vats more.
There is serious consideration given to how our relationships with this invisible world evolved:
…animals emerged in a world that had already been teeming with microbes for billions of years. They were the rulers of the planet long before we arrived. And when we did arrive, of course we evolved ways of interacting with the microbes around us. It would be absurd not to, like moving into a new city wearing a blindfold, earplugs, and a muzzle. Besides, microbes weren’t just unavoidable: they were useful. They fed the pioneering animals. Their presence also provided valuable cues to areas rich in nutrients, to temperatures conducive to life, or flat surfaces upon which to settle. By sensing these cues, pioneering animals gained valuable information about the world around them…hints of those ancient interactions still abound today.“It all depends.� As if life wasn’t complicated enough. Don’t you just love it when you are looking for help and the person you are asking responds with “It all depends.� And it really does, and it really will. What will be different, though, will be that your caregiver will have a much better idea than most caregivers can possibly have today. They will be able to look at a profile from a type of blood test and match potential solutions to the bacteria living in your gut, or wherever else in your two-legged bacteria condo might pertain. This knowledge is still in its infancy � at least a broad knowledge, but it is coming, and has the potential to make meaningful improvements in our health.
As microbiologist Patrice Cani told me, “The future will be a la carte.�
And in this a la carte future, we won’t have to stop at picking the right bacteria for the job. Some scientists are picking the right genes for the job, and combining them into artisanal bacteria. Rather than just recruiting species with the right abilities, they are tinkering with the microbes themselves to endow them with new skills.

Balance � from Explainxkcd.com
This raises some concerns, although they do not get a lot of attention here. If scientists can develop designer probiota to ameliorate suffering, there will always be evil-doers eager to use new technology to make designer biota intended to act as pathogens. In fact that is pretty much my sole gripe about this book. I wish more space had been devoted to the potential dangers of this advancing treatment modality. Just ask yourself, What would ISIS do?
The title of Ed Yong’s book may not be up there with The Selfish Gene, Silent Spring, or Guns, Germs and Steel but what it lacks in snappy-ness it more than makes up for in content. This is a smart, readable explanation of one of the major ongoing scientific revolutions of our time. If you look deep inside yourself you will know that this is absolutely must-read material.
Publication
-----August 9, 2016 - Hardcover
-----January 16, 2018 - Trade Paper
Review first posted � July 1, 2016
==========In the summer of 2019 GR reduced the allowable review size by 25%, from 20,000 to 15,000 characters. In order to accommodate the text beyond that I have moved it to the comments section directly below.

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
I Contain Multitudes.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
May 2, 2016
–
Started Reading
May 8, 2016
–
Finished Reading
May 20, 2016
– Shelved
July 1, 2016
– Shelved as:
books-of-the-year-2016
July 1, 2016
– Shelved as:
brain-candy
July 1, 2016
– Shelved as:
food-nutrition
July 1, 2016
– Shelved as:
nature
July 1, 2016
– Shelved as:
nonfiction
July 1, 2016
– Shelved as:
public-health
July 1, 2016
– Shelved as:
science
Comments Showing 1-50 of 111 (111 new)

Outstanding reveiw Will...

Outstanding reveiw Will..."
I need to know where you got your time machine

Yes, probably not this week, but in June. It is an amazing book!

Yes, probably not this week, but in June. It is an amazing book!"
I'll be on the lookout for it.


Thanks, Henry. According to the Aussie vid, if you go by genes alone, we are only 1% human. The 90% biomass number sounds about right, though. It is only a few weeks before the book is released.

Thanks PJ. It is fascinating stuff.

That xkcd literally had me laughing out loud.
& you are correct that there may be some sinister applications of this science.
Of course, it remains to be seen if mastery of our organic multitudes will happen before the full advent of nanotech.

I read "Parasite Rex", by Carl Zimmer, a few months ago. Ever since, I relate every malaise my husband and I or any of our animals have to parasites.
I bet you, parasites are even more fascinating than viruses, bacteria, and other microbes. Toxoplasmosis, for instance, can make men less safety-minded and women more affectionate. (This explains a lot about our marriage.)
I think you need to read "Parasite Rex" asap. (I, unfortunately, haven't had time to review this book yet.) Then, let's compare all these critters and decide which ones are the most fascinating (and the most nasty).

I've been thinking microbiome for a while now, reading articles that appear etc; no entire books, though....
Maybe all this will make us humans more humble, not so human-centric, I mean. How do we know we're not here for their benefit? Or at least it's mutual. It's not all about us, people! Well, at some level it isn't. Hmm....

More likely we contain bacteria that preclude humility.
Extremely fascinating review, Will. Thank you.
Taught a little Microbiology in my day.
The planet really does belong to "the meek" (and our bodies, too!)
They'll be around long after all us big mammals are gone! :-)
Taught a little Microbiology in my day.
The planet really does belong to "the meek" (and our bodies, too!)
They'll be around long after all us big mammals are gone! :-)

They'll be around long after all us big mammals are gone!
No doubt

Jan wrote: "I can't believe I forgot to return and read this after commenting I was looking forward to your review. Probably thought I already had! Fun review and very informative, Will.
I've been thinking mi..."
Wait - it's not about us? Right, Ann! Great review, Will.
I've been thinking mi..."
Wait - it's not about us? Right, Ann! Great review, Will.
The parallel to the Human Genome Project is what I was thinking before you brought that in, Will! We were in a "science for the people" group for over a decade in Cambridge/Boston MA - mostly Leftist, top scientists and science profs but some lackeys like me, studying the ethical-social-political aspects of the HGP but the science is always so far ahead of our reflections on various impacts and considerations. (The group predicted insurance discrimination based on genetic info in the late 80s, years before it happened, and it really took the ACA to try to beat that back by insisting upon coverage of pre-existing conditions, for ex.) Seems like this may be a great choice for a section of STS (Sci., Tech., & Society) even at the undergrad level.

"When all the trees are cut, when all the animals are dead, when all the water is poisoned and the air can't be breathed, only then you will realize that you cannot eat money"
I cannot stop thinking if we really had the right to give up living like all the rest. On one hand I think we are in the wrong for obvious reasons, on another, I cannot imagine us living like something we are not, ignoring our potential just like that, a world without science and art and progress. I'm shuddering at the thought of it....Still this doesn't seem like a good enough argument. Cause basically I'm saying this way "We have the right, because we can" And this isn't a very good argument. In any case, even if we accept it, there are still things we can do without just fine. Like the stupid hunting. Unfortunately to too many people the words endangered species mean nothing. Or make up. I hope that not all cosmetic companies use animals to test their products, but I know that some do. Gee. I am ready to be a little less attractive. It's a small price to pay for the sparing of the health and lives of the poor puppies. It doesn't make that much difference anyway. And even if it did, it's still not a reason enough. Or those stupid people who believe they should wear coats of real fur. They have actual farms for foxes where they breed them and raise them under horrible conditions and the poor creatures live and die in agony. And I can go on about other stuff of this sort, but better not get carried away. It will only make you feel bad. You get my point anyway. We exploit others even when we don't actually need to because of some really, really superficial stuff. This is one of the reasons I am so disappointed with and angry at people.
Thanks again! :)

Actually it is all of us (species) that developed this way.
we are now, entirely separate category which makes us animals only technically
Nothing technical about it. We are animals.
"When all the trees are cut, when all the animals are dead, when all the water is poisoned and the air can't be breathed, only then you will realize that you cannot eat money"
Great quote. Unfortunately the powerful and rapacious prefer to get their rewards as soon as possible, whatever the long term cost to the planet.
We exploit others even when we don't actually need to because of some really, really superficial stuff.
Yes, we do. Sometimes, though, behaviors, and tastes can be changed if the proper pressure is applied for long enough. Use of animals for cosmetics testing, for example, has been greatly reduced. As has cigarette smoking. It appears that we can learn, as a species, but are probably not the best students.
Links to the author’s , , and
pages
WRITINGS
-----Ed’s blog, , on NatGeo
-----Yong’s weekly newsletter,
-----All Ed’s stories in
-----Ed’s stories for the section of The Atlantic
-----Ed’s articles for
-----Ed’s articles for Science Friday
ED TALKS
-----All Ed’s talks.
-----An individual TED talk � - Go ahead and watch this. You know you want to.
-----TED talk on , no, not Dick Cheney � on Nat Geo
VIDEOS
----- is an animation that presents in a very simple manner, but is quite good
----- - we are only 1% human if you are counting genes, an interesting vid from Australia’s NPS Medicinewise nonprofit
OTHER
----- � an Amsterdam museum of the invisible
------February 15, 2016 - NY Times - - by Nicholas Bakala
-----May 10,2017 - - by Gina Kolatomay
-----June 26, 2017 - NY Times - by Ferris Jabr - An early example of using our own microbiota to help cure problems that are at least in part caused by our own microbiota
-----July 14, 2017 - NY Times - A gene we believe is significant in diagnosing Alzheimer's may, in combination with non-DNA material, help prevent it - - by Pagan Kennedy
-----July 31, 2017 - NY Times - - by Aneri Pattani
-----August 24, 2017 - NY Times - a fascinating new study of contemporary hunter-gatherers' microbiome has implications for modern diets, and health - by Carl Zimmer
-----February 1, 2018 - NY Times - Some of our tenants are behaving badly - with 50,000 Americans dying every year from colon cancer, early testing for these two microbes can save an awful lot of lives - - by Gina Kolata
-----April 13, 2018 - NY Times - More KA-BOOM from this article on the surprisingly global reach of viruses - - by Jim Robbins
-----May 25, 2018 - NY Times - Gives new meaning to the phrase 'I had a gut feeling' - - by William D. Cohen
-----February 5, 2019 - Smithsonian - If your gut feeling is depression, there may be a biotic cause - - by Jane Recker
-----March 2, 2019 - NY Times - - by Eric Topol -----April 9, 2019 - NY Times - - by Kaleigh Rogers
-----November 23, 2016 - I Contain Multitudes is named to the NY Times list of of 2016
-----June 12, 2019 - - by Apoorva Mandavilli
-----March 18, 2021 - by Anahad O’Connor
-----July 11, 2021 - The Guardian - by Rebecca Seal - there is a lot of god information in this piece