欧宝娱乐

After finishing this book I felt virtuous, relieved. Then baffled, irritated, and finally dismissive. Other Good Reads reviewers express the desire to like this book, but proceed to be confused, bored, and insecure. Most wrap up with the dismal feeling that they didn鈥檛 GET it, and so didn鈥檛 succeed in really liking it. I felt the same, but in addition was supremely annoyed and turned off by it. I鈥檓 not so good at post-modern fiction to begin with, but I decided to leave my bias at the door because I had heard such great things about this author, and Pamuk didn鈥檛 seem like a bogus poser from what I鈥檇 read.
The story is about an expatriate Turkish poet named Ka who leads a solitary and arid life in Frankfurt and travels to a remote village in his homeland, ostensibly to investigate a spate of suicides by religious Muslim women protesting the injunction to remove their head scarves at school. He is really there to kindle a romance with a recently divorced woman he knew at university. The novel unfolds over three days when the snow has cut off the town from the outside world. What transpires is a coup led by a dysfunctional theater troupe, a lot of political intrigue, and much ball batting between secular and religious townspeople. Pamuk gives equal billing to every opinion, although they do not differ much in terms of their reductive, inflamed and binary natures, or in ability to capture my interest or sustained attention. This is in large part because the protagonist Ka is stunted,childish and infuriating himself, and the writing is both busy and detached. The political intrigue and opinions in Snow are not interesting or illuminating, as they do not emanate from fleshed-out people, but cardboard cut-outs spouting giant, densely packed and tedious word bubbles.
Inspiration strikes Ka while in Kars, and he stops to transcribe a series of nineteen poems, whenever they descend on him in perfectly realized form. Conveniently they get lost, but a conversation about them between Ka and his paramour goes like this:
鈥淚s it beautiful?鈥� he asked her a few moments later.
鈥淵es, it鈥檚 beautiful!鈥� said Ipek.
Ka read a few more lines aloud and then asked her again, 鈥淚s it beautiful?鈥�
鈥淚t鈥檚 beautiful,鈥� Ipek replied.
When he finished reading the poem, he asked, 鈥淪o what was it that made it beautiful?鈥�
鈥淚 don鈥檛 know,鈥� Ipek replied, 鈥渂ut I did find it beautiful.鈥�
鈥淒id Muhtar [her ex] ever read you a poem like this?鈥�
鈥淣ever,鈥� she said.
Ka began to read the poem aloud again, this time with growing force, but he still stopped at all the same places to ask, 鈥淚s it beautiful?鈥� He also stopped at a few new places to say, 鈥淚t really is very beautiful, isn鈥檛 it?鈥�
鈥淵es, it鈥檚 very beautiful!鈥� Ipek replied.
To my mind, only a child under ten should ever be indulged in this sort of megalomania, and then only by his mother, but Ka is nowhere punished, ridiculed or even chided for his insufferable personality, and in fact I think we are supposed to admire him as embodying the innocence, purity, pathos and single-mindedness that come with being a true artist.
Margaret Atwood says, in the New York Times Book Review 鈥淣ot only an engrossing feat of tale-spinning, but essential reading for our times. [Pamuk is] narrating his country into being.鈥� This seems to me the best case for why Snow won the Nobel Prize. The book makes Turkey legible, as well as digestible, to the West. The novel is chock a block with allusions to white western male institutions 鈥� Kafka, Coleridge, Mann, Nabokov (he wrote a lot of stuff in the west, anyway): an annoying and intrusive narrator, a novelist named Orhan, whose games of peek-a-boo get harder and harder to humor, an abysmal, abyssal usage of literary envelopes, a morose and misunderstood genius of a hero who falls desparately in love with a woman he obstinately refuses to lend more than one dimension 鈥� the sex scenes, incidentally, are some of the most unintentionally off-putting I have ever read, and recall the experience almost every woman has been unfortunate to undergo at least once, where she feels she might leave the room, go get some cheesecake and stand in the door frame watching her partner rythmically brutalizing a stack of pillows in laughable ignorance of her whereabouts or even existence. Afterwards our hero has the witlessness to add to the injury by calling this essentially masturbatory act 鈥渓ove-making鈥�. In fact, this pretty much sums up my response to the whole book.