RedemptionDenied's Reviews > Abandon
Abandon
by
by

RedemptionDenied's review
bookshelves: 2016, ebook, i-didn-t-see-that-coming, mystery, review-of-another-edition, suspense, thriller, what-the-hell-is-going-on
Jun 26, 2016
bookshelves: 2016, ebook, i-didn-t-see-that-coming, mystery, review-of-another-edition, suspense, thriller, what-the-hell-is-going-on
I'm an emotional wreck after reading this book; probably due to the Lana Hartman situation. What the hell was that all about? I really liked it up until that point - then it pissed me off.
Lawrence Kendall (History Professor), his daughter Abigail Foster (Journalist), two guides (Scott and Jerrod) and a husband and wife team of Paranormal Photographers (Emmett and June) head up to the ghost town of Abandon (originally called Hope by Bart Packer). Four members of the group are unaware they are there under false pretences.
What starts out to be an investigation into the mysterious disappearance of an entire town on Christmas Day 1893 - soon turns into a fight for survival. Even though there are phantasm hunters in the group; this is not a story about the supernatural, though Abandon is a haunted town with a dark past where history is about to repeat itself. So there are no ghosts or apparitions floating around sneaking up on people, but there are some new players in this decrepit town - which took the story in a direction I wasn't expecting.
This is basically a story about three things: Greed, madness and secrets - and what happens when certain secrets are no longer kept a secret. In 1893 a secret is shared, and that sets in motion a series of events, which have dire consequences. Fast forward one hundred sixteen years and another secret is shared - that too has consequences. Nobody can keep a secret, I guess.
Anyway, I really enjoyed the book. I liked the descriptions of the wilderness, changing weather conditions and the mining town. And I liked how it vacillated between the different time-lines every few chapters; how it all fitted together. What I didn't like was: how some of the sentences didn't make any sense, no matter how many times I read it or added/changed words. Not sure if it's me or the authors writing style? At times it felt like a crucible trying to make sense of it all - and I've been reading the revised and re edited edition, which I assume is superior to previous editions? Who knows?
Lawrence Kendall (History Professor), his daughter Abigail Foster (Journalist), two guides (Scott and Jerrod) and a husband and wife team of Paranormal Photographers (Emmett and June) head up to the ghost town of Abandon (originally called Hope by Bart Packer). Four members of the group are unaware they are there under false pretences.
What starts out to be an investigation into the mysterious disappearance of an entire town on Christmas Day 1893 - soon turns into a fight for survival. Even though there are phantasm hunters in the group; this is not a story about the supernatural, though Abandon is a haunted town with a dark past where history is about to repeat itself. So there are no ghosts or apparitions floating around sneaking up on people, but there are some new players in this decrepit town - which took the story in a direction I wasn't expecting.
This is basically a story about three things: Greed, madness and secrets - and what happens when certain secrets are no longer kept a secret. In 1893 a secret is shared, and that sets in motion a series of events, which have dire consequences. Fast forward one hundred sixteen years and another secret is shared - that too has consequences. Nobody can keep a secret, I guess.
Anyway, I really enjoyed the book. I liked the descriptions of the wilderness, changing weather conditions and the mining town. And I liked how it vacillated between the different time-lines every few chapters; how it all fitted together. What I didn't like was: how some of the sentences didn't make any sense, no matter how many times I read it or added/changed words. Not sure if it's me or the authors writing style? At times it felt like a crucible trying to make sense of it all - and I've been reading the revised and re edited edition, which I assume is superior to previous editions? Who knows?
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Abandon.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
June 26, 2016
– Shelved as:
to-read
June 26, 2016
– Shelved
July 27, 2016
–
Started Reading
July 28, 2016
–
81.77%
"Looks like history is about to repeat itself. One mystery is solved."
page
332
July 29, 2016
– Shelved as:
2016
July 29, 2016
– Shelved as:
ebook
July 29, 2016
– Shelved as:
i-didn-t-see-that-coming
July 29, 2016
– Shelved as:
mystery
July 29, 2016
– Shelved as:
review-of-another-edition
July 29, 2016
– Shelved as:
suspense
July 29, 2016
– Shelved as:
thriller
July 29, 2016
– Shelved as:
what-the-hell-is-going-on
July 29, 2016
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-42 of 42 (42 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Frances
(new)
Dec 01, 2017 12:36PM

reply
|
flag



:-) And, any author other than Blake Crouch probably would have done exactly that; that wouldn't be nearly evil enough for him.....


It was a really good read, it keeps the reader wanting to find out what's going to happen. A page turner for sure.







But I think that was the point—Crouch is gifted in writing characters you feel you know deeply, and come to care about. Lana was one of the few genuinely good characters in this story. And that’s why her fate was so devastating, IMHO.
One of my professors told me that art needs to evoke an emotional response in the audience. Abandoned sure did for me.

Year's later, I'm still brooding over the epilogue of book 3 of the Wayward Pines trilogy (quadrilogy - I hope). Looking forward to a reread, someday. Thanks for commenting!




Thank you, Jen! Hope you enjoy it when you get around to reading it! Still not sure about the author's prose and still upset at how the Wayward Pines trilogy ended. Might sue due to the fact it didn't end in a satisfying way, lol.