ŷ

Darwin8u's Reviews > The Idiot

The Idiot by Fyodor Dostoevsky
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
2294090
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: 2013, 1001-ante-mortem

“Don’t let us forget that the causes of human actions are usually immeasurably more complex and varied than our subsequent explanations of them.�
� Fyodor Dostoyevsky, The Idiot

description

At once 'The Idiot' is a complicated, beautiful and yet ultimately a somewhat flawed novel. Written shortly after 'Crime and Punishment', it seems like Dostoevsky wanted to invert Raskolnikov. Instead of a mad killer, Prince Myshkin the 'Idiot' is an innocent saint, a positive, a beautiful soul and holy fool motivated by helping those around him. He is a Christ in an un-Christian world, a tortured Don Quixote.

Dostoevsky is able to use Prince Myshkin's spiritual intelligence and Rogozhin's passion to illuminate the main problems and idocyncrasies of Russian society. But the story still falls a bit short of perfection. It literally falls between 'Crime and Punishment' and 'Brothers Karamazov'; failing to achieve the simple greatness of 'Crime and Punishment' and the complex greatness of 'Brothers Karamazov'. Like Myshkin himself, the novel's intent is nearly perfect, but the execution is just a little off, a little unstable. That doesnt mean I didn't love it. As a novel I adored it. I was both taken by and frustrated with Prince Myshkin.

Perhaps my favorite parts of this novel fall into the scenes where Dostoevsky is focused on a painting or an execution. He isn't content with a superficial look at the world. He examines things for depth and poignance that actually left me shaking. He studies Holbein's grotesque 'The Body of the Dead Christ in the Tomb' with a patient, detailed eye that at once appears to capture the whole life and death of Christ. He describes the beheading of John the Baptist; looking for details of his face in that still and eternal second before his execution. In this Dostoevesky is recreating his own near execution and the horror and magnificence that death (or a near death in Dostoevsky's case) brings to a person's fragile, beautiful and flawed life.
104 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read The Idiot.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

May 19, 2011 – Shelved
June 29, 2013 – Started Reading
June 30, 2013 –
page 37
5.85%
June 30, 2013 –
page 60
9.48% "The Beheading of John the Baptist"
June 30, 2013 –
page 190
30.02%
July 1, 2013 –
page 233
36.81% "Body of Dead Christ in Tomb"
July 2, 2013 – Finished Reading
July 3, 2013 – Shelved as: 2013
September 3, 2013 – Shelved as: 1001-ante-mortem

Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Zemene (new) - added it

Zemene What do you mean by "the simple greatness of 'Crime and Punishment' and the complex greatness of 'Brothers Karamazov'?"


Darwin8u Zemene wrote: "What do you mean by "the simple greatness of 'Crime and Punishment' and the complex greatness of 'Brothers Karamazov'?""

I think both are great. I think BK is more complicated, IMHO, than C&P. Does that mean I think C&P isn't complicated? Nah. I think the simplest Dostoevsky stories are more rich and complicated than most other writers master with their entire output. Fair enough?


s.penkevich Great review!


Darwin8u s.penkevich wrote: "Great review!"

Thanks man.


Lawyer You capture all the reasons I read Dostoevsky. Well done. No, an understatement. Superb.


Darwin8u Mike wrote: "You capture all the reasons I read Dostoevsky. Well done. No, an understatement. Superb."

Thanks Mike. I think we probably all do the same thing with the big Russian D. He is like an Everest or a Yosemite. We stop. We wonder. We breathe in and recognize our own insignificance, yet our own part in a greater Universal.


Maru Kun You picked a great quote at the start!


Darwin8u Thanks Maru.


Tom LA What a great review, you're making great points. In my opinion, the way Myshkin's presence among regular people acts as a chemical agent that produces very visceral reactions is the real genius of this novel. His "impossible" goodness does not work perfectly, like you say, precisely because he is only human. A Christ-like figure that is only human is never going to work perfectly well - that is why the debate around the divinity of Jesus was SO important in the first centuries of Christianity, and why it created SO many intense arguments: because, in a sense, it's THE entire point of Christianity. We are unable to achieve absolute goodness, what we can do is use absolute goodness as a magnet towards which our entire life should be oriented. It's only in this context that sin and mercy can make sense.


back to top