Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Violet wells's Reviews > Paradise

Paradise by Toni Morrison
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4196681
's review

liked it

Sometimes you have to hold up your hands as a reader and admit maybe you didn’t do a book justice. I found Paradise really difficult to follow. Mainly this is due to there being no central character. The central character instead is a town called Ruby where only blacks live and are free of white legislation and a nearby building known as the convent. The awfulness of men and magical prowess of women is its theme. Well not quite but the divisions drawn here are not between blacks and whites but between men and women. The men drawing their inspiration from the past, the women much more inclined to look forward.

I’d be interested to know how many characters there are in this novel. I would guess about a hundred and they all have significance which for me meant Morrison was asking too much of the reader. No doubt a novelist lives obsessively in the novel she’s writing. As a reader this isn’t the case. We have the rest of our life to get on with every day. If a character who has only had two lines reappears after a hundred pages it’s almost cruel to expect us to remember him or her. And yet if we don’t remember them here we are punished, shoved out of the narrative. To fully appreciate this novel I’d guess you’d have to read it in three sittings. Unfortunately I was only managing to read about twenty pages a day. On top of that I wasn’t really convinced by any of the characters.

At the beginning, a lynch party of men set out with guns and various other weapons to put an end to the reign of a few mysterious women living in the building outside the town. A witch hunt in other words. The men have managed to convince themselves these women are ungodly. The novel then goes backwards in time to document both the history of the small town of Ruby and the various women who have ended up at the convent. There’s some cleverness in the construction of this novel � I liked how it turns full circle which does create a lot of intrigue - but there’s also a good deal of clumsiness. For starters the characters aren’t particularly memorable with perhaps one or two exceptions. A lot of them, especially the men, seemed interchangeable. Neither is the prose as haunting and exalted as Morrison’s usual fare. So though I felt I didn’t do it justice I can still say with conviction it’s no Beloved. In fact it’s my least favourite of the Morrison novels I’ve read.
183 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Paradise.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

July 13, 2016 – Shelved
July 13, 2016 – Shelved as: to-read
September 25, 2017 – Started Reading
October 21, 2017 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-26 of 26 (26 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Dolors (new)

Dolors Morrison's novels are always a challenge, but this one sounds particularly difficult to follow.


°­²¹°ù±ð²Ô· I remember being blown out of the water by this one, lent my copy to someone and never got it back. But I think I read it at a time when I could do it in two or three sittings, yes. And also willing to suspend all criticism. I don't know how I'd fare with it now.


Violet wells Dolors wrote: "Morrison's novels are always a challenge, but this one sounds particularly difficult to follow."

It's the first of hers I've really struggled with, Dolors.


Violet wells ·°­²¹°ù±ð²Ô· wrote: "I remember being blown out of the water by this one, lent my copy to someone and never got it back. But I think I read it at a time when I could do it in two or three sittings, yes. And also willin..."

That's interesting, Karen, because often I felt this book was much better than my reading of it. Poses the question of whether it’s legitimate to compose a novel in such a way as to require quick reading to bring out all its qualities. Now and again a novel does demand more attention than I’m as the reader capable of giving it. I admired her for putting me to the test but ultimately couldn’t quite decide who had failed the test, me or her. Perhaps six of one and half a dozen of the other.


message 5: by Steven (new)

Steven Godin I have yet to read Morrison, at least that's one less to pick from now.
Staggered by the amount of characters you mention, even without a mind like a sieve it sounds an uphill tussle. Nice pithy review!


Violet wells Steven wrote: "I have yet to read Morrison, at least that's one less to pick from now.
Staggered by the amount of characters you mention, even without a mind like a sieve it sounds an uphill tussle. Nice pithy re..."


They've all got oddball names too which doesn't help. Not only that, often they've got two names and she keeps alternating between the two. Half the time I completely lost track of who everyone was.


Lisa I agree with you, Violet. Despite being an ardent Morrison fan, I found this one confusing and hard to follow. That can be a good thing, but it was a bit too much.


Violet wells Lisa wrote: "I agree with you, Violet. Despite being an ardent Morrison fan, I found this one confusing and hard to follow. That can be a good thing, but it was a bit too much."

Yep, I only had a clear idea of who a couple of characters were, the rest were continually eluding me. It felt like an early rehearsal of what dementia might be like.


message 9: by Jaline (new)

Jaline Terrific review, Violet! I appreciated reading your perspective on this! :)


message 10: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala Violet wrote: "...Now and again a novel does demand more attention than I’m as the reader capable of giving it. I admired her for putting me to the test but ultimately couldn’t quite decide who had failed the test, me or her..."

Your opening line about readers sometimes having to admit they haven’t done a book justice also caught my attention, Violet. If there was a ‘handbook for readers�, these are the kinds of issues I’d enjoy seeing thrashed out.


Violet wells Jaline wrote: "Terrific review, Violet! I appreciated reading your perspective on this! :)"

Thanks Jaline.


Violet wells Fionnuala wrote: "Violet wrote: "...Now and again a novel does demand more attention than I’m as the reader capable of giving it. I admired her for putting me to the test but ultimately couldn’t quite decide who had..."

That would be a fascinating topic for debate. No one would dispute that our enjoyment of novels has a lot of subjectivity in it. And I enjoy reviews that recognise this. But I also enjoy reviews that acknowledge novels as being subject to objectively formulated laws of quality. There is a lot of science in literary criticism. What I like less are reviews that gush or rant as if everything said is scientific fact and you must be an imbecile if you have a contrary opinion. Sometimes we need to admit we can enjoy things which perhaps are unworthy of our love or we hate things because they stretch our mental abilities beyond their limits. I have to say all my friends here fall in the former categories but now and again a review appears on my feed that reads like someone blaming the EU for everything bad without a shred of evidence that what they’re saying is founded in anything but a belligerent and cherished ignorance.


message 13: by Fionnuala (new)

Fionnuala Violet wrote: "...But I also enjoy reviews that acknowledge novels as being subject to objectively formulated laws of quality. There is a lot of science in literary criticism..."

But there are also ‘vogues� in literary criticism. Hemingway, for example.
Virginia Woolf suffered at the hands of literary critics in her lifetime. And she in turn misjudged a few of her contemporaries.
It’s tricky.


Violet wells Fionnuala wrote: "Violet wrote: "...But I also enjoy reviews that acknowledge novels as being subject to objectively formulated laws of quality. There is a lot of science in literary criticism..."

But there are als..."


Yep, and it's inevitable that future generations will have a new set of ideas. What I mean is there are objective fundamental criteria for assessing the quality of novels as works of art rather than just enjoyable escapism. Doesn't mean any of us will be conclusively right or wrong but they do provide a helping hand.


message 15: by John of Canada (new)

John of Canada I always feel just a little more learned after reading your reviews.I think I will keep this book off my Tbr list.Good work as usual Violet.


Jenn "JR" Great review - I think we were on the same timeline reading this. I also found it quite challenging - and I understand Violet's comment about dementia! Check out my review.


message 17: by Angie (new) - added it

Angie Thank you for this review. I'm not the only one. Sometimes I find myself going back a few pages because I didn't understand what was happening, it wasn't making sense. The, one sentence would help me decipher what just happened. Her writing is not always clear. Please tell me it's worth sticking with. I'm on Seneca, page 81.


message 18: by Will (new) - rated it 5 stars

Will Bell Why is this rambling the top rated review?


message 19: by Aown (new) - rated it 4 stars

Aown Kaz I really liked the book but I couldn’t remember the characters either. The women merged during the most part and it was only at the end that I finally got the sense of who was who.
But like you said I think this was my own limitation. It’s a good story and one needs to be a better reader to do it justice.


Karen Jean Your review encapsulates my misgivings on this book. I struggled with it at first and it was only my determination of finishing a book I have started that kept me going. It is, indeed, a far cry from Beloved or even the The Bluest Eye.


Agnieszka Thank you so much for this review. I'm trying to read it now and while I'm almost half way through, I haven't found any of the characters memorable or stories gripping. I agree, she is asking too much from the reader. I'm glad it's not the first book of hers that I've read, otherwise it would totally put me off from reading more by Morrison.


message 22: by Sawaiz (new) - added it

Sawaiz Riaz Oh my goodness! Someone said it. I'm about a 100 pages into the novel but can't seem to make sense of it. The plot is complex, the characters so different and versatile that there's no way I can make sense of it. I'm really pushing through, but this novel's a hard ride.


message 23: by Sondria (new) - added it

Sondria Harp I’m just wondering if anyone who reviewed this book above realize that this is the third part of a trilogy. Maybe that’s why it’s hard to read.


Joseph Young Not everything is for you: maybe that’s why you don’t understand...


Amber Nelson I echo the thanks of others, I have read the others and just struggled too


Matthieu Cornillon You are right that this is a challenging book to follow. It's also typical of Toni Morrison: she introduces characters bit by bit, glimpse by glimpse. Often, she starts with descriptions that make you think you've missed some details previously shared. But the details you feel are missing don't actually come out until later. She always fills in those blanks, but it does indeed take time and patience with the book to have those mysteries resolved. In addition, it's typical of her writing to present multiple views of the same event from different perspectives, each of the tellings a little different. I agree it's tricky in general, and this book in particular is the most sprawling in terms of number of characters, at least among those I've read. I personally think it's worth it to have it all come together, but I agree it's challenging, and--as others have commented--it might not be for everyone.


back to top