Michael Finocchiaro's Reviews > Portnoy's Complaint
Portnoy's Complaint
by
by

Michael Finocchiaro's review
bookshelves: fiction, american-20th-c, american-21st-c, pulitzer-fiction, favorites, novels
Jul 16, 2016
bookshelves: fiction, american-20th-c, american-21st-c, pulitzer-fiction, favorites, novels
Read 2 times. Last read December 14, 2021 to December 26, 2021.
This is the book that made Philip Roth both famous and scandalous. Portnoy is a mother-obsessed sexual maniac and actually quite hilarious. Who else would have had his character masturbating with a cow liver other than the author of the equally darkly humorous Sabbath's Theater? This book and the reaction to it drives the Nathan Zuckerman series of books which all refer back to the public reaction with equal measures of awe and dismay. The book itself is a classic and extremely well-written as only Roth can write.
If I were to compare Roth to another onanist-obsesses writer, I’d probably choose France’s Houllebecq who can barely string two paragraphs together before whipping it out. However, Roth is truly able to get inside his characters and make them real, living breathing beings. I found that Houllebecq’s characters lacked any depth or even human understanding. They are just masturbatory cogs in a wheel. The wheel itself is well-described, but it is all so nihilistic and fatalist which is one reason why he is a darling to the extreme right who deplore decadence and think that God or their conceptions of right/wrong should be imposed because given freewill, humans will always be depraved. Roth’s view is less cynical. There is evil in the world, but it comes from conscious choices, and not just from the world’s inherent immorality or some antiquated idea of fate.
RIP (1933-2018). One of America's literary giants has left us.
If I were to compare Roth to another onanist-obsesses writer, I’d probably choose France’s Houllebecq who can barely string two paragraphs together before whipping it out. However, Roth is truly able to get inside his characters and make them real, living breathing beings. I found that Houllebecq’s characters lacked any depth or even human understanding. They are just masturbatory cogs in a wheel. The wheel itself is well-described, but it is all so nihilistic and fatalist which is one reason why he is a darling to the extreme right who deplore decadence and think that God or their conceptions of right/wrong should be imposed because given freewill, humans will always be depraved. Roth’s view is less cynical. There is evil in the world, but it comes from conscious choices, and not just from the world’s inherent immorality or some antiquated idea of fate.
RIP (1933-2018). One of America's literary giants has left us.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Portnoy's Complaint.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
July 16, 2016
–
Started Reading
July 16, 2016
– Shelved
July 17, 2016
–
Finished Reading
July 19, 2016
– Shelved as:
fiction
November 18, 2016
– Shelved as:
american-20th-c
November 18, 2016
– Shelved as:
american-21st-c
November 18, 2016
– Shelved as:
pulitzer-fiction
November 18, 2016
– Shelved as:
favorites
November 21, 2016
– Shelved as:
novels
December 14, 2021
–
Started Reading
December 26, 2021
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Louise
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
May 25, 2018 10:34AM

reply
|
flag
