Graeme Rodaughan's Reviews > ’Salem’s Lot
’Salem’s Lot
by
by

Vampires are my personal bogeyman

I remember seeing "Salem's Lot" the movie, with David Soul as Ben Mears, when I was fifteen years old, and I truly believed in the existence of vampires for at least a week after watching that movie. (...and maybe, I never stopped believing...)
Sometime in my early twenties, I picked up a copy of Salem's Lot and read it for the first time. So it's been a while, close to thirty years between reads.
Some people may say that this book begins as a slow burn, but I didn't find it that way. From the moment that a clearly haunted Ben Mears comes to the Lot and tells of his childhood encounter with a ghost, it was on for me.
Stephen King's vampires are truly horrific, easily characterised as demonically possessed, blood drinking ghosts with the power to mesmerise their victims - never, ever, look into their eyes.
Like some other stories by Stephen King that I have read, hell is other people, and the people of Salem's Lot provide a full panorama view of themselves falling prey to their own natures as much as they fall prey to the curse of vampires sweeping their town.
On a technical note, I was completely surprised by the authors use of a deus ex machina about half way through the novel. One of his main characters is in a right pickle, and Stephen King provides him with a genius level ability to solve the problem, without any foreshadowing that I could see. It blew me right out of immersion in the narrative.
If the overall narrative was not so damn good, this would drop the rating by a star, however, I can't bring myself to not give this book, which has impacted me on multiple levels anything less than five stars.
A recommended read for anyone who would enjoy a genuinely scary, spooky, creep you out and possibly give you nightmares story.

I remember seeing "Salem's Lot" the movie, with David Soul as Ben Mears, when I was fifteen years old, and I truly believed in the existence of vampires for at least a week after watching that movie. (...and maybe, I never stopped believing...)
Sometime in my early twenties, I picked up a copy of Salem's Lot and read it for the first time. So it's been a while, close to thirty years between reads.
Some people may say that this book begins as a slow burn, but I didn't find it that way. From the moment that a clearly haunted Ben Mears comes to the Lot and tells of his childhood encounter with a ghost, it was on for me.
Stephen King's vampires are truly horrific, easily characterised as demonically possessed, blood drinking ghosts with the power to mesmerise their victims - never, ever, look into their eyes.
Like some other stories by Stephen King that I have read, hell is other people, and the people of Salem's Lot provide a full panorama view of themselves falling prey to their own natures as much as they fall prey to the curse of vampires sweeping their town.
On a technical note, I was completely surprised by the authors use of a deus ex machina about half way through the novel. One of his main characters is in a right pickle, and Stephen King provides him with a genius level ability to solve the problem, without any foreshadowing that I could see. It blew me right out of immersion in the narrative.
If the overall narrative was not so damn good, this would drop the rating by a star, however, I can't bring myself to not give this book, which has impacted me on multiple levels anything less than five stars.
A recommended read for anyone who would enjoy a genuinely scary, spooky, creep you out and possibly give you nightmares story.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
’Salem’s Lot.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
August 13, 2016
– Shelved
September 13, 2016
– Shelved as:
horror
September 13, 2016
– Shelved as:
vampires
September 24, 2016
–
Started Reading
October 1, 2016
–
0.21%
"Reading the "Salem's Lot" as part of an upcoming Castle Dracula group read for late in October 2016"
page
1
October 24, 2016
–
18.01%
"The disappearances have begun, the terror is creeping, creeping out of the shadows, but not yet revealed."
page
87
October 26, 2016
–
53.0%
"Plenty of time to read at airports....
It's instructive to watch SK insert a sub plot between Susan Norton and her mother seemlessly into the story which resolves ...."
page
256
It's instructive to watch SK insert a sub plot between Susan Norton and her mother seemlessly into the story which resolves ...."
October 26, 2016
–
53.0%
"Whoops. SK uses a deus ex machina to save someone's life. Blew right out of my immersion in the story."
page
256
October 28, 2016
–
90.06%
"Vampire stories always allow the passing of the daylight to create suspense, like the ticking counter on a bomb."
page
435
October 28, 2016
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-17 of 17 (17 new)
date
newest »




Great review, Graeme! Yes, I watch the movie before Halloween every year ;)

As for the book, it's classic King, and him on top form at that! Great review.

Cool. Glad you enjoyed it.

Interesting enough since that comment post I still have yet to do my reread. I have been tied up with a cool action packed vampire series that I just cannot break away from at all! 😁 Someday I will get back to doing a reread of this book! :)

Indeed, Derrick. One of it's better qualities.
That's because King understands how to draw a villain.

That movie messed me up good as a kid and I had nightmares for quite some time. I really shouldn't have watched it when I did. I was way too young for that one! *LOL..."
Nicking the image from your comment, Renegade. It's too iconic not to use. One of the freakiest, scariest moments in both the book and the movie.
Thanks in advance.
That movie messed me up good as a kid and I had nightmares for quite some time. I really shouldn't have watched it when I did. I was way too young for that one! *LOL*
I've read a fair bit of Stephen King's work over the years, but not this one despite my all my good intentions. One of these days... when I'm ready...
*takes a deep breath*
One of these days...