Kevin Ansbro's Reviews > Ҳá貹Dz
Ҳá貹Dz
by
by

Kevin Ansbro's review
bookshelves: awesome-premise, modern-fable, nature, recommended-by-cecily, sci-fi, tongue-in-cheek, wry-humour, parable, allegory
Oct 24, 2016
bookshelves: awesome-premise, modern-fable, nature, recommended-by-cecily, sci-fi, tongue-in-cheek, wry-humour, parable, allegory
"When all was said and done, the creatures of the Ҳá貹Dz Islands were a pretty listless bunch compared with rhinos and hippos and lions and elephants and so on."
Leon Trotsky Trout is as dead as a dodo but is nevertheless the incorporeal narrator of a story told a million years into our future.
Trout recounts a sequence of evolutionary events that began in 1986 as a bunch of bipedal misfits gathered in Ecuador for 'The Nature Cruise of the Century.'
Looking back at humankind from a million-years-in-the-future perspective, we were a freakish bunch, possessing oversized brains that we didn't make the best use of, and even gave names to dogs.
Also, because our brains were the size of fat mangoes and not yet atrophied by evolution, a discussion between a husband and wife under stress could end up like a fight between two blindfolded people on roller skates.
Captain Adolf von Kleist, who doesn't know shit from Shinola, is somehow left in charge of this ill-fated, over-hyped maiden voyage to the Ҳá貹Dz Islands.
(I can assure you that the story is better read than explained).
I was a latecomer to Vonnegut and fell in love with his writing quicker than you could say "woolly mammoth." He elucidates with the conviction of a mad prophet; his prose is cheerily unfussy and he is always wickedly provocative.
And, in keeping with the 'circle of life' theme, there are fish metaphors aplenty.
For no reason other than authorial whimsy, he anoints any character who is about to die with an asterisk (so we know in advance that they are going to pop their clogs) and mischievously over-explains things that are blindingly obvious to anyone bar our tiny-brained human descendants, one million years into the future.
Vonnegut had a droll sense of humour that I found immediately enjoyable, and Monty Python fans are sure to like his style. But there is a great deal of sagacity to be found in his eccentricity.
It should come as no surprise to anyone that we humans prove to be the architects of our own downfall. Despite our hefty brains, we are somehow ignorant of the perils of war, financial crashes, global viruses, world overpopulation, climate change and meteorites hitting our planet.
Ain't that the truth?
The only carp I have with Vonnegut is his scattergun approach to plot lines. The story staggers backwards and forwards like a drunken sailor in a hall of mirrors and I felt that the philosophical quotes interrupted - rather than enhanced- the narrative.
In truth, I didn't know what to expect from Vonnegut's Ҳá貹Dz, but was pleasantly surprised, loving every daft, dizzy, witty moment of this prescient read!
Leon Trotsky Trout is as dead as a dodo but is nevertheless the incorporeal narrator of a story told a million years into our future.
Trout recounts a sequence of evolutionary events that began in 1986 as a bunch of bipedal misfits gathered in Ecuador for 'The Nature Cruise of the Century.'
Looking back at humankind from a million-years-in-the-future perspective, we were a freakish bunch, possessing oversized brains that we didn't make the best use of, and even gave names to dogs.
Also, because our brains were the size of fat mangoes and not yet atrophied by evolution, a discussion between a husband and wife under stress could end up like a fight between two blindfolded people on roller skates.
Captain Adolf von Kleist, who doesn't know shit from Shinola, is somehow left in charge of this ill-fated, over-hyped maiden voyage to the Ҳá貹Dz Islands.
(I can assure you that the story is better read than explained).
I was a latecomer to Vonnegut and fell in love with his writing quicker than you could say "woolly mammoth." He elucidates with the conviction of a mad prophet; his prose is cheerily unfussy and he is always wickedly provocative.
And, in keeping with the 'circle of life' theme, there are fish metaphors aplenty.
For no reason other than authorial whimsy, he anoints any character who is about to die with an asterisk (so we know in advance that they are going to pop their clogs) and mischievously over-explains things that are blindingly obvious to anyone bar our tiny-brained human descendants, one million years into the future.
Vonnegut had a droll sense of humour that I found immediately enjoyable, and Monty Python fans are sure to like his style. But there is a great deal of sagacity to be found in his eccentricity.
It should come as no surprise to anyone that we humans prove to be the architects of our own downfall. Despite our hefty brains, we are somehow ignorant of the perils of war, financial crashes, global viruses, world overpopulation, climate change and meteorites hitting our planet.
Ain't that the truth?
The only carp I have with Vonnegut is his scattergun approach to plot lines. The story staggers backwards and forwards like a drunken sailor in a hall of mirrors and I felt that the philosophical quotes interrupted - rather than enhanced- the narrative.
In truth, I didn't know what to expect from Vonnegut's Ҳá貹Dz, but was pleasantly surprised, loving every daft, dizzy, witty moment of this prescient read!
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
Ҳá貹Dz.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
August 31, 2016
– Shelved as:
to-read
August 31, 2016
– Shelved
October 20, 2016
–
Started Reading
October 20, 2016
– Shelved as:
to-read
October 24, 2016
– Shelved as:
awesome-premise
October 24, 2016
– Shelved as:
modern-fable
October 24, 2016
– Shelved as:
nature
October 24, 2016
– Shelved as:
recommended-by-cecily
October 24, 2016
– Shelved as:
sci-fi
October 24, 2016
– Shelved as:
tongue-in-cheek
October 24, 2016
– Shelved as:
wry-humour
October 24, 2016
–
Finished Reading
November 28, 2019
– Shelved as:
parable
November 28, 2019
– Shelved as:
allegory
Comments Showing 1-50 of 94 (94 new)
message 1:
by
Paromjit
(new)
Oct 24, 2016 05:21AM

reply
|
flag

Thanks, Paromjit!
It was a nice surprise to me that the book was so entertaining.
I love it when I read a book that totally flips my preconception of it!
Fabulous review, Kevin, what a great treat it is, reading your imaginative and informative reviews, thank you!
This sounds like a must-read for me, not only because of your praise of Vonnegut's writing style, but I have all sorts of questions about this story that can now only be answered by reading it.
My interest is piqued, big-time, thanks so much!!
This sounds like a must-read for me, not only because of your praise of Vonnegut's writing style, but I have all sorts of questions about this story that can now only be answered by reading it.
My interest is piqued, big-time, thanks so much!!

This sounds like a must-read for me, not only because of your praise of Vonnegut's wr..."
Thanks, Anne!
Knowing that you have a scientific background, I would ask you to suspend belief for the duration of the read.
The book carries a salient subliminal message, but the science is daft and very much tongue-in-cheek.
It is, though, a whole load of free-spirited fun!


If you and Vonnegut think naming a dog is strange, my mother names her household appliances! I forget most of the names, but her computer is Andromeda, and most are female.

Thanks, Angela!
I'm very late to Vonnegut, but was pleasantly surprised!

Thanks, Cecily!
It was a really enjoyable read. I love intelligent quirkiness, and I'm grateful for your recommendation.
I deliberately avoided reading any reviews beforehand, as I wanted to go in unaware.
Giving a dog a name is fine by me, it would just seem odd to our descendants a million years from now. And unless we can get your mum cryogenically frozen, appliance-naming will regrettably become a thing of the past too!

"Regrettably"? I don't think it's really a thing of the present.
;)
EDIT: I'm now worrying that you might name all your appliances and think I am the weird one, disparaging you.

"Regrettably"? I don't think it's really a thing of the pre..."
Cecily the garlic crusher is a favourite in our kitchen! ; )

(@_�)"
My fault, Cecily, I'd phrased it poorly.
'Cecily the garlic crusher' (i.e. the garlic crusher is named 'Cecily').

(Kevin, the tumble dryer, is a favourite in our house*)
But now I understand, I am... crushed!
(。Ģ́︿•̶�)
* Except we don't have a tumble dryer, and none of our appliances have names.

Yes, guilty as charged. I'm afraid this is the result of me typing too fast and then not checking what I've written!


I hope to read your review of Vonnegut's magnum opus* Slaughterhouse-Five
* My Dad's name is actually Opus, well, Opas.�
� That's my Vonnegut style nonsequitur.

I'm onto your faux modesty, Apatt. Your review, as all of yours are, was superb!
And thank you for reading mine. : )


Thank you so much, Lars.
I hope you find space for him at some point.


Thanks, Jaline! Your generosity is the stuff of legend.

You crack me up too, Julie. And I'm sure that Mr. Vonnegut would have loved you also!

Well I'm pleased that you recommended this, Cecily. : )
If I could bend time I'd happily take on more of his work.


Thank you, Paromjit, you are way too kind! : )

Thanks, Zoeytron.
I love to elicit a guffaw!
: D

Now I want to see blind-folded roller skaters fight! Where might I find that? Is it just in an aisle of your funny brain?
Great review!

Now I want to see blind-folded roller skaters fight! Where might I find that? Is it just i..."
Coming from the High Priestess of Funny, that's some compliment. Thank you, Debbie!
: )

That really is most kind of you, J.L. Thank you!

I feel sure he'd've wanted this carved on his tombstone.

I feel sure he'd've wanted this carved on his tombstone."
Thank you, Richard. That really is a very kind thing to say!


Please do, Amy. And tell me how you got on!

So I see, Petra.
I really do need to reacquaint myself with Mr V at some point.


Thank you so much, Kimber! Most kind of you. I endeavour to please! : )


Thank you, Angela! It means a lot coming from you.

Picking this book too! :) (God help my hungry mind!) :P

Aw, that's brilliant, Nilanjana!
I like to elicit chuckles! : D


Hehe
And I love chuckling all the time : D
I re-read the "scattergun approach" part and I imagined what that would look like and that....... XD XD

Thank you so much, Zain!
I appreciate your kind words. I'm also a fan of Vonnegut and don't know why I haven't read many more of his...