ŷ

Kristina Coop-a-Loop's Reviews > Eileen

Eileen by Ottessa Moshfegh
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4272284
I did not care for Ottessa Moshfegh’s novel Eileen. Despite the publisher’s blurb about a “Hitchcockian twist,� this is not a mystery or a crime novel or even a creepy psychological suspenseful read. Eileen is a long character portrait of a young woman named Eileen. She is repulsive, obsessive, socially awkward and unpleasant. Despite her darkness, she’s not remotely interesting and the so-called “Hitchcockian twist� can be seen coming from a mile away. I gained nothing from reading this book and found it boring and repetitive.

Eileen is a twenty-four year old woman who lives at home with her alcoholic and mentally ill father. She barely eats, drinks a lot, is obsessed with and repulsed by vulgar (yet normal) bodily functions and thinks she is in love with (in the most shallow way possible) a prison guard at the juvenile detention facility where she works as a secretary. She spends a lot of time thinking about Randy the prison guard, her toilet habits, and possibly killing herself and how sad her father would be once she is gone. When not thinking of how to off herself, she thinks about her father dying, possibly by his head being split open by one of the ever-present and incessantly mentioned dangerous icicles that dangle over the front door. When Rebecca Saint John arrives at the detention center as a new employee, Eileen is captivated by her beauty and carefree personality and wants to do whatever she can to impress her.

And that’s the whole novel. The prose is dark and descriptive and sets the scene for me quite well. I see Eileen very clearly. Unfortunately, as the novel loops around and around, slowly revealing more about Eileen’s unhappy childhood and the odd relationship between her parents, there’s never any kind of big reveal, nothing that results from all the circling and repetitive details. Eileen is weird and incredibly repulsive and at first I had some sympathy for her; she was clearly raised without any kind of true kindness and has no idea of how to behave socially. As the novel continues to hit me over and over with her repulsive and disgusting habits, I care less about Eileen because she’s so disgusting. She clearly does know better, but enjoys being filthy and smelly and shitting in a can. And for all that, her unlikeable personality and repugnance isn’t even put to good use because I don’t see that she’s particularly intelligent or curious or even an interesting character. The creeping pace of the novel, and the constant discussion of the icicles, bored me and I lost interest about half way through. I didn’t care for Eileen. I lost sympathy for her. She’s not evil or detestable, she’s just repulsive and creepy. Someone you wouldn’t think much about except to avoid her physically when she was around. The crime twist at the end is so yawn. Who didn’t see this coming? Even the ultimate ending, how Eileen left, is so anticlimactic and blah. By then, I was merely excited to finish the damn novel and be done with it.

Eileen is not my cup of tea. I think this book is more of a personal taste kind of book. It’s well-written, but I felt it went nowhere very very slowly. Merely creating a repulsive and unlikeable character is not a great literary achievement. Readers have to also find this repulsive and unlikeable character interesting, fascinating and want to know what she’s going to do. Moshfegh does not have that character in Eileen. She’s all the repulsive and unpleasant you could want, but ultimately as boring as white bread. I see that David Sedaris has recommended this book. I love you, David, but this book is a complete fail for me.
15 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Eileen.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

September 13, 2016 – Shelved
September 13, 2016 – Shelved as: to-read
September 25, 2017 – Started Reading
September 27, 2017 –
page 55
21.15% "Very well-written. The narrator isn't exactly a likable person but you do have a certain amount of sympathy due to her family life. She also has a good deal of biting humor. Although I haven't gotten very far, I know something very weird is about to happen. Excellent so far."
September 29, 2017 –
page 75
28.85% "While I think this is well-written, it's rather grim and depressing. Eileen is such a repugnant character that I am finding the all the time spent in her head is unpleasant. I'm hoping something starts happening soon because the unrelenting unpleasantness of Eileen is starting to get boring and she's bumming me out."
October 2, 2017 –
page 105
40.38% "Really not enjoying this book. The main character is repulsive, her observations and discussions about herself are all repugnant and I'm getting bored. I'm interested in what happens with Rebecca (?) and it's a short book so I'll finish it, but I'm getting weary of this narrator."
October 4, 2017 – Finished Reading
October 5, 2017 –
page 260
100.0% "Done. Hated it. Ridiculous. Review posted soon."
October 7, 2017 – Shelved as: blah-bland
October 7, 2017 – Shelved as: disappointing
October 7, 2017 – Shelved as: got-rid-of
October 7, 2017 – Shelved as: fiction
October 7, 2017 – Shelved as: literary-fiction
October 7, 2017 – Shelved as: my-book
October 7, 2017 – Shelved as: suck
October 7, 2017 – Shelved as: want-my-money-back

Comments Showing 1-15 of 15 (15 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

La Petite Américaine “Merely creating a repulsive and unlikeable character is not a great literary achievement. Readers have to also find this repulsive and unlikeable character interesting, fascinating and want to know what she’s going to do.�
Agreed.
Not an awesome book at all.


Kristina Coop-a-Loop La Petite Américaine wrote: "“Merely creating a repulsive and unlikeable character is not a great literary achievement. Readers have to also find this repulsive and unlikeable character interesting, fascinating and want to kno..."

Did you read it? She has another book out and what's funny is it sounds very similar to this one--the portrait of a repulsive person. Hard pass for me.


La Petite Américaine Yes. I read it in a day. It wasn’t poorly written � it was just a crappy book...like so bad it’s still irritating me a day later.


La Petite Américaine Oh, and can I add that I love your line about "the so-called 'Hitchcockian twist' can be seen coming from a mile away"??
I'm so glad it's not just me...I was sitting there reading, literally cringing like "Oh, God, she's not really going to go in that direction with the story, is she? No way, that's not even remotely a plot twist" ...only to (again, literally) shout "Oh, for chissakes!" at the book 100 pages later.
Yeah, she went there, and it was obvious that's where she was headed. It wasn't Hitchcock, it wasn't Patricia Highsmith, it wasn't even surprising. It was just *irritating.*
It was, God, I don't know, at best maybe Gillian Fynn (if Flynn knew how to write).


Kristina Coop-a-Loop La Petite Américaine wrote: "Oh, and can I add that I love your line about "the so-called 'Hitchcockian twist' can be seen coming from a mile away"??
I'm so glad it's not just me...I was sitting there reading, literally cring..."


It's been almost a year since I've read this book, but I think I started rolling my eyes and swearing under my breath at about 40% in. The end was so damn predictable. And stupid. I hated the book so much I left it at a Tesco in the book exchange pile with a warning written on the inside book cover.

Gillian Flynn...I actually think she's a decent writer but she gets carried away by her own nonsense. I like her characters (until I don't). What usually kills it for me are the ridiculous, over-the-top plots. She's definitely overrated.


message 6: by La Petite Américaine (last edited Jul 29, 2018 02:58PM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

La Petite Américaine That’s hilarious about leaving a warning in the book for the next reader!
I was so pissed off the day after I finished it that I returned it to Amazon for a refund. I just couldn’t deal with it.
Yeah, it was definitely under the 50% mark when I started seeing what she was going to do � because you could see the entire setup and ending from like a third of the way in. It was ri-goddamned-diculous.
I also got pissed off at the repetition. Where was the editor? Like, we get that she hates her father—wants to kill him but doesn’t want him to die—it doesn’t need to be repeated every 10 pages. Bad, incompetent editors shouldn’t be assigned to decent-ish writers...it’s too painful to read.
And after all of it, what really was the point? I’m serious. What was she trying so say with this story? What were the larger themes she was trying to convey? Because I’ve honestly found more depth in pulp horror novels. This just felt like a story—and the worst kind, because there was literally nothing more to it than, well, just a story. UGH.


Kristina Coop-a-Loop La Petite Américaine wrote: "That’s hilarious about leaving a warning in the book for the next reader!
I was so pissed off the day after I finished it that I returned it to Amazon for a refund. I just couldn’t deal with it.
Y..."


I do that a lot, leave notes for readers. When I return a particularly shitty book to the library, I'll put a post-it on the first page: WARNING: shitty book ahead!

The repetition irritated me, but I think it was very deliberate on the part of the author. She wanted that repetition in there. The whole book was like that--circling and circling the same images/themes. I'm not sure an editor should have cut that because it was a stylist choice of the author. Although the constant mentions of the damn icicle could have been cut.

I didn't take away anything from the novel. It was merely a character study for me. Like you say, it wasn't a horror story, it certainly (despite the wishes of the publisher) wasn't a "Hitchcockian" mystery; it was just dumb. Good writing, dumb book.


La Petite Américaine Warnings to readers � still can’t get over it. So funny. :)


Kristina Coop-a-Loop La Petite Américaine wrote: "Warnings to readers � still can’t get over it. So funny. :)"

I feel as if I'm doing them a favor. Although lots of people like stupid books so I'm probably wasting my time, but hey. I try.


message 10: by Steelwhisper (new)

Steelwhisper How is she repulsive?


Kristina Coop-a-Loop Steelwhisper wrote: "How is she repulsive?"

I see I used the world "repulsive" about a million times in my review. I should have edited it better. Otherwise, she is repulsive for what I mention in my review (and what I should have added, that she rarely showered). Plus, she has the personality of a dead fish.


message 12: by Steelwhisper (new)

Steelwhisper Thanks for answering, though I still don't really understand. Not that I want to read this, LOL. I take your word for it to be boring (which is worse than a character with repulsive habits). ;)


Kristina Coop-a-Loop Steelwhisper wrote: "Thanks for answering, though I still don't really understand. Not that I want to read this, LOL. I take your word for it to be boring (which is worse than a character with repulsive habits). ;)"

The character herself wasn't boring, although the pacing of the book got tedious. Eileen (from what I can remember) wouldn't shower for days, wouldn't eat but drank a lot then enjoyed shitting in a can in her bedroom and was generally obsessed with her bodily functions, and basically was creepy and left much to be desired as either a coworker, a romantic partner, or a friend.

If you enjoy novels that basically explore one character's personality, then you might like this book. Otherwise, give it a hard pass.


message 14: by Steelwhisper (new)

Steelwhisper Thank you again! The author clearly seems to have read her Freud. Just for the information, how many days between showers?


Kristina Coop-a-Loop Steelwhisper wrote: "Thank you again! The author clearly seems to have read her Freud. Just for the information, how many days between showers?"

Wow. Have no idea. It's been a while. Long enough that she began to smell. Of course, shitting in a can doesn't help. I'd check for you but I left the book in a lending library at a grocery store in the UK with a warning note for the next reader.


back to top