Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Bloodorange's Reviews > How to Read Literature

How to Read Literature by Terry Eagleton
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
23066833
's review

liked it
bookshelves: library, criticism, uk

The first chapter (Openings) and the last part of the final chapter (Values), where Eagleton analyses fragments of prose and poetry are fabulous, like a live session with an inspiring professor. But as for the middle - I am not sure I can imagine who this book was written for; am under impression that the person interested enough to read that already realizes, at least to some degree, what Eagleton says. There are some remarks on differences between modernist and Victorian writing worth getting through the middle of the book; observations on usefulness of orphans as literary protagonists; lots of tongue-in cheek macho-sounding quotes ("Narratives are like hired assassins"; an analysis of Great Expectation everyone familiar with this book should read. But I'm just not convinced this is enough to give tho book four stars.
8 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read How to Read Literature.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

September 23, 2016 – Started Reading
September 23, 2016 – Shelved
September 23, 2016 –
page 49
21.12% "Fantastic so far. Might be helpful for students."
September 24, 2016 –
page 65
28.02% "The modernists are in search of new modes of characterisation, suitable to a post-Victorian age. What it feels like to be a person is not quite the same for Franz Kafka as it is for George Eliot, and certainly not for whoever wrote the Upanishads or the Book of Daniel. Eliot sees character as 'a process and an unfolding', which is not at all how Woolf or Beckett regard it. For them, human beings do not have that..."
September 24, 2016 –
page 80
34.48% "Chapter 2 (Character) is less useful for me/ my students than chapter 1 (Openings), which was a fantastic introduction to close reading, but at least it gave me a good reason to read Jude the Obscure."
September 24, 2016 –
page 93
40.09% "...Hardy's characters can surprise us, in a way that Austen's or Dickens's rarely do. They can leap suddenly out of windows, marry a man they physically detest, sit motionless for long periods up a tree, unravel their underwear to rescue someone trapped on a cliff, sell their wife at a fair on a sudden whim, or engage in a virtuoso exhibition of sword fighting for no very obvious reason."
September 25, 2016 –
page 101
43.53% "Narratives are like hired assassins, ready to do the dirty work that their characters may flinch from."
September 25, 2016 –
page 117
50.43% "All literary works are orphaned at birth. Rather as our parents do not continue to govern our lives as we grow up, so the poet cannot determine the situations in which his or her work will be read, or what sense we are likely to make of it."
September 25, 2016 –
page 167
71.98% "Interesting analysis of Great Expectations on pp. 149-167 (chapter IV, 'Interpretations')."
September 25, 2016 –
page 168
72.41% "Whereas realist novels, as we have seen, tend to close with some kind of settlement, the typical modernist novel end with someone walking away solitary and disenchanted, his problems unresolved but free of social or domestic obligations."
September 25, 2016 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Bloodorange ...much consistency and continuity. The typical realist character tends to be reasonably stable and unified (...). As such, it reflects an era when identity was felt on the whole to be less problematic than it is today. People could still see themselves as the agents of their own destinies. They had a fairly acute sense of where they stopped and other people begin. Their personal and collective history, for all its ups and downs, seems to represent a coherent evolution, one which was more likely to issue in felicity than in catastrophe.

(...)
So the modernists seek to question stock notions of character. Some of them do so by pressing the psychological complexity of literary figures to the point where character in its classical sense begins to disintegrate.


back to top