Sasha's Reviews > Licks of Love: Short Stories and a Sequel, "Rabbit Remembered"
Licks of Love: Short Stories and a Sequel, "Rabbit Remembered" (Rabbit Angstrom, #5)
by
by

People talk about the Rabbit tetralogy and they rarely acknowledge the fifth coda of a novella, included in this collection. It's called Rabbit, Remembered, and it isn't. This is because it's totally unnecessary. It's not bad, it's just irrelevant.
It picks up about a decade after Rabbit's death, and here come some spoilers for this and previous Rabbit books. (view spoiler)
Updike revisits some of his favorite themes here: oblique references to incestual longing that he likes to drop and then skitter away from, and self-conscious references to contemporary events. (We're in the last days of the 1900s, and "Now the bitch is going to run" says one woman about First Lady Hillary Clinton.) The sex is mostly missing, which of course is sortof a relief since Updike's sex is mostly uncomfortable.
Nelson continues to be basically unpleasant. He's a good character: he means well and he tries, but he is not much of a person. He's small, like Rabbit was, but in a different way; he lacks Rabbit's grudging charisma.
Updike has a talent for seeing these small, unsuccessful people. He lived in Beverly, Massachusetts, where I went to high school and fled as quickly as possible, so I know first-hand that he had plenty of sources to draw on. That's a town of rabbits. It has nothing very interesting to offer, and neither does this book.
It picks up about a decade after Rabbit's death, and here come some spoilers for this and previous Rabbit books. (view spoiler)
Updike revisits some of his favorite themes here: oblique references to incestual longing that he likes to drop and then skitter away from, and self-conscious references to contemporary events. (We're in the last days of the 1900s, and "Now the bitch is going to run" says one woman about First Lady Hillary Clinton.) The sex is mostly missing, which of course is sortof a relief since Updike's sex is mostly uncomfortable.
Nelson continues to be basically unpleasant. He's a good character: he means well and he tries, but he is not much of a person. He's small, like Rabbit was, but in a different way; he lacks Rabbit's grudging charisma.
Updike has a talent for seeing these small, unsuccessful people. He lived in Beverly, Massachusetts, where I went to high school and fled as quickly as possible, so I know first-hand that he had plenty of sources to draw on. That's a town of rabbits. It has nothing very interesting to offer, and neither does this book.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Licks of Love.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
October 15, 2016
–
Started Reading
October 15, 2016
– Shelved
October 18, 2016
–
Finished Reading
October 20, 2016
– Shelved as:
2016
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Lynne
(new)
Oct 20, 2016 07:16AM

reply
|
flag

Lynne, you got me thinking about why this is - because I get this a lot, from people I respect and admire, such as myself. He's an awesome writer, but I hear his name and I'm like ugh, that friggin' dude. So you inspired me to get around to trying to figure out why that is, which I did at the top of my Rabbit, Run review. But I'll save you the effort of clicking: my theory is that
a) he's often great but
b) his characters are awful and his attitude towards them is ambiguous but uncomfortable, and
c) the Venn diagram between "people who are annoying" and "people who really like Updike" is almost the same circle.
Thanks for the kind compliment!