carol. 's Reviews > The Stand
The Stand
by
Dear Stephen,
I'm sorry. I just don't like you in that way. I know we've been friends for a long time, but I just never developed those kind of feelings for you, even after eleven hundred pages. I feel like we only moved forward in fits and stops, and we were just never able to sustain a kind of even-handed development of the kind of chills and thrills a person really likes. Shock someone enough times with snot running out of their nose, and it just becomes a little meaningless. And there are only so many ways to view a dead body before one gets kind of numb instead of apprehensive. Using the journal device to move things forward seems a little crude, when what we really need to do is talk.
I have to confess, I've felt kind of uncomfortable watching you struggle with religion and spirituality. You sparked my interest when you posited that this might be the battle between the age of reason and that of "irrationalism," and the dark man was the last vestige of doomed rationalism. I thought for a few minutes we were headed somewhere really special, but you didn't seem very confident, and the theme fell apart.
I will say there were a few surprises along the way, which I found pleasant. I appreciate you avoiding the obvious character arcs, especially when it comes to redemption. I was glad to meet most of your friends, especially Joe/Leo, Stu and even Kojak. Your military friends bored me out, though, especially Starkey; I don't even get why you like spending any time with those guys. Such a bunch of fossils. I do have to say, I was really impressed with how you must have studied disease modelling and progression--I almost felt like was there.
Sometimes I get the feeling that you don't really see me as a person, just a baby-maker. You even have an extended soliloquy about it, as if I wasn't even here reading your words. It bothers me, because you took the time to develop nuanced male relationships (Larry, Stu, Lloyd), but the women were about reproducing or were cannon fodder. Since you allowed technology to remain, I'm not going to buy into your lowest most-functional society mentality, no matter how many sociological theories you throw at me. And then there's the elderly black woman as representation of all that's spiritual. Perhaps even Mother Earth? If I'm rolling my eyes, it's because it's another aspect of compartmentalizing women as either maiden, matron or crone, and people of color as closer to God(s)(being savage and all, as you so helpfully illustrate in your "The Circle Closes" afterward). Honestly, it's kind of juvenile, and a little disappointing when I know you are capable of so much more.
It's time for me to move on. I'm sure you'll find someone special eventually, Stephen, because you are such a really great guy. And so unusual, too.
With Three Stars,
Your Friend Always.
Cross posted at
by

Dear Stephen,
I'm sorry. I just don't like you in that way. I know we've been friends for a long time, but I just never developed those kind of feelings for you, even after eleven hundred pages. I feel like we only moved forward in fits and stops, and we were just never able to sustain a kind of even-handed development of the kind of chills and thrills a person really likes. Shock someone enough times with snot running out of their nose, and it just becomes a little meaningless. And there are only so many ways to view a dead body before one gets kind of numb instead of apprehensive. Using the journal device to move things forward seems a little crude, when what we really need to do is talk.
I have to confess, I've felt kind of uncomfortable watching you struggle with religion and spirituality. You sparked my interest when you posited that this might be the battle between the age of reason and that of "irrationalism," and the dark man was the last vestige of doomed rationalism. I thought for a few minutes we were headed somewhere really special, but you didn't seem very confident, and the theme fell apart.
I will say there were a few surprises along the way, which I found pleasant. I appreciate you avoiding the obvious character arcs, especially when it comes to redemption. I was glad to meet most of your friends, especially Joe/Leo, Stu and even Kojak. Your military friends bored me out, though, especially Starkey; I don't even get why you like spending any time with those guys. Such a bunch of fossils. I do have to say, I was really impressed with how you must have studied disease modelling and progression--I almost felt like was there.
Sometimes I get the feeling that you don't really see me as a person, just a baby-maker. You even have an extended soliloquy about it, as if I wasn't even here reading your words. It bothers me, because you took the time to develop nuanced male relationships (Larry, Stu, Lloyd), but the women were about reproducing or were cannon fodder. Since you allowed technology to remain, I'm not going to buy into your lowest most-functional society mentality, no matter how many sociological theories you throw at me. And then there's the elderly black woman as representation of all that's spiritual. Perhaps even Mother Earth? If I'm rolling my eyes, it's because it's another aspect of compartmentalizing women as either maiden, matron or crone, and people of color as closer to God(s)(being savage and all, as you so helpfully illustrate in your "The Circle Closes" afterward). Honestly, it's kind of juvenile, and a little disappointing when I know you are capable of so much more.
It's time for me to move on. I'm sure you'll find someone special eventually, Stephen, because you are such a really great guy. And so unusual, too.
With Three Stars,
Your Friend Always.
Cross posted at
1424 likes · Like
�
flag
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Stand.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
July 5, 2011
– Shelved
December 20, 2011
–
Started Reading
December 20, 2011
–
0.0%
"forget all those other books I said I was reading. The Stand is the only one on my mind."
December 22, 2011
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 302 (302 new)
message 1:
by
mark
(new)
Dec 28, 2011 12:35AM

reply
|
flag


I also agree that it took him awhile to get the hang of writing convincing, three-dimensional women - Dolores Claiborne leading the pack, but I'm also a huge fan of Gerald's Game and (despite Annie Wilkes' homicidal tendencies) Misery.
I still want you to read The Long Walk!!!
Also, it's been awhile since I last read it, but are there zombies in The Stand? ;)

I couldn't help but wonder when I was reading if the abridged version was a bit better? I like the world-building in general, but the characters here just felt one-dimensional. If I was feeling charitable, I might say archtypical, but I'm not, so I won't. I probably would have liked it more when I was younger, before all that awareness of feminism ruined my life. ;)
And I do have Long Walk on my to-read-sooner list!

Great review. This one was such a copout and the last in a string of bad luck with King. I gave up on him after this.



Maggie, I almost always add your 5-star books to my TBR list!

Oh, he's so over it. He moved on to domineering, creepy leg-breaking women.

Oh Jesus, aren't I though? ;)"
It's okay. I like librarians. :) I'm admiring your attention to detail and organization.

That's such a nice way of putting it Carol, but I believe the DSM-IV refers to it as OCD :)
But I've made my peace with it. It's embedded on my DNA, I'm certain of it. Can't fight nature! But I promise it will come in handy when we take over the world! mwah-ha-ha


Now that you say it, I think I had to look up a few words as well. Really, kind of a "look at me! I'm a writer!" book.





I'm re-reading and having a hard time giving a rip about this book, now, at age 38. Boring and so UN-compelling!


I really wish I understood why people consider this a masterpiece, so I could at least grapple with it. But it seems every five star review here offers either a plot summary or a bland "SK is grreeeeat!"




Unabridged, and I'm super curious about unabridged as well!




That said, I agree, some of it is due to the time it was written--I think it is a reflection of what was a "normal" view. But I didn't read it way back to have a younger positive impression (during the days when I had underdeveloped humanist consciousness), so I had no qualms about skewering it now.


Congrats on being able to find your way around a highway system without a GPS! However did ancient Americans manage it?

Wait, did you mean me?