Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

J.G. Keely's Reviews > The Education Of Little Tree

The Education Of Little Tree by Forrest Carter
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
84023
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: contemporary-fiction, novel, reviewed, america

The closest this book gets to touching nature is the sweet sappiness of the story. Though the author put the story forward as true, he was not actually a Native, but a who fought to keep segregation and was a member of the KKK.

But this revelation shouldn't be that surprising, since the book is hardly insightful or sensitive in its views. Carter's characters are old, romanticized cliches of the colonial --poor Indians beset by the white man's greed trying to eke a peaceful and natural existence out in the wild of nature. It should remind us all that an overly rosy view can be just as racist and condescending as a negative one.

Carter is just another in a long line of people who tried to make themselves more mysterious and interesting by making up a distant Native ancestor and then claiming it gives them some kind of spiritual and moral superiority. I guess I should mention here that it's overtly racist to imagine that a fully-formed culture can be propagated through blood, as if Native peoples were magic elves.

But people like to individualize themselves, and if that means they have to create a culture from whole cloth to belong to, that isn't going to stop them, whether it's someone bringing up their '1/16th Cherokee blood' or a Wiccan who doesn't realize they're following , , and some stuff that was made up by delusionals and con-men.

And if that wasn't enough to tip us off, there's also a lengthy sambo slapstick scene almost as insulting to blacks as Martin Lawrence in a fatsuit. It just goes to show that it's easy to fool people with over-the-top cliches and over-romanticized characters. Even Oprah was taken in, featuring this book in her reading club--but perhaps it shouldn't surprise us that one purveyor of ill-informed saccharine melodrama should be taken in by another.

In the end, we get a sort of literary version of the blackface minstrel show, depicting Native life with a quaint nostalgia that has nothing to do with the real experience of Natives or their history. Instead, everything is boiled down into a simple little story--almost a fable--of how the colonial mindset would prefer to see Natives: as fundamentally separate in vague, mystical ways.

They are so oversimplified (as heroes or villains) that they no longer resemble real people; instead, they are reduced to a subspecies of man defined by a set of universally shared traits. Their identity is primarily communal, primarily traditional, incapable of change, learning, or individuality.

It's hard for me to think of a more pointed definition or racism than 'assuming that a group of people, similar in appearance and ancestry, all share a series of invariable traits which make them fundamentally and inescapably different from every other individual and people group'.

Like 'The Kite Runner', this is just another book that assuages white guilt by making white readers feel that, in just picking up a book, they have become worldly, understanding, and compassionate--despite the fact that neither book really reveals the culture it set out to depict, and could not provide any real insight to anyone who was in the least familiar with how those cultures actually work.
129 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read The Education Of Little Tree.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
March 1, 2005 – Finished Reading
June 11, 2007 – Shelved
June 11, 2007 – Shelved as: contemporary-fiction
February 27, 2008 – Shelved as: novel
June 9, 2009 – Shelved as: reviewed
September 4, 2010 – Shelved as: america

Comments Showing 1-36 of 36 (36 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Epee (new)

Epee Racist con-men abound, L. Ron Hubbard, Martin Luther and Joseph Smith among them. All profited mightly, sin is not its own punishment. Forest Carter obviously isn't in their league.


J.G. Keely It's true that carter did not start his own widely influential religion, but is merely a mostly forgotten author of once popular children's literature. However, the book does help to illustrate how a romanticized racist viewpoint can be as dehumanizing as a hateful one.

In addition, Luther's antisemitism was not a case of racism, as he did not care about the Jewish genetic line. If a Jew converted to Christianity, Luther was fine with them, it was the alternative religious practice to which Luther objected. In this sense, it wasn't even ethnocentrism but religious intolerance which Luther suffered from.

Of course, this should come as no surprise, as the man's legacy is nothing more than his strongly dissenting religious opinions.

Smith's racism was a product of its time, a fate not even as powerful a thinker and supporter of emancipation as Thomas Jefferson could escape. The science of the time promoted racism on a fundamental level.

Smith's other delusions seem to align well with Hubbard's, though. Both men found the idea of a private little religion too tempting to overlook, and to judge based upon their writings, neither was inspired either divinely or personally. At least Luther was more theologian than charismatic.

I would not cite Carter as an example of lasting influence, but rather a caution against even the seemingly innocuous and especially the idealistic. Idealism always represents an attractive falsehood, and whether it more closely resembles in scale grand religious escapism or minute romanticism, both may prove equally dangerous to the rational thinking of the individual.

Sometimes the lesser can be a greater threat to skepticism because it passes beneath scrutiny.


Alex Did you read this book


J.G. Keely Well, perhaps this will come as a surprise to you, but the author of The Education of Little Tree was actually a man named , who was not a Native American but a white man who was a segregationist and member of the Ku Klux Klan. His depiction of Natives in the book is not genuine, but stereotypical and full of racist caricatures.


Alex Read the book, you'll see that though he was a bigot, he wrote an amazing, warm, wise book


J.G. Keely I did read it. I found it condescending and saccharine and lacking in genuine insight or sentiment.


Alex then srry, ur blind


J.G. Keely At least I can find my keyboard.

But in all seriousness, if you study Native culture, if you read the work of authors like Erdrich, Welch, Alexie, and Momaday, it's easy to see that all of the 'wisdom' in this book is just generic platitudes--it has very little to do with any actual Native culture or tradition. It's just more condescension to the ideal of the , a romantic notion beloved of White folks trying to attach themselves to a more obscure culture.


message 9: by Erin (new)

Erin What is it about your reviews that always end in people wanting to insult you?

Also, Alex gave 4 stars to the Holy Bible. Maybe HE'S blind!


J.G. Keely I think it's probably because of my stupid dumb face, but that's just a theory.

Also, there are good reasons to give a lot of stars to the bible, it does have a lot of action scenes, incest, slavery, wizards, and probably the highest body count of any book outside of a space opera, where you'd have guns that blow up planets.


message 11: by Alex (new) - rated it 5 stars

Alex yep ;


message 12: by Alex (last edited Mar 23, 2012 07:28PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Alex why judge a story by judging it's author? sure the bible was influenced by bigoted Roman a-holes, but it's got its merits. like incest!


J.G. Keely It's not all about the author. I talk about the content of the book in my review, too. Positive stereotypes are still stereotypes, and they still reduce human beings to predictable caricatures.


message 14: by Dan (new) - rated it 5 stars

Dan It is saccharine and all the other things people write, it was written by a rascist. But this doesn't dilute the fact that it is a book that children enjoy and they there are truths to be learned from the book.


J.G. Keely Yeah, but children also enjoy Miley Cyrus and the Transformers movies, so that's hardly a way to a judge quality. I'd also worry that whatever overt positive messages there might be in this book, there are many more subtle instances of negative messages, like the many racist depictions of sambos, mammies and 'Noble Savages', so I wouldn't say it's a positive outlook, overall.


message 16: by Dan (new) - rated it 5 stars

Dan I view it as an opportunity for discussion. I talked about these issues with the children I taught the book too.


J.G. Keely Ah, sure, there's certainly something in that approach. However, using the book as a cautionary example doesn't speak much to its quality.


message 18: by Richard (last edited Jul 02, 2012 12:09AM) (new)

Richard Keely, in your review, you say that the author fought against segregation, yet in a comment you say he was a segregationist. From the context I think the latter is what you actually meant to say in the review, isn't it?

By the way, though I questioned the second sentence, I loved the first one. And your analysis of racism is right on!


J.G. Keely "From the context I think the latter is what you actually meant to say in the review, isn't it?"

Yes, incorrect phrasing on my part, thanks for the heads-up.


message 20: by Richard (new)

Richard Keely wrote: ""From the context I think the latter is what you actually meant to say in the review, isn't it?"

Yes, incorrect phrasing on my part, thanks for the heads-up."


Sorry to pick nits, but I knew what you meant, and I just wanted to make sure it was clear for the rest of your readers.


J.G. Keely Oh definitely, I appreciate it. Please don't hesitate to mention any errors you see.


message 22: by Jacqueline (new)

Jacqueline Awesome review! Loved it. This-the best, "
Carter is just another in a long line of people who tried to make themselves more mysterious and interesting by making up a distant Native ancestor and then claiming it gives them some kind of spiritual and moral superiority. I guess I should mention here that it's overtly racist to imagine that a fully-formed culture can be propagated through blood, as if Native peoples were magic elves." So true!


message 23: by Laura (new) - rated it 1 star

Laura I love this review. I'm reading this book for my reading group, and I'm really having trouble figuring out why so many of the doctors and lawyers and veterans in my group all went dewey eyed when it came up as a possibility. Admittedly, my main connection before this was the fact that the author was a racist ass, but I'm having trouble finding anything particularly wise about it.


message 24: by Jo (new)

Jo Oh, god, glad I saw this before actually reading this! Ever since I was a kid I've been really interested and inspired by Native culture. I've recently started reading a lot of fictional books having to do with Native people, mostly children's. I think all of them have been by Native people (and not people who are 1/16th of some unknown tribe). I'd rather read a book about someone who actually knows or experienced what a certain culture was like then read some bullshit stereotype book that's just a load of crap. Like this book supposedly.


Alberto M So, it seems you managed to destroy one of the books I loved as a child. But yet, I have to admit that if I read it now, with a more seasoned look and knowing the bio of its author, I would probably not appreciate it at all.


message 26: by Taylor (new)

Taylor G Well done Keely, well done.


message 27: by Nora (new)

Nora I'm glad I've enjoyed 67% of the book before researching author. May not finish reading, now. Put a very "bad taste in my mouth". Too bad.


Emily Allison I have to disagree with the hateful comments on here. This book is one of the most beautiful books I have ever read. I would go as to far as say that it actually made me a better human being after reading it as a young teen
I was as shocked and disappointing as anyone when I found out who wrote it. But I do not believe that a racist monster could have written a story such a this with so much heart, without there being some truth to it. we don't know his full story, or if he had a change of heart somewhere down the line. Regardless, take this beautiful story for what it is- a lesson about how to be kind, less judgemental, and most of all, how to compassion and a Heart towards other people.


message 29: by Alex (new) - rated it 5 stars

Alex Fact: racists are made, not born that way. And they can be unmade. Yes, take all stories for what they are, especially life changing ones.


J.G. Keely Emily said: "I do not believe that a racist monster could have written a story such a this with so much heart"

Alex said: "racists are made ... And they can be unmade"

Well, I guess the first thing I'd point out is that the treatment of African Americans in the book is still very insulting--there's a whole chapter built around making them look stupid and absurd, where the girl is being dragged around naked through the mud by a farm animal she can't control.

Beyond that, you have to remember that it's possible to represent a race in positive terms and to still be racist--indeed, it's how a lot of modern racism plays out. For example, when people say that African Americans are athletic, good at sports, and natural dancers, while those are all positive traits, they play right into the racist image of Africans as being physical in nature, not intellectual, that they are like animals.

Or conversely, the presentation of Asians as being intelligent, logical, task-oriented, and well-organized plays into the same old racist cliche that they are emotionless and asexual. It's promoting the same racist views that have always been around, it's just expressing it through positive terms instead of negative ones. It's like saying a girl has 'a nice personality'--it should be a compliment, but in fact, it's just a coded sexist insult.

Likewise, in this book, the representation of Natives is so sickly sweet and romanticized that it robs them of their humanity. They aren't presented as real people, with flaws and personalities, they're presented as symbols of nature and peace--it's racist because they aren't allowed to have individual identities, they are defined by the overarching cliches of their race--it's just the old stock character of the .


message 31: by Manybooks (new)

Manybooks Alex wrote: "then srry, ur blind"

Just because YOU liked the book, does not mean we have to, and the fact that you are obviously too lazy to even post a correctly spelled sentence makes it even easier to point my fingers at you and label you as at best naive and at worst as someone who is obviously not intelligent enough to realise that we can like books you do not like (and for me, books that are patronising and full of noble savage garbage are an issue). And guess what, I personally would respect you liking this book, but since you do not seem to respect those of us who do not like this book, why should I respect you??


Paul/Suzette Graham Ad hominem attacks of an author in a review probably feels good to the reviewer, but it’s disingenuous and shallow. Y’all remember those logical fallacies they taught ye in college? Oh, you didn’t get that class? Sorry. It would free you from a lot of know-it-all-ism and moral high horsin�. You might even learn something from the most unlikely of places—a genuinely flawed human being, just like the rest of us.


message 33: by Gene (new) - added it

Gene I truly appreciate this review. If I never read this, I wouldn’t have known about this whole made up story. It’s very disappointing and upsetting to find out the author was a white supremacist who pretended to be someone he totally was not.

As I was reading the book, I had tried to really digest each and every scene and picture as if they were real life events since it’s introduced as a memoir. I am absolutely disgusted by the author’s history and for fooling the readers; not to even mention for disrespecting the Native Indians & their culture. I wish I had found out about this sooner so I could stop myself from wasting my time.

If you don’t believe his horrible history and about this fraud story, google it. There’s plenty of information.


message 34: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Proser Loved the book. Hated the brain dead comments of simplistic characters and racist author as if these dimwits knew the author.


message 35: by Denise (new)

Denise Westlake Wow.


message 36: by Sara (new) - rated it 5 stars

Sara Brunet I’m guessing everyone who is upset by this book in white? Just a guess. You only hate it because of the authors past. Even the people with the worst pasts can create something beautiful. If I only enjoyed books, art and music by people with my exact views, there wouldn’t be much to love. I adored this book. It was sweet and deeply moving. The whole thing was beautiful. Might be my new favorite.


back to top