Lisa's Reviews > Contact
Contact
by
by

Contact! Contact? No�
To make a long story short: this is probably an excellent book, but I failed to make contact, to connect to the characters. Feeling sorry about that, I decided to read Sagan’s nonfiction instead, to give him another chance.
The problem I had with the novel was similar to my experience with 2001: A Space Odyssey, but on a bigger scale. I have no doubt that Sagan’s visions and ideas on extraterrestrial lifeforms are much more erudite than other science fiction I have read, where technology and cosmology are (deliberately) left vague. But that was part of the problem. I never once had the impression that he was telling me a story, but rather that he was explaining his (fictional) findings. He even explained the characters� thoughts and actions, rather than letting them act them out. Dialogues (especially the philosophical, scientific and theological discussions) were polite exchanges of positions and information. There was absolutely no sense of humour involved.
What I learned from my most recent science fiction readings are two things: I do not want scientists to “fictionalise� their teaching. Neither historical fiction, nor speculative science fiction interest me as a rule, mainly because I prefer to read the nonfiction they are based on and make up my own mind on the topic. That was something I also experienced in Peter Ackroyd’s The Lambs of London, which I found to be a very weak novel. I have yet to discover his nonfiction, which I have heard is based on solid research and well-written.
The exception to the rule is if science (or historical) fiction is written not with the purpose of explaining science (history), but to show certain character and plot developments that are relevant in our society, to tell me something about human interaction and behaviour, or to poke fun at our way of perceiving the future (or past). I would count Douglas Adams or John Wyndham into that category, for example. Many authors of dystopian fiction appeal to me for that reason as well, such as Margaret Atwood, Kurt Vonnegut, George Orwell and so on.
I have a few science fiction novels waiting. I might change my mind. In the face of new evidence, that is what scientists would do. That much I learned from the novel!
To make a long story short: this is probably an excellent book, but I failed to make contact, to connect to the characters. Feeling sorry about that, I decided to read Sagan’s nonfiction instead, to give him another chance.
The problem I had with the novel was similar to my experience with 2001: A Space Odyssey, but on a bigger scale. I have no doubt that Sagan’s visions and ideas on extraterrestrial lifeforms are much more erudite than other science fiction I have read, where technology and cosmology are (deliberately) left vague. But that was part of the problem. I never once had the impression that he was telling me a story, but rather that he was explaining his (fictional) findings. He even explained the characters� thoughts and actions, rather than letting them act them out. Dialogues (especially the philosophical, scientific and theological discussions) were polite exchanges of positions and information. There was absolutely no sense of humour involved.
What I learned from my most recent science fiction readings are two things: I do not want scientists to “fictionalise� their teaching. Neither historical fiction, nor speculative science fiction interest me as a rule, mainly because I prefer to read the nonfiction they are based on and make up my own mind on the topic. That was something I also experienced in Peter Ackroyd’s The Lambs of London, which I found to be a very weak novel. I have yet to discover his nonfiction, which I have heard is based on solid research and well-written.
The exception to the rule is if science (or historical) fiction is written not with the purpose of explaining science (history), but to show certain character and plot developments that are relevant in our society, to tell me something about human interaction and behaviour, or to poke fun at our way of perceiving the future (or past). I would count Douglas Adams or John Wyndham into that category, for example. Many authors of dystopian fiction appeal to me for that reason as well, such as Margaret Atwood, Kurt Vonnegut, George Orwell and so on.
I have a few science fiction novels waiting. I might change my mind. In the face of new evidence, that is what scientists would do. That much I learned from the novel!
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Contact.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
January 23, 2017
– Shelved
January 23, 2017
– Shelved as:
1001-books-to-read-before-you-die
January 23, 2017
– Shelved as:
nice-try-but-no-cigars
January 23, 2017
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-19 of 19 (19 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Matthias
(new)
Jan 23, 2017 02:18AM

reply
|
flag

But jokes aside, I just quick-checked your bookshelves, and you are indeed not very much into speculative fiction, I realise. Some of them are fantastic. This one is not a good contact point, however.


Oh, thank you for the suggestion, Greg, I will certainly try that one, especially if it has a vital connection to our messed up world of today!

Thank you so much, Greg! I just read your review, and that sounds exactly like my kind of nonfiction, with a focus on human behaviour and ethics. I will order it today!

Yes, that would be nice, wouldn't it? Whenever we recommend books to each other, online bookstores make money.


Thank you, Christine! It has actually taken me decades to figure out why I love certain kinds of speculative fiction, and can't be bothered with other kinds. Historical fiction is almost always a disappointment.


Glenn, I am happy you entered the pun contest! The more the merrier. A star contribution, it is!


Well, my mood travelled lightning speed to teach cosmic dimensions! Star struck!


Fair enough! I am with you on thatvone. However, I am mainly interested in humanity's messes, and therefore the Sagan philosophy left me rather cold...