ŷ

Darwin8u's Reviews > Richard II

Richard II by William Shakespeare
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
2294090
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: 2017, shakespeare, drama

"I wasted time, and now doth time waste me.�
-- William Shakespeare, Richard II

description

'Richard II' is a gem. It will never be my favorite, but it is fascinating and finely finished. In many ways it is William Shakespeare meets Machiavelli. Shakespeare wrote eight historical "War of the Roses" plays. They weren't written in order. It is pretty easy, if you are a Star Wars fan, to think of the plays like this. Richard II is = the Phantom Menace. Henry VI, Part 1; Henry VI, Part 2; Henry VI, Part 3; and Richard III (together known as the Minor Tetralogy) were all written and performed first (Like A New Hope, Empires Strikes Back, and Return of the Jedi). Then Shakespeare jumps back and gives us the Henriad, aka the Major Tetralogy (Richard II; Henry IV, Part 1; Henry IV, Part 2; Henry V).

It is also a fascinating look at the body of the king. The king having both a physical body and the kingdom. Shakespeare does a brilliant job in some later speeches made by Richard II of illuminating the King's two bodies (Natural Body and Body Politic). This isn't new. This isn't me. I ran across this theme in several places (Wikipedia, "The King's Two Buckets") after I read the play, and now I want to go check out Ernst Kantorowicz's The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. This plays a large part in this play. The king is LITERALLY the embodiment of England (its people and the land).

This dualism can be taken even further as a metaphor for Christ and His double nature/role as divine mediator. I'm not saying Shakespeare means for us to interpret Richard II as a type of Christ. But, I think we could look at England's King as existing in a similar (man/divine) space. Anyway, there were several direct references to Judas', betrayal, etc.. Enough to warrant me spending a couple sentences on that topic.

There are also several minor themes that bob around in this play as well: honor, rituals of state, loyalty (to family, King, country). There were also several nice lines, specifically:

- “You may my glories and my state depose,
But not my griefs; still am I king of those.�

- “Woe, destruction, ruin, and decay;
the worst is death and death will have his day.�

- “Let's talk of graves, of worms, and epitaphs;
Make dust our paper and with rainy eyes
Write sorrow on the bosom of the earth,
Let's choose executors and talk of wills�

- “Each substance of a grief has twenty shadows."
- “My brain I'll prove the female to my soul;
my soul the father: and these two beget
a generation of still-breeding thoughts,
and these same thoughts people this little world.�
40 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Richard II.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

February 1, 2017 – Shelved
February 1, 2017 – Shelved as: to-read
April 7, 2017 – Started Reading
April 7, 2017 – Shelved as: 2017
April 7, 2017 – Finished Reading
August 15, 2017 – Shelved as: shakespeare
January 27, 2018 – Shelved as: drama

Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Jonfaith (new)

Jonfaith Excellent. You may have prompted me to watch Hollow Crown again.


Darwin8u Jonfaith wrote: "Excellent. You may have prompted me to watch Hollow Crown again."

I was telling my wife about it and she was like, "um, let's watch that now." How was it?


message 3: by Jonfaith (new)

Jonfaith The first season was amazing, the second less so.


Darwin8u Jonfaith wrote: "The first season was amazing, the second less so."

I just ordered both. Thanks for the Easter-gift idea.


Darwin8u I just watched Richard II from Hollow Crown. So good. IT was nice seeing the King/Christ/Body/England themes done so well on screen.


Sookie As did I. I had copy of Richard II on the side. Reading this play and seeing it performed on the screen simultaneously was a different experience.


Steve I loved The Hollow Crown. Ben Wishaw was superb as Richard II, wasn't he? I thought the Henry IV plays were a touch disappointing - the humour felt squeezed out. Still, certainly worth a watch.


back to top