Dennis's Reviews > Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
by
by

Dennis's review
bookshelves: science-fiction, philosophical, post-apocalyptic, favorites
Feb 05, 2017
bookshelves: science-fiction, philosophical, post-apocalyptic, favorites
Read 2 times. Last read May 19, 2019 to May 22, 2019.
Brilliant!
Many questions arise when one reads Philip K. Dick’s 1968 sci fi classic. But one question I specifically had to ask myself was, Why on earth did I give this a four star rating when I joined Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ? Am I completely nuts? I leave it up to you, dear Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ friends, to answer that question. But thanks in advance for your encouraging words.
Personally I’m going to put it down to circumstances. I was reading this book for the first time while I was on vacation in Barcelona. It took me about a week to read it, even though it’s only 193 pages, because I simply didn’t have much time to read. And therefore most of my reading was done in short spurts, often while I was standing in crowded places or even not been standing at all, but walking to some other place. That’s really not how a book like this should be read.
Even though it is a fairly easy read, and possesses the qualities of a page-turner, your mind will be working overtime. Trying to figure out what is, and what is not, and what it all means.
There is much more in the book than there is in the movie. Mood organs, empathy boxes, Wilbur Mercer and Buster Friendly, an electric sheep, of course. There’s much for you still to discover, if so far you‘ve only seen the movie(s).
But the main point is the same as it was when in 1982 Blade Runner finally got onto the big screen. As androids have become so similar to us that it is increasingly hard to tell if they are androids in the first place, and they might not even know it themselves, then what is it that differentiates us from them? And is one worth more than the other? What if we have decided on a certain quality that distinguishes us from them, but then we realize that some people don’t possess that quality? Or maybe they possess it to a lesser extent than the average person does. Are they not humans then? Are they lesser humans? Are they? Are we? What are we?
We follow bounty hunter Rick Deckard on his assignment to retire six rogue androids, as he wrestles with those questions himself. He will come across some persons that could be androids or could be humans. Deckard will not know initially. And neither will the reader. At some point the reader might even ask if Deckard himself is an android. The ambiguity of the text, in spite of PKD’s easily flowing and easily understandable prose, is a real treat.
The other POV is that of J.R. Isidore, a special, meaning someone with a below average IQ that was not allowed to leave for Mars, as most of mankind did after World War Terminus, and is now degenerating because of the radioactive fallout. He’s living all by himself in a deserted apartment building and basically only comes into contact with other people while he’s at work. That is, until one day he discovers that an android has moved into the building and he tries to befriend her (it?).
At some point the paths of these characters will inevitably cross and all of them are about to lose something in the process.
And then there’s the matter of Wilbur Mercer and Buster Friendly, of course. Find out for yourself. ;)
Thanks to my pathetic memory (or the circumstances � remember the circumstances?) I tremendously enjoyed this re-read. And honestly, I think there’s so much here in the text and also between the lines that I’m quite certain I’m going to read this again in the future. And I might enjoy it equally as much then or even more than I did during this second read.
I’m finally moving this to my favorites shelf now.
Highly recommended!
Brilliant!
Many questions arise when one reads Philip K. Dick’s 1968 sci fi classic. But one question I specifically had to ask myself was, Why on earth did I give this a four star rating when I joined Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ? Am I completely nuts? I leave it up to you, dear Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ friends, to answer that question. But thanks in advance for your encouraging words.
Personally I’m going to put it down to circumstances. I was reading this book for the first time while I was on vacation in Barcelona. It took me about a week to read it, even though it’s only 193 pages, because I simply didn’t have much time to read. And therefore most of my reading was done in short spurts, often while I was standing in crowded places or even not been standing at all, but walking to some other place. That’s really not how a book like this should be read.
Even though it is a fairly easy read, and possesses the qualities of a page-turner, your mind will be working overtime. Trying to figure out what is, and what is not, and what it all means.
There is much more in the book than there is in the movie. Mood organs, empathy boxes, Wilbur Mercer and Buster Friendly, an electric sheep, of course. There’s much for you still to discover, if so far you‘ve only seen the movie(s).
But the main point is the same as it was when in 1982 Blade Runner finally got onto the big screen. As androids have become so similar to us that it is increasingly hard to tell if they are androids in the first place, and they might not even know it themselves, then what is it that differentiates us from them? And is one worth more than the other? What if we have decided on a certain quality that distinguishes us from them, but then we realize that some people don’t possess that quality? Or maybe they possess it to a lesser extent than the average person does. Are they not humans then? Are they lesser humans? Are they? Are we? What are we?
We follow bounty hunter Rick Deckard on his assignment to retire six rogue androids, as he wrestles with those questions himself. He will come across some persons that could be androids or could be humans. Deckard will not know initially. And neither will the reader. At some point the reader might even ask if Deckard himself is an android. The ambiguity of the text, in spite of PKD’s easily flowing and easily understandable prose, is a real treat.
The other POV is that of J.R. Isidore, a special, meaning someone with a below average IQ that was not allowed to leave for Mars, as most of mankind did after World War Terminus, and is now degenerating because of the radioactive fallout. He’s living all by himself in a deserted apartment building and basically only comes into contact with other people while he’s at work. That is, until one day he discovers that an android has moved into the building and he tries to befriend her (it?).
At some point the paths of these characters will inevitably cross and all of them are about to lose something in the process.
And then there’s the matter of Wilbur Mercer and Buster Friendly, of course. Find out for yourself. ;)
Thanks to my pathetic memory (or the circumstances � remember the circumstances?) I tremendously enjoyed this re-read. And honestly, I think there’s so much here in the text and also between the lines that I’m quite certain I’m going to read this again in the future. And I might enjoy it equally as much then or even more than I did during this second read.
I’m finally moving this to my favorites shelf now.
Highly recommended!
Brilliant!
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
December 30, 2016
–
Started Reading
January 6, 2017
–
Finished Reading
February 5, 2017
– Shelved
October 8, 2017
– Shelved as:
science-fiction
October 9, 2017
– Shelved as:
philosophical
May 19, 2019
–
Started Reading
May 19, 2019
–
10.88%
"Interesting that while the blurb says the story is set in 2021, my book actually still has it in 1992.
And I'm reading that 2010 edition of the book.
Anyways, mood organs, WTF! Wanna have a depression today? Dial 451."
page
21
And I'm reading that 2010 edition of the book.
Anyways, mood organs, WTF! Wanna have a depression today? Dial 451."
May 20, 2019
–
53.37%
"Halfway through and enjoying it a lot. I might add another star to my initial rating. We'll see."
page
103
May 22, 2019
– Shelved as:
post-apocalyptic
May 22, 2019
– Shelved as:
favorites
May 22, 2019
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 93 (93 new)
message 1:
by
Bradley
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
May 22, 2019 12:36PM

reply
|
flag

It didn't quite work with the movie, though. I always liked it. But never loved it. Can't really tell why. And that didn't change when we've watched it again last week, even though I've definitely seen quite some crap in the meantime.



What boggles my mind, whether you just like or love this movie, is how brilliant they were able to make such movies back then. Nowadays, with much more possibilities (also but not only because of CGI), most movies aren't half as great as they could be. I wonder why.


Some movies these days DO focus on subtlety even with CGI but any movie made at any time is going to be separated between the crap and the fantastic. It's just that there's a lot more high-budget crap out these days. lol

What since? I'm tempted to mention some of the Marvel movies but they don't pop over the revolutionary measure. Or maybe they do in how they shame everyone else?

Some movies these days DO focus on subtlety even with CGI but any movie made at a..."
Agreed. At least back then the crap was usually fairly low budget as well. Which made some of it even fun again. High budget crap is the worst.

What since? I'm tempted to mention some of the Marvel movies but th..."
I would have to think quite hard now. Give me a week. Lol.



There might be some really good low budget stuff. But you would probably have a hard time finding anyone at the bar to punch. Because at the cinema those movies get lost in the mainstream crap avalanche. It might ultimately lead to extinction.

You've seen Under the Skin with Scarlett Johansson? I honestly can't say if it's a good movie or not. Lol. But it is certainly different.


Uhm ... actually ... any excuse will do so I get to punch people nowadays.
As for Donnie Darko: how comes my opinion is only ever welcome if I agree about some movie or other being awesome or crap but not when I disagree, hm?!

I've seen it many years ago and I agree that it was certainly messed up. But nothing to gush about in the dark imo. Might be because of Jake Gyllenhaal. Although ... he had a role he was good in, supposedly - or was that because he played alongside Hugh Jackman? ;P




Btw, Brad, do you know the detailed results of the Nebula voting?

But now that I have...
I don't know. There are a few I agree with such as the dramatic presentation and the short story, but the rest? I don't know. I wasn't wowed with any of the winners. I may have liked them, but I would have chosen others. Maybe by two or three slots from my favorites, even. *shrug*


If you can get ahold of them and you are allowed to share them, that would be nice. :)

Thanks, Fergus! And it's never too late to open your eyes. Give it a try. :)




I don't think the order on Verge corresponds with the received votes. At least it didn't last year. Or maybe I'm looking at a different page. I'll send you a PM. :)

13


