Dave Schaafsma's Reviews > We Have Always Lived in the Castle
We Have Always Lived in the Castle
by
by

Dave Schaafsma's review
bookshelves: horror, madness-psychi-supernat-faith-proj, mystery-detective-thriller, books-loved-2017, eng-240-spr-17, ya-fall-2017, ya-fall-2018, best-books-ever
Mar 01, 2017
bookshelves: horror, madness-psychi-supernat-faith-proj, mystery-detective-thriller, books-loved-2017, eng-240-spr-17, ya-fall-2017, ya-fall-2018, best-books-ever
Read 4 times. Last read February 14, 2025 to March 3, 2025.
3/3/25: Reread for my Spring 2025 YAL class; lively, fun exchanges about this book that I would share except they constitute spoilers. Just: different opinions about the ending, different assessments of characters. I love talking about books. The class was basically introduced to Shirley Jackson, whom they mosty love!
10/31/23: Happy Halloween, (which for horror fans in general or Shirley Jackson fans in particular is basically every day of the year), in conjunction with my having just read The Shirley Jackson Project, a comics tribute collection edited by Robert Kirby.
10/7/21: Always a great read, with an amazing main character, though in this discussion we troubled the issue of her reliability as a narrator. Of course she is unreliable, in many respects, but can we trust her version of the story in any respect? I think we can. I also read an essay that contended that Constance and Mary Katherine are different aspects of Shirley Jackson's personality. I also read more about Jackson's psychopathology, her agoraphobia, her hatred of the working class townies from North Bennington where she and her husband lived, antipathies that make their way out in this novel and in "The Lottery."
9/17/18: Third read for my Fall 2018 YA course, and what has emerged as one of my favorite books of all time. This time I noticed all the food references more than ever.
“We eat the year away. We eat the spring and the summer and the fall. We wait for something to grow and then we eat it.� “I'm going to put death in all their food and watch them die.�
And loved the strange lyricism of Merricat's deft observations. Are Merricat and Constance really happy in their life in the castle, and should we just leave them alone with their choices of isolation, or are they cases of arrested development, of stasis, of the opposite of "coming-of-age" and maturation that we expect in a YA novel? You get to choose, I think. I'll say that, isnce ths is horror, that there is a sufficient case here that these women need just a leetle bit of help in the mental health arena.
9/12/17: I read this in March of this year for a course I was teaching and read it again for my fall YA course.
A memorable tale of gothic suspense by Jackson, the author of the much anthologized, exquisitely perverse short story, “The Lottery" (1948). Castle is Jackson’s last book, often described as her masterpiece, featuring two of the best sister acts in American literature, Constance and her sister Mary Katherine, or Merricat, who says things like this:
“On the moon we wore feathers in our hair, and rubies on our hands. On the moon we had gold spoons.�
And, to her sister, Constance:
“Oh Constance, we are so happy.�
Who often replies, "Silly, silly Merricat."
But truly un-merry Merricat also says things like this, about the people of the town:
“I'm going to put death in all their food and watch them die.�
Six years ago, several of the Blackwood family were poisoned, from arsenic sprinkled with sugar on a bowl of blackberries. Constance, who was in the kitchen, was and still is widely suspected of the crime, of which Merricat simply says:
“Fate intervened. Some of us, that day, she led inexorably through the gates of death. Some of us, innocent and unsuspecting, took, unwillingly, that one last step to oblivion. Some of us took very little sugar.�
Merricat's distinctive narrator’s voice joins those of Scout and Holden Caufield as unforgettable teen main characters in American literature. At turns creepy, delightful, dark, with a touch of black humor, the book also features Constance, Merricat's caretaker sister, weirdly hilarious Uncle Julian, and greedy Cousin Charles who comes to live in the castle for a time. I was intrigued by the tension between the townies and the Blackwood family holed up in their dark gothic mansion. I loved the chilling moment of the Big Reveal, that dramatic horrific climax, but I also loved the strangely sweet conclusion, colored as always by Merricat’s strange witchy habits:
“All our land was enriched with my treasures buried in it, thickly inhabited just below the surface with my marbles and my teeth and my colored stones, all perhaps turned to jewels by now, held together under the ground in a powerful taut web which never loosened, but held fast to guard us.�
A masterpiece, revealing more riches at every reading.
10/31/23: Happy Halloween, (which for horror fans in general or Shirley Jackson fans in particular is basically every day of the year), in conjunction with my having just read The Shirley Jackson Project, a comics tribute collection edited by Robert Kirby.
10/7/21: Always a great read, with an amazing main character, though in this discussion we troubled the issue of her reliability as a narrator. Of course she is unreliable, in many respects, but can we trust her version of the story in any respect? I think we can. I also read an essay that contended that Constance and Mary Katherine are different aspects of Shirley Jackson's personality. I also read more about Jackson's psychopathology, her agoraphobia, her hatred of the working class townies from North Bennington where she and her husband lived, antipathies that make their way out in this novel and in "The Lottery."
9/17/18: Third read for my Fall 2018 YA course, and what has emerged as one of my favorite books of all time. This time I noticed all the food references more than ever.
“We eat the year away. We eat the spring and the summer and the fall. We wait for something to grow and then we eat it.� “I'm going to put death in all their food and watch them die.�
And loved the strange lyricism of Merricat's deft observations. Are Merricat and Constance really happy in their life in the castle, and should we just leave them alone with their choices of isolation, or are they cases of arrested development, of stasis, of the opposite of "coming-of-age" and maturation that we expect in a YA novel? You get to choose, I think. I'll say that, isnce ths is horror, that there is a sufficient case here that these women need just a leetle bit of help in the mental health arena.
9/12/17: I read this in March of this year for a course I was teaching and read it again for my fall YA course.
A memorable tale of gothic suspense by Jackson, the author of the much anthologized, exquisitely perverse short story, “The Lottery" (1948). Castle is Jackson’s last book, often described as her masterpiece, featuring two of the best sister acts in American literature, Constance and her sister Mary Katherine, or Merricat, who says things like this:
“On the moon we wore feathers in our hair, and rubies on our hands. On the moon we had gold spoons.�
And, to her sister, Constance:
“Oh Constance, we are so happy.�
Who often replies, "Silly, silly Merricat."
But truly un-merry Merricat also says things like this, about the people of the town:
“I'm going to put death in all their food and watch them die.�
Six years ago, several of the Blackwood family were poisoned, from arsenic sprinkled with sugar on a bowl of blackberries. Constance, who was in the kitchen, was and still is widely suspected of the crime, of which Merricat simply says:
“Fate intervened. Some of us, that day, she led inexorably through the gates of death. Some of us, innocent and unsuspecting, took, unwillingly, that one last step to oblivion. Some of us took very little sugar.�
Merricat's distinctive narrator’s voice joins those of Scout and Holden Caufield as unforgettable teen main characters in American literature. At turns creepy, delightful, dark, with a touch of black humor, the book also features Constance, Merricat's caretaker sister, weirdly hilarious Uncle Julian, and greedy Cousin Charles who comes to live in the castle for a time. I was intrigued by the tension between the townies and the Blackwood family holed up in their dark gothic mansion. I loved the chilling moment of the Big Reveal, that dramatic horrific climax, but I also loved the strangely sweet conclusion, colored as always by Merricat’s strange witchy habits:
“All our land was enriched with my treasures buried in it, thickly inhabited just below the surface with my marbles and my teeth and my colored stones, all perhaps turned to jewels by now, held together under the ground in a powerful taut web which never loosened, but held fast to guard us.�
A masterpiece, revealing more riches at every reading.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
We Have Always Lived in the Castle.
Sign In »
Quotes Dave Liked
Reading Progress
February 17, 2017
–
Started Reading
February 17, 2017
– Shelved
February 17, 2017
– Shelved as:
horror
February 17, 2017
– Shelved as:
madness-psychi-supernat-faith-proj
February 17, 2017
–
9.49%
"Just started it, never read it or any of her novels before. By the author of "The Lottery," which everyone seems to read in school (in the states, anyway)."
page
15
February 22, 2017
–
18.99%
"“My name is Mary Katherine Blackwood. I am eighteen years old, and I live with my sister Constance. I have often thought that with any luck at all, I could have been born a werewolf, because the two middle fingers on both my hands are the same length. I like my sister Constance, and Richard Plantagenet, and Amanita phalloides, the death-cup mushroom. Everyone else in our family is dead.�"
page
30
February 23, 2017
–
31.65%
"“I can't help it when people are frightened," says Merricat. "I always want to frighten them more.�"
page
50
February 27, 2017
–
69.62%
"Merricat, said Connie, would you like a cup of tea?
Oh, no, said Merricat, you’ll poison me.
Merricat, said Connie, would you like to go to sleep?
Down in the boneyard ten feet deep!"
page
110
Oh, no, said Merricat, you’ll poison me.
Merricat, said Connie, would you like to go to sleep?
Down in the boneyard ten feet deep!"
March 1, 2017
– Shelved as:
mystery-detective-thriller
March 1, 2017
– Shelved as:
books-loved-2017
March 1, 2017
–
Finished Reading
September 12, 2017
–
Started Reading
September 16, 2017
–
0.0%
"Re-reading for Fall 2017 YA class. Merricat is one of the greatest teen heroines of American literature, totally unique, right up there with Scout from To Kill a Mockingbird. Yes, she's really that great a character!"
September 16, 2017
– Shelved as:
eng-240-spr-17
September 16, 2017
– Shelved as:
ya-fall-2017
September 16, 2017
–
Finished Reading
September 14, 2018
– Shelved as:
ya-fall-2018
October 21, 2019
– Shelved as:
best-books-ever
October 4, 2021
–
Started Reading
October 7, 2021
–
Finished Reading
February 14, 2025
–
Started Reading
March 3, 2025
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-37 of 37 (37 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Lauren
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Mar 01, 2017 05:48AM

reply
|
flag

*looks at leaning tower of books*"
ah, a thing of beauty, not a terrifying tower. You have many important things to do! Go, read, and keep building the tower as you go!



*looks at leaning tower of books*"
ah, a thing of beauty, not a terrifying tower. You have many important things to do! Go, read, and keep building the..."
You always know exactly what to say, David. I think I need to bottle your words and keep them with me always :)

Oh no, said David, you’ll poison me.



I love how you described "The Lottery" here, as exquisitely perverse. I re-read it last week and I sat, almost in awe, at the conclusion (yet again).






I wanted to add something that I also loved about the graphic novel (since my reviews always go the circuitous route!), regarding the scenes of the ill-fated housewife. . . disrobing and entering a bath. . . I thought about this for days after reading it. Was the artist using those scenes to spike book sales, or did it serve some purpose? I finally settled on the sensual nature of her nudity, the obvious pleasure she experienced from being alone and in the elements. I think he was contrasting the spark despair of daily life in the village with the private pleasure that Nature can bring. Was it a moment of optimism?




I will say that it is unusual to see nudity in Jackson, it basically never happens. It's asexual universe, hers.
We get more background about the lottery; not sure that Jackson would approve. Her story was lean and mean, leaving so much open to question. She might have liked the bath scene, but maybe less the pointing to the Puritans by her grandson.



I think "The Lottery" is dystopian enough in nature; I'm not sure Ms. Jackson was trying to assert the particular origins of the tradition (more like Any Town, Any Place), though we can typically blame the Puritans for many of our issues!






