ŷ

Leonard Gaya's Reviews > Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
27098959
's review

really liked it

Do Androids is one of the most famous novels by P. K. Dick, probably due to Ridley Scott's Blade Runner, which was loosely adapted from it. I was quite surprised to see that, apart from the general plotline and a few character names, the movie has very little to do with the novel.

A couple of things that are fascinating in PKD's work (not depicted in the film) are (i) the relationship between men and (mostly robotic) animals in a post-nuclear war environment where most animals are extinct, and the human population has migrated to Mars, and (ii) the religious-like experience of "mercerism" where people get fused, through an Empathy Box (a sort of game console), with a mysterious man called Wilbur Mercer, who endlessly climbs a hill, while being stoned by surrounding onlookers... Perhaps some kind of Sisyphus or Jesus walking towards the Golgotha?
127 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
February 20, 2017 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

P.E. Sensible comparison here! I had not to this point connected the dots between Mercer and Sisyphus!


Leonard Gaya Weird video game, right? :)


P.E. Weird video game alright, Leonard! One you can't win over the bargain... Is that... the ultimate Dark Souls ? ;)


Warwick Wow, I said almost exactly the same thing � only much more long-windedly! Nice review, Leonard.


Leonard Gaya Indeed! Just read your own excellent review. Les grands esprits se rencontrent ! I'm guessing you're currently through the 1st volume of the LoA omnibus edition? Got the same here. And I need to catch up with you! ;)


Warwick Exactly so! I'm not usually a big fan of the covers/fonts used on those LoA editions, but this one is a beautiful set (and surprisingly quick to read, too).


Leonard Gaya Excellent. I’ll dust my set asap, then... I believe a reread of Ubik is long overdue, as far as I’m concerned, so I guess I’ll take it from there on. I have also been wanting to read Martian Time-Slip, which is one of the early novels, but for some odd reason I don’t remember seeing it in the LoA. I’ll have to get that one separately.


Warwick It's in my vol. II.


Leonard Gaya Oh, you're abs right, silly me! I meant to say Time Out of Joint. But I guess this one was written before the 60s, so it makes perfect sense that it's not included in a volume titled "Novels of the 1960s"... Anyway, next stop for me, that or Ubik, depending on mood and barometric pressure, I guess. I'll see you there. :)


message 10: by Ivana (new)

Ivana Books Are Magic Yes, the book and the novel are quite different.


Leonard Gaya Yes, Ivana. I guess PKD is not easily “adaptable� as is (perhaps his stories a bit too dry or too weird?). See for instance the Man in the High Castle TV series: widely embroidered as compared to the book.


message 12: by Ivana (new)

Ivana Books Are Magic Leonard wrote: "Yes, Ivana. I guess PKD is not easily “adaptable� as is (perhaps his stories a bit too dry or too weird?). See for instance the Man in the High Castle TV series: widely embroidered as compared to t..."

He is definitely not easily adaptable. I'm trying to imagine what a good adaptation of this book would look like and all I can think of is some melancholic film with cheesy voice over featuring some of my fav lines. I wouldn't be able to come up with a good way to do it. It might be done perhaps, especially now that many things predicted in the book came true (isn't collective merging a bit like social networks nowadays and the mood machine like the pills?) but maybe there is no need. Sometimes adaptations can be completely different and still be great. I think Blade Runner is one of those films. It is more inspired by the book than based on it but I liked it.
I haven't seen the Man in the High Castle TV series but yes I imagine it must be different from the book.


Leonard Gaya You are right. Ridley Scott’s film is a masterpiece, indeed. But in any case, each work has its own merits. I believe that the fact that a book is not easily transposable or translatable into another language or medium is a good sign: it shows that it doesn’t just rely on a good story, but has some specific qualities (be it style, or structure, or feel, or whatever) that are intrinsic to the book, and couldn’t adequately be expressed otherwise.


message 14: by Ivana (new)

Ivana Books Are Magic Beautifully said.


back to top