Trish's Reviews > A Wrinkle in Time
A Wrinkle in Time
by
by

We all want to fit in somehow. We also want to be ourselves and thus stand out a little bit, but basically we don't want to deviate too much from "the norm" because it's usually considered bad by others (funny, considering that we're pretty much all feeling the same way so we should just let the others be) and especially children often have a hard time when not fitting in with their peers. Thus, being different can be risky.
Meg is a girl that doesn't fit in. Her parents are multiple PhDs and have taught her and her siblings a thing or two (about maths mostly) with the result that Meg can often not understand why she is supposed to solve a (mathematical) problem in school this way instead of that. The problem is that neither her teachers nor the other kids in school are thrilled with what her parents have already taught her and she is therefore subject to verbal bullying from both groups.
Meg has three brothers: twins (Sandy and Dennys) and Charles Wallace. The former two know how to play the game and usually don't let anything get to them. The latter is 5 years old and usually doesn't speak at all because he knows full well that his correct and adult way of speaking - to say nothing of knowing peoples' minds - would freak others out. He prefers letting them think he cannot speak and is "dumb". He's also Meg's confidant and (thanks to his ability) always knows what she and their mother need.
The children live in a house with their mother who conducts experiments in a room off the kitchen. Sadly, the childrens' father has been missing for over a year, leaving the family emotionally desperate. He worked with the government and there isn't any information the family is given by way of explanation. The cruel people of town speak about him having left for another woman, which doesn't make Meg feel any better, of course. In fact, Meg hates people for being so unfair and ignorant and she frequently grows impatient with the way things are (leading to her getting into trouble).
Thanks to her gifted brother Charles Wallace, the family encounters a peculiar old woman called Mrs. Whatsit. The following day, Meg and Charles Wallace not only meet Mrs. Whatsit's sister (Mrs. Who) but also a boy from school - a popular boy, Calvin, who nevertheless seems to have enough troubles of his own and reveals to only be popular because he is what everyone expects of him without it really being him.
To go into such detail about the children is important to me because they are the central characters. Sure, Mrs. Which, Mrs. Whatsit and Mrs. Who are important as well and the kids meet other creatures besides them, but the author managed to truly write a story for and about children.
Anyway, at one point, the three ladies reveal to Meg, Charles Wallace and Calvin that they want to help getting back Meg's and Charles Wallace's father because he is in great peril. Thus, they take them on a fantastic journey through several galaxies.
It's a tale of all your faults being necessary at the right time if you can apply them properly, of perseverance, love, and self-sacrifice. It's about the darkness in the world and that we can't simply do nothing, even if that might seem seductively easier. It's also about celebrating who you are instead of homogenizing the entire world.
Camazotz, a world the children travel to while trying to find their father, is the perfect example of what happens when everyone has to be like everybody else. Not only does it make the world grey and dull, it also does not make the people in it happy.
This is definitely a tale I'd read to my children if I had any, because it teaches so much about people, the world, perception, and looking beyond the surface. It's also about compassion and intelligence and hard lessons that all people need to learn at one point in their lives or another and the author had a wonderful way of not only delighting me when I travelled to distant planets with the children, but of also breaking my heart once or twice.
I loved the prose, I loved the author's imagination, I loved the children and everyone they encountered for the colourful worlds they inhabited and their strangeness. I loved how the interaction of light and dark was portrayed, how our way of seeing the world was challenged, and the fact that the book was filled with scientific topics, explained so children could understand them. In the introduction to my edition, the author said that the book had been rejected many times, usually because nobody could tell what it was (it was as different as its main characters) and the publishers said that children would never "get it" - to which the author commented that children usually perceive much more than adults, and her own children (demanding more writing from her) were proof enough for her to persevere. I therefore love her self-imposed high standard to make this a tale for children, about children, that nevertheless equally thrills thanks to the adventure and educates through the imbedded facts. It is rather fascinating even though there are plenty of religious themes embedded as well (though much more subtly than C.S. Lewis did in most of his books).
I have the audiobook that was read by Hope Davis and was delighted about her narration. I've listened to a number of audiobooks lately but she must be one of the top 3 narrators I've heard so far and I hope she's narrated the rest of the series as well.
Because this is a quintet and while you could technically regard this as a standalone, it literally ends in the middle of a sentence from Mrs. Whatsit which caught me by complete surprise and left me wanting more (nice touch). *lol*
Meg is a girl that doesn't fit in. Her parents are multiple PhDs and have taught her and her siblings a thing or two (about maths mostly) with the result that Meg can often not understand why she is supposed to solve a (mathematical) problem in school this way instead of that. The problem is that neither her teachers nor the other kids in school are thrilled with what her parents have already taught her and she is therefore subject to verbal bullying from both groups.
Meg has three brothers: twins (Sandy and Dennys) and Charles Wallace. The former two know how to play the game and usually don't let anything get to them. The latter is 5 years old and usually doesn't speak at all because he knows full well that his correct and adult way of speaking - to say nothing of knowing peoples' minds - would freak others out. He prefers letting them think he cannot speak and is "dumb". He's also Meg's confidant and (thanks to his ability) always knows what she and their mother need.
The children live in a house with their mother who conducts experiments in a room off the kitchen. Sadly, the childrens' father has been missing for over a year, leaving the family emotionally desperate. He worked with the government and there isn't any information the family is given by way of explanation. The cruel people of town speak about him having left for another woman, which doesn't make Meg feel any better, of course. In fact, Meg hates people for being so unfair and ignorant and she frequently grows impatient with the way things are (leading to her getting into trouble).
Thanks to her gifted brother Charles Wallace, the family encounters a peculiar old woman called Mrs. Whatsit. The following day, Meg and Charles Wallace not only meet Mrs. Whatsit's sister (Mrs. Who) but also a boy from school - a popular boy, Calvin, who nevertheless seems to have enough troubles of his own and reveals to only be popular because he is what everyone expects of him without it really being him.
To go into such detail about the children is important to me because they are the central characters. Sure, Mrs. Which, Mrs. Whatsit and Mrs. Who are important as well and the kids meet other creatures besides them, but the author managed to truly write a story for and about children.
Anyway, at one point, the three ladies reveal to Meg, Charles Wallace and Calvin that they want to help getting back Meg's and Charles Wallace's father because he is in great peril. Thus, they take them on a fantastic journey through several galaxies.
It's a tale of all your faults being necessary at the right time if you can apply them properly, of perseverance, love, and self-sacrifice. It's about the darkness in the world and that we can't simply do nothing, even if that might seem seductively easier. It's also about celebrating who you are instead of homogenizing the entire world.
Camazotz, a world the children travel to while trying to find their father, is the perfect example of what happens when everyone has to be like everybody else. Not only does it make the world grey and dull, it also does not make the people in it happy.
This is definitely a tale I'd read to my children if I had any, because it teaches so much about people, the world, perception, and looking beyond the surface. It's also about compassion and intelligence and hard lessons that all people need to learn at one point in their lives or another and the author had a wonderful way of not only delighting me when I travelled to distant planets with the children, but of also breaking my heart once or twice.
I loved the prose, I loved the author's imagination, I loved the children and everyone they encountered for the colourful worlds they inhabited and their strangeness. I loved how the interaction of light and dark was portrayed, how our way of seeing the world was challenged, and the fact that the book was filled with scientific topics, explained so children could understand them. In the introduction to my edition, the author said that the book had been rejected many times, usually because nobody could tell what it was (it was as different as its main characters) and the publishers said that children would never "get it" - to which the author commented that children usually perceive much more than adults, and her own children (demanding more writing from her) were proof enough for her to persevere. I therefore love her self-imposed high standard to make this a tale for children, about children, that nevertheless equally thrills thanks to the adventure and educates through the imbedded facts. It is rather fascinating even though there are plenty of religious themes embedded as well (though much more subtly than C.S. Lewis did in most of his books).
I have the audiobook that was read by Hope Davis and was delighted about her narration. I've listened to a number of audiobooks lately but she must be one of the top 3 narrators I've heard so far and I hope she's narrated the rest of the series as well.
Because this is a quintet and while you could technically regard this as a standalone, it literally ends in the middle of a sentence from Mrs. Whatsit which caught me by complete surprise and left me wanting more (nice touch). *lol*
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
A Wrinkle in Time.
Sign In »
Quotes Trish Liked

“We can't take any credit for our talents. It's how we use them that counts.”
― A Wrinkle in Time: With Related Readings
― A Wrinkle in Time: With Related Readings

“Le coeur a ses raisons que la raison ne connait point. French. Pascal. The heart has its reasons, whereof reason knows nothing.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“I don't understand it any more than you do, but one thing I've learned is that you don't have to understand things for them to be.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“A book, too, can be a star, “explosive material, capable of stirring up fresh life endlessly,â€� a living fire to lighten the darkness, leading out into the expanding universe.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“The truth is that I hate to think about other people reading my books," Miranda said. "It's like watching someone go through the box of private stuff that I keep under my bed.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“Come t'e' picciol fallo amaro morso! Dante. What grievous pain a little fault doth give thee!”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“We do not know what things look like, as you say," the beast said. "We know what things are like. It must be a very limiting thing, this seeing.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“But we know that just because we want something does not mean that we will get what we want,”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“You’re good in school. Everybody likes you.â€� “For all the most unimportant reasons,â€� Calvin said. “There hasn’t been anybody, anybody in the world I could talk to. Sure, I can function on the same level as everybody else, I can hold myself down, but it isn’t me.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“La experiencia es la madre de la ciencia. Spanish, my dears. Cervantes. Experience is the mother of knowledge.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“She was enfolded in the great wings of Mrs. Whatsit and she felt comfort and strength pouring through her. Mrs. Whatsit was not speaking aloud, and yet through the wings Meg understood words.
"My child, do not despair. Do you think we would have brought you here if there was no hope? We are asking you to do a difficult thing, but we are confident that you can do it. Your father needs help, he needs courage, and for his children he may be able to do what he cannot do for himself.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
"My child, do not despair. Do you think we would have brought you here if there was no hope? We are asking you to do a difficult thing, but we are confident that you can do it. Your father needs help, he needs courage, and for his children he may be able to do what he cannot do for himself.”
― A Wrinkle in Time

“There are forces working in the world as never before in the history of mankind for standardization, for the regimentation of us all, or what I like to call making muffins of us, muffins all like every other muffin in the muffin tin. This is the limited universe, the drying, dissipating universe, that we can help our children avoid by providing them with “explosive material capable of stirring up fresh life endlessly.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“To love is to be vulnerable; and it is only in vulnerability and risk—not safety and security—that we overcome darkness.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“Oh, why must you make me look at unpleasant things when there are so many delightful ones to see?â€� Again Mrs Which’s voice reverberated through the cave. “Therre willl nno llonggerr bee sso many y pplleasanntt thinggss tto llookk att iff rressponssible ppeoplle ddo nnott ddo ssomethingg abboutt thee unnppleassanntt oness.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“Maybe I don't like being different," Meg said. "but I don't want to be like everybody else, either.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“We have to make decisions, and we can’t make them if they’re based on fear.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“The most memorable books from our childhoods are those that make us feel less alone, convince us that our own foibles and quirks are both as individual as a finger-print and as universal as an open hand.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“But I love her. That’s the funny part of it. I love them all, and they don’t give a hoot about me. Maybe that’s why I call when I’m not going to be home. Because I care. Nobody else does. You don’t know how lucky you are to be loved.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time

“In your language you have a form of poetry called a sonnet...It is a very strict form of poetry, is it not?
...There are fourteen lines, I believe, all in iambic pentameter. That's a very strict rhythm or meter, yes?...And each line has to end with a rigid rhyme pattern. And if the poet does not do it exactly this way, it is not a sonnet, is it?'
'No.'
'But within this strict form the poet has complete freedom to say whatever he wants, doesn't he?'
'Yes." Calvin nodded again.
'So,' said Mrs. Whatsit.
'So what?'
'Oh, do not be stupid, boy!' Mrs. Whatsit scolded. 'You know perfectly well what I am driving at!'
'You mean you're comparing our lives to a sonnet? A strict form, but with freedom within it?'
'Yes,' Mrs. Whatsit said. "You're given the form, but you have to write the sonnet yourself.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
...There are fourteen lines, I believe, all in iambic pentameter. That's a very strict rhythm or meter, yes?...And each line has to end with a rigid rhyme pattern. And if the poet does not do it exactly this way, it is not a sonnet, is it?'
'No.'
'But within this strict form the poet has complete freedom to say whatever he wants, doesn't he?'
'Yes." Calvin nodded again.
'So,' said Mrs. Whatsit.
'So what?'
'Oh, do not be stupid, boy!' Mrs. Whatsit scolded. 'You know perfectly well what I am driving at!'
'You mean you're comparing our lives to a sonnet? A strict form, but with freedom within it?'
'Yes,' Mrs. Whatsit said. "You're given the form, but you have to write the sonnet yourself.”
― A Wrinkle in Time

“You’re much too straightforward to be able to pretend to be what you aren’t,â€� Mrs. Murry said.”
― A Wrinkle in Time
― A Wrinkle in Time
Reading Progress
July 16, 2017
– Shelved
July 16, 2017
– Shelved as:
maybe
January 19, 2018
– Shelved as:
to-read
February 7, 2018
–
Started Reading
February 7, 2018
–
42.0%
"Wow! This is magical! A lot of scientific concepts very neatly explained and the settings as well as characters are great!
Also, the narrator, actress Hope Davis, is doing a marvellous job here!"
Also, the narrator, actress Hope Davis, is doing a marvellous job here!"
February 8, 2018
–
67.0%
"After a wonderful journey with Mrs. Which, Mrs. Who and Mrs. Whatsit, the children are now at Camazotz and have to manage on their own.
This is really rather wonderful although I cannot, for the life of me, unite the images in my head with what I've seen in the movie trailer!"
This is really rather wonderful although I cannot, for the life of me, unite the images in my head with what I've seen in the movie trailer!"
February 8, 2018
–
85.0%
"How horrible the realization that your parents aren't omnipotent, can't solve all the problems, don't have all the answers, can't always save you. How horrible the realization that you have to do it all on your own, no matter how big or small your shoulders. My heart bleeds for the children."
February 8, 2018
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-35 of 35 (35 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Dave
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Feb 08, 2018 02:47AM

reply
|
flag



Thank you. And yes, it is. I definitely have to continue with the series. To think that I'd have missed out on this gem if it wasn't for the movie adaptation!


I also enjoy a good rant *lol* but yeah, it's generally much more pleasant to fall in love with a book and review it then. :)
Have you read the rest of the series? Does it keep up the quality?

But yes, I enjoy your rants as much as these kinds of reviews from you, Trish. You can get emotional (and sometimes very funny) about your views sometimes, and that's fun to read.

*lol* Thanks - I guess? :P

Veronique wrote: "Great review. Yes, I do need to read this"
Thanks! And yes, Vero, you certainly need to.

Not yet but ... ;) ... if I can get my hands on it, I certainly want that one. Do you have that one?


That's cool! I hope he'll like it.

That's cool! I hope he'll like it. "
It's been about a week, and he hasn't thrown it across the room so far!

*lol* I guess that's a good sign. :)



I saw the trailer and already wasn't enchanted. This article confirmed one more fear of mine. I'll watch it eventually, for completion's sake but I don't expect much. Too action-y and they seem to be trying too hard to recreate what made the book be so beloved while also being socially and politically correct and relevant. I was already very disappointed by the Annihilation movie and expect this to be no different. :(
This, however, makes the article so much more important.

I was very excited by the movie coming out, but truthfully, it was awful. Miscast, poorly directed, dull dull dull. Really, really awful. 😢
I will have to read this book someday.



Yep. It's why I was so pissed off when hearing some time ago that there will be another Mary Poppins film. You know, the typical "milking that cash cow until there's nothing left" thing. Or so I thought. Because that movie is almost holy. *lol* Too much nostalgia I guess. But then I saw the trailer for the new one AND I WEPT! So much for it deserving magic!