Bradley's Reviews > Mythos: The Greek Myths Retold
Mythos: The Greek Myths Retold (Stephen Fry's Great Mythology, #1)
by
by

I don't know about any of you, but this one's a winner. Far from feeling like another dry recounting of a number of our favorite Greek myths, Fry's down-to-earth humor and traditional (modern) storytelling have turned these gods into something most relatable.
I've read Edith Hamilton and Bullfinch's recountings and I've had the pleasure of countless other sources, but here's where Fry shines: he cherry-picks the very best stories and tells them so charmingly and naturally that I wouldn't be surprised if most people would go out of their way to start their friends and family out with this, first.
He does sacrifice breadth in favor of depth, but of course, that's a fine thing. These are some of the most amazing stories of the bunch. They're all told with intelligence, heart, and humor.
Do I have a man-crush? Maybe. A little. But Fry has always been charming as hell. A must-read!
I've read Edith Hamilton and Bullfinch's recountings and I've had the pleasure of countless other sources, but here's where Fry shines: he cherry-picks the very best stories and tells them so charmingly and naturally that I wouldn't be surprised if most people would go out of their way to start their friends and family out with this, first.
He does sacrifice breadth in favor of depth, but of course, that's a fine thing. These are some of the most amazing stories of the bunch. They're all told with intelligence, heart, and humor.
Do I have a man-crush? Maybe. A little. But Fry has always been charming as hell. A must-read!
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Mythos.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
November 5, 2017
– Shelved
November 5, 2017
– Shelved as:
to-read
November 9, 2017
–
Started Reading
November 9, 2017
– Shelved as:
2017-shelf
November 9, 2017
– Shelved as:
traditional-fiction
November 9, 2017
– Shelved as:
fantasy
November 9, 2017
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-29 of 29 (29 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Trish
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Nov 10, 2017 01:31AM

reply
|
flag



Don't start talking shit about my drunken master. Just because you can't get drunk doesn't mean he ought to be stricken from the hearts of all us hedonists. :)
I really want the mystery religion stuff, too. :)


No alcohol, no possible reason ANYONE would be willing to get along in groups. He's the SAVIOR of all humanity!
And here's the funny thing... I don't even drink that much. I just appreciate a good savior.


See? SAVIOR.

As for getting a drunk to have sex with you - you really wanna go down that lane? How many get raped because of alcohol? How man beat people half to death (spouses even) because they don't have themselves under control when drunk (and only barely when sober)?! Thank you, Dionysos, I guess.

In ancient Greece, wine (the most commonly consumed alcoholic beverage) was not a tool with which to become drunk and disorderly. That's not at all what the cult of Dionysus was about; it wasn't about getting sloshed because it's fun. In ancient Greece (and a lot of other ancient cultures) wine was symbolic of truces, family, victory, and social status, and drinking wine was thought of as a way to bring a person closer to their deities (wine has an important standing across religions; Jesus turned water into wine). Wine became popular in the Hellenic peninsula as a status symbol: those who drank wine were wealthy and "cultured". That's far from the attitude that we have today, though it's similar to tobacco consumption, and how in the days of yore it was thought of as a healthy habit, and further back, as a religious practice.
Dionysus was far from the patron of "drunken idiots", but rather a deity with whom people connected via alcohol. The cult of Dionysus also championed a gentle sort of anarchy: it was about the freeing of a person's soul and using wine and ritual to contact the higher powers. He was considered a protector of "outcasts" - the chaotic and dangerous and theatrical. His cult wasn't about the sesh, but meant almost as a communal safe space for society's rejects, hence why he was often styled as foreign-looking, and therefore not the epitome of the "perfect Greek".
Greece was never an excessively wasteful society and nor were the Greeks ever known to be drunks - some Greek scholars believed that minors shouldn't be drinking alcohol at all. Wine meant much, much more to them than it does to us today.

I'm not saying that wine is bad in general but Dionysos is not exactly the god of all that behave correctly all the time.
That doesn't mean that he might have supported rape under the influence of alcohol but the fact is that drunkenness has always been the excuse for bad behaviour - in ancient times as well as nowadays. The fact that even the Catholic Church uses wine as the Blood of Christ doesn't make that any more or less legitimate.

I understand what you're saying, but rather than just looking at what the myth says on paper, you have to look at it contextually. It's not really enough to read the myth and then that's that. Looking at who exactly was drawn into the cults of Dionysus, and also what the stance was on alcohol in general (again, excess in any way was not widely accepted in Greece and they were not a wasteful people, and so drunkenness was not considered something aspirational) is essential.
The gods were the *only* resource available to the Greeks to understand the world around them. It was the way that society's cliques formed: what cult are you in? Who do you worship? Dionysus's followers were sort of the "punks" of the time; it was rebellious and anarchist to be a follower to Dionysus, in the way it was once really cool to be a KISS groupie even after that dude bit the head off a live rat (was it a rat?) on stage. Dionysus's followers were a part of his cult for far bigger reasons that just enjoying alcohol. It was a lifestyle, and far more nuanced that simply a desire to drink.
I have read the myths, and that's fine, but working out where it fits in with the reality of what was happening in Greece at the time is also extremely important.
The way Bradley phrased his response to you before was totally inappropriate, but alcohol is not evil and nor is it the reason why rapes and assaults happen. Rapes and assaults cannot be excused with alcohol and it is missing the point to say that *alcohol* is the reason why these crimes happen. Rapes and assaults happen because of social structures that make people feel entitled to commit those crimes. I am a smoker (not just of tobacco) and I like to party VERY hard, but I have never ever even come close to committing that kind of crime against anybody. It would never even cross my mind, even subconsciously. Again, it has to be looked at in context.

As for spirituality, it was the center of the numinous. That which cannot be explained or described. It was the feeling of something grand right out of our reach. And therefore it was also the focus for idealism.
I believe Kiki just brought that up. Civilization and agreements, hospitality and culture. Not just revelry.
I really was being ironic and laughing about how moderns might perceive it in my comment... mostly because I'm a big and (real) fan of Dionysus. I'm more of a fan of Orpheus, however, but that's just because he has a more fun and crazy story. :)

There is nothing spiritual about getting drunk or high. Maybe some people hallucinate while under the influence (though drunks are usually different from people who are high), but that doesn't mean it's a good thing. It's a way to escape reality that usually makes reality for everyone else worse (since most drunks don't have themselves under control). Not to mention that reality doens't go away but rather comes back with a vengeance (leading to so many alcoholics) or you spiral out of control and fry what is left of your brain.
Even is you reign yourself in and only do it moderately, there is nothing spiritual about it. It's a chemical reaction in your body. No expansion of mind, just a chemically induced state that might feel good at the time. *lol*
This argument is like what I hear from most religious people about their invisible friend in the sky. If it makes you feel better to believe in trancedial experiences or some such stuff, fine, but don't try to bully others into agreeing with you by saying that only you have seen the light (so to speak) and the ones counter-arguing haven't so they cannot understand because that is like a Catholic priest getting his little lambs in position. I'm not a sheep so it won't work.
So keep drinking your wine (I wasn't only talking about it in excess as I've mentioned before) and telling yourself that it will lead you to a higher plane but leave me out of it. The thing is that I will not stop anyone from wanting to feel better in any way, I just don't like people trying to sell it as something it's not. Especially since you see it going wrong left and right.






I absolutely 1000% agree and am glad I'm not alone. *lol*