ŷ

Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall's Reviews > Don't Wake Up

Don't Wake Up by Liz Lawler
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
28372189
's review

did not like it

Shockingly poor, with an increasingly preposterous plot and an awkwardly abrupt narrative, Don’t Wake Up is comparable only to the misery of a six-hour wait in A&E surrounded by inebriated football hooligans. For me, this novel sums up everything that is wrong with the over populated female friendly psychological thriller market.. far fetched scenarios, unlikely occurrences to satisfy the twist component and inane decision making by unconvincing characters devoid of both consistency and logic. That Liz Lawler’s narrative is unwieldy adds to the overriding feeling that Don’t Wake Up is an amateur attempt at capitalising on the relatively unexplored territory of dark and unsettling medical mayhem.

When twenty-eight year old Bristol based doctor, Alex Taylor, wakes up in theatre with only drapes covering her modesty, strapped to the operating table with her ankles in stirrups and two large cannulas inserted into her arms, her medical training kicks in. Struggling to drag herself from a sluggish lethargy obviously induced by anaesthesia she finds a masked figure looming over her who she assumes is a doctor, although she fails to recognise the voice. As the mystery voice threatens to staple her lips, she is told that her coil has been removed and that she is due to undergo a vulvectomy (removal of the vulva). Her only chance to halt the planned treatment comes when she is asked the question, “what does ‘no� mean?�, the intimation of which is that saying ‘no� whilst dressed like a strumpet is equivalent to saying ‘yes� and leading a man on.

When she reawakens for a second time however, Alex finds herself greeted by two of her closest colleagues; her boss and senior consultant, Dr Caroline Cowan and her best friend and senior nursing sister, Fiona Woods, who are insistent that she was simply discovered in the hospital car park and suspected of being hit by a falling branch in the gale force wind. They attribute her confusion and panic to concussion and are mystified by her assertions that she has been raped. Despite their reassurances Alex insists on reporting her alleged abduction and rape to the police, for which no supporting evidence is found. Riddled with inconsistencies, the first fifty pages were enough to show me that Lawler’s developing plot owed more to being selective with the information she presents than overtly up front about the circumstances. Naturally no one believes Alex and whilst several close colleagues connect it to the unprocessed trauma of an incident a year back, knowledge of which is a closely guarded secret.

Despite this harrowing event Alex is convinced by her arrogant boyfriend of a year, vet Patrick Ford, to hightail it to Barbados for a week’s respite during which time she fails to mention the incident and is intimate with her partner, which is laughable. Back on home soil and Alex’s claims return with a vengeance and it becomes clear that both Patrick and her colleagues think she is losing the plot and suffering from post-traumatic stress. As she attempts to return to her demanding job, her colleagues reticence to engage with her and their obvious disbelief exacerbates her paranoia and as she struggles to cope she turns to both alcohol and diazepam to manage her fears. Two weeks later the emergency admission of a pregnant nurse and the young woman’s death bed words lead Alex to believe that she has been a victim of this same attacker. Reporting the death as suspicious, the police start questioning Alex’s sanity and after the blame for near-fatal drug error is laid at her door and she is present at another suspicious death, Alex wonders whom, if anyone, she can trust, and how to establish her own innocence. As she begins to suspect that the only answer is to proactively search out the psychopath intent on destroying her life the stakes become ever riskier.

As a central protagonist I was convinced by Alex’s insistence of the initial episode but it is is the rapidity of her swings in mood and distress that smack of unconvincing. From sitting fully clothed in the shower addled by vodka and taking daily doses of diazepam in order to keep some semblance of calm, Lawler manages to follow up each tale of woe with Alex needing very little persuasion to go to a nightclub or evening out with colleagues, and her seamless transference of romantic interest does nothing to make her situation more believable. The characters were largely one-dimensional, and the police and medical staff largely unprofessional, from SIO DI Greg Turner who goes weak at the knees over Dr. Taylor and is unwilling to even countenance her potential involvement, to immature DC Laura Best and her attempts at a single-handed character assassination of a talented medic, going out of her way to dig dirt and intent on claiming her scalp. From biased cops to doctors under the influence, the moral of this story seems to be steer clear of anyone working for or operating under the guise of the emergency services.

The premise of Don’t Wake Up on which the novel is marketed makes it sound like the plot has some element of substance, so despite the woefully inept opening chapters I persevered. Comically bad, the plot and execution is dire but nothing can mask the fact that there is little sleight of hand in evidence and for readers to even imagine these incidents are the work of a increasingly delusional Alex takes a massive suspension of disbelief. Seeing as these incidents did manage to confound the entire CID personnel I was clearly alone is seeing through this transparent plot and whilst clear medical know how is evident and well researched the police response (personal wild goose chases, hours of navel gazing and muck racking) is risible.

When the elaborate motive is revealed it feels desperately unlikely that a person would go to such extraordinary lengths to destroy someone’s career and sanity and stretches the bounds of credibility immensely, given that the risk reward ratio is stacked against a successful execution and that it relies on the perpetrator having superhuman powers and infinite resources to hand. Apart from the early insight into how rape crisis victims are handled and what an utterly degrading experience such a process is, Don’t Wake Up, has few redeeming aspects and my rating reflects the neatly tied up loose ends which by and large answered most of my remaining questions, although one or two still admittedly linger. Although Alex is belatedly referred to a psychoanalyst to help her tackle her problems, this line of thread is largely untapped despite its obvious potential and felt like a missed opportunity.

Abysmal writing, inane plot and come year end, a reading lowlight!
128 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Don't Wake Up.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 22, 2017 – Started Reading
November 22, 2017 – Shelved
November 25, 2017 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 51 (51 new)


message 1: by Miriam (new)

Miriam Smith (A Mother’s Musings) Dear me, put me right off at vulvectomy, why write that in a story? Eeeewww! Thanks for heads up, will be giving this a very wide swerve. But a fab review as always! 💕


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall Thanks Miri, the masked doctor also tells Dr Alex that she has a retroverted uterus (tilted posteriorly apparently).. TMI?!

So disappointed with this.. just silly to imagine that someone who genuinely believes they have been raped would be intimate with two different men in the two months following it all. xx


message 3: by Maureen (new)

Maureen Oh dear! Think I'll pass on this one Rachel😄


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall Would advise you to Maureen, as I could have carried on with another two pages of moans about it.. was in such a bad mood reading due to number of issues that I had with it! Sad, but true thank you pet xx


message 5: by Frances (new)

Frances Oh nooo, the horrid 1*!! Hope the next one is a winner Rachel!!


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall Thanks Frances.. I know.. the pain of a one star for us readaholics! xx


Kaceey Oh no Rachel!! So sorry this was a complete fail for you!!


message 8: by Roman Clodia (new)

Roman Clodia Great review, Rachel! I agree, we need to not accept uncritically the sub-standard 'psychological' fiction that is increasingly being churned out 😠xx


message 9: by Miriam (new)

Miriam Smith (A Mother’s Musings) Oh it gets worse then? - definetly giving this a miss, how horrid 🤢 X


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall Thanks Kaceey and Roman - maybe I need a break from an increasingly disappointing genre.. honestly, I worked myself up into quite a state venting my spleen!

Miriam, don’t worry, no more info coming at you before you sit down to your dinner! 🤦‍♀� xx. Safe tonight my love xx


message 11: by Deanna (new)

Deanna Aww I'm sorry this was such a bomb....Rachel. I've had this on my list for awhile but never go around to it. It does anxiety inducing.
I hope your next/current read makes up for how this one made you feel! <3 xxo


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall Thanks Deanna, a fast read but I couldn’t let go of the increasing irritations on the plot and ludicrous twists. xx


message 13: by Sid (new)

Sid Nuncius Look, there's no need to beat about the bush, Rachel. Why don't you just say what you really thought of it? :o)

Great review - and thanks for the warning!


message 14: by Diane (new)

Diane Wallace pointed,blunt n honest!


message 15: by David (new)

David Dowdy Outstanding review! You've definitely made your point.


message 16: by [deleted user] (new)

Great review!


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall Thanks for comments and apologies if seemed a bit aggressive! I am normally quite calm but some books get me started! Anyway, thank you for bothering to read guys xx


message 18: by Sid (new)

Sid Nuncius Absolutely no need for apology! I appreciated your candour - it sounds dreadful and you said why very clearly. That's exactly what I want from a review.


message 19: by Susan (new)

Susan Ha ha! Sometimes you just have to vent, Rachel :)


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall Much obliged, Sid and Susan! xx


message 21: by Heidi (new)

Heidi Glad to read your review knowing I'm not the only one that finds the plot far fetched. I started reading this but my eye-rolling caused me such a headache that I had to abandon the book, and after your review I don't think I'll persevere!


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall Personally I think that is a very sensible choice Heidi. Absolutely dire and some of the medical thinking was flawed too which annoyed me.

For example, in one scene Alex sees a woman on the floor of her car park and is forward thinking how she could help. She is supposed to have a chest drain in her car. When I needed one my local hospital which caters for the London Borough of Greenwich and circa 250k patients couldn’t perform as is a specialised procedure. I had to go to Kings College - a central London hospital. Supposedly having one in your car is absolute rubbish!

xx


message 23: by Kris (new)

Kris Jones I disagree, I loved it!


Dorothy I agree - I hate giving up on books in the middle so pushed through to the end but I couldn't stand this book and it got worse as it went on. Genuinely shocked by all the good reviews! Thanks for your candour here.


Helen White Fantastic review! I felt the book began well, and indeed to start with I was hooked. But the conclusion felt rushed, and I felt that there was very little in the way of real detective work done. Laura Best spends half her time intent on proving Alex a killer in order to further her own career and Greg Turner spends his time simpering over Alex and trying to decide if she’s guilty or not - evidence be damned! Such a shame, as it could have ended brilliantly if it was better thought out.


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall Totally, Helen! And the premise and opening has real potential.. but then it ends up becoming one of those frustrating reads that keeps popping into your mind as you think over the missteps. xx


message 27: by Kay (new)

Kay Fletcher Most helpful review I've read in ages. You have saved me a lot of time, frustration and disappointment


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall Cheers, Kay! This one was so frustrating and maddening that I couldn’t hold back in my review!


message 29: by sophie lee (new)

sophie lee I completely agree with your review. I can't believe the high rating on this book. Ignoring all other faults, I still don't understand the motive of the villain. The plots felt like there were tacked on for the obligatory shock/twist value. I'm glad I'm not the only one!


Anera I couldn't agree more with you, you put your thoughts into your review really well. Exactly what I felt. Cheers from Cro


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall Thank you Sophie and Anera. Good to know that other people were as miffed by the success of the book as me!


Letitia I absolutely loved this. Not sure if we really read the same story


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall It’s all subjective, Letitia, and everyone is entitled to their own opinion.


message 34: by Psych (new)

Psych Tui Haha I wish I’d read this first. It was indeed a crock of shit. The demented laura best, and her farcical narrative that somehow explained how Alex was guilty and then the truth of it all being a capable wealthy woman all over some stupid actor? A serial murderer? Violent as hell? What a joke.


message 35: by Kay (new) - rated it 1 star

Kay I so agree Rachel. The initial premise was interesting but then became inane in execution. The writing and characterization stilted. I basically skimmed most of it to find out who so luckily I spent maybe a hour to finish.


Janice Robertson One of the most spot on reviews I’ve ever read. I think YOU should be an author.


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall I wish, Janice! But thanks very much!


message 38: by Figgy (new) - rated it 1 star

Figgy I couldn't agree with you more. One of THE worst books.

I discovered after I'd read this entire book and raged over it for a while that this imprint specialises in publishing in ebook first, and will turn it into a physical book with proper marketing if it sells enough copies in electronic format... or something along those lines.


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall Actually Figgy now you mention it the reason I first bought the book in a charity shop was how long it seemed to have been hovering in the Amazon Kindle Top 100 (probably becauseit was cheap as chips). I kept seeing it lingering and I thought I must be missing out. How naive I was..

The most depressing thing is that the book is still taking up valuable space on my cluttered shelves and that my friend sent me her follow up novel! Saving that for a very rainy day! x


message 40: by Figgy (new) - rated it 1 star

Figgy Holy shit, there's a second book? What? Why???

At least the MC in the second seems to be a slightly better choice... The author has experience as a nurse, and trying to write about a hotshot doctor showed a certain level of ignorance. Or maybe it was just the crappy writing.


Jacqueline Agreed!! Utter rubbish!


Brooke I totally agree with your review and wish I had read it first before attempting to trudge through this book. I didn’t even make it halfway before having to give up.


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall Thanks, Brooke and although a friend gave me the author’s second book, I’m just not sure I can put myself through a repeat experience!


message 44: by Caryn (new) - rated it 1 star

Caryn I can't wait for this horrid bit of rubbish to be over. The plot is insulting, the writing is sophomoric and this book isn't worth repurposing as a paperweight. Maybe a brick.


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall Agreed, Caryn. Either that or lockdown loo paper!


message 46: by Julie (new)

Julie 😂 😂 You don't recommend this one then Rachel?!


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall You’ve got it, Julie! Another firm favourite of mine.. and believe it or not, I do actually have the occasional day off from moaning! xx


message 48: by Caryn (new) - rated it 1 star

Caryn Yes to lockdown loo paper, Rachel! My copy is in an e-reader but I would happily buy the hardcover if we ran out of toilet rolls.


message 49: by Claire (new)

Claire Rayner I've just started this and I'm on chapter 11. I'm enjoying it so far so maybe there's something I'm missing. I like reading people's reviews but it doesn't put me off reading the book. Everyone has different tastes and I like to make up my own mind 😌


Rachel (not currently receiving notifications) Hall I really hope you enjoy reading, Claire! I know I am very picky so I would hate to put anyone off and I agree, everything is so subjective. I am constantly amazed at how many differing opinions a single book can attract. xx


« previous 1
back to top