Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Kim's Reviews > The Great Gatsby

The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4542979
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: mt-tbr-challenge, kindle, lost-generation


It's pretty amazing that I'd never read this novel before. All I can say is that it wasn't on the syllabus when I was in high school, nor on the syllabus when I was at university and since leaving university my taste in literature hasn't generally run to early 20th century American male writers. Not only had I not previously read Gatsby, but I've not seen a film adaptation of the novel, which means that I've come to it free from pre-conceptions. Although that's not really true: it's hard to escape having some ideas about a novel which finds its way onto most lists of important literary works (including Harold Bloom's The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages - for what that's worth).

My reaction is positive. Fitzgerald masterfully evokes the Jazz Age, with all of its brilliance and superficiality. His prose is clear and spare, with moments of great poetic beauty. Fitzgerald creates memorable characters, although they are mostly not particularly sympathetic. The exception is the narrator, Nick Carraway, whose role is similar to that of the chorus in Greek tragedy and who also provides something of a moral centre.

Fitgerald's tale of the corruption of the American dream is a bleak one. This is not a pleasant, easy read. But it is an interesting novel and one that I'm glad that I finally got around to reading.
20 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read The Great Gatsby.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

October 29, 2011 – Shelved
February 27, 2012 – Started Reading
February 27, 2012 –
0%
February 29, 2012 –
0%
March 1, 2012 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-24 of 24 (24 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by [deleted user] (new)

I'm waiting to see which camp you end up in. :)


message 2: by Kim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim Too early to tell as yet!


message 3: by [deleted user] (new)

Same camp as me! Good timing, reading just before the new film production release in 2012.


message 4: by [deleted user] (new)

Well, I guess I'm still mostly in the "lonely" camp. I hope you enjoy it, too, Shelley!


Tracey I've never read this either; it's been on my "really ought to get to soon" list for a while now. One of these days ...


message 6: by [deleted user] (last edited Mar 01, 2012 05:58AM) (new)

I loathed it in school, but I loathed a lot of things in school that are now my favorite books (Great Expectations, f'rinstance). I will get to it again, eventually, but will ahve a hard time getting Redford and Farrow out of my head.

Shelley: who's in the new production?
Just went to look, Di Caprio and Mulligan, who I don't know at all.


message 7: by [deleted user] (new)

Mulligan has been in quite a few "smaller" pictures, starting with 2005 Pride & Prejudice. I think she's a good actress.


message 8: by [deleted user] (new)

Carey Mulligan is one of my new favourites - really enjoyed her in An Education and My Boy Jack.


message 9: by [deleted user] (new)

I'd like to see An Education. I really enjoyed My Boy Jack. Did she play Jack's sister?


message 10: by [deleted user] (new)

Yes, she played the sister.


message 11: by [deleted user] (new)

It was very well acted, and a side of Kipling I knew nothing about.


message 12: by Kim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim I only know Mulligan from an excellent episode of Doctor Who called Blink. I will definitely see the film, but I'm worried about it. Luhrmann is a self-indulgent director (albeit very creative) and the film's in 3D, which I'm having trouble liking.


message 13: by Diane (last edited Mar 01, 2012 11:31AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Diane Kim, nice review and I'm glad you gave the book high marks. Quite a lot of story packed into a book of few pages (generally speaking). I haven't heard of the new movie coming out this year, but I have to say I love the original with Mia Farrow and Robert Redford.


message 14: by Kim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim Diane D. wrote: "Kim, nice review and I'm glad you gave the book high marks. Quite a lot of story packed into a book of few pages (generally speaking). I haven't heard of the new movie coming out this year, but I ..."

Thanks Diane. I must watch the Farrow / Redford film, preferably before the new one is released. something about the new production.


Diane Thanks for that link, Kim. Hmmm. 3-D Gatsby. It will take one heck of a movie for me to prefer it over the original. We shall see!


message 16: by Kim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim Diane D. wrote: "Thanks for that link, Kim. Hmmm. 3-D Gatsby. It will take one heck of a movie for me to prefer it over the original. We shall see!"

It is reasonable to assume that with Baz Luhrmann directing it, the film will be somewhat over-the-top. I will definitely see it, but I have some serious reservations about it already!


message 17: by Manybooks (last edited Mar 03, 2012 04:50AM) (new) - added it

Manybooks I guess I need to reread this as well. I did not completely loathe it when we read it for school, but I did not love it very much either (and did not get all of it). I think teachers think because The Great Gatsby is a short novel, it is suitable for and understandable for most high school students and that is not necessarily the case with this novel, I believe.


message 18: by [deleted user] (new)

Maybe I should watch the Redford movie; I might enjoy it more than the book. I'm still not sold on 3-D, as I don't enjoy watching 3-D films. My eyes can't deal with the technology.


message 19: by [deleted user] (new)

I think it depends, really. We saw Hugo Cabret and the 3D was really necessary for the story, I think. I can't imagine what will be added to the story of Gatsby by having it in 3D. A nice scene with the shirts flying out of the closet, and a good view of the house on Long Island, but I can't think what else.


Jan C I liked this book when I read it in high school and I've liked it every time I have read it since, which is probably 4-5 (about once a decade or something).

And, actually, the new movie will be the fifth production. (see ) I've never seen the silent movie but it feature William Powell as Wilson. I also didn't seen the version from the '40s with Alan Ladd. I've only seen the Redford one and the one that A&E did in 2000, which I actually like better than the Redford version.

I don't really think that Fitzgerald usually translates very well to film. His language has a tendency to come across as stilted and stiff.

He was one of the writers on the movie Gone With the Wind but much of his stuff had to be chucked because he doesn't translate very well.

I don't know about 3D though - have the glasses gotten better. They always used to give me a horrendous headache.


message 21: by Kim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim Hugo is the only feature film I've seen in 3D and while it didn't bother me or give me a headache, I wasn't all that keen on the visual experience. A friend of mine described 3D film as like a pop-up book and I agree. It's not like real-life vision: images are either in the foreground or in the background, with nothing in between. That works okay in Hugo, which is very stylised, but I'm not sure it would work in anything naturalistic. Baz Luhrmann's work is usually highly stylised, so I suspect that's where he is going with this film.


message 22: by [deleted user] (new)

We watched HP and the Order of the Phoenix in 3D on the IMAX screen. I really didn't enjoy it very much. I think we saw Alice in Wonderland 3D, also. It's a bit annoying to me, and it doesn't enhance the experience. I think you sum it up well, Kim, two layers of images, foreground and background. I don't know how well it's going to work with the more intimate setting of Gatsby.


Kathryn This is one of my favorite novels. I thought it was wonderful!!! Glad you got to read it at last.


Dawn (& Ron) Jan, I like the 2000 version better too. I thought it represented the story better. I haven't seen the first two versions either but it would be interesting to see the silent version since it was filmed during the time the book was originally published.

I'm waiting for this 3D fad to get over with my vision problem I can't tolerate it for any length of time and just don't get the necessity of it. There are even 3D televisions now. Can you imagine having to wear those glasses all the time to watch your tv? No thank you.


back to top