Kim's Reviews > The Great Gatsby
The Great Gatsby
by
It's pretty amazing that I'd never read this novel before. All I can say is that it wasn't on the syllabus when I was in high school, nor on the syllabus when I was at university and since leaving university my taste in literature hasn't generally run to early 20th century American male writers. Not only had I not previously read Gatsby, but I've not seen a film adaptation of the novel, which means that I've come to it free from pre-conceptions. Although that's not really true: it's hard to escape having some ideas about a novel which finds its way onto most lists of important literary works (including Harold Bloom's The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages - for what that's worth).
My reaction is positive. Fitzgerald masterfully evokes the Jazz Age, with all of its brilliance and superficiality. His prose is clear and spare, with moments of great poetic beauty. Fitzgerald creates memorable characters, although they are mostly not particularly sympathetic. The exception is the narrator, Nick Carraway, whose role is similar to that of the chorus in Greek tragedy and who also provides something of a moral centre.
Fitgerald's tale of the corruption of the American dream is a bleak one. This is not a pleasant, easy read. But it is an interesting novel and one that I'm glad that I finally got around to reading.
by

It's pretty amazing that I'd never read this novel before. All I can say is that it wasn't on the syllabus when I was in high school, nor on the syllabus when I was at university and since leaving university my taste in literature hasn't generally run to early 20th century American male writers. Not only had I not previously read Gatsby, but I've not seen a film adaptation of the novel, which means that I've come to it free from pre-conceptions. Although that's not really true: it's hard to escape having some ideas about a novel which finds its way onto most lists of important literary works (including Harold Bloom's The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages - for what that's worth).
My reaction is positive. Fitzgerald masterfully evokes the Jazz Age, with all of its brilliance and superficiality. His prose is clear and spare, with moments of great poetic beauty. Fitzgerald creates memorable characters, although they are mostly not particularly sympathetic. The exception is the narrator, Nick Carraway, whose role is similar to that of the chorus in Greek tragedy and who also provides something of a moral centre.
Fitgerald's tale of the corruption of the American dream is a bleak one. This is not a pleasant, easy read. But it is an interesting novel and one that I'm glad that I finally got around to reading.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Great Gatsby.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-24 of 24 (24 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Feb 27, 2012 01:35PM
I'm waiting to see which camp you end up in. :)
reply
|
flag
Same camp as me! Good timing, reading just before the new film production release in 2012.
Well, I guess I'm still mostly in the "lonely" camp. I hope you enjoy it, too, Shelley!

I loathed it in school, but I loathed a lot of things in school that are now my favorite books (Great Expectations, f'rinstance). I will get to it again, eventually, but will ahve a hard time getting Redford and Farrow out of my head.
Shelley: who's in the new production?
Just went to look, Di Caprio and Mulligan, who I don't know at all.
Shelley: who's in the new production?
Just went to look, Di Caprio and Mulligan, who I don't know at all.
Mulligan has been in quite a few "smaller" pictures, starting with 2005 Pride & Prejudice. I think she's a good actress.
Carey Mulligan is one of my new favourites - really enjoyed her in An Education and My Boy Jack.
I'd like to see An Education. I really enjoyed My Boy Jack. Did she play Jack's sister?
It was very well acted, and a side of Kipling I knew nothing about.



Thanks Diane. I must watch the Farrow / Redford film, preferably before the new one is released. something about the new production.


It is reasonable to assume that with Baz Luhrmann directing it, the film will be somewhat over-the-top. I will definitely see it, but I have some serious reservations about it already!

Maybe I should watch the Redford movie; I might enjoy it more than the book. I'm still not sold on 3-D, as I don't enjoy watching 3-D films. My eyes can't deal with the technology.
I think it depends, really. We saw Hugo Cabret and the 3D was really necessary for the story, I think. I can't imagine what will be added to the story of Gatsby by having it in 3D. A nice scene with the shirts flying out of the closet, and a good view of the house on Long Island, but I can't think what else.

And, actually, the new movie will be the fifth production. (see ) I've never seen the silent movie but it feature William Powell as Wilson. I also didn't seen the version from the '40s with Alan Ladd. I've only seen the Redford one and the one that A&E did in 2000, which I actually like better than the Redford version.
I don't really think that Fitzgerald usually translates very well to film. His language has a tendency to come across as stilted and stiff.
He was one of the writers on the movie Gone With the Wind but much of his stuff had to be chucked because he doesn't translate very well.
I don't know about 3D though - have the glasses gotten better. They always used to give me a horrendous headache.

We watched HP and the Order of the Phoenix in 3D on the IMAX screen. I really didn't enjoy it very much. I think we saw Alice in Wonderland 3D, also. It's a bit annoying to me, and it doesn't enhance the experience. I think you sum it up well, Kim, two layers of images, foreground and background. I don't know how well it's going to work with the more intimate setting of Gatsby.

I'm waiting for this 3D fad to get over with my vision problem I can't tolerate it for any length of time and just don't get the necessity of it. There are even 3D televisions now. Can you imagine having to wear those glasses all the time to watch your tv? No thank you.