Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Cecily's Reviews > Titus Alone

Titus Alone by Mervyn Peake
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1199525
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: classics, magical-realism, dystopian-apocalyptic, scifi-future-speculative-fict, gormenghast-peake, series-and-sequels
Read 2 times. Last read February 2, 2010 to February 9, 2010.

Titus Groan and Gormenghast are two of my ten favourite books (reviewed on my Favourites shelf), but despite some wonderful language, I struggled with this one, intriguing as it is. My first reading was not enjoyable � it was so far from what I was familiar with and what I expected. Subsequent readings have endeared it to me.


Peake's illustration of Muzzlehatch

Plot

In this, Titus, seventy-seventh earl of Gormenghast is 22 and wandering unknown lands. He is invariably being rescued, nursed or running away, especially by/from Muzzlehatch and Juno, though I’m never convinced as to why they go to such lengths for him. It’s all rather repetitive, especially when other characters start running away too! And then there’s Cheeta, a counterpoint to Juno, who also goes to extraordinary lengths, but for nastier motives.

Where and When?

This story is more dream-like than the earlier volumes: weird, disjointed, implausible, e.g. people at a party initially looking like animals, Muzzlehatch’s extraordinary driving technique (lying on his side), watching and being watched (though the last of those applies just as much to the other books). There are fewer recurring characters (and none from the earlier books, save Titus and Gormenghast).

It’s a totally different milieu and style (written when Parkinson's disease was exerting its toll on Peake). The other two have a wonderfully vivid sense of place (even though we don’t know where it is), but are intriguingly vague about the time period; this book is the other way round. It is explicitly in modern times, as cars and aeroplanes are mentioned, though there is still a distinct old world feel to it (including a Dickensian underclass), which sits oddly with futuristic floating electronic spying devices and death rays. Clearly, this is meant to reflect Titus' situation: adrift, without papers, in a strange country, where no one has ever heard of Gormenghast. In fact it’s so effective that even though this world is more akin to ours, after two rich volumes set in Gormenghast, the reader is almost as disorientated by this new world as Titus. Perhaps it echoe’s Peake’s bewilderment moving from China to England in his formative years. Poor Titus mislays his single flint from Gormenghast, but eventually he realises that doesn’t matter because “he carried his Gormenghast within him�.

What?

It is a strange hybrid: Dickensian characters living Under-River; a socialite’s party more like Wodehouse, Wilde or Waugh ("What is the point of being married if one always bumps into one's wife?"); a comic court scene more like Alice in Wonderland or Wind in the Willows (though the court is a little like Gormenghast: all symbol and procedure), and a few, brief and unexpected entries for the literary bad sex award ("his cock trembled like a harp string"). Overall, it is perhaps most like dystopian sci fi: a bemused outsider is treated as a mad and bad interloper by all-seeing, all-knowing authorities and where a rough underclass survives literally underneath the main cities, which makes me wonder if I would enjoy it more as a standalone book with no references to Gormenghast or the Groans.

Each time I read it, I am more baffled than the last.

Despite that, there are still glimpses of Peake's inimitable use of language: “merest wisp of a man... his presence was a kind of subtraction. He was nondescript to the point of embarrassment�; “his responses to her magnetism grew vaguer... he longed to be alone again... alone to wander listless through the sunbeams�; “head after head in long lines, thick and multitudinous and cohesive as grains of honey-coloured sugar, each grain a face... a delirium of heads: an endless profligacy.�, and an extraordinary simile “I don’t like this place one little bit. My thighs are as wet as turbots.�!

Quotes

� “The very essence of his vocation was ‘removedness�... He was a symbol. He was the law�. (Magistrate)
� “sham nobility of his countenance� (Old Crime)
� “a light to strangle infants by�
� The “merest wisp of a man... his presence was a kind of subtraction. He was nondescript to the point of embarrassment�. (Scientist)
� “a man of the wilds. Of the wilds within himself and the wilds without; there was no beggar alive who could look so ragged and yet... so like a king� (Muzzlehatch)
� “Within a span of Titus� foot, a beetle minute and heraldic, reflected the moonbeams from its glossy back.�
� “What lights had begun to appear were sucked in by the quenching effect of the darkness.�
� “A flight of sunbeams, traversing the warm, dark air, forced a pool of light on the pillow.�
� “The sun sank with a sob and darkness waded in�
� “What light there was seeped into the great glass buildings as though ashamed.�
� “The old and the worn, who evolved out of the shades like beings spun from darkness.�
� “his responses to her magnetism grew vaguer... he longed to be alone again... alone to wander listless through the sunbeams.�
� “that he abhorred her brain seemed almost to add to his lust for her body�
� “He was no longer entangled in a maze of moods.� (Titus)
� “Head after head in long lines, thick and multitudinous and cohesive as grains of honey-coloured sugar, each grain a face... a delirium of heads: an endless profligacy.�
� “I don’t like this place one little bit. My thighs are as wet as turbots.�!
� “a loquacious river�.
� A floating spy cam is a “petty snooper, prying on man and child, sucking information as a bat sucks blood.�
� “a voice of curds and whey�
� Brief but unexpected sexual references ("scrotum tightening", "his cock trembled like a harp string") and when he first regains consciousness and sees Cheeta, his greeting is "let me suck on your breasts, like little apples, and play upon your nipples with my tongue"
� Cormorant fishing � as in China!
� “they were riding on the wings of a cliché�

All My Peake Reviews

All my Peake/Gormenghast reviews (including biographies/memoirs and books about his art) are on a shelf,
HERE.
54 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Titus Alone.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

2004 – Started Reading
2004 – Finished Reading
May 30, 2008 – Shelved
June 9, 2008 – Shelved as: classics
June 9, 2008 – Shelved as: magical-realism
February 2, 2010 – Started Reading
February 9, 2010 – Shelved as: dystopian-apocalyptic
February 9, 2010 – Shelved as: scifi-future-speculative-fict
February 9, 2010 – Finished Reading
June 19, 2012 – Shelved as: gormenghast-peake
March 20, 2024 – Shelved as: series-and-sequels

Comments Showing 1-31 of 31 (31 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Bjorn (new)

Bjorn Sorensen Great review! Detailed and opinionated without being too too long. Thank you! I might get to this book.


Cecily Thanks, Shawn. I would only suggest reading this when you've read the two that precede it: Titus Groan and Gormenghast, and there is now Titus Awakes to complete the story arc. I look forward to reading your thoughts in due course.


message 3: by Bjorn (new)

Bjorn Sorensen Thank you!!


Lindsay This was possibly the most unsettling book I've ever read - it felt like direct insight into intense alienation and a mind unraveling. Like a whole different person writing it.


message 5: by Mark (new)

Mark Loved all three of your reviews. I have only read number one but have the other two to read at some point. How many times have you read the Trilogy?. It sounds as if it is a goodly number


Cecily Probably only three times each, but that's partly because I discovered them relatively recently (about 7 years ago, I think).


message 7: by Louise (new)

Louise I discovered it about 7 years too but loved the first two books so much I've actually been scared of rereading the at all in case I don't enjoy them as much as I remember. I also have to admit to not reading Titus Alone at all for the same reason - I was informed by my sister when she gave me the books that it wasn't as good. Then I read the first two and the experience and ending was just so perfect I had to stop there for fear a third book would somehow taint it.


message 8: by Mark (new)

Mark well Louise you are ahead of me. I still have not yet opened the second


message 9: by Louise (new)

Louise Oh, I loved it so much! I basically devoured the first two books in a matter of days.

Hope you enjoy it when you do get round to it. Steerpike is probably one of my favourite characters ever.


Cecily I understand your reticence. Titus Alone is totally different - almost the opposite in many ways. I didn't like it the first time I read it, but I enjoyed it more when I reread it, though I do keep it in a slightly different mental compartment.

And Steerpike, ah Steerpike... never has evil been so attractive.


message 11: by Louise (new)

Louise Not just me who totally has the hots for Steerpike! I'm not sure if that's a relief or not though...

Will probably avoid Titus Alone for a while longer. At least until I've finally got round to a reread of the first two.


message 12: by Mark (new)

Mark I have no doubt Steerpike would have been quite happy to have had you both in his admiration society and is probably even now in some rehabilitation centre for underhand seducers and manipulators thinking up a way of explaining away the awkwardness of your discovering each other


Cecily I can't see Steerpike ever succumbing to rehabilitation! (And I'm not sure I'd like him if he did.)


message 14: by Ian (new) - added it

Ian "Marvin" Graye Wonderful review and the most hilarious and/or beautiful list of quotes I've read in a review.


Cecily Thanks, and of course Peake takes all the credit for the quotes.


message 16: by Ian (new) - added it

Ian "Marvin" Graye Some credit for the assemblage is warranted, too ;)


Cecily You're too kind.


message 18: by K.D. (new) - added it

K.D. Absolutely Congrats for finishing the 3 books that I am still to read, Cecily. Excellent reviews. They inspired me to give these books a try in 2013. Happy New Year my friend! :)


Cecily Thank you, K.D., and best wishes for a happy and healthy 2013 to you.

(Incidentally, I merely updated this review a little bit today, in the light of reading Peake's widow's memoirs. Now I've started on his son's...)


message 20: by Kyle (new) - rated it 5 stars

Kyle Great review Cecily! I like how you talk about the book's merits while still managing to talk about your problems with it. I had a positively strange, and I think unusual reaction to this book, so it's really nice to see someone give this book a fair shake. Your review feels like we are getting insight into your mind as you struggle with how to accept this book. Love it!


Cecily Thanks. I think it's a brilliant book, and I wouldn't be without it; it's just actual love that I can't quite feel for it. However, I get closer with each reread.


message 22: by Kyle (new) - rated it 5 stars

Kyle Cecily wrote: "Thanks. I think it's a brilliant book, and I wouldn't be without it; it's just actual love that I can't quite feel for it. However, I get closer with each reread."

I can understand that. I think I was helped by the fact that I was expecting it to be such a drastic change, and that I waited a bit before diving into it after Gormenghast. Going into it, my expectations were low, and I expected to be disappointed. The fact that I was surprised at it's quality likely contributed to my thoughts on the book. I'm already feeling the urge to reread them all, actually.


Cecily That makes sense, which is why I always warn other embarking on Gormenghast. For me, it was a total surprise - well, more of a shock. Shortly before I read it the second time, I'd heard China Mieville give a passionate talk about Peake, including Titus Alone, and I approached it in a different light. It made all the difference (it also made me give Mieville's own works another chance, for which I'm very glad).


message 24: by Lynne (last edited Sep 30, 2013 02:12AM) (new) - added it

Lynne King Intriguing review Cecily and this makes me all the more determined to read this book.

Looking at the first two titles in the trilogy, I see that they were published in 1946 and 1950 respectively. Whereas this book was published in 1959 when Peake already had declining health plus the onset of dementia. The title, "Titus Alone" states it all. His swansong in a way I guess even though he had a fourth unfinished book at the time of his death.

I'm so pleased I came across this author and I must read a good biography about him. Can you recommend one Cecily?


H (no longer expecting notifications) Balikov Describing the plot as "dream-like" nicely captures the feel of the story and serves to explain some of the recurring elements such as rescues and running away. But I only need to read descriptors such as "a light to strangle infants by" once, thank you!


Cecily Lynne wrote: "Intriguing review Cecily and this makes me all the more determined to read this book...."

Oops, I've only just noticed this comment. Thank you for it.

Yes, you're right about the chronology of publication, and the effect of Peake's health on Titus Alone.

Lynne wrote: "I'm so pleased I came across this author and I must read a good biography about him. Can you recommend one Cecily?"

If you want accessible but somewhat academic (i.e. detached) bios, I suggest Vast Alchemies: The Life and Work of Mervyn Peake (which I reviewed here) and Mervyn Peake: My Eyes Mint Gold - A Life (which I reviewed here) .

For more personal accounts, you want those by his widow (which I reviewed here) and daughter (which I reviewed here).


message 27: by Cecily (last edited Apr 11, 2017 05:45AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Cecily HBalikov wrote: "Describing the plot as "dream-like" nicely captures the feel of the story and serves to explain some of the recurring elements such as rescues and running away..."

The original title/subtitle of this used the word "dream", but of "Titus Groan", Peake said "It is, and it is not, a dream". Thanks, H.


message 28: by Greg (new) - rated it 4 stars

Greg Cecily, I'm sure i'll read all three of these again! There is nothing like them in all of literature. That said, this third volume IS the reason I can't call these three books a trilogy. The first two belong together, this one is almost like it was written by a different author, and in a way, it was.


Cecily Greg wrote: "...this third volume IS the reason I can't call these three books a trilogy. The first two belong together, this one is almost like it was written by a different author, and in a way, it was."

Exactly. Sadly. Brilliantly.


message 30: by Tim (new) - rated it 2 stars

Tim Makes sense that Parkinsons was beginning to affect him while writing this. Explains why he lost the plot. For me it doesn't belong with the first two books.


Cecily Tim wrote: "Makes sense that Parkinsons was beginning to affect him while writing this. Explains why he lost the plot. For me it doesn't belong with the first two books."

It does. And it wasn't just the Parkinson's itself, but the treatment too (including electric shock). As for whether it "belongs", for me it does, fractured as it is. Oddly, reading the controversial Titus Awakes: The Lost Book of Gormenghast gave me the closure to appreciate this more.


back to top