Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Cecily's Reviews > Oryx and Crake

Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1199525
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: scifi-future-speculative-fict, dystopian-apocalyptic, usa-and-canada, series-and-sequels

Futuristic, bad new world in the wake of an unspecified environmental/ genetic engineering disaster, told from the viewpoint of a nostalgic but detached survivor. It is as much about personal relationships, sexual exploitation, sexual freedom, religion, creation and original sin as it is cyber-punk sci-fi. The central, though unoriginal, irony is that this dystopia was created from a failed Utopian plan.

Trilogy

O&C is parallel with the equally excellent "The Year of the Flood" (reviewed here: http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...), with several characters in common, and both end with the same scene, though approached from a different angle. The third in the trilogy, MaddAddam (reviewed here: /review/show...), was hugely disappointing.

Structure of Story

However, the format and style of this novel is entirely different from Flood: this alternates between Jimmy's childhood, told in the past tense, and his current situation (when known as Snowman) - passages which are angrier and more adult in tone, and told in the present tense. When tense and name switch in consecutive sentences, it can be disconcerting.

Jimmy is a materially privileged but emotionally deprived and manipulative child ("He loved her [his mother] so much when he made her unhappy, or else when she made him unhappy"), whose most important adult friendships are equally unbalanced and unhealthy. Telling the story from his perspective, but in the third person, emphasises his hurt, resentment and detachment ("Then they could thick off that item on the Terrific Parenting checklist they both carried about inside their heads").

Evil and Humour

There is much pain, evil and fear in this story: tales of sexual exploitation of children are the worst, and exacerbated when, as an adult, a victim insists it was not a big deal because learning to read and write "was a good trade[-off]" - yet Atwood is usually portrayed as a feminist author. I can't square that circle, and this aspect would make me a little cautious about who I recommend it to.

There is balance from humour - mainly in the ingenious ways Snowman, as a de facto priest (though really more of an ancestor) struggling to survive, invents rules from Crake (a deity, who was himself "against the notion of God, or of gods of any kind"), and an associated belief system. When this overlaps with Snowman's passion for words, things get a little liturgical.

Love of Language

The love of language starts in childhood, when Jimmy had collected old words, "He developed a strangely tender feeling towards such words, as if they were children abandoned in the woods and it was his duty to rescue them." A foreshadowing of a future when Snowman finds comfort in words, relishing the diverse names of "oil paints and high-class women's underwear" and exhorting himself to "Hang on to the words... When they're gone out of his head... they'll be gone, everywhere, for ever. As if they had never existed." What a responsibility.

Is Religion Inevitable?

The inevitability of religion is suggested, though perhaps more for the benefit of those in power than those who are meant to believe. Even when starting anew, there is a vacuum to fill. When Snowman first slipped into this role, he began "to find this conversation of interest, like a game. These people were blank pages, he could write whatever he wanted on them". He learns the importance of internal consistency, though I think that's a lesson some religions have yet to learn.

More strangely, "If you take 'mortality' as being, not death, but the foreknowledge of it and the fear of it, then 'immortality' is the absence of such fear. Babies are immortal."

Women

Unlike many of her stories, the female character, although crucial and with a typically Atwoodesque troubled background, is not the main protagonist, or at least not in the literal sense. Her attitude to her own life is what I struggle with.


Overall, a complex, troubling and funny story.

Final Thoughts

Powerful quote:
"The air is thick, as if panic has condensed in here and hasn't yet had time to dissipate."

Disconcerting image:
"He doesn't know which is worse, a past he can't regain or a present that will destroy him if he looks at it too clearly. Then there's the future. Sheer vertigo."

Sobering final thought:
"All it takes... is the elimination of one generation. One generation of anything... and it's game over for ever." "All the available surface metals have already been mined... without which, no iron age, no bronze age... it's not like the wheel, it's too complex now."


Finally, Snowman reminds me a little of Leon Trout, the narrator of Vonnegut's "Galapagos", so you might want to look at that (http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...), though it's rather funnier than O&C.
62 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Oryx and Crake.
Sign In »

Quotes Cecily Liked

Margaret Atwood
“All it takes,â€� said Crake, “is the elimination of one generation. One generation of anything. Beetles, trees, microbes, scientists, speakers of French, whatever. Break the link in time between one generation and the next, and it’s game over forever.”
Margaret Atwood , Oryx and Crake


Reading Progress

May 30, 2008 – Shelved
June 9, 2008 – Shelved as: scifi-future-speculative-fict
July 25, 2009 – Shelved as: dystopian-apocalyptic
August 9, 2009 – Shelved as: usa-and-canada
November 5, 2011 – Started Reading
November 22, 2011 – Finished Reading
March 20, 2024 – Shelved as: series-and-sequels

Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by [deleted user] (new)

Perhaps if you consider that Oryx is not actually the child from the HottTotts video or the girl in the garage may help you reconcile Oryx's attitude. Maybe Jimmy just projected those images onto the woman named Oryx and the stories she tells him of her 'past' are made up to satisfy him.


Cecily Hmm, that's an intriguing thought. I'll have to ponder that.

When the final one of the trilogy comes out (MaddAddam, in summer this year), I'll probably reread this and The Year of the Flood, so I'll bear your comment in mind.


Lit Bug I'll say more on this after I read the trilogy, I think - it might alter my perspective...


Jeff The similarities to Galapagos did not occur to me while reading but it's a very interesting point. By coincidence that's the book I read before O&C. Have you read the sequels?


Cecily Jeff wrote: "The similarities to Galapagos did not occur to me while reading but it's a very interesting point. By coincidence that's the book I read before O&C. Have you read the sequels?"

Sequels to Galapagos? No, I confess I hadn't realised there were any.


Jeff Sorry I meant the sequels to Oryx and Crake. There are two others that I haven't gotten to yet.


Cecily Ah, right. I've read the second one, "Year of the Flood" (there's a link to my review in the second paragraph of this one), but I haven't yet read the latest, "MaddAddam".


Jenny (Reading Envy) One question I return to, despite multiple re-reads and discussions, is about Crake. I'd like your opinion since I know you have read the trilogy!

(view spoiler)


Cecily Good question, though I've not got very far with the third book yet, and although it recaps the others quite a lot, I'm not sure I remember enough detail of the first one to answer it. On the plus side, I'll now have that thought in mind as I read Maddaddam.


Cecily Jenny (Reading Envy) wrote: "One question I return to, despite multiple re-reads and discussions, is about Crake. I'd like your opinion since I know you have read the trilogy!
[spoilers removed]"


And now that I've finished the third one, I'm still not sure. Unfortunately, I don't think it was anywhere near as good as this and Flood.


Cassy Well said, Cecily! I enjoyed this book, but cannot decide if I should finish out the series. I lean towards "no".


Cecily If you enjoyed this, I'd suggest reading Flood but skipping MaddAddam.


message 13: by Lily (new) - added it

Lily I've been wondering about which Atwood to read next (having only read The Handmaid's Tale). I'm thinking about giving this one a try.


message 14: by Cecily (last edited Mar 17, 2015 11:34PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Cecily This is a good follow-on: it's dystopian, but very differently so. The second of the trilogy is very good, too. (As you can see, I'm less keen on the third and final part.)

However, Atwood writes a range of wonderful books, most of which are not dystopian at all. My other favourite is Cat's Eye.


back to top