Cecily's Reviews > The Woman in Black
The Woman in Black
by
by

A chilling, traditional ghost story, with a strong Victorian feel: a lone lawyer goes to a spooky house on the marshes, plagued by stories of madness and death. No great surprises, but shocking none-the-less. It is skilfully written, so that most of the scary stuff happens in your head, rather than being explicit on the page.
NARRATOR
Arthur Kipps, the main character and the narrator is very pragmatic and always tries to dismiss his fears and find a rational explanation, which serves to make his story more believable � and thus more alarming. All the way through, his greatest need is to uncover the truth, however unpalatable it may be. However, it’s not what he sees or hears that really scares him, but what he FEELS, and the power of the Woman in Black’s emotion. His feelings towards her change from concern through fear to anger.
However, despite his pragmatism, right at the beginning Kipps does have a strong conviction that a particular house is part of his destiny (which implies some openness to the supernatural), and when he first arrives at the town he says he felt like “a spectre at some cheerful feast�.
WEATHER IMAGERY
The weather (mist, rain, wind and sun) is a major character in the book; sometimes it parallels the situation and mood of the characters (mists and disappearances) and sometimes it is in total contrast (sun at a funeral). It could be clichéd, but, perhaps because it doesn't always match the plot, it has more dramatic weight.
BIRDS
One feature I didn’t notice on first reading was the birds. Kipps himself is a bit of a birdwatcher, and different birds make fleeting appearances: a menacing “snake-necked bird�, the woman in black looking like a carrion bird, a nice happy robin later on.
PROBLEMS WITH TIME
The first chapter jumps around in a confusing way, which doesn’t really matter plot-wise, but is disconcerting.
The bigger mystery is when it is set. Everything about it feels Victorian (foggy London, pony and trap, steam trains), but she mentions telephones, electric lights (even in a remote house on the marshes), cars, cycling as a (not particularly wealthy) boy, a grave stone from “years back� is inscribed �190...�, and Kipps makes reference to Dickens and the treatment of Victorian servants 60 years earlier. Each time I’ve read this book, I’ve been more puzzled and irritated by this, though it's still a very good book.
If you like it, The Turn of the Screw is in a similar vein.
And don’t believe those who say it is like a ghost story written by Jane Austen!
NARRATOR
Arthur Kipps, the main character and the narrator is very pragmatic and always tries to dismiss his fears and find a rational explanation, which serves to make his story more believable � and thus more alarming. All the way through, his greatest need is to uncover the truth, however unpalatable it may be. However, it’s not what he sees or hears that really scares him, but what he FEELS, and the power of the Woman in Black’s emotion. His feelings towards her change from concern through fear to anger.
However, despite his pragmatism, right at the beginning Kipps does have a strong conviction that a particular house is part of his destiny (which implies some openness to the supernatural), and when he first arrives at the town he says he felt like “a spectre at some cheerful feast�.
WEATHER IMAGERY
The weather (mist, rain, wind and sun) is a major character in the book; sometimes it parallels the situation and mood of the characters (mists and disappearances) and sometimes it is in total contrast (sun at a funeral). It could be clichéd, but, perhaps because it doesn't always match the plot, it has more dramatic weight.
BIRDS
One feature I didn’t notice on first reading was the birds. Kipps himself is a bit of a birdwatcher, and different birds make fleeting appearances: a menacing “snake-necked bird�, the woman in black looking like a carrion bird, a nice happy robin later on.
PROBLEMS WITH TIME
The first chapter jumps around in a confusing way, which doesn’t really matter plot-wise, but is disconcerting.
The bigger mystery is when it is set. Everything about it feels Victorian (foggy London, pony and trap, steam trains), but she mentions telephones, electric lights (even in a remote house on the marshes), cars, cycling as a (not particularly wealthy) boy, a grave stone from “years back� is inscribed �190...�, and Kipps makes reference to Dickens and the treatment of Victorian servants 60 years earlier. Each time I’ve read this book, I’ve been more puzzled and irritated by this, though it's still a very good book.
If you like it, The Turn of the Screw is in a similar vein.
And don’t believe those who say it is like a ghost story written by Jane Austen!
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Woman in Black.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-50 of 54 (54 new)
message 1:
by
Christine
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Jul 19, 2012 06:23AM

reply
|
flag


As for fog, London has far less of it than places like San Francisco, and the Clean Air Act of the mid '50s got rid of smog.

I did not know that; thanks for dispelling that stereotype! That's another factor that might suggest a roughly 1950 date, then, just before the change in the quality of London's air that the Clean Air Act would bring about.


was the hero in H.G. Well's "Kipps" - how could
the author steal his name!! In "Kipps" he
marries Ann who goes out to work as a maid and
when they marry she has plenty to say about the
design of the house that Kipps wants to build
for her. That is a very famous
book and Jane Austen wasn't involved.



Happy election day! Don't vote for Whathisname who wants to exterminate the Doctor!


Almost as exciting as the naming of Charlotte Diana Whatshername ;)

I heard UKIP performed poorly at the polls because they lost the Whovian votes? I bet next time Nigel will wear a fez and a bowtie when canvassing.



I don't read horror-horror, but this is an old-fashioned spine-chiller.
Apatt wrote: "where's your review of The Woman in White?"
It's very old, so very short and shallow: /review/show...
(You've even commented on it.)

A proper good old-fashioned ghost story for Halloween, and one which I thoroughly enjoyed. Albeit a few years ago.
Same couldn't be said for the theatre adaptation; I very nearly burst out laughing at a scary bit that was unintentionally hilarious (as did my wife and several members of the audience).
So, don't see the show, read the book!
Superb review, Cecily!
(I will add this to my 'books read' list now).

Quality, not quantity. Size isn't everything. Alternatively, can you borrow it from a library or friend? Or, given how short it is, you could be one of these people who visits a bookshop several times a week and leaves their bookmark in a copy they put at the back of the shelf! Not that I'm recommending that, of course.

I very nearly burst out laughing at a scary bit that was unintentionally hilarious...
Superb review, Cecily!"
I really enjoyed the stage version - twice - and even though I knew the plot, it made me jump, rather than laugh, both times. Yes, it was very "stagey", but it was theatre not cinema, so I rather liked that. Thanks, Kevin.

I agree with you that the scary part of the book is inside our heads. The seclusion created by Hill's writing was what got me the most.
Great review Cecily, as usual! :)

I'm not sure where I heard or read that, but it sounded daft at the time, and even more so when I reread this. I'm not a big Austen fan, so am not very aware of who she liked, though I vaguely remember some Gothic tome getting a mention in one of her own novels. Thanks, Amy.

I agree with you that the scary part of..."
In Northanger Abbey, Austen's heroine, Catherine, is an avid reader of Gothic novels (and gets into some trouble when she lets her Gothic-inspired imagination run away with her!). Austen mentions a couple of Ann Radcliffe's novels by name, as well as several other actual Gothic novels of that day, some of which Catherine's friend and fellow Gothic fan assures her are all (deliciously) "horrid." There's some satire here, but it's an affectionate satire, since Austen wasn't above reading and enjoying some of these works herself (though her own writing is quite different; she's a proto-Realist, not a Gothic Romantic.)

Ah, yes, that's the one. The baseball-playing Catherine Morland. Thanks, Werner.
Werner wrote: "...she's a proto-Realist, not a Gothic Romantic."
Something to ponder.

I agree with you that the s..."
I couldn't remember which Austen book this was mentioned in, so thank you Werner! I read Radcliffe's The Mysteries of Udolpho solely because of Austen's enjoyment of it. I found it to be rather long and contrived, unfortunately. I'm sure it was thrilling and a bit scandalous in her time! :)

I remember contemplating doing that too. It doesn't sound like a great loss that I didn't.

Perhaps one day! :)

I remember contemplating doing that too. It doesn't sound like a great loss that I didn't."
It satisfied my curiosity, but I probably wouldn't read another book by Radcliffe.

I'll be interested to read your thoughts if it ever does reach the top of the pile.
Amy wrote: "It satisfied my curiosity, but I probably wouldn't read another book by Radcliffe."
Or maybe you needn't bother.


Let's both plan to stick around till then.
;)

Which raises an interesting question: which is harder and rarer: good writing, or a good story?
(It chimes with my current reading of Stephen King's On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft, in which he's just been advising against plotting. Start with a situations, and by describing that, see where it takes you. Sounds strange, but makes more sense in context and I'll elaborate in my eventual review.)


The story isn't very original, but that's (sort of) the point. I think it's really well done. And almost anything is better than The Shining, imo. This, I've read and seen performed several times; The Shining I was too bored to finish even once.


Yes, it is. And very atmospheric. Thanks, Agnieszka.


Hmm. It's like TotS in terms of atmosphere and genre and length, but the prose is more... "accessible" isn't the right word, but I'm not sure what is. Can you play safe and borrow, rather than buy?

I will try the second-hand bookshops in Mumbai here: sometimes you get the books dirt cheap, especially if you bargain.

And thank you for letting me know. That's circularity of opinion, viewpoint, and sharing is what I love about GR.