Julie's Reviews > The Conquest of Plassans
The Conquest of Plassans
by
by

6.5/10
I was beginning to fear that this one would never end. No matter how much I read, there were always at least 100 pages left to go. I felt certain I'd read the equivalent of two thousand pages when I looked up to see "100 more to go". Was Penelope at work, on her magic shroud? While I slept, she added 100 pages each night. This is surely the most boring book in the Rougon-Macquart series yet. (This is my 4th.)
Multiple stray thoughts occurred to me as I was sighing and bemoaning my way through this one: I would have enjoyed this as a teenager, just "eating up" every word of Zola's religious and political caricatures; I would have enjoyed this as a young uni student as we dissected and parsed every precious Zolaian (is that a word? if not it should be) thought. Now: not so much. Now, it just annoyed me because the more I read, the more absurd it became. I even read it in French for a while, thinking that the translator had dropped the ball on this one, as often happens with Zola. Nope. The translator was bang-on, in sentiment, in cultural reference, in boring old prose.
"Mon Dieu. Mon Dieu. Would that Abbé Faujas and precious Marthe Mouret be swallowed whole by the religious fire that burns them," I thought. Oh, such prophecies, in the old and wise! I could have written this in my sleep and made it a barn-burning mini-series for television.
Plodding. Lumbering. Dragging. Floundering. Hummmmdrrum. I still hear the low base rumbling in my skull. This book has driven me to the edge of distraction.
These characters were too far-fetched even for me, and I say that having lived in the shadow (and grip) of small-town (catholic) Ontario where the priests and nuns ruled the communities with iron fists; where the manipulations and maneuverings could have been the prototypes for Zola's people, had they lived in his time. But even they, in their machinations, could never have gone this far.
Zola's main characters don't work here, because the caricatures are flawed; they are consistently evil and nasty specimens, without once achieving a breath of kind humanity. Human nature is not like that, and I am surprised that Zola should paint them this way. Even 'umble Uriah has his moments of tenderness -- where he reveals the soft underbelly of his humanity. Here, Abbé Faujas is persistently evil, from the moment he walks into the town with his gnarly crone of a mother in tow, to the moment he expires on the mythical pyre. (One can almost hear Satan cackling, and crackling away, over Faujas's demise.)
Marthe Mouret is the epitome of religious ecstasy gone badder-than-bad: a portrait incarnate of unrelenting religious fervour and obeisance-to-the-Black-Cloth in misplaced adoration: in loving the man, she thinks she is loving God. Such women were indeed created by the Catholic Church, but never such a woman as Mme Mouret.
François Mouret plays the fool from beginning to end, a relentless hard-headed, narcissistic moron who is saved from himself by his own wilful madness.
The dozens of other evil characters that populate the novel are no more than stick figures of evilness, which once again surprised me in Zola. I'd expected more depth and perspicuity from him. (Perhaps by this point in the series he was getting tired of his own mission, of painting the baseness of human nature and so let loose like a cannon shot, without much accuracy.)
As I slept on this, and reflected more, my estimation fell even more, and so slipped to a mere 6.5/10 stars because of the total implausibility of this scenario. I've never had difficulty in suspending my disbelief in literature, for the sake of a good story, but this one, for some reason stretches the very bounds of cockeyed credulity. This one was so over the top, that even Le ventre de Paris was less gormandizing.
I was beginning to fear that this one would never end. No matter how much I read, there were always at least 100 pages left to go. I felt certain I'd read the equivalent of two thousand pages when I looked up to see "100 more to go". Was Penelope at work, on her magic shroud? While I slept, she added 100 pages each night. This is surely the most boring book in the Rougon-Macquart series yet. (This is my 4th.)
Multiple stray thoughts occurred to me as I was sighing and bemoaning my way through this one: I would have enjoyed this as a teenager, just "eating up" every word of Zola's religious and political caricatures; I would have enjoyed this as a young uni student as we dissected and parsed every precious Zolaian (is that a word? if not it should be) thought. Now: not so much. Now, it just annoyed me because the more I read, the more absurd it became. I even read it in French for a while, thinking that the translator had dropped the ball on this one, as often happens with Zola. Nope. The translator was bang-on, in sentiment, in cultural reference, in boring old prose.
"Mon Dieu. Mon Dieu. Would that Abbé Faujas and precious Marthe Mouret be swallowed whole by the religious fire that burns them," I thought. Oh, such prophecies, in the old and wise! I could have written this in my sleep and made it a barn-burning mini-series for television.
Plodding. Lumbering. Dragging. Floundering. Hummmmdrrum. I still hear the low base rumbling in my skull. This book has driven me to the edge of distraction.
These characters were too far-fetched even for me, and I say that having lived in the shadow (and grip) of small-town (catholic) Ontario where the priests and nuns ruled the communities with iron fists; where the manipulations and maneuverings could have been the prototypes for Zola's people, had they lived in his time. But even they, in their machinations, could never have gone this far.
Zola's main characters don't work here, because the caricatures are flawed; they are consistently evil and nasty specimens, without once achieving a breath of kind humanity. Human nature is not like that, and I am surprised that Zola should paint them this way. Even 'umble Uriah has his moments of tenderness -- where he reveals the soft underbelly of his humanity. Here, Abbé Faujas is persistently evil, from the moment he walks into the town with his gnarly crone of a mother in tow, to the moment he expires on the mythical pyre. (One can almost hear Satan cackling, and crackling away, over Faujas's demise.)
Marthe Mouret is the epitome of religious ecstasy gone badder-than-bad: a portrait incarnate of unrelenting religious fervour and obeisance-to-the-Black-Cloth in misplaced adoration: in loving the man, she thinks she is loving God. Such women were indeed created by the Catholic Church, but never such a woman as Mme Mouret.
François Mouret plays the fool from beginning to end, a relentless hard-headed, narcissistic moron who is saved from himself by his own wilful madness.
The dozens of other evil characters that populate the novel are no more than stick figures of evilness, which once again surprised me in Zola. I'd expected more depth and perspicuity from him. (Perhaps by this point in the series he was getting tired of his own mission, of painting the baseness of human nature and so let loose like a cannon shot, without much accuracy.)
As I slept on this, and reflected more, my estimation fell even more, and so slipped to a mere 6.5/10 stars because of the total implausibility of this scenario. I've never had difficulty in suspending my disbelief in literature, for the sake of a good story, but this one, for some reason stretches the very bounds of cockeyed credulity. This one was so over the top, that even Le ventre de Paris was less gormandizing.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
The Conquest of Plassans.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
April 29, 2018
–
Started Reading
April 29, 2018
– Shelved
May 1, 2018
–
6.23%
"“Abbé Faujas stretched out his arms with an air of ironic defiance, as though he would have liked to circle them round Plassans, and squeeze the life out of it by crushing it against his brawny chest. And he murmured to himself:
'Ah! to think that the imbeciles laughed at me this evening, as they saw me going through their streets.�"
page
22
'Ah! to think that the imbeciles laughed at me this evening, as they saw me going through their streets.�"
May 3, 2018
–
14.16%
"“The impression created by the Abbé was, indeed, an unfavourable one. He was too tall, too square-shouldered, his face was too hard and his hands were too big. His cassock, moreover, looked so frightfully shabby beneath the bright light of the chandelier that the ladies felt a kind of shame at seeing a priest so shockingly dressed.�"
page
50
May 3, 2018
–
17.85%
"“Haven't I told you that you never see anything? Do you know what the Abbé did at Besançon? He either murdered a priest or committed forgery! They are not quite certain which it was. However, they seem to have given him a nice reception! He turned quite green. Well, it's all up with him now!�"
page
63
May 3, 2018
–
24.08%
"“She began to love the lofty arches and the solemn bareness of the walls, the altars draped in protecting covers, and the chairs all arranged in order. As soon, indeed, as the padded doors swung to behind her, she began to experience a feeling of supreme restfulness, she forgot all the weary cares of the world, and perfect peace permeated her being.�"
page
85
May 3, 2018
–
24.36%
"“The feeling of purely physical happiness which she experienced in the church began to distress her as being something wrong; and it was with a slight feeling of trouble that she thenceforward entered Saint-Saturnin's trying to force herself to remain indifferent and uninfluenced by her surroundings but in spite of herself she was deeply, distressfully affected. It was ... a distress to which she willingly returned.�"
page
86
May 3, 2018
–
29.75%
"“His voice broke, and he himself seemed on the point of sobbing. Marthe, quite heart-broken, deeply touched by his last words, was prompted to throw herself into his arms. But they were afraid of being observed; and besides they felt as if there were some obstacle between them that prevented them from coming together. So they separated, while Olympe's eyes still glistened between the red curtains upstairs.�"
page
105
May 4, 2018
–
38.53%
"“Since the foundation of the Home of the Virgin, the women had been on his side; and defended him against the malicious stories which were still occasionally repeated, though no one was able to get at their origin. Now and then they found him a little blunt, but this roughness of his by no means offended them, least of all in the confessional, where they rather liked to feel his iron hand pressing down their necks.�"
page
136
May 7, 2018
–
50.71%
"“He has made me feel cold to the very marrow,' exclaimed Rose, as they went downstairs again. 'Did you notice his eyes? And what a filthy state the room is in! He hasn't laid a pen on that desk for a couple of months past, and to think that I fancied he spent all his time there writing. Fancy him amusing himself like that—shutting himself up all alone like a corpse, when the house is so bright and cheerful!�"
page
179
May 10, 2018
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)
date
newest »


I just read your great..."
It's good to go back to old reviews, Fionnuala. It provides an interesting diary of one's thoughts: I had predicted I would enjoy this series tremendously, based on my reading of the first one, and it turns out: hmm, not so much. Two have been a hit; two have been fairly big misses.
Perhaps late-cycle 19th C French literature is not for me, after all. I don't know what Zola was trying to accomplish in the end: to follow a naturalist, more scientific path seemed a good premise; but I think he's thrown out the baby with the bath water in following it. Surely, there is a more balanced view of human nature; surely people are much more nuanced than he portrays in his quest for naturalism. Scientific methods imply objectivity, detachment, neutrality, open-mindedness. I'd be hard pressed to find any of these conditions in Zola's environments.
Or it's possible I have it all wrong, and people like this really do exist; and when put under the naturalist microscope, they are nothing more than vile insects biting and stabbing at each other, in a fierce act of survival.
But then, here we go round the mulberry bush: surely ants and bees are naturalist, too, and there can be no better co-operative in nature than the hive insects. Why did he not see that part of "naturalism" in human nature -- for certainly there are many who can "live up to the bees' philosophy". : )
I would have thought that people put under the scientific microscope would emerge as multi-faceted; he is leaving me with the impression we sorry humans are one-dimensional, based on which egg basket we've fallen out of.
In final (perhaps cruel) irony, this puts my own anthropological and scientific beliefs about human to the test, and I am finding myself back-pedalling: perhaps genetics plays a lesser role than I originally thought. I suppose Zola has his uses after all, even if it is to solidify one's own beliefs. : /
Like Vinnie Barbarino ... "I'm so confused....!" (This cultural reference will be completely lost on anyone who didn't grow up watching Welcome Back, Kotter!"

Now I'm trying to think of other writers who've created characters on purpose to make a scientific/philosophical/political point and the only one who springs to mind is Ayn Rand whose characters weren't credible either. Interesting.

That's a good point, Fionnuala. I never read Ayn Rand when everybody else was reading her back in the day, and swooning; and when I came to her years (decades) later, I thought, "meh ... what's the fuss here." Her characters don't work for me. (Well, I wish they did work for me -- I've got lots of gardening and laundry that they could be doing. : ) !) ... Maybe, like Rand, Zola isn't my cup of tea. I prefer a little nuance with my humanity. Thanks for helping me refine the point.
I just read your great review of the first book in this series, Julie, and am thinking of what you said about Zola's intention to use the 'scientific method' to demonstrate how one particular family can be modified by their environment. It doesn't surprise me that the scientific method might not work in practice when it comes to the characters and how credible they are for readers.