Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Mats Mehrstedt's Reviews > Factfulness: Ten Reasons We're Wrong About the World � and Why Things Are Better Than You Think

Factfulness by Hans Rosling
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
U 50x66
's review

it was ok

In the last decades of his life Hans Rosling (1948 � 2017) made a world-wide career lecturing to large corporations, Wall Street bankers, hedge fund managers and gatherings of Nobel laureates and heads of states such as in Davos, about the statistics of the world. Rosling´s son invented a software so that you could present statistics with moving, shrinking and growing bubbles in different colors, which made an otherwise boring subject highly entertaining. The program could even be sold to Google.
Now, if you want to make a lot of money with people like this, you better tell them what they want to hear, or the invitations may dry up. Rosling´s message is that everything is getting better. Did you know that the number of extremely poor people have halved in the last 20 years? Did you know that the majority of the world´s population do not live in poor countries but in middle-income countries? Did you know that 80% of the world´s 1-year-olds have been vaccinated (against “some� disease)? Everything is getting better. At a slow pace, but it is getting there, so there´s no need to worry. Unless there is an outbreak of Ebola or some such thing.
Rosling is not lying. Everybody can check these statistics themselves on the internet. But, as it is with statistics, you pick some and leave others out. And then there are those less-than-scientific value judgments. What is a “middle-income country�? If you look closely, if you make more than 2 dollars a day you are already there, according to Rosling. Now, if you are lucky, you might even be able to buy a bicycle and go into town and maybe even get a job in one of the garment factories! Imagine that! Progress is there! That progress is so slow that your generation and the next few ones may not live to see it should be of no concern.
Why do the Africans risk their lives as refugees in the middle of all this progress? Because the EU won´t allow them to come by plane. Yes, that is a small part of the answer, but just a very small part and it does not explain why people leave their countries in the first place when there is no war.
In the middle of the book Rosling has two honest pages about an African woman who talked to him after one of his lectures. She said Rosling was a good talker but he had no vision, which he found unfair. Then she said “Do you think Africans will settle with getting rid of extreme poverty and be happy living in only ordinary poverty?�
She said his attitude was the same old European attitude Africans had lived with for centuries. Now, it honors Rosling that he mentions this, but he did not learn anything from it, obviously. On the very next page, as on all the others, he keeps going on as before.
The over 1000-year-old nordic Edda says “One thing I know that never dies � the judgment over a dead man�.
Hans Rosling was born in a working class family. He did many great things as a doctor in Africa and India. But he should have closed his ears to the siren call of fame and Big Money. He became a tranquilizer for the ruling class.
97 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Factfulness.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
May 7, 2018 – Finished Reading
May 11, 2018 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-15 of 15 (15 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Nimish (new)

Nimish This is glorious. I felt exactly the same way.


Mats Mehrstedt Nimish wrote: "This is glorious. I felt exactly the same way."

Glad to hear that,


Michael Hi Mats,

thanks for your review. I am very grateful about having followed Hans since his first TED talk in 2006 and now being able to read his book. It tells me so much about the world how it is today which is the opposite of what the media, my friends and my peers tell me. I would like to understand why you despise him taking that knowledge and sharing it with the world in return for fame and money? And why do you think it is wrong to tranquilize citizens heavily affected by negative media? Thanks for your reply.

Michael


Mats Mehrstedt Brother,

thanks for your input. I was obviously mistaken, but I thought that my short piece on Hans Rosling´s new book was pretty clear and to the point. Maybe you should read it again? As for your questions, I do not despise Hans Rosling. Not at all. I take my ancestors´ wisdom about “the judgment over a dead man� very seriously. That is why I phrased those words, in my opinion, in a nuanced way. I mentioned Rosling´s positive achievements along with the ones I thought were not so positive. Court jesters have a long history and it takes quite some talent and wit to be a court jester. But I think there are many other kinds of people who deserve more admiration than they do. Hans Rosling was, in my opinion, a modern day court jester. He made a living telling the ruling class what they wanted to hear. He was also a professor of statistics, which comes with responsibilities. On top of that, coming from a working class family I think you should have a certain responsibility to care for your brethren who were not as lucky as you were. Solidarity is a word that is almost forgotten today.
If you look at the misery and the suffering in the world today and say; give me a tranquilizer, this makes me feel bad, Hans Rosling is the right guy for you. Personally, I think you should not take the tranquilizer; you should get angry and you should want to do something about the misery in the world. You may have some of it next door, no matter where you live. But that is just my opinion. You may think differently about that. There are plenty of people telling you everything is fine, from the school books and way on up to the media moguls. But if you chose to swallow their tranquilizers my bet is that one day they will be coming for you, too.


Michael Perkins This is a rather cynical review and makes it clear that you have not read the book carefully, if at all. Here's a snippet from the book that apparently you don't recall...

"I do not deny that there are pressing global risks we need to address. I am not an optimist painting the world in pink. I don’t get calm by looking away from problems. The five that concern me most are the risks of global pandemic, financial collapse, world war, climate change, and extreme poverty. Why is it these problems that cause me most concern? Because they are quite likely to happen: the first three have all happened before and the other two are happening now; and because each has the potential to cause mass suffering either directly or indirectly by pausing human progress for many years or decades. If we fail here, nothing else will work. These are mega killers that we must avoid, if at all possible, by acting collaboratively and step-by-step."

Part of what he's going after in his overall discussion is that we should not be defeatist in the face of hard problems. If you haven't read his story about Ebola, a potential pandemic, you should. It was a call to action, not to giving up.


diane e. tretter Mats wrote: "Brother,

thanks for your input. I was obviously mistaken, but I thought that my short piece on Hans Rosling´s new book was pretty clear and to the point. Maybe you should read it again? As for you..."



diane e. tretter I agree


Sarah My thoughts EXACTLY!!!!


´³Ã¡²Ô Skácel My thoughts after first 5 pages. Yet, I will finish it.


Julie Harding I hadn’t thought about it this why. I read your Review because I’m finding it dull, repetitive and predictable. But your point is interesting.


message 11: by Mats (new) - rated it 2 stars

Mats Mehrstedt additional comment by Swedish sociologist Roland Paulsen:




Tom LA Wow. Such an unfair review.


message 13: by Sam (new)

Sam I couldn't help but see this as a guide to absolving billionaires' guilt. "Everything's fine. Nothing to see here."


James McNamee Shameful political hijacking, here!


message 15: by Rachel (new) - added it

Rachel I agree. I started to think about why these huge corporations always hire him to give talks (he mentions it constantly) and then I realized it's because he is telling them exactly what they want to hear so they can continue to destroy the planet.


back to top