Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Steven Godin's Reviews > A Hero of Our Time

A Hero of Our Time by Mikhail Lermontov
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
26706841
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: russia-ukraine, fiction, classic-literature

A Hero of Our Time, part swashbuckler, part travelogue, which first appeared in 1839, cleary had an influence over another certain famous Russian writer who sported a great big long grey beard. Infact this could quite easily have been written by Tolstoy himself. Opening in a vast landscape, the narrator is travelling through the Caucasus, he explains that he is not a novelist, but a travel writer, making notes. Think a sort of Paul Theroux type. The mountainous region were supposedly fabled, Noah’s ark apparently passed by the twin peaks of Mount Elborus. Must have been a wonderful spectacle for the elephants, giraffes, and rhinos. Beyond the natural border of the River Terek was an alluring and dangerous terrain, where Ossetians, Georgians, Tatars and Chechens harried Russian soldiers and travellers, or offered uncertain alliances. But just who could you trust?

Lermontov’s narrator marvels at the purity of the mountain air, and the delights of welcoming a sense of withdrawing from the world. But he also feels a sombre and bewildering depth, that the hidden valleys hold a foreboding. He meets an old Caucasus hand, a staff captain called Maxim Maximych, who has been in Chechnya for a decade and who warns him about the dangerous ways of the region’s inhabitants. Maxim Maximych begins to rabble on to his new found friend about the ravishing tale of a young officer he met five years earlier, Pechorin (who is now dead) had a lively energy and a changeable temperament, he could hunt for days one minute, and hide in his room the next. Whilst spending time at Maximych’s fort, Bela, the daughter of a Tatar prince caught his eye, casting flirtatious looks at him as one does. And even sings him a love song. Ahhh, how sweet.
This story then involves the Prince's son, who is after the horse of a local bandit, Pechorin offers him a deal. He steals the horse, if Bela is delivered to him. But after the exchange, the bandit goes looking for blood.

Unlike Tolstoy, this is not some huge Russian beast of a novel, as it sits comfortably at under two-hundred pages. Although there turns out to be three different narrators, the whole thing works well, and is perfectly graspable for anyone who has read any of the old Russian classics. Lermontov doesn't beat around the bush when kicking things off, and builds a picture straight away. The book makes its points efficiently, in a little amount of time. The character of Pechorin was far more intriguing than anyone else, and his part of the overall story I found the better. What is striking is Lermontov's handling of form, the way Pechorin emerges gradually in a fragmented narrative that anticipates Modernism in its perspectival shifts. The book not only pleased Leo, but Gogol, Dostoevsky and Chekhov as well. Lermontov deserves to mingle in with this crowd. He really wouldn't be out of place. He demonstrates that literature is the most beautiful artform when written in this fashion.
81 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read A Hero of Our Time.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

May 17, 2018 – Started Reading
May 17, 2018 – Shelved
May 17, 2018 – Shelved as: russia-ukraine
May 17, 2018 –
page 68
40.24% "My songstress appeared to be not more than eighteen years of age. The unusual suppleness of her figure, the characteristic and original way she had of inclining her head, her long, light brown hair, the golden sheen of her slightly sunburnt neck and shoulders, and especially her straight nose- all these held me fascinated."
May 19, 2018 – Finished Reading
May 1, 2019 – Shelved as: fiction
June 2, 2023 – Shelved as: classic-literature

Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Fede (new)

Fede The main reason I'm not too fond of Russian lit is the frightening lenght of its masterpieces... this seems to be shorter but quite intense though. Good to know!


Steven Godin Fede wrote: "The main reason I'm not too fond of Russian lit is the frightening lenght of its masterpieces... this seems to be shorter but quite intense though. Good to know!"

I know what you mean. I have yet to read - War & Peace, Anna Karenina, or The Brothers Karamazov. Regardless of how good they are, size wise, I am still not ready to take the plunge.


Ilse Thank you for penning this excellent write-up and taking me on a lovely trip down memory lane, Steven - I loved this, what stayed with me a certain sardonic playfulness and a fairy tale like atmosphere.


Steven Godin Ilse wrote: "Thank you for penning this excellent write-up and taking me on a lovely trip down memory lane, Steven - I loved this, what stayed with me a certain sardonic playfulness and a fairy tale like atmosp..."

Yes, that's another way to look at it, it did carry itself as a bit of a fairy tale. Happy to have evoked the fond memories.


message 5: by LB (new) - rated it 5 stars

LB I like the review but I disagree with the statement that it could have been written by Tolstoy "himself". First, I wouldn't put Tolstoy above Lermontov unless you mean the sheer volume of his work. Second, I think Tolstoy might've written something like that but only idea wise, not form wise. Tolstoy would've thrown in a million of other characters, big and small, a million of other ideas and digressions, and a million of lengthy repetitions and over-explanations. I don't feel that Tolstoy was capable of the terse simplicity of the form that Lermontov produced, and thus, it would've been a totally different work. I've read War and Peace twice, and I've read A Hero of Out Time at least 3 times. I am a patient and careful reader. In fact, reading was long part of my job/career, but I must say that by the end of the 2nd War and Peace read, I was plain annoyed by his didactical patronizing of the reader, while I never thought this way about Lermontov.


Steven Godin LB wrote: "I like the review but I disagree with the statement that it could have been written by Tolstoy "himself". First, I wouldn't put Tolstoy above Lermontov unless you mean the sheer volume of his work...."

Thanks for the comment, I can see your point.


back to top