Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Nate D's Reviews > The Third Bear

The Third Bear by Jeff VanderMeer
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
406701
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: stories, weird, fantasy, read-in-2018, horror

I don't always have a lot of patience with contemporary sci-fi and fantasy, but Vandermeer here tempers forays into pulp with a better-than-working-familiarity with the more postmodern and surreal threads running through 20th-century fantastic fiction, as well as that formative dread of the turn of the century weird. Which I suppose encapsulates all of what the New Weird sub-movement he's a part of promises in general, though I don't often find it so elegant in execution as in the three or four especially standout stories here, which push into genuinely strange, memorable, and original territory.

It's bits like the mostly unexplained conceptual tendrils, for instance, permeating "Three Days in a Border Town", which could be set in an ordinary post-apocalyptic world were it not for its yearning towards a de-localized, ghostly, there-but-not-there city promising something better than dusty present life. Or the reconfiguring of Pale Fire, reinvented autobiography, and rewritten bits of other stories, in "Errata". Possibly best of all, the otherworldly office politics of "The Situation", which remains unpredictable throughout by never totally resolving its terms, even as many scenes familiarly recapitulate drab contemporary day job existence. Not so incidentally, that story also offers prototype and sub-variant of Vandermeer's stellar most recent novel, Borne. Or the multiverse-spanning political nightmare in "The Goat Variations".

Other stories do fall more neatly into their categories, and suffer for it -- there's a steampunk piece, a myth retelling, a few bits of surrealism creeping into normal life basically in line with the original weird templates of the past. These will fade down in my memory before long, I'm sure. But then you have a story of a bear plaguing a small town with the techniques of a serial killer, that soon expands from horror yarn into a bleak commentary on how society treats its outsiders. Something familiar here is turned unfamiliar, then smarter and more knowing -- even as it basks in the pulpiest pulp it can offer. Which I can get behind. Sometimes I like to be entertained, it's just that so much ostensibly purely entertaining storytelling, and especially unfortunately horror writing, for me, feels limited and uncreative or else tips over into mawkishness, and I can't really enjoy it. This, more often than not, avoids these pitfalls.
14 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read The Third Bear.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

May 27, 2018 – Started Reading
May 30, 2018 – Shelved
June 25, 2018 – Shelved as: stories
June 25, 2018 – Shelved as: weird
June 25, 2018 – Shelved as: fantasy
June 25, 2018 – Shelved as: read-in-2018
June 25, 2018 – Shelved as: horror
June 25, 2018 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by mark (new)

mark monday have you read Michael Cisco yet?


message 2: by Nate D (last edited Jul 04, 2018 07:22AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Nate D Yes, but only The Narrator and the Divinity Student so far. Cisco has the more completely hermetic, singular vision, but also (like Thomas Ligotti) comes closer to tipping over into the ridiculous, for me. Still very much need to read more of him though. Which would you recommend?

Granted, the problem of tipping over into the ridiculous, is an issue I have with all too much horror writing in general (ie, it may be my problem not anything to do with the works themselves). This marred my enjoyment of Vandermeer's own Southern Reach trilogy as well. It's just that here it seems like he's often more intentionally playful, so it works.


message 3: by mark (new)

mark monday that's so surprising in a way - you seem fond of the absurd in works of non-horror! but I get what you are saying. many people feel the same way about fantasy as well. do things become ridiculous for you because of the situations being portrayed - the actual "horrors" - or due to the reactions and emotions coming from the characters?

the only Cisco I've read is his collection of stories, Secret Hours. I thought it was amazing.


message 4: by Nate D (last edited Jul 04, 2018 05:29PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Nate D I know, I love all manner of unreality and absurdity, so that's not the issue at all. I just feel like the sensations of dread and horror are sort of singular, and lie right on the edge of tipping over into eye-rolling, or worse, boredom, if they don't click with the particular reader (especially apparently me). And if I'm going to roll my eyes, I want to roll them with the author, not at the author. I don't mean all fiction that is horrifying here, but especially horror as genre fiction, which seems to often carry a lot of specific pop culture cliche as baggage, which pushes me along into not being able to take it seriously all the quicker. Part of this is because of how much I really want to enjoy horror -- it seems like the quickest route to the kind fascinations of mystery and the uncanny that really speak to me. Which makes it all the more disappointing when such an atmosphere dissipates into a b-movie monster reveal, or semi-parodic goth tropes, or whatever. I also realize that, in contrast, I called Robert Aickman's subtle restraint boring horror in another review, but he's actually much more what I can wholeheartedly get behind. But I bring him up to show how impossible I am to please with horror writing. On the other hand, when it works, it works. I was completely mesmerized by Fever Dream to a degree that few books are capable of.

tl;dr I should probably get over it and read some Ramsey Campbell already regardless, which I'm sure will be ridiculous, but probably also a lot of fun.

(Oh, and that's the other thing -- horror for some reason seems to have an even more cult following than sci-fi, so it can be difficult to find and really force me to work in order to have my ambivalent reactions. I've never even seen a novel by Ramsy Campbell, or Michael Cisco for that matter, on a bookstore shelf.)


message 5: by mark (new)

mark monday I am going to have to check out Fever Dream! I'm unfamiliar with that one.

I wonder what you will think of Ramsey Campbell. he's one of my favorites. although Aickman is too...


Nate D What's the one Campbell I should start with, would you say?


message 7: by mark (last edited Jul 05, 2018 09:26PM) (new)

mark monday sorta hard to say, and may have to recommend ones I haven't even read: the recent The Darkest Part of the Woods and The Kind Folk. I've read very interesting things about both.

most of my experience with him was in my 20s. he's an often quirky and mannered writer who loves to play with unreliable narrators; I recall liking the ones where his prose and story were especially off-kilter (The Doll Who Ate Its Mother, Incarnate, The Nameless, The Face That Must Die) and not particularly enjoying ones that felt more mainstream (The Hungry Moon, The Influence, Ancient Images).

the most recent Campbells I've read were the very hit-or-miss Cold Print and the surprisingly delightful The Last Revelation Of Gla'aki

here's another author I think you should look into: T.M. Wright. I've read three by him recently, and two of them were superb: The Eyes of the Carp and Strange Seed


Nate D Excellent, thanks. Noted all around.


message 9: by Jordan (new)

Jordan West I definitely second Ramsey Campbell, in my opinion he's probably the greatest living writer of supernatural fiction in the UK; his work reads a bit like a contemporary MR James suffering from an anxiety disorder - feel like panic attacks captured in prose.


Nate D I'm sold!


back to top