Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Steve's Reviews > Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!: Adventures of a Curious Character

Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! by Richard P. Feynman
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
236411
's review

liked it

There’s presumably a rule where only smart people are awarded Nobel Prizes in Physics. Richard Feynman was no exception. This memoir is filled with anecdotes from his childhood spent fixing radios, his experiences as a young man doing bomb research at Los Alamos up through his days as a renowned professor at Cal Tech. The central theme was always that this is one smart cookie. It was interesting to pick up on his thought processes. It probably didn’t feature as much pure science as most of his other books, but at least you could appreciate his intuition into the physical world’s biggest puzzles. Rather than emphasizing the technical details of physics, most of his stories were focused on his other interests and his geeky humor.

While some of the stories were entertaining, and the lumens of candle power abounded, it didn’t always work for me. I kept getting the feeling that had the same stories been told in the third person, they would have been better � less egotistical sounding. In every one of his sidelines, he was masterful. It was like he was still driving home the point of how brilliant he was even when he was slumming it. After a while, I got tired of hearing how he became fluent in Portuguese when he taught in Brazil, or impressed the locals to no end with his distinctive style of bongo playing, or could dance like a professional, or got just about any woman he wanted to sleep with him. It was this last one that left the worst taste in my mouth. Some of his tales of attraction and conquest occurred when one of his wives was on her death bed.

He was probably not as bad as I’ve made him sound. Like I said, we can certainly appreciate his intellect. He had a rare ability to explain difficult concepts in laymen’s terms, too. I got a confirmation of this a week after I finished the book when we were interviewing a former student of his from Cal Tech. He mentioned the “Feynman Effect�: a phenomenon whereby someone asking him a question got answered in such a clear and intuitive way that it was only later that they realized they still didn’t know exactly how it all tied to their existing understanding.

So, count me as a fan of his scientific contributions and his ability to communicate, but not of his swagger. If it had all been a bit of a joke (you know, physicist � funny hair � limited social skills � but a would-be Lothario in spite of it), I would have laughed along with him, but I don’t think that was his intention.
64 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
November 30, 2011 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-31 of 31 (31 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Susan (new)

Susan Poor Feynman lacked your world-class humility!


Steve Yup, I'm probably as 'umble as Uriah Heep.


message 3: by Susan (new)

Susan Uriah should have been 'umble, yet he wasn't sincere...you are sincerely 'umble and you needn't be.


Steve What's that, Ms. Pot? You're calling me black?

Or maybe it's more like the Calphalon calling the T-Fal stick-free.


message 5: by Susan (new)

Susan I love how you are able to segue from Dickens to Calphalon so easily...you're such a Renaissance Man!


Joshua Nomen-Mutatio Of possible interest:


Steve Hmm... blocked by the company server. I'll have to try from home. Thanks in advance, though.


Joshua Nomen-Mutatio It's Lawrence Krauss giving a little talk about his book on Feynman: http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/85...


Steve This looks like it's got both the science appreciation and the 3rd person assessment of the man himself, which is bound to be interesting. Thanks, J N-M (MFSO? Donald Rohrmayer? Nom de plume du jour?), for the recommendation.


Joshua Nomen-Mutatio Krauss is a real no bullshit kinda guy and a super talented physicist in his own right. I haven't read the book but it looked interesting to me for the same reasons you mention above.


message 11: by Mir (last edited Jan 26, 2012 02:39PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mir One of my cousins did his graduate work under Feynman and your impression pretty much tallies with his assessment. I still enjoyed the book, though.


Steve Thanks, Miriam. It's good to get another data point. Sounds like your cousin is a smart cookie (Cal Tech physics students usually are), so I'll assign this point higher weight.


message 13: by Mir (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mir Oh, I wasn't trying to imply that you should give it another star. That's just a reflection of how much you enjoyed the book.


Steve I'm afraid I wasn't very clear. The data point I was happy to get was the extra bit of information that your cousin, through you, provided to more or less confirm my view of Feynman. You're right, my stars are what they are.

Thanks again for sharing his impression.


message 15: by Mir (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mir Oh, okay. You're welcome! Like you, my cousin was especially troubled by Feynman's infidelities (and by his tendency to let his associates know about it, which put them in an awkward position).


message 16: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Feynman is my son's favourite physicist, and this is the only one of his many publications that I've attempted. I think it's really good when such an eminent scientist is able to write popular science as well: non-scientists need to understand something of science, and not be afraid of it.


Steve Feynman has a reputation for explaining concepts in a way we non-scientists can comprehend. From my limited exposure to him, I agree.


message 18: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Feynman married his first wife knowing she was unlikely to survive tuberculosis. She travelled west with him when he joined the Manhattan Project.

This was recounted in another book about him - perhaps a boigraphy.

What were circumstances behind interviewing that student? That same bio recounted another "effect". A colleague had been working on a problem for some months and used Feynman as a sounding board - going over the math. Feynman listened, then took up the chalk and presented a different way to "get into" the problem.


Steve Thanks for shedding additional light on Feynman's personal and professional life, Jim. Stories like that help modify my view of him.

The interviewee was trying for a quant analyst job in finance. Much of the same math is used as it turns out, and an intuitive understanding (like the kind many of the best physicists have) can be very helpful.


Laura Noggle I 100% agree with you! Spot on—some tales worked, but the womanizing definitely did not.


Steve Thanks for the confirmation, Laura. I know this is a psychological assessment on the cheap, but it makes you wonder if he was trying to cover for some kind of insecurity.


Laura Noggle Interesting thought! Wouldn't be surprised—although maybe he was just a horn dog (excuse the terminology).


message 23: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim Horn Dog! No need to "excuse" that.

As for "cheap" "psychological assessment(s)" - it may be no more complicated than liking feminine variety in his "youth" (and when was it when he married - post "womanizing"?)

(reeled in - the second time - at age 34 and again at 42 - per wikipedia)




message 24: by Mir (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mir Steve wrote: "Feynman has a reputation for explaining concepts in a way we non-scientists can comprehend. From my limited exposure to him, I agree."

I tried reading Six Easy Pieces. I didn't get all the way through and have since forgotten most, but I was able with a lot of effort to understand the concepts. And it was not dull.


Steve It's not often that a review from almost 10 years ago gets any comments, but I guess it shows the power of physics, accessibility, and sex.

@Laura, I always kind of liked "horn dog". It sounds more playful, like "shag" that the Brits use. Hmm... it just occurred to me that could meld the two with "shaggy dog."

@Jim, you get what you pay for with psychology. :-) It was a while ago that I read the book, but I do remember being put off by affairs while his first wife was dying. Anyway, thanks for the link.

@Mir, good to know that his more hard-core physics books are still interesting and understandable. I hate when you have to go to the 11th dimension of string theory for the "Aha" insights.


message 26: by Mir (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mir Steve wrote: "It's not often that a review from almost 10 years ago gets any comments, but I guess it shows the power of physics, accessibility, and sex.

@Mir, good to know that his more hard-core physics books are still interesting and understandable. I hate when you have to go to the 11th dimension of string theory for the "Aha" insights."


Oh, this is soft-core for Feynman! It's meant for physics undergrads. But I didn't have even high school physics, alas.


message 27: by Steve (last edited Jan 23, 2021 09:39AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Steve Mir wrote: "Oh, this is soft-core for Feynman!"

Feynman's soft-core is all I'd be able to handle, and I had a year of college physics plus a year as a physics lab instructor. I'm guessing his truly hard-core work is meant for an audience of about five.

I give both you and him credit for establishing a connection through Six Easy Pieces. I also give the book credit for going one further than that Jack Nicholson movie from 1970.


message 28: by Mir (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mir Maybe I should have refreshed with Five Easy Piec before starting on Six. That could be my problem.


Steve I don't know if this is comparable, but it helped me to learn about the first 21 catches before tackling Joseph Heller's classic.


message 30: by Jim (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jim There’s presumably a rule where only smart people are awarded Nobel Prizes in Physics.

No "rule" required for a Nobel in the sciences - a "mere PhD" has a way of filtering out the dumb bunnies.

And now it occurs to me that Dear Old Albert may not have gotten the Swiss/Prussian version of the "doctorate".

(off to check)

HE DID - the current wiki entry mentions a "24-page doctoral dissertation" "completed on 30 April 1905" (the so-called Annus Mirabilis).

I am too poorly informed about "Literature" to comment on those laureates.

I DO wonder about the Peace Prize - not about the laurates, but perhaps the occasional naiivety of the committee - in 1994 Yasser Arafat got that prize - along with Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres. To be "fair" this was twenty years after Arafat "addressed" the UN General Assembly. Two wiki references address the "holster on his hip" - one stating it carried sunglasses.


Steve Those are some first-rate factoids, Jim. Thanks!

And now that you've brought the topic up, I wonder why more people haven't thought of a holster on the hip for those clunky Ray-Bans.


back to top