Steve's Reviews > Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!: Adventures of a Curious Character
Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!: Adventures of a Curious Character
by
by

There’s presumably a rule where only smart people are awarded Nobel Prizes in Physics. Richard Feynman was no exception. This memoir is filled with anecdotes from his childhood spent fixing radios, his experiences as a young man doing bomb research at Los Alamos up through his days as a renowned professor at Cal Tech. The central theme was always that this is one smart cookie. It was interesting to pick up on his thought processes. It probably didn’t feature as much pure science as most of his other books, but at least you could appreciate his intuition into the physical world’s biggest puzzles. Rather than emphasizing the technical details of physics, most of his stories were focused on his other interests and his geeky humor.
While some of the stories were entertaining, and the lumens of candle power abounded, it didn’t always work for me. I kept getting the feeling that had the same stories been told in the third person, they would have been better � less egotistical sounding. In every one of his sidelines, he was masterful. It was like he was still driving home the point of how brilliant he was even when he was slumming it. After a while, I got tired of hearing how he became fluent in Portuguese when he taught in Brazil, or impressed the locals to no end with his distinctive style of bongo playing, or could dance like a professional, or got just about any woman he wanted to sleep with him. It was this last one that left the worst taste in my mouth. Some of his tales of attraction and conquest occurred when one of his wives was on her death bed.
He was probably not as bad as I’ve made him sound. Like I said, we can certainly appreciate his intellect. He had a rare ability to explain difficult concepts in laymen’s terms, too. I got a confirmation of this a week after I finished the book when we were interviewing a former student of his from Cal Tech. He mentioned the “Feynman Effect�: a phenomenon whereby someone asking him a question got answered in such a clear and intuitive way that it was only later that they realized they still didn’t know exactly how it all tied to their existing understanding.
So, count me as a fan of his scientific contributions and his ability to communicate, but not of his swagger. If it had all been a bit of a joke (you know, physicist � funny hair � limited social skills � but a would-be Lothario in spite of it), I would have laughed along with him, but I don’t think that was his intention.
While some of the stories were entertaining, and the lumens of candle power abounded, it didn’t always work for me. I kept getting the feeling that had the same stories been told in the third person, they would have been better � less egotistical sounding. In every one of his sidelines, he was masterful. It was like he was still driving home the point of how brilliant he was even when he was slumming it. After a while, I got tired of hearing how he became fluent in Portuguese when he taught in Brazil, or impressed the locals to no end with his distinctive style of bongo playing, or could dance like a professional, or got just about any woman he wanted to sleep with him. It was this last one that left the worst taste in my mouth. Some of his tales of attraction and conquest occurred when one of his wives was on her death bed.
He was probably not as bad as I’ve made him sound. Like I said, we can certainly appreciate his intellect. He had a rare ability to explain difficult concepts in laymen’s terms, too. I got a confirmation of this a week after I finished the book when we were interviewing a former student of his from Cal Tech. He mentioned the “Feynman Effect�: a phenomenon whereby someone asking him a question got answered in such a clear and intuitive way that it was only later that they realized they still didn’t know exactly how it all tied to their existing understanding.
So, count me as a fan of his scientific contributions and his ability to communicate, but not of his swagger. If it had all been a bit of a joke (you know, physicist � funny hair � limited social skills � but a would-be Lothario in spite of it), I would have laughed along with him, but I don’t think that was his intention.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
November 30, 2011
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-31 of 31 (31 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Susan
(new)
Dec 01, 2011 03:26PM

reply
|
flag

Or maybe it's more like the Calphalon calling the T-Fal stick-free.








Thanks again for sharing his impression.




This was recounted in another book about him - perhaps a boigraphy.
What were circumstances behind interviewing that student? That same bio recounted another "effect". A colleague had been working on a problem for some months and used Feynman as a sounding board - going over the math. Feynman listened, then took up the chalk and presented a different way to "get into" the problem.

The interviewee was trying for a quant analyst job in finance. Much of the same math is used as it turns out, and an intuitive understanding (like the kind many of the best physicists have) can be very helpful.



As for "cheap" "psychological assessment(s)" - it may be no more complicated than liking feminine variety in his "youth" (and when was it when he married - post "womanizing"?)
(reeled in - the second time - at age 34 and again at 42 - per wikipedia)

I tried reading Six Easy Pieces. I didn't get all the way through and have since forgotten most, but I was able with a lot of effort to understand the concepts. And it was not dull.

@Laura, I always kind of liked "horn dog". It sounds more playful, like "shag" that the Brits use. Hmm... it just occurred to me that could meld the two with "shaggy dog."
@Jim, you get what you pay for with psychology. :-) It was a while ago that I read the book, but I do remember being put off by affairs while his first wife was dying. Anyway, thanks for the link.
@Mir, good to know that his more hard-core physics books are still interesting and understandable. I hate when you have to go to the 11th dimension of string theory for the "Aha" insights.

@Mir, good to know that his more hard-core physics books are still interesting and understandable. I hate when you have to go to the 11th dimension of string theory for the "Aha" insights."
Oh, this is soft-core for Feynman! It's meant for physics undergrads. But I didn't have even high school physics, alas.

Feynman's soft-core is all I'd be able to handle, and I had a year of college physics plus a year as a physics lab instructor. I'm guessing his truly hard-core work is meant for an audience of about five.
I give both you and him credit for establishing a connection through Six Easy Pieces. I also give the book credit for going one further than that Jack Nicholson movie from 1970.


No "rule" required for a Nobel in the sciences - a "mere PhD" has a way of filtering out the dumb bunnies.
And now it occurs to me that Dear Old Albert may not have gotten the Swiss/Prussian version of the "doctorate".
(off to check)
HE DID - the current wiki entry mentions a "24-page doctoral dissertation" "completed on 30 April 1905" (the so-called Annus Mirabilis).
I am too poorly informed about "Literature" to comment on those laureates.
I DO wonder about the Peace Prize - not about the laurates, but perhaps the occasional naiivety of the committee - in 1994 Yasser Arafat got that prize - along with Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres. To be "fair" this was twenty years after Arafat "addressed" the UN General Assembly. Two wiki references address the "holster on his hip" - one stating it carried sunglasses.