Manny's Reviews > Grandeur et Décadence
Grandeur et Décadence
by
by

Manny's review
bookshelves: french, history-and-biography, linguistics-and-philosophy, life-is-proust, swedish-norwegian-and-danish, too-sexy-for-maiden-aunts, well-i-think-its-funny
Jun 25, 2018
bookshelves: french, history-and-biography, linguistics-and-philosophy, life-is-proust, swedish-norwegian-and-danish, too-sexy-for-maiden-aunts, well-i-think-its-funny
Read 2 times. Last read June 25, 2018.
It's difficult to write a proper review of Liv Strömquist's Uppgång och Fall (in French, Grandeur et Décadence), since my reactions are so confused. First, it's a fantastically entertaining graphic novel: I literally couldn't put it down. My initial attempt, which I posted a couple of days ago, focusses on that side of it. But Strömquist isn't just trying to entertain you, she is deadly serious. This unassuming little book is, I kid you not, one of the best attempts I've seen in recent years to answer the question that's bothering pretty much everyone in the world who still has a functioning brain. You can phrase this question in many ways, some of them dry and academic in the extreme, but a straightforward way to put it would be: why is everything so totally fucked up?
Now of course I can already hear a fair number of people saying what do you mean, fucked up? Things have never been better. Guys, please try and look at the actual facts. (Remember facts? We used to think they were important). Most of the world's qualified scientists tell us that we are causing massive, irreparable harm to the environment, and that the consequences will be somewhere between very bad and utterly catastrophic. And yet the people who make the decisions are somehow ignoring these dire warnings, on the rather surprising grounds - when any grounds are even given - that said scientists are part of a massive global conspiracy to distort the truth. Well, agreed, anything is possible, but just use basic principles like Occam's Razor and cui bono. Perhaps this global scientific conspiracy exists, though it seems like a hard way to get a little research funding. Or perhaps the conspiracy is between the extremely rich people who stand to get even richer by continuing to behave in a totally irresponsible way and carrying on plundering the Earth. It seems to me that the second explanation is a whole lot more plausible than the first.
Strömquist starts off her book by telling you how mindbogglingly disconnected from reality these top decision-makers are. She has a wonderfully ironic sequence where she compares them with those Oriental sages who after a lifetime of spiritual discipline are able to lose track of past and future and only live in the present - except, as she points out, the CEOs who are busily leading the world to ruin are even better at it. And this is just the start. Having established what they're doing, she then introduces us to the official ideology that motivates so many of them, where the teachings of Ayn Rand play a startlingly important role. There's another great sequence where she gives you a quick tour of critical points in Rand's magnum opus, Atlas Shrugged, which she accurately describes as a science-fiction romance about hot capitalists. I have read Atlas Shrugged, and I found it very entertaining, but I also found Robert Heinlein's The Moon is a Harsh Mistress very entertaining when I read it as a teen. If I had to take one of these books as a guiding philosophy, I'd pick Heinlein, but the right choice is obviously "neither". It is not sensible to let your life be guided by a hack science-fiction writer with weird homegrown political-ethical-sexual theories.
Continuing her rapid tour of the state of the world - Strömquist realistically appreciates that in the iPhone generation, no one is going to sit still for anything much longer than a TED talk - the next topic is how things got this way. Where do these weird people come from, who believe that the only way to run civilization is to push about half the country down to the poverty line so that they can engage in ever more repulsive acts of conspicuous consumption? Here, we have an engagingly savage attack on Chris O'Neill, the extremely rich American who in 2013 married Sweden's Princess Madeleine. People like Mr O'Neill, Strömquist tells us, come from families where the concept of love has been replaced with that of money. They have distant parents, who are never there and give them material goods instead. And when they grow up, the only way they have to try and find love is to carry on acquiring more goods. Well, I have heard less plausible theories.
I'll skip a couple of the entertaining parentheses, though the exhaustive list of all working-class characters appearing in the second volume of Knausgård's Min kamp is hilarious. What choices do we have? Segueing from her Princess Madeleine skit, Strömquist alertly points out that the people who say they want to get rid of the monarchy are a bit late to the party if they intend to come across as brave and forthright. In 2018, the monarchy no longer means anything. If these people had come out with their republican sentiments in 1518, that would have shown courage, but in 1518 they'd have been met with blank incomprehension. What do you mean, get rid of the monarchy? What other system could possibly work? And that's exactly where we are today when anyone is foolish enough to suggest that extreme laissez-faire capitalism might perhaps not be the ideal system. No one even seems to believe there is an alternative.
And finally, Ströquist gets to the central question. Again, this can be phrased in various dry, neutral and academic ways. But a direct way to put it would be: what the fuck can we do about this? Why has the left, which is supposed to act as a counter to this no-longer-even-disguised philosophy of unthinking, unrestrained greed, completely failed in its mission? Strömquist says, I think very perceptively, that they've forgotten how to be inclusive and instead allowed themselves to become exclusive. Once upon a time, if you were a worker, you were welcomed by the working class revolutionaries as a brother or a sister. That built big, powerful movements that could change things. People believed in them enough that they were literally willing to fight and die in their cause. But now, the left has become sidetracked into a wilderness of arbitrary moral judgements. If you use non-PC language, or buy the wrong kind of shopping bag, or read an inappropriate book, they want nothing to do with you. Nativist politicians have rushed in to fill this vacuum. They aren't fussy: if you're angry and white, they welcome you to the club and let you help them change the political agenda. Meanwhile, the left is posting witty comments on the internet. [Yes, I know...]
We need more people like Sister Liv. I have been corresponding with Ordfront, her publisher, and they assure me that an English edition of this book is in the pipeline and will soon appear. When it comes out, go buy yourself a copy. Maybe it'll amuse you. Maybe it'll make you angry. Maybe - who knows? - it'll inspire you to go out and actually do something.
Now of course I can already hear a fair number of people saying what do you mean, fucked up? Things have never been better. Guys, please try and look at the actual facts. (Remember facts? We used to think they were important). Most of the world's qualified scientists tell us that we are causing massive, irreparable harm to the environment, and that the consequences will be somewhere between very bad and utterly catastrophic. And yet the people who make the decisions are somehow ignoring these dire warnings, on the rather surprising grounds - when any grounds are even given - that said scientists are part of a massive global conspiracy to distort the truth. Well, agreed, anything is possible, but just use basic principles like Occam's Razor and cui bono. Perhaps this global scientific conspiracy exists, though it seems like a hard way to get a little research funding. Or perhaps the conspiracy is between the extremely rich people who stand to get even richer by continuing to behave in a totally irresponsible way and carrying on plundering the Earth. It seems to me that the second explanation is a whole lot more plausible than the first.
Strömquist starts off her book by telling you how mindbogglingly disconnected from reality these top decision-makers are. She has a wonderfully ironic sequence where she compares them with those Oriental sages who after a lifetime of spiritual discipline are able to lose track of past and future and only live in the present - except, as she points out, the CEOs who are busily leading the world to ruin are even better at it. And this is just the start. Having established what they're doing, she then introduces us to the official ideology that motivates so many of them, where the teachings of Ayn Rand play a startlingly important role. There's another great sequence where she gives you a quick tour of critical points in Rand's magnum opus, Atlas Shrugged, which she accurately describes as a science-fiction romance about hot capitalists. I have read Atlas Shrugged, and I found it very entertaining, but I also found Robert Heinlein's The Moon is a Harsh Mistress very entertaining when I read it as a teen. If I had to take one of these books as a guiding philosophy, I'd pick Heinlein, but the right choice is obviously "neither". It is not sensible to let your life be guided by a hack science-fiction writer with weird homegrown political-ethical-sexual theories.
Continuing her rapid tour of the state of the world - Strömquist realistically appreciates that in the iPhone generation, no one is going to sit still for anything much longer than a TED talk - the next topic is how things got this way. Where do these weird people come from, who believe that the only way to run civilization is to push about half the country down to the poverty line so that they can engage in ever more repulsive acts of conspicuous consumption? Here, we have an engagingly savage attack on Chris O'Neill, the extremely rich American who in 2013 married Sweden's Princess Madeleine. People like Mr O'Neill, Strömquist tells us, come from families where the concept of love has been replaced with that of money. They have distant parents, who are never there and give them material goods instead. And when they grow up, the only way they have to try and find love is to carry on acquiring more goods. Well, I have heard less plausible theories.
I'll skip a couple of the entertaining parentheses, though the exhaustive list of all working-class characters appearing in the second volume of Knausgård's Min kamp is hilarious. What choices do we have? Segueing from her Princess Madeleine skit, Strömquist alertly points out that the people who say they want to get rid of the monarchy are a bit late to the party if they intend to come across as brave and forthright. In 2018, the monarchy no longer means anything. If these people had come out with their republican sentiments in 1518, that would have shown courage, but in 1518 they'd have been met with blank incomprehension. What do you mean, get rid of the monarchy? What other system could possibly work? And that's exactly where we are today when anyone is foolish enough to suggest that extreme laissez-faire capitalism might perhaps not be the ideal system. No one even seems to believe there is an alternative.
And finally, Ströquist gets to the central question. Again, this can be phrased in various dry, neutral and academic ways. But a direct way to put it would be: what the fuck can we do about this? Why has the left, which is supposed to act as a counter to this no-longer-even-disguised philosophy of unthinking, unrestrained greed, completely failed in its mission? Strömquist says, I think very perceptively, that they've forgotten how to be inclusive and instead allowed themselves to become exclusive. Once upon a time, if you were a worker, you were welcomed by the working class revolutionaries as a brother or a sister. That built big, powerful movements that could change things. People believed in them enough that they were literally willing to fight and die in their cause. But now, the left has become sidetracked into a wilderness of arbitrary moral judgements. If you use non-PC language, or buy the wrong kind of shopping bag, or read an inappropriate book, they want nothing to do with you. Nativist politicians have rushed in to fill this vacuum. They aren't fussy: if you're angry and white, they welcome you to the club and let you help them change the political agenda. Meanwhile, the left is posting witty comments on the internet. [Yes, I know...]
We need more people like Sister Liv. I have been corresponding with Ordfront, her publisher, and they assure me that an English edition of this book is in the pipeline and will soon appear. When it comes out, go buy yourself a copy. Maybe it'll amuse you. Maybe it'll make you angry. Maybe - who knows? - it'll inspire you to go out and actually do something.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Grandeur et Décadence.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
June 19, 2018
–
Started Reading
(Paperback Edition)
June 19, 2018
– Shelved
(Paperback Edition)
June 21, 2018
– Shelved as:
history-and-biog...
(Paperback Edition)
June 21, 2018
– Shelved as:
linguistics-and-...
(Paperback Edition)
June 21, 2018
– Shelved as:
parody-homage
(Paperback Edition)
June 21, 2018
– Shelved as:
swedish-norwegia...
(Paperback Edition)
June 21, 2018
– Shelved as:
too-sexy-for-mai...
(Paperback Edition)
June 21, 2018
– Shelved as:
well-i-think-its...
(Paperback Edition)
June 21, 2018
–
Finished Reading
(Paperback Edition)
June 25, 2018
–
Started Reading
June 25, 2018
– Shelved
June 25, 2018
– Shelved as:
french
June 25, 2018
– Shelved as:
history-and-biography
June 25, 2018
– Shelved as:
linguistics-and-philosophy
June 25, 2018
– Shelved as:
life-is-proust
June 25, 2018
– Shelved as:
swedish-norwegian-and-danish
June 25, 2018
– Shelved as:
too-sexy-for-maiden-aunts
June 25, 2018
– Shelved as:
well-i-think-its-funny
June 25, 2018
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-19 of 19 (19 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
notgettingenough
(new)
-
added it
Jun 25, 2018 01:42PM

reply
|
flag

Maybe the author will do a text-only edition in Times Modern Roman if you ask her nicely?

Sofia at Ordfront was categorical. I will ask her for an exact date if they have one yet.

Sofia at Ordfront was categorical. I will ask her for an exact date if they have one yet."
Thanks!

I'd be ever so grateful. There must be a translation point at which there probably is the text only before they turn it into a hand written picture book. Why not offer it for sale?

Sofia at Ordfront was categorical. I will ask her for an exact date if they have one yet."
Thanks!"
I just mailed her and said people wanted to know. I will post as soon as I get a reply.

I think you will have to write to her yourself. I don't want to confuse things. But I'm pretty sure you can find other people here to back you up.

What about Times New Roman? Or do you mean the Other Times Modern?

Jag tror inte någon utanför Sverige vet hur allvarligt det är. Vi är på väg att rösta in ett parti som starkaste partiet som har anknytningar till svensk nazism, och som du säger - vänstern är för tam för att ens kommentera ordentligt. Svensk konfliktskygghet gör det psykologiskt enklare att rösta på någon som låtsas som om det går att vrida tillbaka klockan än att ta tag i verkligheten.


Jim: "Any suggestions on what sort of 'something' one might do? Not being facetious, just curious about practical, do-able actions in the face of such global chaos."

Some immediate thoughts:
- write letters to democratically elected representatives
- become a member of a left/green political party
- take part in popular actions (demonstrations, campaigning)
- boycott countries/organisations that have been behaving irresponsibly
You know, just the usual stuff. Nothing dramatic. But if enough people did it, we would pretty soon see change.
I'm afraid I don't do any of the above. My rather feeble excuse is that I'm hardly ever in Britain, the only country where I have citizenship. I think I need to take steps to become a Swiss and/or Australian citizen and start actively exercising my democratic rights.

Luckily, all members of every government have email addresses. And more luckily, you can send an email from anywhere to all the members of the british government, 24/7.
As for me, I joined the Green Party in 1986, so I'm covered on that. I haven't written any emails to my reps in California, so I'm lax on that front. Unfortunately, the only demonstrations in my little town are by the labor union, and unfortunately I don't support their positions. There are also protests against a proposed bypass road, but I actually support the idea, so I'm out on that front. If I was back in San Francisco, I'd be on the streets shaking my fists and carrying signs, but in my sleepy corner of the sud-ouest, my options are limited for direct action.
As for consumer issues, I'm lucky enough to live in an agricultural area and I'm able to buy from local producers instead of supermarket chains... and I have no plans to buy a Harley, no matter where it's built....
All that being said, part of the chaos as I see it is based on population increases versus diminishing resources. Several cities and regions are running out of drinking water this summer, which means those people are going to migrate wherever they can to stay alive... and dickwads like trump use the threat of those migrations to harden people's hearts... this is the part that's hard to figure out what action to take... maybe we just need to implode for awhile until some sort of equilibrium is reached.... yes, people are going to die as a result of the chaos, but that is our history as a species... so do we resist or do we try to survive the chaos... what would Socrates say?

There is no doubt some incompetence at play here. There is no reason why Sao Paulo or Cape Town should be in this situation as desalinisation plants are viable for both places. Sao P is less than 100 kms from the sea.
The struggle is not just a question of scare resources but of sheer evil too. After the world's financial organisations got caught with their fingers in the cookie jar in the global meltdown of 2008, they needed a new unethical way to make money. The same companies which were behind the ruination of the world's economy and which went unpunished in any way, set about advising that water would shortly become the new gold. So, the worst of it is that some of the wealthiest people in the world now own a lot of the water.
Fortunately a lot of good people are also putting effort into working out new ways of dealing with water shortages. However, best for now, as far as I can see, is the possibility for desalinisation. Any places reasonably close to the sea have the potential to put the possibilities into practice. Coming from the driest State of the driest Continent, I recommend the following article which discusses in detail what Adelaide has done, trying to keep environmental concerns at the fore during the process:

She recommends contacting them directly if you're interested. Maybe it will even accelerate the process?

Look for it to be available in August.I'm not quite sure if this means it'll be released in August or announced in August, but I'm guessing the former.

If you would like to see one, mail them at [email protected] and let them know!